THE RKI DECLARES VACCINATION PRACTICALLY POINTLESS - IN SMALL PRINT
Just when you think it couldn't get any crazier, the next "clunker" comes around the corner: the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) has secretly confirmed a whole bunch of previous alleged "conspiracy theories" - and indirectly endorsed the long-held view of vaccination sceptics that vaccination in principle does not protect against infection at all. The alleged "fact" that vaccinated people pass on the virus much less frequently than unvaccinated people is one of the two straws that the vaccination lobby has so far desperately clung to in order to continue to invoke the usefulness or even indispensability of vaccination despite ever more vaccination breakthroughs and even hospitalised fully vaccinated people. The other is the narrative that unvaccinated people have much milder courses.
In the small print, so to speak, the RKI has now changed a key passage in its official information on the Covid vaccinations. It now states succinctly that the probability of infection after vaccination is "not quantifiable". Also, there is suddenly no more information on the alleged protective effect. In plain language, this means that the highest health authority no longer wants to determine whether and to what extent a vaccinated person is still protected himself or to what extent he prevents others from becoming infected. However, these were previously the only plausible reasons for getting vaccinated in the first place.
Key passages deleted without replacement
As late as 27 August 2021, the RKI had declared: "Further data prove that even in people who become PCR-positive despite vaccination, the viral load is significantly reduced." But that was not enough; until last Monday, the RKI page still read: "From a public health perspective, vaccination appears to reduce the risk of virus transmission to the extent that vaccinated people no longer play a significant role in the epidemiology of the disease." This passage forms one of the main bases for the "privileges" for vaccinated persons, as "RT Deutschland" notes - and of all things it was deleted without replacement in the new version.
The following sentences were also removed from the info page: "The vaccination has a high protective effect (at least 80%) against severe COVID-19, regardless of the vaccine used (Comirnaty by BioNTech/Pfizer, Spikevax by Moderna, Vaxzevria by AstraZeneca). Furthermore, the current data shows that vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine as well as with mRNA vaccines leads to a significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infections (symptomatic + asymptomatic) (protective effect about 80-90% after the 2nd vaccine dose)." Instead, this substitute formulation is now found: "However, it must be assumed that people become PCR-positive after contact with SARS-CoV-2 despite vaccination and also excrete infectious viruses in the process." In other words: vaccinated people are just like unvaccinated people - which calls into question the whole point of vaccination.
Even more serious, however, are the implications of this rewriting of vaccination information for the vaccination regime and the widespread exclusion of the unvaccinated from public and social life. For all rules, whether 1G, 2G or 3G, are based - as "Reitschuster.de" also points out today - on the self-evident basic assumption that the unvaccinated run a higher risk of infection than the vaccinated, and that the latter pass on the coronavirus far less frequently than the unvaccinated. If these previous "certainties" are no longer scientifically or evidence-based and not even the RKI is willing to admit to them, then there is DEFINITELY no legal basis for the unequal treatment of the unvaccinated.
Safeguarding against foreseeably also ineffective boosters?
This new version is particularly revealing in view of the booster vaccination that is currently being vehemently propagated - also by the RKI: because the now officially confirmed non-quantifiability of the infectiousness of vaccinated persons as well as their own risk of contracting the disease then also concerns a third or fourth dose. Although the usual nebulous tappers and false prognosticators from Lauterbach to Spahn to Wieler placate that the third injection multiplies the vaccination protection, the truth is that they simply don't know, and no one should be surprised when the first "booster breakthroughs" appear after a few months, like the current vaccination breakthroughs. In Israel, by the way, these have been going on for some time, with an upward trend. It is possible that the RKI wants to protect itself in exactly this case: that boosting - apart from gaining a few months of time for those in power - will not bring anything and the "waves" will continue to sweep through the country.
The biggest scandal continues to be hushed up: That last year's approval studies, on the basis of which vaccines worth hundreds of billions of dollars were ordered worldwide, were obviously fundamentally flawed or at least only of limited value and thus ultimately worthless. This vaccination campaign can already be described as the most expensive miss of all time - just as this "pandemic" is probably the most monstrous false alarm in history.
No need to invoke 'the mandate' as a reason.
