This is the sort of thing that interests me. Yes, there is confrontational energy in this thread. There is hyperbole and also dogged insistence. I'm feeling all of those things. This is also my first time sharing with a group in this forum, so I'll disclose something.
I got both jabs. Maderna. The second one completely -flicked- me up. For three days, I was as vulnerable and incapacitated as a person aught to get. Anything beyond would have effectively resembled full-body paralysis. I'm aware that covid was quite similar to my symptoms, though I experienced those symptoms for roughly 30% as long as someone with covid would have. I suppose I also wasn't contagious because I didn't have the virus replicating or mutating inside of me, I had this odd little protein that was built to simulate and stimulate.
From what I can tell, I'm right on the edge with my immunization. My reading points to 6-8 months of solid efficacy against the virus (the original strain) before a steep decline.
The wildest take I've seen in this thread has to do with this concept of the green card, if I'm getting that right. It's this idea that if I get the shot once, I've essentially signed away my agency. I'm very resistant to that view. It's certainly not reflective of my experience. I had a network of people who cared and supported me through the process just as much as they hold space for me to pontificate about the overreach of the state and the unfortunate politicization of the pandemic and polarization of opinion.
I actually see very little difference between vaxxers and anti-vaxxers. When I'm in an anti-vax space, I'm ridiculed and dehumanized for my choice to get the jab. When I'm in a vax-positive space, I'm handled with a 10-foot pole and treated as though I'm not a serious person. The only useful conversations I've had are the ones that lead with a disclosure of fear because that's what I'm obsessed with and consumed by when it comes to this stuff. I'm afraid that the pandemic has catelized an irreconcilably addictive polarization of "light" that foregrounds a major cultural contradiction about what it means to stand your ground. The really troubling thing is that I see people on both sides using arguments that dehumanize the other. I have never heard of that behaviour solving any problems. Not ever. I'm afraid of the consequences. I try to complexify the discussion when I have the opportunity because I think skepticism and doubt evenly distributed across the thought horizon of the mind restores the scope of our inner witness. I would have us all pause and witness the severity of this polarization so that we could compare the risks of tending toward a trauma-informed approach rather against the risks of doubling down on our biases, which, by their nature, don't really require re-enforcement or sharpening. They're biases, after all. They'll do what biases do.
I feel closer to Joe's energy on this issue just in terms of his approach. I want to be confrontational. It feels necessary. That's my presumption and it's based on a fear. The behaviour feeds my bias. I'm trying not to judge myself when I say that. It just is what it is. It's harder work for me to walk a healer's path on this one but that's my aspiration.