I've finished reading this book, and will group my response into three main portions: 1) main takeaways with similar commentary by group members, 2) thoughts on additional points made by group members, and 3) points I've not yet seen discussed here. I will also try to structure each section by the importance of each point.
Firstly, I think Laura has brought up the most important point regarding this book:
So, basically, "The Watchers", the fallen angels, have been transformed into more or less psychic creations, manifested by humans themselves in various ways.
Geeze, it reminds me of "human caused global warming". It is a curiously material interpretation of what is alleged to be psychic/paranormal phenomena.
We have almost completely lost "a specific psychic intelligence of a nonhuman nature connecting the invisible dimensions with the material world in which we live." But even that was a weak description of what the Cs refer to as 4th Density beings that control our world.
The author just "casually" drops that definition in at the beginning of the book, and I was waiting for him to return to it, but he never did. Given his careful exposition of other concepts and lines of thought, one gets the impression that either he made a massive oversight, or has done this deliberately.
Then we have the name: the Ancient Greek word's association to the concept seems entirely based on use related to the Book of Enoch. It seems we have a "Gmirkin-like" infusion of Hellenic information into a more ancient Qumranic/Zoroastrian idea. Is this name appropriately reflective of 4D STS beings, though? It seems to me that 4D STS have done a lot more than just "watch" throughout the course of human course. The "Meddlers" or "Interferers" would probably be a more apt title for them, although "Polypragmosynes", from the Ancient Greek words polys + pragma, certainly isn't as catchy.
Don't misunderstand me. What Stavish describes as "egregores" certainly have some reality. But what is troubling is that he (and others) choose to call these structures "watchers" when they are not that at all. It seems far more likely to me that 4D beings are the "Watchers" of ancient texts.
Yep. One even wonders whether the "watchers" of Enoch are perhaps an incorrect translation from Sanskrit or proto-Sanskrit sources?
Now, all of that is not to say that "egregores" as Stavish would have them, do not get created and maintained, and function somewhat in the way he describes. But I think we should think of what Stavish calls "egregores" to be more like what we would call "conduits". That is, Stavish's egregore is a structure designed to transfer energy between densities/realms. And we should not ever forget what is on the other side of that conduit sucking up all that emotional energy.
What impresses me the most is how similar is his description of egregores to what you wrote regarding the Overlords of Entropy in Secret History. What's up with that? Is he using your ideas for his own purposes or is he trying to muddy the waters more in regard to 4D STS beings? Or...?
Given that the book was published in 2017, it's a little difficult to believe at that point that any serious student of "occultism" wasn't aware of Laura's work. So again, we are confronted with the idea of deliberate avoidance, if not direct obfuscation. If deliberate obfuscation however, does this imply that the idea of the egregore was starting to draw associations in people's minds with concepts of otherworldly, even hyperdimensional, beings manipulating humanity? Cosmic COINTELPRO at work? “Egregores aren’t nonhuman, even hyperdimensional, beings; they’re just human imaginations run amok on the astral planes!”
Next, we have the concept of what the author thinks an Egregore actually is, or wants us to think an Egregore is:
The idea of Egregores as depicted raises many interesting questions. Is the idea that the Egregore is created from the ‘bottom up’, that is, created by humans, just a corruption and disinformation about the idea that large masses of humans are under the control of hyperdimensional denizens? Or, is there truth in the idea that a group of humans can, through their collective activities, actually ‘create’ some sort of hyperdimensional representative being, even without the knowledge that that is what they are actually doing?
Maybe Hyperdimensional beings can imprint some thought, or idea into the human mind and these people then create an "egregore", that can be used by Hyperdimensional beings as a feeding conduit. Who knows? Maybe this can be a question for the next session.
Where the author's definition is weak is that these entities, whether self-aware or not, are presented as being the creatio ex nihilo of human thought. It is more likely that either a person or a group taps into them, or they parasite a person or group, and then the feeding feedback loop takes place. The idea that whenever two people are having a frivolous idea about the weather, they create a weather mini-god is a little far-fetched.
- The concept of egregors as described in the book is important in the sense of understanding and remembering that everything we do, think and believe has a mark on the reality on various levels.
- Egregor is the mechanism of a mechanical control - emanations, as was described by Gurdgieff, in the 3D world.
Using Stavish's definition, an egregore is some sort of structured astral/semi-physical energy accumulation that may have more or lesser degree of innate consciousness. As such, that would suggest it's more of a "bottom up" phenomena. Given that thought seems to be the non-physical "field" within which an egregore forms, I see no requirement that such thoughts would need to come exclusively from human minds.
Does such an astral/semi-physical structure as Stavish's 'egregore' qualify as hyperdimensional in the sense we use? I have a hunch that this may be the case, but what the exact correspondences are between the "astral" and hyperdimensional realms, I can only speculate on at the moment. Observed paranormal phenomena such as "ectoplasm" which are traditionally attributed to the "astral" may suggest some form of overlap between the two.
There's also the "top down" aspect that needs to be explored. What does the word "egregore" connect to in terms of information, despite the various projections of meaning being made?
Stavish describes a wide variety of his so-called egregores, from memes, to UFO/Alien phenomena, briefly citing Vallee's "control system" as an egregore and ignoring entirely the implications. And certainly, a group of people engaged in doing things together can generate a structure. The question is, is there a hidden stimulus that compels or induces one or more persons to engage in a "structure producing" activity so that "feeding" can take place?
Maybe some human picks up an idea from the "ether", kind of embryonic thought-form, develops it, passes it to other humans, and the collective emotional focus feeds the egregor until it becomes its own thing. Most religions appeared during Earth turmoils, and accompanying human emotional turmoils. In addition to that, there is this idea that 4D denizens "teach" things to humans throughout history. Maybe these "teachings", through subsequent feedback loops with humans, made them gods and goddesses.
- Hyperdimentional or higher influence sounds more like it when it comes to egregor's influence. But there could be various manifestations and variations according to a personal vibration level, like a specific part of the information field, focusing on a specific emanation and aligning with its principles. Also has to do with levels of being.
This reminded me of the Ibn Al-Arabi's concept of divine names. From The Sufi Path Of Knowledge by William C. Chittick:
The association with the Divine Names occurred to me as well. Hyperdimensional Beings represent the Divine Names in a "purer" form than the mixtus orbis at 3D. What Divine Name, or mixture of Names, does "egregore" represent? And does that Name, or mixture of Names, compel the sort of "structure producing activity" Laura mentioned above? What 'inspires' these various 'magicians' to perform their rituals and thought projections, and to what degree do they dictate the form and content of such activities?
I am almost done reading the book and like some of you, I too have wondered whether Stavish is a man with a hammer who sees everything as a nail. Kind of like the anthropogenic global warming alarmists who blame humans for cosmic factors that have affected the Earth for ages.
What is interesting is that it appears that quite a few people have noticed the phenomenon down through history. And they have tried to formulate explanations for it. [..]
So, clearly, there are a lot of things going on and I don't think it is helpful to just toss them all in the same basket and declare "Egregores"!!!
I think the concepts and/or dynamics that are presented in the book have been mentioned in other materials threads before, but he talks about them from a slightly different angle which is interesting to consider. However, like some of you said here (I haven't read the entire thread yet), I think that it is a bit exaggerated to call all those phenomena "egregores".
It appears that Stavish does puts any possible psychic effect or result of any possible human interaction in one big egregor pile. Some of it may be true, but the reality is probably much more complicated and intricate.
And speaking of "memes", sorry, but I couldn't help myself.
LOL, yep, I think the author generalises in a big way regarding what egregores are, and the effects they can and do have upon humanity. Exactly like conspiracy theorists that want to blame everything on 5G, chemtrails, or bankers. Of course, such simplistic explanations can have great appeal, which is useful for those who want to spread a message that vectors people away from the truth.
So far I have an impression that all the groups, like Golden Dawn and others, often approach their interaction with various forces in the mechanical way that is akin to the research by the mainstream scientists. They base their findings on the research of other accepted and respected "esoteric experts", and then also put a great emphasis on the "evidence based esoterics" that is based on wrong or limited premises. Something that leaves them blind to various higher influences and manipulations while maintaining the belief that they are on top of it.
I wouldn't deny that the creation of "egregores" by humans doesn't happen in the ways he describes, it is probable that it does, but I don't think that it occurs to the extent he seems to believe. If he takes into account the reality of hyperdimensional beings and their control over humanity for millennia it will explain a lot of his observations. And perhaps people who delve into dark magic and occult subjects don't always create these beings but attract them instead.
I never quite understood the purpose of the secret societies and rituals. Except for their possible knowledge about other hyperdimensional spheres of existence. I never understood the rituals and what can they achieve with them.
Now, I get it much better perspective.
Just a note: The guy who wrote the forward to the Egregore book, James Wasserman, was a "longtime proponent of the teachings of Aleister Crowley". This is according to the forward to his own book, "In the Center of the Fire".
Stavish makes a number of somewhat disturbing statements throughout the book that hint at his own opinions regarding occult forces:
Mark Stavish said:
“The egregore may be an essential mechanism or tool, but for the movement to maintain control over its own egregore and continuity of mission, it must go through periods of activity and rest as do human beings.” [..] p. 49
“The illuminati, however, do not act in the world, they only sustain the spiritual tradition so that it will not be lost to the tides of ignorance that sweep through this, the Kali Yuga.” [..] p. 53
“In addition to specific spheres of the Kabbalistic Tree of Life connected to the head, shoulders, and breast (and by extension the groin and feet), the four arms of the cross are related to the four cardinal directions, their attendant archangels, kerubim or guardian animals, and classical elements. The center of the cross is where the mystery resides. This is often given the domain of the spiritual void, the Hebrew letter shin in Hermetic Kabbalah and the rose of the Rosicrucians. The letters I.H.S. and I.N.R.I. alone or with a five-petal Tudor rose can also be seen in Protestant designs of the cross.” p. 81
“To truly grasp the power of ideas we must stop thinking in terms of “good” and “evil.” Good and evil are simply constructs; they have no rooting in any singular, absolute, and universal doctrine or experience. This is terrifying to consider, but it is a reality known well by those who create egregores—be they channels of esoteric initiation or political memes. To extend this to its completeness we must accept that “there is no such thing as good or evil, only ideas and their consequences.” p. 87
Something that has become quite clear to me after reading this book is that every occult or esoteric secret society has, as at least one aspect, the study of magic. And there are some secret societies that appear to be absolutely obsessed with it.
Stavish seems to question the idea put forward by Tomberg, claiming that "we are being told to accept the egregore that is not an egregore" but my impression is that he's focusing more on semantics while Tomberg, although coloured by his own religious beliefs, seems to make a distinction more akin to the concepts of STS vs STO.
This was another thing that got my spidey-sense tingling. Stavish seems quite insistent on the idea of "religion as egregore", especially Christianity. While it's pretty easy to see that Tomberg had some fairly big blinders regarding mainstream Christianity, I agree that his awareness of deeper reality seems to be more acute - he was probably projecting his own conscience onto Catholicism in the absence of any better example he could find. I find what he wrote here to be quite insightful:
Valentin Tomberg said:
“If there are egregores of initiation orders and religious—and other—communities, they are always negative. The egregore of Catholicism, for example, is its parasitic double (the existence of which it would be futile to deny), which manifests itself as fanaticism, cruelty, “diplomatic wisdom” and excessive pretentions. But insofar as the positive spirits of communities are concerned, they are never egregores, but rather they are entities from the ten hierarchies (ten, because the tenth hierarchy—that of mankind—is included here). It is therefore a human soul, an Angel or an Archangel, who assumes responsibility for the direction of a human community in a positive sense. Thus, it is not at all an egregore but rather St. Francis himself who is the spiritual director of the Franciscan order. It is similarly so for the Church. Its guiding spirit is Jesus Christ.”
Of course if there's a "guiding spirit" to Christianity, it's more likely to be Caesar or Venus than a mythical "Jesus", but I'm sure y'all get the gist.
Still need to think and formulate thoughts about this, but if "good and evil" isn't important to the "Golded Dawn" etc. guys, then there is no proper sifting through "truth and objectivity". For them what is true and objective are only constructs. They are only ideas and their formulations. So there is no deeper thinking about the value of information from this perspective. Sure, they do appear to do a lot of thinking and experiencing. They do appear to make an effort to "infuse" a bunch of information, but without the STO/STS division something is lacking, or so it seems to me.
Yes, this is where Stavish got his interpretation of Tomberg from, osit.
Gustav Le Bon’s work on crowd psychology & how crowds can behave very differently compared to the individual.
I thought of the "
Strange Contagion" book, which they
reviewed on The Truth Perspective as well.
In a way, he seems to support individualism while generating alarm regarding the formation of groups. What he doesn't take into account is the idea of soul groups as described in the literature regarding life after death. He also seems to lack the psychological awareness that one person on their own cannot see their blindspots let alone the reality around them as objectively as possible, and a group of people is needed to help keep each other aware and awake (as he prescribes) in order to reach as much freedom as possible from the control system into which they are enslaved.
I also was starting to feel a bit worried that the author might say that the only escape is to be a loner, which I don't think is a good option at all. I mean, I get it that people within groups might tend to groupthink, and some groups also encourage this kind of behavior, but that isn't what happens in ALL groups or ALL the people who participate in a group.
I thought this as well. Stavish seems to advocate breaking away from all forms of negative groups but not replacing them with any kind of positive social or spiritual bonds. Seems a bit like Dabrowski's "negative disintegration" not in personality, but in social terms.
Here are some thoughts on additional points made:
- When he talked about location specific egregors it reminded me of the saying "We are Russians and God is with us". Could it be the manifestation of a geographic egregor mentioned in the sessions?
Possibly. Is this a common saying in Russia? Is it used for nationalist or political purposes? Does it mean that Russia is "favoured" of God, or simply that God will help the Russian people and stand by them?
In the book I noticed something that reminded a lot of what's going on with the weird Ukrainian and Western propaganda today. The description below mathces perfectly the stories of 'Ghost of Kiev', 'Great Spring Offensive' etc. I wonder if some of these people propagating these storylines are thinking that they're doing some kind of magic, feeding an egregore that will help them win. A variation of YCYOR.
There have been stories of Ukrainians openly performing witchcraft rituals to "get Putin and Russia". There was also that weird solstice celebration by the UAF that was like something out of
Raiders of the Lost Ark. I think "magic" is part and parcel of the inner circles of hardcore Nazi ideology, so such ideas, and even practises, are probably quite common in Ukraine today, especially when we consider the "portal" in Ukraine might make a conduit between densities much easier to establish.
- Limbic resonance within the group is like access to the group egregor.
Interesting point. Limbic resonance might strengthen the group access to the information field in some way.
Some 30% into the book, it reminded me of the Golem from that session in 2015:
There's definitely more than a little correlation there I think, considering all the Kabbalah dogma entwined within western occultism.
Maybe without truth and objectivity there is no true "magic". Maybe for something to happen you do need this distinction and understanding. Maybe in most cases of mechanical indications it doesn't lead to individualized "egregors" or whatever. Maybe it remains as the static in the information field in whatever form, unless 4D STS have an aim to capitalize on it. Or some other source, like Thor's Pantheum, etc. Maybe all of our emotional and mental activity does leave a mark and it can be used for whatever purpose.
But maybe in order to create a new possibility, something more fundamental and grandiose like creating a new reality, a more "pure" and truth oriented effort is required. Not some mechanical chanting and repetition of the words shared in a journal. But an open and creative intent. Just some thoughts.
Agree 100%.
He says that the Egregor lost strength in particular because of the nature of some of the cults that were becoming popular at the time, because these cults offered salvation and that wasn't something the Egregore's cult offered.
So, I connected this to what we discussed elsewhere about Paul's teachings and early Christianity.
In the Egregore book, the author says that the Egregores required more attention via ritualistic cults with a lot of focus in the material realm, sacrifices, etc., to get the favour of these entities (which sounds a lot like "the gods" of ancient cultures). So I remembered some of what Paul said about these rituals, not giving too much importance to them, and what we learn from Paul's Necessary Sin about the difference between the Law and the more mature spirituality that he was teaching. Also, when Paul said something along the lines of Christ exposing and wining over not only some earthly authorities but also "angelic" ones, and therefore opening that path to humans. And I just thought that maybe some of what he was teaching is that human beings can attain 'salvation' and be in communion with God (the Divine) without being subject to those entities which are truly below God. So his teachings were offering freedom from these "watchers" and that was partly why Christianity was such a big deal.
This touches on something very interesting, I think. Can an egregore be "converted"?
Some additional points I haven't seen directly mentioned:
Mark Stavish said:
“So how did Dorje Shugden originate? Apparently, Shugden was only a minor protector (gylapo—angry or vengeful spirit) until the nineteenth century, when it became a tool for persecuting the evolving nonsectarian movement of the period. It should be noted that the Gelukpa were also the principal political force or administrative party in Tibet as well, with all Dalai Lamas having been Gelukpa (or related to it) since the installation of the office of the Dalai Lama at the hands of the Mongolians in 1642. As a result, some have seen the Chinese occupation and destruction of Tibet as punishment for—or at least as a result of—the inadequate worship of Dorje Shugden.
This is directly analogous to what Laura describes as the "Stockholm Syndrome" of the Jews regarding the conquest of Israel by the Assyrian Empire - "Yahweh" didn't fail the Jews; the Assyrians were used as the "instrument of punishment" against the unobservant and unfaithful, never mind that the Assyrians had no idea about the Judean god and would quite happily execute said god's prophets. So when we consider this unusual psychological syndrome in the context of the information about egregores, it seems that there may be more influences at play than the simply psychological in such cases.
Regarding "thoughtforms":
The concept "thoughtform" seems to have materialistic assumptions baked into it. The idea seems to be that thoughts can be "projected" outside one's mind where they can exist temporarily on their own, and if two or more people "think the same thing" that make the thoughts "combine" into a thought that is "bigger/stronger/more real". There's a very simplistic arithmetic at work there, osit. How do we know thoughts can exist outside of the minds which contain them? It seems to me more likely that such a formation would literally require beings to "lend and blend"
portions of their own minds as part of the process so that the thought would have an appropriate "container", which could explain why, with sufficient effort, the focal point could acquire a distinct consciousness. Thus the more appropriate concept may be "
formthought".
Another comparison that occurred to me was that of the egregore with the "social memory complex" described in the Ra channeling. It seems to me that an egregore may be described as a specifically negative proto-social memory complex, formed around a candidate attempting to achieve 4D STS graduation. Consider what Stavish writes:
Mark Stavish said:
“For this reason any interruption in the performance of the ritual will have an equally disruptive effect on the vitality of the egregore. Thus rituals, after a certain period of time, cannot be modified without weakening the egregore, making secrecy all the more critical. Rituals composed of “secret names, words, and formulae . . . to awaken and establish the egregore” are also directed around specific astrological events to coordinate with celestial and cosmic cycles. It is not by accident that equinox and solstice rituals play such an important part in many organizations.”
Secret names that associate the very concept of a "group mind" or "proto-social memory complex" with
a specific psychic intelligence of a nonhuman nature, depicted in myth as "fallen angels" and responsible for the creation of the Nephilim?
Mark Stavish said:
“This explains why opponents of such a concept, on studying the origin, nature and life of this concept, often end by joining with it or at least by espousing a part of the theories, even without their knowledge. They are connected to a current, which, as it is more powerful than those who are primitively linked to it, carries them unknowingly away from the road that they imagined they were following.”
Definitely a warning to be careful regarding this topic, or so I think. The word "egregore" is one I think is one we should avoid projecting any unwarranted positive qualities into whatsoever.