Failed Trump Assassination Attempt

George Webb has suggested that crooks may have been working for the Butler Township Police as they have confirmed that volunteers were part of the security coverage team.


He also claims that four motorcycle police left Joe Biden motorcade and joined Trumps motorcade before the event and that two of them were wounded during the shooting.


New Evidence Points To Multiple Shooters In Trump Assassination

New Forensics Delineate Eleven Shots From Three Weapons​


GEORGE WEBB
JUL 17, 2024
84
11
Share


Stunning new forensic analysis if the Trump Assassination attempt indicates a total of eleven shots fired from three separate weapons, obliterating the “lone gunman” theory of the Trump Assassination.

The forensics speak for themselves, and the probability that the Crooks young sniper fired all three weapons after being shot is extremely unlikely. The geometry doesn’t align with at least two sources for the shots fired.
The race here in Butler, PA, seems like a race between citizen journalism now to uncover evidence and the FBI destroying it.

Even published pictures make it look like Crooks was spotting for a sniper, not the actual shooter. His dead body lies a significant distance away from the gun he hauled up to the roof. Was he bringing a gun to a SWAT member? Why was he killed so far away from the weapon?

Are we seeing the movie “Spotter Patsy” played out before our eyes?

I have confirmed with the Butler Township Police that volunteers were part of the security coverage for “outside the perimeter” of the Secret Service, meaning the “Sniper Crooks” could actually just be the “Spotter Crooks.” That would explain Crooks's three intercepts by law enforcement and then being allowed to proceed to the roof with range-finding equipment.
Why is there a SWAT ladder if there is no SWAT member?

How did they know Yearick wasn’t the sniper he was supporting before opening his phone? How did they know he was a “lone gunman”.

Wouldn’t a spotter for Yearick go to the site to scope it out as a part of his job? Wouldn’t that explain how he was not stopped with a RangeFinder after being intercepted three times?

George Webb’s Task Force Orange Journal is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Subscribe



Neighborhood News citizen journalist Tyrone Sargent shows the two angles of fire from the forensic evidence.

We also have new evidence of four different motorcycle police leaving the Joe Biden motorcade to join the Trump motorcade in a very suspicious last-minute change of security assignments.

I am actually staying at a hotel with Police snipers and sharpshooters from all over the United States and Canada at my hotel, and to a man and woman, they are all shocked at the lack of security at the Trump Assassination attempt.

Here is a split screen video which highlights the long wait to engage the shooters.

I confirmed this morning at Butler Township Police Headquarters that an officer did engage with the suspected shooter on the roof of the American Glass Research building.

The Butler Township Police Department would not answer follow-up questions about the officer who intercepted Crooks, and the Township told me the FBI is handling all public information releases now.

“Inside the perimeter” and “outside the perimeter” were the key phrases slung around Butler Township Police Department this morning. I had a feeling there were active discussions on assigning blame where these were the operative phrases. Clearly a ladder was used by the Crooks shooter to ascend to the roof. Elon Musk has tweeted out the location, which is very close to a SWAT ladder in the same building.

Fox Commentator Dan Bongino says an “unimpeachable source” says someone was assigned to the roof and did not show up for the job. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle says the pitch of the roof was the deciding factor not to put a Secret Service sniper on the roof (what about the water tower just beside the buildings?).

The pitch of the roof the snipers used to take out Crooks is actually much steeper, making Director Cheatle’s excuses almost appear comical.

Fox commentator Dan Bongino says he has an unimpeachable source that can identify who was assigned to the roof and that the assignee did not show up for the assignment (so don’t name a replacement?). I have publicly asked Dan Bongino to share the name so I can do a follow-up interview here in Butler.

In another troubling story about the Secret Service’s judgment, Jonathan Willis, reputedly a Secret Service sniper, had the Crooks roof shooter in his sights for three minutes and was not permitted to fire. Video evidence appears to bear this out.

I have reached out to Willis here in Butler, PA, but he appears to be in fear for his life.

We are also working on the “ladder story” here in Butler, PA.

I am also following the fake lamp story, which appears to have been taken in a staged photo before the assassination.


We will continue reporting on this Trump Assassination attempt from here in Butler, Pennsylvania. I visited Butler Township Police this morning, and the Police have informed me the FBI will run all future press conferences. More daily updates here.
Click to expand...
 
Joe said:
Latest from Cullen. Fair point.
Click to expand...
Yes and it points to more than one shooter. So if the shot on Trump came from the Water tower, then the shots which have been triangulated from 'Crooks' position to match with Trump, (though they don't according to Cullen's video above) and hit the hydraulics hoses behind him, were done to pin it on Crooks?

Joe said:
Video I haven't seen before here

https://twitter.com/x/status/1813696688495948164
Click to expand...

In this video the first shot sounds distinctly different from the other ones which follow which have more of tinny sound to them if you know what I mean. Starts at 0:45 of the video which Joe showed. Have a listen.


Joe said:
The shot(s) that hit the right hand bleacher (to Trump's left) had to have come from somewhere else.
Click to expand...
Indeed. She makes a good point and also she was present in the crowd. She said the shots came from right AND left and the crowd was aware of more shooters.
 
I am not sure what to trust on this.

Let's look at this tweet. some how this shooter climbed to the top curvature of the tower and disappeared with in seconds
https://twitter.com/x/status/1813836723618476419

If I cut out water tower from the left picture, denoise it, what ever black hazy stuff looks , it is as if floating . Probably it is not human. May be some drone copter. drone copters makes NO audible noise? or is it some 4D stuff triangulating? If it is humans they can't disappear in few seconds.
trump water tower denoised.png
But this doesn't explain the viral horizontal bullet picture which MSM promoting, if shot came from the water tower. Probably that bullet MSM pictured came from patsy?

If I take the picture from this video. There is some bubble type structure CONSISTENTLY on water tower, but it is not there in the above tweet.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1813858017118679195
some say, There is human shaped dark shadow near the railing ( middle of tower sphere) as a possible shooter. Other sayd the shadow is always there.

To add to the confusion.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1813837128599532002
where does right most red line coming from. It is not coming from tower. Probably X poster extended the red line to sky.
 
Aeneas said:
In this video the first shot sounds distinctly different from the other ones which follow which have more of tinny sound to them if you know what I mean. Starts at 0:45 of the video which Joe showed. Have a listen.
Click to expand...
Agreed.
Aeneas said:
Indeed. She makes a good point and also she was present in the crowd. She said the shots came from right AND left and the crowd was aware of more shooters.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's interesting.
Here's a possible firing line if it's coming from Trumps left (crowds right).
Red = official line of fire.
Blue = possible sniper/line of fire.
Screenshot 2024-07-18 140308.png
 
Approaching Infinity said:
A significantly less worthless analysis from yesterday by "459 Crimes":
...

In replies, he clarifies that this analysis can't determine relative locations, just signatures, but that it does suggest three guns fired from three different locations. He presumes that shots 9 to 11 are from counter-snipers.
Click to expand...

Having looked at this, I was thinking that shots 1-3 came from the "professional" sniper, shots 4-8 from the patsy as he became aware of them and tried his luck and shots 9-11 from counter-snipers. As noted earlier, the patsy was considered a "bad shot", hence him "spraying" in quick succession...
 
That the forest does not let them see the trees... if we take the possibility of the armed drone, it is not necessary that it be on the water tower, it could be in another location such as certain trees further to the right, even though Not so practical, a tree with adequate vision conditions helps a shooter position himself.

PS: I think several have already noticed it and it could be redundant with this, but people are suspicious of the situation and the authorities; In addition to seeing the ineptitude of security (this is partly good and is enhanced by the lack of censorship on Twitter), so it is no surprise that a lot of theories and data abound that seek to show the "conspiracy."
 
Konstantin said:
It would not be a lonely shooter if anybody knew something about any potential threat. Then it means it has some inside logistics.
How could anyone know about a potential threat if it was just an average intelligent, good shooter guy?

I don't think he would tell anyone before the shooting.
If SS knew about the threat, then they probably knew from intelligence info.
Click to expand...

The main question is whether or not the Senators who descended on Cheatle received good info in the intelligence briefing.

Prouty's books make it clear that the CIA will often brief politicians and/or the public with disinfo to cover their tracks. The release of the Pentagon Papers was probably the biggest example of this, which allowed the CIA to cast itself as 'just an intel agency' and at the same time blamed the failures of Vietnam on the certain Pentagon officials and others.

So in this case, let's propose some faction of the 'fun and games' sector of US intelligence, some faction of this or that agency, briefed the Senators. It could be CIA, FBI, NSA, DoD, a mix, who knows. It will be impossible to know unless there is a patriotic whistleblower like Prouty or an info leak or hack somewhere.

So this intel faction provided those Senators with info about the attempted assassination during an intelligence briefing. The info itself could have laid out all the facts that we have seen here - no security personnel stationed on the roof where Crooks was eventually shot being the main item. Then it becomes easy to lay blame squarely on the shoulders of the SS for this oversight.

But there will also likely be disinfo included with the real info. Maybe the disinfo is the idea that the SS knew beforehand of a threat, but allowed Trump to take the stage anyways. That makes Cheatle and the SS look even worse, securing in the minds of the Senators that she is to blame. It's incompetence to a whole different level! It also indicates the potential for the SS being in on the job. It's an emotional time, and the intel faction knows that angry Senators and the American public needs a scapegoat.

What will be missing from the briefing is the real info about who likely organized the whole thing. The intel faction will likely say they don't know, an investigation is pending, etc. We'll see if this goes to a Congressional investigation like the Warren Commission or HSCA.

Anyways, in reporting only on SS incompetence and potential culpability, the first intel faction will likely be providing cover for whichever second faction really did organize it. This, of course, is assuming that is wasn't just the SS.

I think some intel faction did organize this at the behest of the PTB. Now, the factions are so compartmentalized that one faction could have organized it, while another faction has no clue about this activity. Thus, when reporting the Senators, they are telling the truth as they see it. The story becomes about SS incompetence, and maybe being in on the job, and the discussion of a US intel faction targeting the President is muted.

The Senators, already in emotional turmoil, seize on this SS story. They make a bee-line for Cheatle, confront her, and their confrontation with Cheatle would then go public, giving the population the idea of Cheatle's incompetence as the main factor in all this also. And also leading them to believe she was in on it, which is key. It is a suggestion, without evidence, which is enough to drive people in that direction. In a way, if Crooks is a patsy, then Cheatle is a patsy, too, but in the political sense.

Meanwhile, the SS story could have easily been instigated or caused by the intel faction - a second one - who organized this whole thing, with the goal being Cheatle taking the blame. The intel faction could have issued a stand-down order. Or they could have simply planted the info with the Senators that a threat was known, and no action was taken by the SS. They could have locked the security officers in the fenced enclosure. They could have made sure no local police were on Crooks' roof. They could have done any number of things. I think all it would take is a few people planted in the correct positions of the command hierarchy.

Basically, I think Cheatle was set up to be the scapegoat in the event that Trump was truly assassinated. 'SS incompetence/culpability' was the narrative we are all meant to SEE (and it is true based on most of the facts). But this detracts from the larger question - who was behind the assassination attempt in the first place?

Hope that makes sense. I could be wrong, but that's what the Prouty material has me thinking.
 
iamthatis said:
The main question is whether or not the Senators who descended on Cheatle received good info in the intelligence briefing.

Prouty's books make it clear that the CIA will often brief politicians and/or the public with disinfo to cover their tracks. The release of the Pentagon Papers was probably the biggest example of this, which allowed the CIA to cast itself as 'just an intel agency' and at the same time blamed the failures of Vietnam on the certain Pentagon officials and others.

So in this case, let's propose some faction of the 'fun and games' sector of US intelligence, some faction of this or that agency, briefed the Senators. It could be CIA, FBI, NSA, DoD, a mix, who knows. It will be impossible to know unless there is a patriotic whistleblower like Prouty or an info leak or hack somewhere.

So this intel faction provided those Senators with info about the attempted assassination during an intelligence briefing. The info itself could have laid out all the facts that we have seen here - no security personnel stationed on the roof where Crooks was eventually shot being the main item. Then it becomes easy to lay blame squarely on the shoulders of the SS for this oversight.

But there will also likely be disinfo included with the real info. Maybe the disinfo is the idea that the SS knew beforehand of a threat, but allowed Trump to take the stage anyways. That makes Cheatle and the SS look even worse, securing in the minds of the Senators that she is to blame. It's incompetence to a whole different level! It also indicates the potential for the SS being in on the job. It's an emotional time, and the intel faction knows that angry Senators and the American public needs a scapegoat.

What will be missing from the briefing is the real info about who likely organized the whole thing. The intel faction will likely say they don't know, an investigation is pending, etc. We'll see if this goes to a Congressional investigation like the Warren Commission or HSCA.

Anyways, in reporting only on SS incompetence and potential culpability, the first intel faction will likely be providing cover for whichever second faction really did organize it. This, of course, is assuming that is wasn't just the SS.

I think some intel faction did organize this at the behest of the PTB. Now, the factions are so compartmentalized that one faction could have organized it, while another faction has no clue about this activity. Thus, when reporting the Senators, they are telling the truth as they see it. The story becomes about SS incompetence, and maybe being in on the job, and the discussion of a US intel faction targeting the President is muted.

The Senators, already in emotional turmoil, seize on this SS story. They make a bee-line for Cheatle, confront her, and their confrontation with Cheatle would then go public, giving the population the idea of Cheatle's incompetence as the main factor in all this also. And also leading them to believe she was in on it, which is key. It is a suggestion, without evidence, which is enough to drive people in that direction. In a way, if Crooks is a patsy, then Cheatle is a patsy, too, but in the political sense.

Meanwhile, the SS story could have easily been instigated or caused by the intel faction - a second one - who organized this whole thing, with the goal being Cheatle taking the blame. The intel faction could have issued a stand-down order. Or they could have simply planted the info with the Senators that a threat was known, and no action was taken by the SS. They could have locked the security officers in the fenced enclosure. They could have made sure no local police were on Crooks' roof. They could have done any number of things. I think all it would take is a few people planted in the correct positions of the command hierarchy.

Basically, I think Cheatle was set up to be the scapegoat in the event that Trump was truly assassinated. 'SS incompetence/culpability' was the narrative we are all meant to SEE (and it is true based on most of the facts). But this detracts from the larger question - who was behind the assassination attempt in the first place?

Hope that makes sense. I could be wrong, but that's what the Prouty material has me thinking.
Click to expand...

Surely makes sense and is likely.
 
Ketone Cop said:
I hope I'm alone in this struggle but I'm sure there's others here who can understand.
Click to expand...

Ketone Cop said:
BTW sorry for the tone of my last post. It's probably something I should have posted in the Swamp. But I do wonder how many here who read that have experienced any of the same things with their own friends and family? And if anyone has some input that might help heal things, I'm open. I'm doing all I can for myself currently so that isn't so much of an issue, though it is hard in its own way. Thanks for listening, always appreciated. On with the assassination discussion.
Click to expand...

You're definitely not alone, although maybe not all of us have a parent who is so focused on hating Trump. They'll all say nasty things about him, like the media tells them to, but most I think don't spend too much time on it. Only when the topic comes up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom