Just listened to James Corbett interviewing this interesting investigative journalist Rosemary Frei.
Independent journalist (and regular OffG contributor) Rosemary Frei sits down with James Corbett to discuss her recent article “Were conditions for high death rates at Care Homes created on purpose…
off-guardian.org
They talk about the covid 19 situation in care homes in Ontario, Canada, and how the changed rules there relating to death in care homes result in drumming up the death numbers from covid 19 and that Big Pharma and Big Medicine could be behind this in their quest for a vaccine being manufactured in the near future putting billions in their pockets. At the end of the interview she mentions that Koch postulates, the criteria for determining whether the agent of a disease has indeed been correctly identified, have not been met in the case of covid 19. She and Amory Devereaux have written an interesting article about this:
About 150 years ago, scientists painstakingly constructed a set of principles that can prove whether a particular microbe is the cause of a specific disease or is just a bystander. Those three principles are known as the Koch postulates. From all the available information, the novel coronavirus...
www.marktaliano.net
Some snippets:
'About 150 years ago, scientists painstakingly constructed a set of principles that can prove whether a particular microbe is the cause of a specific disease or is just a bystander. Those three principles are known as the Koch postulates. From all the available information, the novel coronavirus doesn’t appear to meet any of these tenets, never mind all three.
The resulting
three postulates are:
- The pathogen occurs in every case of the disease in question and under circumstances that can account for the pathological changes and clinical course of the disease.
- The causative microorganism occurs in no other disease as a fortuitous and nonpathogenic parasite.
- After being fully isolated from the body and grown in tissue culture (or cloned), it can induce the disease anew.
The principles have been altered almost beyond recognition by
various researchers over the ensuing 130 years. But the changes concomitantly watered down the postulates. That’s why they’re still used today by most researchers seeking to robustly prove or disprove the existence of a pathogen and its exclusive relationship with a particular disease.
There’s an urgent need for scientists to step up and do this conclusively with the novel coronavirus and COVID-19. But, strangely, the fire hose of scientific papers on the virus-disease dyad is only a sickly trickle on this tremendously important aspect of it.
A very straightforward and inexpensive experiment is all that’s needed to prove that the first postulate has been met.
Here’s how to do it. Test blood samples from a large number of people for the novel coronavirus using a test that’s been proven by several non-conflicted third parties to be accurate – i.e., to have very low rates of false positives and false negatives.
Then, if all the people who are diagnosed with COVID-19 are the same ones who tested positive for the novel coronavirus, that would prove the virus causes COVID-19. (Note that COVID-19 would have to be diagnosed based on a well-defined and finite set of symptoms. The currently-used and excessively broad diagnostic criteria – such as pneumonia, or the combination of fever and cough – doesn’t cut it, because those are present in many other respiratory conditions.)
But such an experiment has never been done, or if it has been done it hasn’t been made public.
The real kicker, though, is that the third postulate – isolating and sequencing the virus and then showing it causes the disease in other organisms – has not been fulfilled either.
We’ve scoured the internet and
found no proof that scientists have done the simple steps required to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 conclusively meets even one – never mind all — of the third postulate’s constituent parts. Those parts are:
- isolation from a human patient’s cells of full-length novel-coronavirus DNA*
- sequencing of the isolated DNA, then determining that the identical sequence is not present in any other virus, and next replicating or cloning the DNA to form a new copy of the virus
- injecting the new copy of the virus into a statistically significant number of living hosts (usually lab animals) and seeing whether those animals develop the discrete diagnostic symptoms associated with COVID-19 rather than developing the diagnostic symptoms of any other infection or disease.
A few scientists have claimed that some or all of the postulates have been fulfilled. Their papers have been given laudatory coverage by the media, public-health officials and politicians.
The problem is that each of these papers falls apart on even cursory examination.'
........
The section’s next two sentences describe several Chinese research groups’ virus-sequencing results.
However, these sequencing attempts are shoddy. For example,
one group’s paper has many red flags – and indeed, on the web page showing the group’s
sequence, commenters point to such problems as ‘sequencing and assembly artifacts.’ That group also didn’t replicate or clone the DNA to form a new copy of the virus, as required by the third postulate. (All subsequent sequencing attempts also have fatal flaws with respect to meeting the postulates.)
Yet the Chinese researchers’ gene sequences are integral to all of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test kits.
....
Meanwhile, public-health officials appear oblivious to this gaping hole in the science. They imperiously pronounce that they’re using the best data available, and act as if evidence-based decision-making is the substrate for the draconian measures they’re imposing.
'Here’s an idea: please email your local, state/provincial AND national/federal governments, asking for solid scientific evidence that:
- SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness that matches the characteristics of all of the deaths attributed to COVID-19
- the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.'
So, if those postulates have not been met demonstrably, there does not seem to exist a specific isolated virus covid 19, and so it is just a fear based plandemic and those in key positions change the rules as they go while most people either ignore this completely or willingly look the other way.
The people here meanwhile are continuing to wear the mandatory muzzles in all stores (never mind it's 30+C here), afraid of the police and their fines, their economy almost destroyed and their tax monies being wasted on (amongst other things) completely useless quests for vaccines while the pockets of Big Pharma, Big Government and Big Medicine fill up.
And then this:
"A 21-year-old infected with Covid-19 but refusing to comply with rules of self-isolation has been chained to railings by neighbours in his Lisbon community. PSP police in hazmat suits turned up to remove the man to the local police station."
Lisbon community ‘chains Covid-infected 21-year-old to railings’. The incident in Bairro Padre Cruz, reported this morning by TVI 24, was the neighbours’ way of protecting themselves.
www.portugalresident.com
Sjeeeezz
People are done with this BS.
