Can't remember if this was posted before...
The guy gets into HAARP, but the claim about the Japanese wouldn't be surprising if true!
The guy gets into HAARP, but the claim about the Japanese wouldn't be surprising if true!
That guy looks an awful lot like Benjamin Fulford... unless my eyes are deceiving me.Can't remember if this was posted before...
The guy gets into HAARP, but the claim about the Japanese wouldn't be surprising if true!
The guy gets into HAARP, but the claim about the Japanese wouldn't be surprising if true!
A: We told you that "HAARP" was being designated for capturing and modulating electromagnetic fields for the purpose of total control of brainwave patterns in order to establish a system of complete "order on the surface of the planet" in either 3rd or 4th density.
Q: (L) Can I ask my other questions? Some people on the net want me to ask about this HAARP thing... seems to be some sort of antennae thing...
A: Disguise for something else.
Q: (L) What is that something else?
A: Project to apply EM wave theories to the transference of perimeters.
Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: If utilised as designed, will allow for controlled invisibility and easy movement between density levels on surface of planet as well as subterranially.
(L) Getting back to the underground bases, is the HAARP project connected to these underground bases.
A: Not directly.
Q: (L) You once said that HAARP was something that was to be used to "transfer perimeters." I am assuming that this means to manipulate space, time and density.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Once before you said that the HAARP assembly was a continuation of the Montauk project, and was being used to 'transfer perimeters.' I guess this meant space/time travel, correct?
A: Yes. And resurrect Atlantean crystal principle.
Q: (L) Do they plan to actually attempt to bring up the Atlantean crystals?
A: No.
Q: (L) Do they plan to use this for mind control?
A: And other uses.
Q: (L) Can you give us a few of these uses?
A: Technical.
Q: (Andromeda) On the same day as Sandy Hook, and the following day, there were a lot of other attacks. There was the slashing of school children in China, and there were a couple of other people with boxcutters, and the guy who was picked up who had 47 guns and had claimed he was gonna do a school shooting or something. What was up with that?
A: All of these types of events are "covered" by HAARP and that cannot be restricted at will.
Q: (L) So in other words they turn on the HAARP thing to muddle people's brains. While they're brains are all turned into tapioca, they do their deed. Then, of course, the thing being turned on and people's brains being muddled, people who are already on the edge or susceptible go off the deep end along with the targets. Is that it?
A: Exactly.
Q: (L) Besides the crystal in the Bermuda Triangle, are any of the others still active?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Does the government know about them?
A: Semi.
Q: (L) Where are the others located?
A: Off Japan; in Brazil; in Ural mountains of Russia; North and South Poles.
Q: (T) Are the ones on the Moon and Mars active also?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Are they responsible for any of the earthquakes like the one in Japan?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) If one crystal is found and the technology is deciphered, and another is found, does it increase the power...
A: Let us answer this way: If Neanderthals found a 747 would they know how to use it?
In this point in time, there is no need to speculate much. We need to be prepared to their findings/trials.... To the people, us; will be just colateral damage.Could we speculate that the powers that be may cause a cataclysm in their quest to conquer such technology?
Yep, that's him. There's a bunch of discussion on the forum about him. He's been making stuff up for years, so wouldn't be surprised if he made up the statement about the Japanese Finance Minister too.That guy looks an awful lot like Benjamin Fulford... unless my eyes are deceiving me.
Edit: If you search, Benjamin Fulford, earthquake machine, his name pops up down the list.
That theory that HAARP was involved with the Turkey earthquake was off the chart on tweeter.Yep, that's him. There's a bunch of discussion on the forum about him. He's been making stuff up for years, so wouldn't be surprised if he made up the statement about the Japanese Finance Minister too.
And thanks for the quotes, Puma. I didn't mean to suggest that HAARP was used for weather control - just the possibility that the Americans really did threaten the Japanese, and that Fulford jumped to the conclusion that it was HAARP. But as you write, it's probably more likely that he made it up as support for the HAARP theory.
Date & time | Feb 11, 2023 08:55:06 UTC - 2 hours 25 minutes ago |
Local time at epicenter | Saturday, Feb 11, 2023 at 4:55 pm (GMT +8) |
Status | Confirmed |
Magnitude | 6 |
Depth | 11.0 km |
Epicenter latitude / longitude | 3.67°N / 126.76°E
|
Antipode | 3.67°S / 53.24°W |
Shaking intensity | Severe shaking |
Felt | 1 report |
Primary data source | BMKG (Meteorological, Climatological, and Geophysical Agency of Indonesia) |
Nearest volcano | Awu (140 km / 87 mi) |
Very strong mag. 6.0 earthquake - Molucca Sea, Indonesia
Date & time Feb 11, 2023 08:55:06 UTC - 2 hours 25 minutes ago Local time at epicenter Saturday, Feb 11, 2023 at 4:55 pm (GMT +8) Status Confirmed Magnitude 6 Depth 11.0 km Epicenter latitude / longitude 3.67°N / 126.76°E (Molucca Sea, Indonesia)Antipode 3.67°S / 53.24°W Shaking intensity Severe shaking Felt 1 report Primary data source BMKG (Meteorological, Climatological, and Geophysical Agency of Indonesia) Nearest volcano Awu (140 km / 87 mi)
Mag. | Depth | Location | Source |
6.0 | 11 km | Indonesia: 239 Km SE of Sarangani, Philippines | BMKG |
5.9 | 50 km | KEPULAUAN TALAUD, INDONESIA | EMSC |
There is no scientific basis for earthquake predictions. There is always a chance for earthquakes in places with active faults, but specific forecasts perform no better than random when tested. Claims of correlation with planetary alignment have been disproven. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-position-moon-or-planets-affect-seismicity-are-there-more-earthquakes-morningin-eveningat
M 6.0-6.4 | M 6.5-6.9 | M 7.0-8.4 | M 8.5+ |
70% | 60% | 40% | 30% |