Joe and Niall's latest NewsReal takes a measured and carefully toned deep dive into the conflicting and contradictory nature of the scandemic (great show guys thank you - and also the kind of assessment that might catch the minds of those who suspect something's amiss but don't want to go near conspiracy theory).
They also touch on some of the factors that together hint at how this situation is still fluid and changeable in terms of where next:
1. Politicians being jump scared into an OTT response to what they rapidly knew was in effect just another seasonal virus - an epidemic rather than a pandemic - most likely because they were 'briefed' that it was an escaped bio-weapon with gain of function and that it would therefore be way more lethal than the norm for this type of virus.
2. That the massive overreaction by the system that followed has gone on to create its own internal pandemic logic / momentum almost out of thin air i.e. essentially creating the circumstances via lock downs, hospitals ceasing all normal treatments for those with chronic conditions, perpetual stress, including those who were close to death anyway in COVID figures, false PCR tests as the benchmark, media hysteria, etc, etc, all conspiring to confirm a narrative that doesn't exist.
3. That this flood of conflicted data is covering up the real story - that most of the deaths / critical care issues are a product of the pandemic itself not the virus.
4. That the visible power system has been pleasantly surprised at how quickly and deeply docile / obedient the population has become and they are getting a taste for it; and that their confidence regarding the long term potential benefits (for them) of this compliance is growing by the day. That the ambition to have a New Normal that was proclaimed by some out of thin air at the very start looks to be a possible reality for all going forward.
We all know this but it is worth remembering that we should be careful not to get trapped into the idea that there is a single master plan governing all of this chaos. There are so many layers to the PTB, with differing agendas, and its not clear that there is as yet any single rationale at work other than they all like the fact that we ourselves have created for them this ideal and fertile soil for the future.
I say this because Joe ended the show with some brief, cryptic remarks suggesting he thinks there is going to be a 'tactical' withdrawal of pressure before too long. I admit that to some extent this surprised me because part of my assessment of late has been that they are now in so deep they simply have to push home this advantage or risk exposure. There are now so many crimes - witting and unwitting - with so many very capable voices collating and preparing data evidence of at best gross negligence / incompetence and at worst, crimes against humanity, that any lull in this game would possibly allow some kind of break through moment or significant legal victory in some important geography that they could begin to struggle to hold on to the narrative. Unlikely I know with courts everywhere integrated into the system of self-protection and a total hegemony over the media. But they are aware that the media's hold on people's trust is paper thin and capable of being dismantled - and without the media they are naked in the wind.
On the other hand a huge amount has been achieved very quickly, and as Niall and Joe briefly discussed, whatever happens this uniform mentality of obedience, mistrust of other humans, self isolating, trusting government no matter what, etc, now runs very deep and as we know from transmarginal inhibition programming, is probably permanent in the minds of most - in other words it can now be switched on and off at the touch of a button. There is also the perception issues around post Trump / the new Biden regime. He has to be granted some kind of global honeymoon period in which he perpetually basks in the waters of his own holy glory (and yes they are selling him as a cult saviour). So that needs time to create even false positive results (Biden as a PCR test), and delivering to people what they need so as to believe what they want to believe - because Biden. It can only get better. They also really need a mass perception that the vaccine works, like magic. Yes, we here can talk about population reductions, Agenda 2031, The Great Reset etc, but vaccines - and especially repeat multiple vaccines as the norm - have to become established and there is significant kick back in large enough sections of the the population despite the mass rushing to be jabbed. And they will have all those ADRs to deal with (because COVID of course). Its a tricky one for them to manage because as the vaccine is seen to 'work', and as COVID starts to drop (engineered by reducing the cycle level of PCR tests), so the pressure to get everyone vaccinated lessens. Their leverage over that group of people becomes more tricky to mange - and a draconian approach to forced vaccination less justifiable.
They are also not there yet financially to flip the currency system / US dollar and go uniform digital. They're getting closer but they need more time.
So I think Joe might be right - that we may see a surprising period, say by the summer, where its nothing but double-good news and some kind of genuine (if still managed) opening up and half return to old normal is let back in the kennel - and even allowed to hang around for a while to get everyone 'happy' again. A regrouping and re planning stage so that they can even give themselves a breather to take stock, regather around priorities and then change maybe the tactic of the problem (i.e. we know that cyber pandemics are certainly on the agenda). In truth the COVID narrative was always a terribly weak baseline to hang the whole agendas future on and at some point they have to dump it. If we think of this as the War on Terror brought home its as if they need Saddam Hussein (the first bogey man) to fall so they can move on to the next chapter.
A phony war scenario in other words as they prep properly for Blitzkrieg. Its as if they've driven further than expected into enemy territory and may therefore have to stop and regroup and build up supplies again for the next push. Playing catch up with themselves in other words.
Maybe...
And then again...
I'm sure there are tussles and debates going on between the various factions over who gets to say what happens next - and those like say gates who thought all their Christmas' had arrived may be told to sit down and can it for a while (as all junior prefects discover, it's the head boys who say yes of no in the end!)
Just some thoughts. Others? More of the same vs Game Theory tactical 'defeat'?
Only time will tell of course and all we can do is speculate - but it might be good to step outside the bonfire and actually look at it with less convinced eyes that its got all the flames on display or in its pocket just yet.
