Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection

[Persej]

There is another interesting structure in our neighborhood.

The Radcliffe Wave is Waving

A few years ago, astronomers at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian (CfA) uncovered one of the Milky Way's greatest secrets: an enormous, wave-shaped chain of gaseous clouds in our sun’s backyard, giving birth to clusters of stars along the spiral arm of the galaxy we call home.

Naming this astonishing new structure the Radcliffe Wave, in honor of the Harvard Radcliffe Institute where the undulation was originally discovered, astronomers at CfA now report in Nature that the Radcliffe Wave not only looks like a wave, but also moves like one – oscillating through space much like "the wave" moving through a stadium full of fans.

"By using the motion of baby stars born in the gaseous clouds along the Radcliffe Wave," said Ralf Konietzka, the paper's lead author and a Ph.D. student at Harvard’s Kenneth C. Griffin Graduate School of Arts and Sciences and CfA, "we can trace the motion of their natal gas to show that the Radcliffe Wave is actually waving."

In 2018 when University of Vienna professor João Alves was a fellow at Harvard Radcliffe Institute, he worked with Catherine Zucker – then a Ph.D. student at Harvard and now a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) astrophysicist at CfA – and Alyssa Goodman, Robert Wheeler Willson Professor of Applied Astronomy at CfA, to map out the 3D positions of the stellar nurseries in the sun’s galactic neighborhood. By combining brand-new data from the European Space Agency's Gaia mission with the data-intensive "3D Dust Mapping" technique – pioneered by Doug Finkbeiner, a Harvard professor at CfA and his team – they noticed a pattern emerging, leading to the discovery of the Radcliffe Wave in 2020.

"It's the largest coherent structure that we know of, and it's really, really close to us," said Zucker. "It's been there the whole time. We just didn’t know about it, because we couldn’t build these high-resolution models of the distribution of gaseous clouds near the sun, in 3D."

The 2020 3D dust map, which was developed at the CfA, clearly showed that the Radcliffe Wave existed, but no measurements available then were good enough to see if the wave was moving. But in 2022, using a newer release of Gaia data, Alves' group assigned 3D motions to the young star clusters in the Radcliffe Wave. With the clusters' positions and motions in hand, Konietzka's team then determined that the entire Radcliffe Wave is indeed waving.

The star clusters along the Radcliffe Wave move up and down, like people in a sports stadium doing "the wave," creating a pattern that travels through our galactic backyard.

"Similar to how fans in a stadium are being pulled back to their seats by the Earth's gravity," said Konietzka, “the Radcliffe Wave oscillates due to the gravity of the Milky Way."

Understanding the behavior of this 9,000-light-year-long, gargantuan structure in our galactic backyard, just 500 light-years away from the sun at its closest point, allows researchers to now turn their attention to even more challenging questions. No one yet knows what caused the Radcliffe Wave or why it moves the way it does.

"Now we can go and test all these different theories for why the wave formed in the first place," Zucker said.

"Those theories range from explosions of massive stars, called supernovae, to out-of-galaxy disturbances, like a dwarf satellite galaxy colliding with our Milky Way," Konietzka added.

The Nature article also includes a calculation on how much dark matter might be contributing to the gravity responsible for the Wave's motion.

"It turns out that no significant dark matter is needed to explain the motion we observe," Konietzka said. “The gravity of ordinary matter alone is enough to drive the waving of the Wave."

In addition, the discovery of the oscillation raises new questions about the preponderance of these waves both across the Milky Way and other galaxies. Since the Radcliffe Wave appears to form the backbone of the nearest spiral arm in the Milky Way, the waving of the Wave could imply that spiral arms of galaxies oscillate in general, making galaxies even more dynamic than previously thought.

"The question is, what caused the displacement giving rise to the waving we see?," Goodman said. “And does it happen all over the galaxy? In all galaxies? Does it happen occasionally? Does it happen all the time?"

The Radcliffe Wave is Waving | Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian

A few years ago, astronomers at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian (CfA) uncovered one of the Milky Way's greatest secrets: an enormous, wave-shaped chain of gaseous clouds in our sun’s backyard, giving birth to clusters of stars along the spiral arm of the galaxy we call home.

www.cfa.harvard.edu

Astronomers say the wave’s rippling effect could in turn trigger bursts of supernovae and swarms of star formation within the gas and dust clouds of the interstellar medium. In earlier research, Zucker and other astronomers suggested that sometime around 14 million years ago, just such a burst gave rise to the “Local Bubble,” a star-forming shell that surrounds our own solar system.

Other researchers have proposed that the long-lasting fallout from all those supernovae could have affected Earth’s geology and climate — for example, by showering our planet with radioactive dust or perhaps even triggering an ice age.

The Radcliffe Wave is currently about 980 light-years away from our own solar system, and appears to be drifting outward at a speed of about 11,000 mph (5 km/sec). “The measured drift of the Radcliffe Wave radially outward from the galactic center suggests that the cluster whose supernovae ultimately created today’s expanding Local Bubble may have been born in the Radcliffe Wave,” authors of the newly published paper say.

Study co-author Alyssa Goodman, an astronomer at the CfA, said the evidence supports the case for claiming that the Radcliffe Wave had an effect on Earth and its cosmic neighborhood.

“Passage of the sun through over-dense material like the Radcliffe Wave and the Local Bubble does affect the heliosphere,” she wrote in an email, “and the timing does work out that some of the peaks in radioactivity on Earth (e.g., iron-60) line up time-wise with when the sun would have crossed the RadWave, Local Bubble surface, and other ‘Local Fluff’ clouds as well.”

Scientists Track How a Giant Wave Moved Through Our Galactic Backyard

Astronomers say there's a wave rippling through our galactic neighborhood that's playing a part in the birth and death of stars.

www.universetoday.com

 

[Persej]

Ivelisse Estrada:
Could the Radcliffe Wave come this way?

Alyssa A. Goodman:
What do you mean?

Ivelisse Estrada:
Through our solar system?

Alyssa A. Goodman:
Oh. Oh boy, that’s a whole other story. Go ahead, João.

Catherine Zucker:
João, that’s for you.

João Alves:
Okay, so that’s the top secret, I’m not allowed to talk about it. I’m joking.

So, the most fantastic thing, I think, is that we, the solar system of planet Earth, we’re inside the Radcliffe Wave. We crossed it. And we learned that, about 14 million years ago, that happened, and we don’t know exactly what that represented yet on the geological record. But there are interesting events that happened 14 million years ago on the geological record that could be related to this passage.

What’s exciting about it is that we’re realizing now, because we know the motion of the gas and we didn’t before, is that we can do this back and forth, we can go into the future, can go to the past. And we’re kind of realizing that the sun must have been inside clouds much more often than we used to think. So I think this is very, very new. It’s something that we are just about to submit the paper on, and you will hear more hopefully in the future.

Episode 201: Riding the Radcliffe Wave | Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University

www.radcliffe.harvard.edu

So in this interview, they claim that we are inside this Radcliffe Wave, and that we entered it 14 million years ago. But in another paper, this same group of scientists, claim that we are not inside of Radcliffe Wave, and that we are moving towards it. And in the previous articles, it is said that the Radcliffe Wave is anywhere from 980 to 500 light-years away from our solar system. I attached pictures from the below quoted article that show where our Sun is currently located in the galaxy. Local arm is also called Orion arm.

There is mounting evidence that the star-forming regions traditionally associated with Gould’s Belt clouds are only a small part of two linear kpc-long gas structures: the Radcliffe Wave (Alves et al. 2020) and the Split (Lallement et al. 2019). The Sun is currently located in between these kpc-long structures.

[2212.00067] The Solar Neighborhood in the Age of Gaia

 

[Persej]

Q: (L) I asked Niall to check on any possible geological or any other kind of events at the time. What were the results? The New Madrid Earthquake was when?

(Niall) 1811 or 1812. Then there was a cholera outbreak in the Bell Witch region in the 1820s and again in the 1830s.

(L) What about the comets you mentioned?

(Niall) There were three comets, two of which were called Great Comets: 1830 and 1831. Another one might have been seen in 1825.

(L) So, it doesn't really look like anything is necessarily connected. What was the impetus for the opening of the window?

A: The Earth was still settling and did so for many years after. This creates good EM conditions for breaching of the curtain. In this case there were also some astral elements piggybacked on the faller phenomenon.

Q: (L) So when you say, "astral elements"...

(Joe) Hang on... I think the earthquake happened...

(L) When was the eruption of Krakatoa?

(Pierre) I think it was 1813?

(L) So Krakatoa I think was in 1818 or something? You gonna go check? There was possibly a lot going on then!

A: Indeed. The Earth was in stress!

Q: [Pierre returns] (Pierre) It's not 1818, Krakatoa erupted in 1883.

(L) There were probably other things happening, but we don’t know what they were because there weren't many people living around there to observe or record them.

Session 22 September 2018

It's weird that the Earth was in so much stress, but nobody recorded what could have been a cause of that stress. Perhaps a change in the cosmic environment was the cause?

5. WHERE CLOUDS COLLIDE

5.1. The ‘‘Ring of Fire’’ around the G Cloud

Figure 19 shows the projected morphologies of all 15 clouds, which collectively cover more than 90% of the sky. The LIC and G Cloud clearly dominate the sky and contain large areas where one or the other is the only absorber along the line of sight. At the boundaries of the LIC and G Cloud, several overlapping absorbers are typically present, particularly near l from 40_ to 80_ and b from _15_ to +30_, as well as near l from 270_ to 320_ and b from +20_ to +50_ and from _70_ to _30_. These areas at the boundaries of the LIC and G Cloud may be dynamical interaction zones, which produce ‘‘new’’ clouds with significantly different kinematic properties. We refer to the active boundary of the G Cloud where the G Cloud and LIC may be colliding as the ‘‘Ring of Fire,’’ in analogy to the Pacific Ocean ‘‘Ring of Fire’’ where dominant tectonic plates (here interstellar clouds) interact, resulting in a highly dynamic interaction zone that gives rise to earthquakes and volcanos (here interstellar shocks, heating, or turbulent flows).

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

Perhaps, at the beginning of the 19th century, the solar system entered one of these "Ring of Fire" zones at the boundary of LIC and G-cloud, since we know that we are now in the overlapping zone of those two clouds and are about to exit this zone and fully enter the G-cloud somewhere in the near future? Perhaps that is the source of stress that Earth experienced at that time? And if that is true, will the Earth experience another such stress at the moment (which could again last many years) of exiting from this zone?

 

[Persej]

Revealing the properties and structure of the interstellar medium

The vast expanse of space between stars might appear to be empty, but it actually contains immense quantities of gas and dust. This material began its life as lighter elements that were fused together in the cores of massive stars, before being flung into space in violent supernova explosions. This mixture of gas and dust is known as the interstellar medium (ISM) and plays a vital role in the evolution of galaxies. Professor Emeritus Jeffrey L Linsky at the University of Colorado, USA, who has been studying ISM for many years, explains that ‘the ISM transports the chemical elements that are created in the cores of exploding supernovae to dense clouds, which go on to form new stars and planets as they collapse under their own gravity.’

The ISM’s behaviour is heavily influenced by its interaction with stars, which send out constant streams of energetic charged particles in all directions. These streams are called ‘stellar wind’ or ‘solar wind’ in our Solar System, perhaps best known for creating the vivid aurorae seen in Earth’s polar regions. As they push against the ISM, stellar winds create roughly spherical bubbles which surround the stars that created them and shield entire planetary systems from damaging interstellar radiation. These bubbles are called astrospheres or the heliosphere for our Solar System. Their boundaries stretch far beyond the orbits of a stars’ orbiting planets and asteroids. So far, the only manmade objects to have escaped the heliosphere are the Voyager 1 and 2 probes, which each took over 40 years to cross its outer edge.

Moving through local environments

Linsky explains that an astrosphere’s boundaries are far from rigid. The pressure balance between local interstellar gas and the outflowing solar and stellar winds determines the size of the heliosphere or astrosphere. As they move through space, these bubbles will naturally encounter clouds of denser gas and dust, surrounded by regions where interstellar material is much sparser. In turn, these changes will alter the pressure balance between an astrosphere and its surrounding ISM, causing the astrosphere to alternatively grow and shrink over time.

Answering key questions

Although astronomers now understand how these changes occur, it has so far proven more difficult to predict them. In their research, Linsky and his colleagues have identified key questions that need to be answered: what are the 3D structures and properties of the ISM in the solar neighbourhood, and what are the physical causes for these structures? The heliosphere’s recent past also presents a third question: what changes in the size of the heliosphere have occurred in the last million years and will occur as the Sun moves through high- and low-density regions of the ISM? Finally, the aim of astronomers to determine the impact of this behaviour on our home planet leads to a fourth question: what changes in the ultraviolet and high energy radiation from the Sun and space incident on the Earth could have occurred as the size and shielding properties of the heliosphere change over time, and how these changes alter the environment for life on Earth?

How is the radiation incident on Earth affected by interactions between the heliosphere and ISM?

High energy radiation (galactic and extragalactic cosmic rays) accelerated by magnetic fields in the interstellar medium produce changes that affect life on Earth in many ways. First, it produces mutations in the genetic material of humans and animals and thus, in the evolution of mankind. Second, this radiation likely also changes the cloud cover in Earth’s atmosphere and climate. Third, this radiation can initiate photochemical reactions in Earth’s atmosphere that can reduce the amount of oxygen and ozone in the atmosphere, allowing solar ultraviolet radiation to penetrate to the surface and mutate genetic material.

The heliosphere absorbs much of the incoming cosmic rays, thereby partially shielding the Earth from the deleterious effects of this radiation. When the Sun enters a high-density region of the interstellar medium, the size of the heliosphere will shrink minimising the cosmic ray shielding. This change in the incoming cosmic ray flux at Earth could have caused major changes in the evolution of life on Earth in the past.

https://researchfeatures.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Jeffrey-Linsky.pdf

(Pierre) At the time on Kantek was there more oxygen than on Earth nowadays?

A: Yes

Q: (Andromeda) That was a good question.

(Pierre) Does it explain partly...

A: There was also more oxygen on Earth at times in the past.

Session 23 April 2022

(RedFox) The C's said HBOT was protective against 4D STS. A few questions: Does HBOT re-integrate a persons dislocated energy? Does it also remove spirit attachments? Anything else?

A: Oxygen strengthens in many ways and upregulates genes. And eliminates parasites and bacteria and virii thus eliminating attachment sites.

(...)

Q: (Ellipse) Does the oxygen serve as an interface with the information field for the neurons in the human body?

A: Yes.

(...)

Q: (Gottathink) Will Earth's environment become more oxygen rich in our lifetime?

A: Yes after a brief spell of poor saturation.

Session 10 December 2022

Since the G-cloud is less dense than the LIC, that means that the heliosphere will increase, the oxygen level on Earth will increase, and perhaps there will be fewer clouds in the atmosphere, maybe something like the water canopy covering the Earth that C's talked about.

Of course, during the time of transition from LIC into G-cloud, we could experience the opposite of that.

And all of that could produce changes in our DNA.

 

[Persej]

Q: (Galahad) We recently pulled together some info on the Maunder Minimum. Are we correct in the direction we are taking on that?

A: We wondered how long it would take you to figure that one out.

Session 17 August 2003

And what they figured out is that Nemesis had already approached us during the Maunder Minimum.

In general, since the C’s gave us certain data about the Companion Star, we tended to think that event was “in the future,” and that the time between the twin’s appearance and disappearance would be short, following which the time between its disappearance and the arrival of the fresh comet cluster would be only a few years. For example: twin sun sighting in 2005 and comets in 2009 or something like that. This could work, though perhaps the numbers are off.

The C’s have said that the closest approach of the Companion Star is somewhere around the orbit of Pluto. Pluto is 6,000,000,000 km from Earth. If you travel at an average cometary speed of 108,000 km/hr, you could get to Pluto in about 10 years. Conversely, something could get from Pluto to here in that period of time – assuming it enters the solar system at a specific point and travels in a straight line.

What this does not account for is the mechanics of the movement of the disturbed comets in the Oort cloud. There is also another problem that came up recently and led to some startling new ideas. The email I wrote to the members of the Quantum Future School will best explain the issue:

We have been going back over all the mentions of [the companion star] in the transcripts and identifying our questions that were loaded with assumptions and which thus brought back an ambiguous answer or a “confusing” answer and trying to sort out what the C’s really have tried to convey.

As one of the staff members pointed out last night, the C’s info is sort of “geared” to my own thinking and if they are giving clues in a sort of “code” so as not to 1) violate free will, 2) create destructive superluminal communication into the past paradoxes, then the information will be delivered in such a way that I will only be able to “get it” on certain points when the proper “triggers” in the environment are tripped.

In this case, it was just day before yesterday – and as a result of the post on the subject of the solar maximum being so darned protracted. It was supposed to be over a long time ago and the “experts” keep “extending” their explanations to cover the fact that the sun is so active and nobody can explain why.

We started talking about it and the comment was made that the sun might be “reacting to the close approach” of the companion. But then, someone remarked that didn’t the C’s say that when this happened, the sun’s gravity would increase and sunspots and consequent solar mass ejections would be suppressed?

Well, sure. That’s what the C’s said. And that was the problem. If the solar companion was drawing near, how can you have it both ways: no sun spots and more sun spots??? You can’t.

Well, we tried to explain this by saying “the comets must be doing it.” But the comets aren’t supposed to be on the agenda until AFTER the companion star is sighted.

And then, there is the ever present issue – in my mind, that is not satisfied by assuming superluminal travel of cometary bodies! – of the distances involved and the “time” required for their travel from the orbit of Pluto to the inner solar system.

Okay. There was the problem and I went for a walk and while I was walking I kept mulling over this “increase in the sun’s gravity” and then I realized that this had ALREADY HAPPENED during the period known as the Maunder Minimum. I also remembered that there was a strange star seen by Flamsteed that many astronomers have tried to explain as a supernova, but none of their explanations of why the observations of Flamsteed simply do not match any supernova remnants that we know make any sense. Well, the information about this star came about due to the study of possible supernovae – which then leads to considering WHY the C’s urged me to study supernovae.

It was then that I realized that, if our assumptions “colored” the answers or our interpretation of the answers from C’s, then we need to revisit this subject seriously with a fresh perspective.

What is more, this idea better answers the problems: How can a companion star that sweeps through the Oort cloud appear at one point, recede, and then within just a few short years we get smacked by comets? Doesn’t make sense.

BUT, if the companion star appeared 323 years ago, dragging a bunch of comets in its wake, and then it swung around in its orbital path, slingshotting the comets our direction, they have had about 300 years or so to travel this way. And if the “dragging” effect took place over time – as it certainly must have – as the Oort cloud rotates, that could mean that they are coming into the solar system from ALL directions… and some of them must be following this rotational motion of the Oort cloud, spiraling around.

Voila! It all begins to make sense.

Of course, it also means we are in the middle of the turkey shoot and WE are the turkey.

And then, considering Baillie’s information about Jupiter as a “collector” of comets, one also has to ask the question about the “sudden discovery” of so many additional moons of Jupiter. Is it capturing some of these bodies like crazy… does that mean that much of the cluster is about the orbit of Jupiter just now – or some of them even closer????

How long?????

(...)

What all this suggests is that a SECOND SUN was seen on and around May 29, 1630, and that 20 or 30 years later a lot of new comets showed up just as we would expect – the first wave to have been flung in by a companion star that briefly lit up to scare the bejeebies out of everyone at the time. And we do see that the effects of this event were exactly as we would have expected them to be, only it seems to have been covered up and/or forgotten, for the most part in its historical context. Also, there have been attempts to describe this second sun as a “comet.” It’s possible, of course, but it seems that, in such a case, it would have been described as a “flaming star,” which was equally portentous. The observers of the time had no problem distinguishing between comets and other observational anomalies.

(...)

So, it seems that we have found some descriptive evidence that may “fit” with the hypothesis that the companion sun was at perihelion on May 29, 1630, or close enough for horseshoes. And that the comets that followed 20 or 30 years later were an initial group that was flung in or pushed in with this star. If we are correct and the disturbance in the Oort cloud was prolonged for hundreds of years as the star passed through, and that the disturbance resulted in masses of comets entering the solar system in a spiraling motion, it just may be that there are some really big ones out there on their way in to the “target” from ALL directions.

(...)

Based on what the Cassiopaeans have said, supported by our research to this point, it is very likely that we are already experiencing some of the comets from this event: the close passage of the Dark Star over 300 years ago at the time of the Maunder Minimum.

Independence Day

Last year on the 4th of July we drove down to the local mall to watch the fireworks display. We bought boxed dinners from Colonel Sanders, and listened to Vivaldi as the evening sky was transformed…

cassiopaea.org

If this is true, and the Nemesis was at the perihelion in 1630, and comets followed 20 or 30 years later, and that whole cosmic phenomena was already over in the 17th century, then we are still left with the mystery of the 19th century. And the mystery of our current century, if we should expect some cosmic changes in our near future. Is the transition from the LIC into the G-cloud the answer to those two mysteries?

 

[BHelmet]

And what they figured out is that Nemesis had already approached us during the Maunder Minimum.

If this is true, and the Nemesis was at the perihelion in 1630, and comets followed 20 or 30 years later, and that whole cosmic phenomena was already over in the 17th century, then we are still left with the mystery of the 19th century. And the mystery of our current century, if we should expect some cosmic changes in our near future. Is the transition from the LIC into the G-cloud the answer to those two mysteries?

Beautiful! I love it. The destructive cosmic effects may have been over "quickly" but the rebuilding, socio-economic effects, political effects, psycho-emotional effects and re-population would take longer to play out.

It puts a whole new spin on the worlds fairs; on the way the great fire photographs look more like the aftermath of a bombardment; on the orphan trains, incubator babies and insane asylums, the random "mud floods" and the photos of built out cities like San Francisco shortly after the gold rush that don't match the "historical" narrative such as the existence of European looking gothic cathedrals in odd places like Montana; glorious state capital buildings in places with a population of 9,000 etc etc etc etc. It would answer and explain so many anomalies such as the photos of great cities absent of human life, apparent electro-planing, melted bricks and rocks; the attempts to survive underground. I have been wracking my brain and all I could come up with is time line manipulation, but this theory explains it way better. And from 2003! WOW.

If the periodicity of the solar minimums is roughly 400 years it could also suggest that another 300 years was inserted between the mid 500's fall of the roman empire and early 1200's.

Of course it leaves many more new questions. How and when did the repopulation occur?

"A: .....You see, if one desires to create a new race, what better way than to mass hybridize, then mass reincarnate. Especially when the host species is so forever ignorant, controlled, and anthropocentric. What a lovely environment for total destruction and conquest and replacement... see?"

So we are the hybridized replacements... and we are going to be replaced again it would seem.

But this next reset cycle is going to be a different animal due to the addition of the wave.

Thanks for sharing this, Persej. Absolutely stunning, if true.

 

[Voyageur]

There is another interesting structure in our neighborhood.

"It's the largest coherent structure that we know of, and it's really, really close to us,"

Despite waving, it might probably be Helical too - yet super big.

In addition, the discovery of the oscillation raises new questions about the preponderance of these waves both across the Milky Way and other galaxies. Since the Radcliffe Wave appears to form the backbone of the nearest spiral arm in the Milky Way, the waving of the Wave could imply that spiral arms of galaxies oscillate in general, making galaxies even more dynamic than previously thought.

As above, so below:

 

[Persej]

It puts a whole new spin on the worlds fairs; on the way the great fire photographs look more like the aftermath of a bombardment; on the orphan trains, incubator babies and insane asylums, the random "mud floods" and the photos of built out cities like San Francisco shortly after the gold rush that don't match the "historical" narrative such as the existence of European looking gothic cathedrals in odd places like Montana; glorious state capital buildings in places with a population of 9,000 etc etc etc etc. It would answer and explain so many anomalies such as the photos of great cities absent of human life, apparent electro-planing, melted bricks and rocks; the attempts to survive underground. I have been wracking my brain and all I could come up with is time line manipulation, but this theory explains it way better. And from 2003! WOW.

I just got a crazy idea in my head. This whole 19th century mystery of unusual buildings reminds me of the time of gothic cathedrals that Fulcanelli was talking about in his books. And my idea is, what if those gothic buildings in the 19th century were built by the same people that built gothic cathedrals in the Middle Ages? Are they time travelers who came to 19th century to rebuild the western civilization? And are they going to come back to our time during the next cosmic upheaval? Why did they choose the 19th century and not the 18th? Maybe the increased Sun's activity and disturbances on Earth allowed them to more easily enter into that time period? And now they are waiting for the same circumstances to appear again in order to come to our time?

The C's said that our current environment is not good for 4D beings to live here. Maybe the environment of the 19th century was temporarily changed so that 4D or bidensity beings, such are those alchemists, were able to stay here for a longer time, just like lizzies once lived with humans on Earth?

Have I gone too far away in my fantasy, or is there something in this theory?

 

[Persej]

Q: (L) Is there anything you would like to tell us before we get started on this really long list of questions? I mean, something that we might need to know in advance?

A: In reality, there is no time. Perception is what gives the illusion.

Q: (L) And that is apropos of what?

A: You will see.

April 27th 2024

We will see something that will show us that there is no time? Will somebody come into our time from another time period? Did the same thing happen in the 19th century?

 

[Persej]

(Joe) How do you get around it then? How do you introduce the idea of the existence of aliens without presenting yourself...?

(Chu) By not making it look like an invasion.

(L) Here to help. Displays of power by stopping warlike activity, being the saviors of humankind or something like that...

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) They'll present themselves as benevolent. It wasn't even that they were gonna be aggressive... It's more like how do they present themselves? Is it a ship?

(L) Well they can present themselves without presenting an invasion.

(Chu) Like miracles in the past or something like that? Angels?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) We'll just have to wait and see.

A: Weather and geological activity also involved.

Q: (Chu) That one wouldn't grow awareness in aliens. People would just think it's a weather event.

(Scottie) Unless they come and save us from weather or geological events...

(L) So we have no idea what we're facing. And you can't help us out any more there?

A: To do so would violate learning directive. It is good that you know that prominent figures are already preparing the ground. Such as Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab.

Session 14 January 2023

Q: (Keit) Does global awareness of aliens correspond with the 4D STS agenda?

A: Not necessarily as "aliens".

Q: (L) As aliens. So they will be introduced as something else?

A: We have covered this previously.

Q: (Joe) Yeah. Recently we had a discussion about it, but they kind of said "no dice" when we tried to get specifics. But it was that they would come and provide like tech or displays of power, or whatever. Disguised as help with saving the world, like environmental problems or war problems or whatever. And it was left hanging because I didn't know how... Because I asked, "Does that imply a generalized awareness of aliens among the population?" And they said "Yes". But then, in that session not too long ago, they said that they wouldn't necessarily be perceived as aliens. And then we kind of left it there because that was going to give us too much information, and we have to figure it out ourselves. Wait and see.

Q: (L) Yes, but remember we had a session years ago, when we were talking about Courtney Brown, if anybody wants to use that as a search term: "Courtney Brown". We had a discussion about this, and that was years ago.

(Joe) What was it about?

(L) About how the alien presence would be gradually introduced, and so forth?

(Joe) As aliens?

(L) Well, no, not necessarily as aliens.

(Joe) No. As what?

(L) Well, they said that they would be like survivors of a cataclysm that have lived underground, and are now coming out to save humanity.

(Joe) That's just as bad. I don't know how that's going to happen, but...

Q: (Keit) Do they require more people believing in them? Do they need more people believing in them?

A: Better to not believe.

Q: (L) So in other words, their true nature still needs to be concealed.

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) Are they going to reveal themselves as some kind of descendants of a former civilization on planet Earth that went to some other planet and inhabited it hundreds of thousand years ago and now they're coming back? So they're technically humans.

A: Close!

Session 24 June 2023

I think what would get Joe's version even closer is that they might present themselves as travelers through time! After all, that is Laura's idea of how to escape cosmic cataclysms. No need to go underground or to some other planet. You just go into a different time and skip all the violent weather and geological activity! And when you reappear in the other time, you rebuild the world.

 

[BHelmet]

I just got a crazy idea in my head.

I am going to say something utterly shocking. At this point I think it is important to take a cue from guys like Ryan and Beau and pump the brakes a bit. Take it slow. Take a deep breath. Exhale slowly. I know I am SUPER excited (for me...usually i am a blasé person) about this speculative break through, however, taking the scientific right-brain, evidence-based, "let's think it through" approach is warranted here because we are talking about some deep water here. I know; shocking coming from a person (perhaps) generally perceived as Mr LeftBrainFlightofFancy.

This whole 19th century mystery of unusual buildings reminds me of the time of gothic cathedrals that Fulcanelli was talking about in his books. And my idea is, what if those gothic buildings in the 19th century were built by the same people that built gothic cathedrals in the Middle Ages? Are they time travelers who came to 19th century to rebuild the western civilization? And are they going to come back to our time during the next cosmic upheaval? Why did they choose the 19th century and not the 18th? Maybe the increased Sun's activity and disturbances on Earth allowed them to more easily enter into that time period? And now they are waiting for the same circumstances to appear again in order to come to our time?

The other perhaps more right brain explanation from the Beau School of Thought would be this: Sometimes a cathedral that is stylistically and structurally similar to another cathedral on the other side of the earth were built in approximately in the same era by the same builders.

(IOW, the construction timeline given is a BS story to confuse - and that is also what Fulcanelli was suggesting)

The C's said that our current environment is not good for 4D beings to live here. Maybe the environment of the 19th century was temporarily changed so that 4D or bidensity beings, such are those alchemists, were able to stay here for a longer time, just like lizzies once lived with humans on Earth?

Or, the different environment was the pre-1600's period and the Nemesis passing changed the environment. This is the simpler explanation.

Have I gone too far away in my fantasy, or is there something in this theory?

It is all on the table. This is an epic breakthrough. I am super pumped. However I think we have to take it slow. Baby steps. Don't run too far too fast.

Thanks again.

 

[BHelmet]

A side note on the left/right brain thing (which can also be the masculine/feminine archetype). Both are necessary and neither is inherently superior. They have to be harmonized and balanced and work together to produce the best results. This fits with the grail quest thing, if I am not mistaken and the ultimate androgyny: Neither male nor female in the Lord - Galatians.

The flaw of the left brain is it sees dots that are not really there.
The flaw of the right brain is that it does not see dots that really are there.

That is why I think a deliberate balanced approach is key with this discussion. The implications are so huge. And the conclusions potentially to be derived from this hypothesis are immense.

 

[BHelmet]

A few more data points that seem to fit IMO:

In the Tartaria/past or lost civilization circle, is the theory is that the old structures were inherited/already existent: that we are the inheritors. This is a distinct possibility. The immense scale of the old world construction could also point to the idea of a different cosmic environment. (different O2 concentrations as noted and perhaps different gravity, electro-magnetic fields too)

Another point for perspective: Assuming our 3D perception of time is distorted, we are still prone to think in terms of past, present and future. This begs some big questions:

1. What and Who the hell were we? What was this pe-Maunder age really about? Is this an echo of the longing for an Arthurian golden age lost?

2. If the leading edge of the wave (which is transformative and 4D in nature) is already upon us, it could explain why we are having these visions and speculations now given that 4D may have a truer view of time and that is why this can has popped open at this moment.

The last data point: from a 3D perspective, there is a boat load of data points. From the 4D perspective, there is a different data set. There is still the looming specter of 4D STS jacking humanity around and we are still their herd in a bizarre petrie dish of a world. (C's - ultimate secret is we are not in control of ourselves or something to that effect)

Where that factors in is that, to some extent, the walls of the petrie dish are constructed of lies, narratives, beliefs and programming. I think that is where they are losing control and feel the most threatened as more people are waking up. But we are still operating connected to 3D physical containers bound to 3D earth with restraining bolts on our DNA, but, this new chronology and perspective feels liberating to me.

These are all my observations, opinions and speculations which are subject to error, of course.

 

[BHelmet]

More Data Points just to see them graphically



So if this can be assumed to be correct, Early/Mid 1600's to early 1700's is a major wipe out of the population with pre and post effects of Nemesis.



The above may not be totally accurate numbers, but I am thinking the general curve is close enough for government work. I suppose a more accurate graph would have dips for WW1 and WW2 but it seems they are glossing that over.

Anyway, Things don't really stabilize and get rolling again after Maunder until the early 1700's and ramp up post-Dalton in the early-mid 1800's and beyond. And that is exactly when the camera is (re?) introduced and things start looking weird and out of whack compared with the stated narratives.

(The pre Maunder population figures are probably totally speculative, in my opinion.) Anyway, I do not mean to be drawing conclusions, but just looking at the 2 data sets of solar activity and population side by side and basically stating the obvious.

 

[Persej]

Since you brought up a glorious state capital building in Helena, Montana, I wanted to share something interesting that I noticed.

Here is a statue on that building: Montana Statue - Montana State Capitol Campus Historic District | Historic Montana

And here is a statue on state capital building in Belgrade: I BEOGRAD IMA KIP SLOBODE Ko je misteriozna žena koja nas posmatra sa vrha zgrade Vlade Srbije, a nalazi se i na žigu liÄne karte

They look like they are sisters.