Failed Trump Assassination Attempt

[Cosmos]

Judicial Watch has uploaded all recently released bodycam footage on DropBox, HERE.

I don't know at what time in the story line this happens, but at 4:37/4:38 in this video (#5 of 12) you can see a guy running on the roof of AGR#3. You don't see him for very long but he is definitely moving to the left and it looks like the same path Crooks took in the other video but, obviously, I can't be 100% certain it's Crooks. It's a long ways away. You can also just make out some other movement around 4:54. His head popping up? This cop was in the woods to the east of AGR.


View attachment 100012

Someone on X just made a stabilized and zoomed in version of that:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1822190835250987325

You can see someone, maybe Crooks, getting up on the roof with a backpack and running across. That happen ca at 18:08:30, ca 3min before the first shot.

It looks like whoever that is on the roof (likely Crooks, IMO) was filmed before the first shots were fired. And he is indeed coming from far back in the building complex, close to the red position marker above.

I found a video that has more audio on it than the previous uploaded ones, which leads me to the suspicion that (at least in this case) it wasn't the police officer himself that didn't record audio but that it was cut out afterward:

So I'm getting kinda suspicious about all the police cam videos that we have seen now, where the audio is missing here and there. It could very well be that the FBI or whoever cut out audio parts before the videos were released to the public.

 

[Cosmos]

I was just thinking that whoever planned this probably knew beforehand that there would be a lot of normal people and police around who will see and record something in many areas including Crooks area, so they might have decided from the get-go that it would be too risky to place a second real shooter somewhere because of that? Maybe they then just decided to pave the way for Crooks himself, maybe even helping him to some extent on the scene to accomplish what he did? And maybe that is the one thing they are really trying to hide now? That he was helped to be able to do what he did?

 

[Cosmos]

It seems like the mainstream is pushing the idea that Crooks did that by himself, while, at most, there was a serious “mismanagement“ or “incompetence“ taking place by the secret service that paved the way for Crooks. Maybe even going as far as suggesting, if needed, that this “mismanagement“ was done deliberately “by the secret service alone“. While in reality, what they really want to hide is that Crooks was not really planning and acting alone (maybe even on the scene itself) but that he was groomed, prepared and helped directly by the “FBI“ and/or other power structures of the PTB to be able to do that.

 

[aragorn]

I was just thinking that whoever planned this probably knew beforehand that there would be a lot of normal people and police around who will see and record something in many areas including Crooks area, so they might have decided from the get-go that it would be too risky to place a second real shooter somewhere because of that? Maybe they then just decided to pave the way for Crooks himself, maybe even helping him to some extent on the scene to accomplish what he did? And maybe that is the one thing they are really trying to hide now? That he was helped to be able to do what he did?

Could be. In JFK's time this wouldn't have been a problem, but you're right, in today's world everyone has a smartphone that enables recording. Right now, and especially after watching Martenson's latest segment, I think that there was at least a dozen individuals in various roles (SS, LEO:s) that controlled/secured the whole AGR complex so that whoever took those shots could make them successfully. Basically, the whole of building 6 was under 'their' control and prepared for the event, OSIT.

For instance, those officers/agents at the West side of building 6 appear suspcicious (ZZ Top guy etc.) as they were among the crowd who were shouting and pointing out Crooks on the roof, and did nothing. Then, after the shots they can be seen on the East side 'checking' and talking to the other officers.

 

[aragorn]

I haven't had time to analyse this video but it shows some interesting details. It's a shortenen semgent by an X user (with some unnecessary dramatizing music) from a longer bodycam video BWC2-122110, which can be found HERE. The X user's video below:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1822487664286634132

From ca 5min in, you can see Crook's body clearly and in detail (graphic!). Maybe you with the right kind of medica/anatomical knowledge can see something that would give more clues of how and from where he was shot? What surprised me, at least, was how far back from the ridge his body was – did they drag him backwards, if so, why? Also, one officer cuffs his hands with those plastic things, why do that if he's clearly dead? Another weird detail starts at 7:15 in the X video. One of the camouflaged officers puts something that looks like a part of a gun that he picked up from the roof into the belt of the SWAT guy who's wearing gloves. Maybe nothing, but a bit weird.

Here's a screeshot of the gun part, or whatever it is. Can someone identify what that is?

 

[seek10]

Here is some first 3 screen shots from the video. The audio and video slightly better than previous video.
see the small text comment below

• first shot at 02:08:66 - No flash available though camera is facing. There is some serious highspeed readjustment going on window 3 between shot 1 and 2 , if one looks at it frame by frame.
• 2nd shot at 02:09:51 - Flash shows up in 3rd window (from left) but at 02:09:70 and reflection of it on 4th window too.
• 3rd shot at 02:10:19 - Camera no longer facing building, so nothing captured.

I used Aegisub 3.2.2 to put the comments




There is slight time difference ( 10 to 20 msec) showing when the same video is opened in movie maker and Aegisub 3.2.2. Probably it is related software versions and like practical calibrations. any way the readjustment after first shot.



Some are too convinced that it can't be done from 3rd window without going through the fence. It is possible, but may not be ideal with simple flat out calculations. Any angle of the gun upwards, gravity effect on the bullet ( it is considered negligible for first 100 ft) can easily make it happen. These are the calculations professional assassins' takes care of them.

How To: The Effect Of Gravity On A Bullet's Path

Gravity has an inordinate effect on a bullet's flight path. But because it's consistent, it can be easily accounted for to make an accurate shot.

gundigest.com

 

[Cosmos]

From ca 5min in, you can see Crook's body clearly and in detail (graphic!). Maybe you with the right kind of medica/anatomical knowledge can see something that would give more clues of how and from where he was shot? What surprised me, at least, was how far back from the ridge his body was – did they drag him backwards, if so, why?

I would say there is a low probability that Crooks was dragged back down the slope after he was shot: You would expect to see some blood further up if that was the case. I don't see that. It seems like Crooks might not have shot further up the slope because 1; from there, there was enough clearance to see Trumps head and 2; being positioned farther back made it easier to hide.

Another weird detail starts at 7:15 in the X video. One of the camouflaged officers puts something that looks like a part of a gun that he picked up from the roof into the belt of the SWAT guy who's wearing gloves. Maybe nothing, but a bit weird.

Shorty after the guy goes up the roof, you can see and hear that the handgun (which is in a holster, it seems) was dropping down from the black uniform guy (accidentally, it seems). The black uniform guy reacts shortly after that, trying to get back down to pick it up, and probably does so, but then sets the gun aside back on another spot on the roof, because he had other stuff to do: examining Crooks dead body. Meanwhile, the other officer in beige uniform saw all of that happening (handgun falling down), and later grabbed the gun and put it away on still another spot on the roof. Then, when the black uniform guy was finished with his examination of the dead body, the beige uniform guy takes up the handgun again and helps to put it back on the black uniform officer. Nothing suspicious there, IMO.

 

[Cosmos]

Here is some first 3 screen shots from the video. The audio and video slightly better than previous video.
see the small text comment below

• first shot at 02:08:66 - No flash available though camera is facing. There is some serious highspeed readjustment going on window 3 between shot 1 and 2 , if one looks at it frame by frame.
• 2nd shot at 02:09:51 - Flash shows up in 3rd window (from left) but at 02:09:70 and reflection of it on 4th window too.
• 3rd shot at 02:10:19 - Camera no longer facing building, so nothing captured.

I used Aegisub 3.2.2 to put the comments


View attachment 100053

There is slight time difference ( 10 to 20 msec) showing when the same video is opened in movie maker and Aegisub 3.2.2. Probably it is related software versions and like practical calibrations. any way the readjustment after first shot.

View attachment 100054

Some are too convinced that it can't be done from 3rd window without going through the fence. It is possible, but may not be ideal with simple flat out calculations. Any angle of the gun upwards, gravity effect on the bullet ( it is considered negligible for first 100 ft) can easily make it happen. These are the calculations professional assassins' takes care of them.

How To: The Effect Of Gravity On A Bullet's Path

Gravity has an inordinate effect on a bullet's flight path. But because it's consistent, it can be easily accounted for to make an accurate shot.

gundigest.com

Actually, when you look at the new video above from the police guy, it seems to make it rather clear that that proposed "lighted window" was pretty much closed when the first shot rang out. I think we can see that rather clearly because we can see the reflections of that glass in that window before, during, and after the first shot. We couldn't see the reflection of the glass in Daves video in those crucial moments, which added to speculations about it having been opened. Here we can clearly see reflections on the window. We could argue though that that window might have been opened just very slightly. Although I would tend to say no to that. Also, I'm still pretty convinced that you can not shoot at Trumps head from that window, while clearing the fence, unless maybe, you would position your gun extremely high up in that window. Also, notice how very different the gun shots sound in this video (AGAIN!) compared to other videos. Which further reinforces my opinion that you can't say much about how each gun shot sounds in comparison to others.