French presidential elections.

Just one thing about electronic vote : the agrement for using it had been given by interior ministry, when N.Sarkozy was the minister...


P.S.
Sorry for my english. Hope my words are comprehensible ;)
 
...Well I am just "Very Concerned" for Laura, Ark and her organization which are homebased in France now!!!!

It seems that Psychopathy is still in its Growing and Expanding stage worldwide, and has yet to begin to 'Turn' and collapse on itself, destroying the very structures it built.

They seem to be closing in everywhere, no-where to go...tentacles circumscribing the world.
 
NORDIC HEALER said:
It seems that Psychopathy is still in its Growing and Expanding stage worldwide, and has yet to begin to 'Turn' and collapse on itself, destroying the very structures it built.
Interesting, last night I dreamt a kind of voice (myself or another voice, don't exactly know) said something like this. This system is destroying itself. Heck, too bad I don't remember the exact words, I should have noted them when I woke up right after. Basically it said we just had to let it destroying itself, like it was a natural process. There was thunder, and it was night in the dream.
 
Rylek said:
If there was any vote manipulatin, and it is a possibility, then the 3% of the vote would be very significant in this case. Has anyone looked into this possibility?
Yes, and even the use of the voting machine are sufficient to explain the results. Look for some cities using it :

Bourges : 50.05% Sarko - 49.95% Royal
Mimizan : 55.84% Royal - 44.16% Sarko
St Malo : 52.17% Sarko - 44.16% Royal
Mulhouse : 54.29% Sarko - 45.71% Royal
Le Mans: 56.19% Royal - 43.81% Sarko
Antibes : 70.89% Sarko - 29.11% Royal

If you want to see all the results , go there for the cities which have use voting machine:
http://medias.francetv.fr/bibl/url_autres/2007/04/06/29774477.htm

and for the results:
http://www.lexpress.fr/info/france/elysee_2007/resultats.asp?etp=231
 
a torrent of sarko's utterances on NEW french foreing policy
Making France a Power for the Future
interview to National Interest

part 1
part 2

Nicolas Sarkozy: Our first objective is of course to assure the security of France and its allies. Because our interests are global, so must be our responsibilities. Our security interests are inseparable to those of Europe and our other partners, those who share our goals and values. Faced with a new threat environment—terrorism, proliferation, etc. —cooperation will be the key to success. Our second objective must be to promote the universal values of liberty and the respect for human rights and dignity. I believe that France is only truly itself when it embodies liberty against oppression and reason against chaos. Lastly, our third objective for foreign policy is the promotion of our economic and commercial interests that will strengthen France as it takes on globalization.

My problem with realpolitik is that it limits diplomatic action in an effort to leave unchanged the reality of the world. "Stability" and status quo are their obsessions. But the pursuit of status quo is not a policy; it is akin to giving up. Stability for stability’s sake is not how I conceive the world. The steadfast adherence to stability leads to turning a blind eye to cruelty and injustice.

The friendship between Europe and the United States is a cornerstone of world stability, period. It is deep, sincere and unshakeable.

Our silence, when faced with 200,000 deaths and 400,000 refugees in Chechnya, is unbearable. Neither is our indifference when faced with 200,000 deaths due to ethnic massacres in Darfur.

Each country is currently experiencing some form of tensions—Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Israel and Palestine, Iran. In certain cases these countries are destabilized by external interference from other regional actors. . .

Dear France! Dear France!
 
Sarkozy said:
Our first objective is of course to assure the security of France and its allies.
Of course, it's the same with the US psychopaths - security, security, security! How do you assure security? The C's say - knowledge. But the US government and now their buddy Sarkozy in France say - ignorance. We must be kept ignorant, and with full faith in the good intentions of our governments. You know, secrecy, spying on own citizens, invading foreign nations that they claim support terrorism, remove freedoms from own people for security's sake, overthrowing foreign governments and installing puppet regimes, the usual.

Sarkozy said:
Because our interests are global, so must be our responsibilities.
Oh boy, he's going global people. And it's not a vacation in Cancun.

Sarkozy said:
Our security interests are inseparable to those of Europe and our other partners, those who share our goals and values.
Security interests. The only way a psychopath feels secure is when everyone else is subjugated and under his control. If something is not under his control it's a potential security threat. Which means people, wealth, land, everything. If we don't invade and take over the world, someone else will and we'll be taken over too, so we gotta pre-emptively do it for security reasons don't you know.

Sarkozy said:
Our second objective must be to promote the universal values of liberty and the respect for human rights and dignity.
I love how that's the second objective. Which means, we will accomplish the first objective of "security" (read: satisfying our extreme paranoia and need for control) using any means we deem necessary. And if there's any time left after we're done, we might promote some of those universal values. By "promote" he means go on TV and say how impotant they are, and maybe pass out some flyers.

Sarkozy said:
I believe that France is only truly itself when it embodies liberty against oppression and reason against chaos. Lastly, our third objective for foreign policy is the promotion of our economic and commercial interests that will strengthen France as it takes on globalization.
What he means is, we gotta bring our crap into everybody else's house whether they like it or not. It's our crap, we think it's good crap, so how dare they prefer their crap over ours? It's our way or the highway, as they're probably terrorists anyway.

Sarkozy said:
My problem with realpolitik is that it limits diplomatic action in an effort to leave unchanged the reality of the world. "Stability" and status quo are their obsessions. But the pursuit of status quo is not a policy; it is akin to giving up. Stability for stability’s sake is not how I conceive the world.
Whoa, he's conceiving the world now? This world is not his to conceive how it should be.
Sarkozy said:
The steadfast adherence to stability leads to turning a blind eye to cruelty and injustice.
Read: We must wage war in order to achieve peace. I know you're all used to your cozy stable atmosphere here in France, but we must join in the action with the US to get real peace don't you know. What is "real peace"? It's the peace of mind a psychopath gets once he can own everything and everyone, now THAT is the kind of stability that makes me all warm and fuzzy.

Sarkozy said:
The friendship between Europe and the United States is a cornerstone of world stability, period. It is deep, sincere and unshakeable.
So like I said, the US is clearly responsible for REAL stability in the world, isn't it obvious? We must help them in this goal to achieve this stability. What is that you ask? I just answered that in that part about "real peace" silly!

Sarkozy said:
Our silence, when faced with 200,000 deaths and 400,000 refugees in Chechnya, is unbearable. Neither is our indifference when faced with 200,000 deaths due to ethnic massacres in Darfur.
... or the deaths of the soldiers of our friend in Iraq. We must help them in their slaughterfest, and when all the Iraqis are dead or in cages, our soldiers will no longer die, and we'll have peace at last.

Sarkozy said:
Each country is currently experiencing some form of tensions—Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Israel and Palestine, Iran. In certain cases these countries are destabilized by external interference from other regional actors. . .
Like I just said, see how US stabilized Iraq by its interference, but how Iran is constantly destabilizing it? I'm sure it's obvious to everyone by now. Well US didn't stabilize it all the way yet of course, not all the Iraqis are dead or in cages YET. But when they are, I promise you lasting peace and stability. Then we will take care of all the other tensions similarly and finally world peace! And finally we will bring the same stability to our own nations, soon all the French and all the Americans will be either dead or in cages too! Terrorists cannot suicide-attack if they are in cages, and since anybody could potentially be a terrorist, everybody must be put in a cage for your security. This is not stability for its own sake, it's stability for a very good reason - it's the only way I, Sarkozy, and my fellow psychopaths will feel secure, peaceful, and happy.

P.S. - I love you all and uhh free beer for everyone! *hears cheers and applause*

Seriously, if you just read between the lines, I think he just clearly outlined his plans for the near future using some doublespeak and conversive thinking, the psychopath that he is. I'm kinda shocked that the French voted him in, but when was the last time a psychopath didn't commit voter fraud and forced his way in? I can only hope that the French are not the Americans, and will take to the streets as they are historically known to do as soon as the psychopathic policies begin to be implemented. Otherwise it's a slippery slope. And I know that Americans "took to the streets" to some extent with nothing resulting from it, so this has to be truly massive and final, and the French at least know how to do it as they've done it before.
 
Recently Wayne Madsen wrote about Sarkozy and the purge of French intelligence service. This topic already popped up on the forum here (http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=5152.msg34159#msg34159)
_www.waynemadsenreport.com
Wayne Madsen May 10 2007 said:
Neo-con purge of French intelligence services begins. Only days after the election of neo-con Nicolas Sarkozy as President of France, the expected neo-con purge of anti-Sarkozy members of the French intelligence and security services has begun. Captain Thierry Tintoni of the Renseignements generaux (RG) (General Intelligence service) has been questioned by a secret tribunal for violating secrecy laws. Tintoni is accused of providing defeated Socialist Party candidate Segolene Royal with damaging information on Sarkozy's conduct while Interior Minister. The French intelligence services will now face the same purges that befell similar neo-con purges of the U.S., British, Australian, Danish, and Italian intelligence services. ...
Putting in his cronies for the dirty work, getting rid of normal people in key positions.
Nicolas Sarkozy said:
The friendship between Europe and the United States is a cornerstone of world stability, period. It is deep, sincere and unshakeable.
What this friendship means is quite clear:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=5152.msg34160#msg34160
Keit said:
It reminds me about something I've read in Political Ponerology.
Read this first:
Whether directly or indirectly, i.e. by means of deviant “agents� , this call of pathocracy, once appropriately “deckedout� , reaches a significantly wider circle of people, including both individuals with various psychological deviations and those who are frustrated, deprived of the opportunity to earn an education and make use of their talents, physically or morally injured, or simply primitive. The scope of the response to this call may vary in proportion, but nowhere will it represent the majority. Nonetheless, the home-bred spellbinders who arise never take into account the fact that they are not able to enrapture the majority.
And now read the footnote by Laura for this quote:
Noticable in any country. In the present day, when the United States is well on the way to becoming a full-blown pathocracy, and is thus the source of the contamination, spellbinders for the deviant reality promote “American style� economics and “culture,� and are even viewed by their fellow countrymen as “America-ophiles� . Most people do not understand that the first step to becoming part of the Global pathocracy that America is attempting to impose on the world is to become part of the economic system as it is formulated in America. A recent example of a country rejecting this maneuver is France’s rejection of the European Constitution, a document focusing on the neo-liberal transformation of the European economy along the lines of the U.S. model.
 
I heard this news yesterday:

PARIS - The Associated Press

Just two days after his pal Nicolas Sarkozy won the presidency, French rock legend Johnny Hallyday is already planning to abandon his tax-motivated self-exile in Switzerland and return to France.

In a much publicized departure, Hallyday moved to Gstaad late last year to avoid heavy French taxes. The move came in the heat of the election campaign, in which Hallyday openly backed Sarkozy - a conservative who pledged tax cuts - over his Socialist rival Segolene Royal. Asked on RTL radio yesterday whether they would come back to France now that Sarkozy is taking over, Hallyday's wife Laeticia said, "Oui." She did not say when. Sarkozy has proposed that income tax be limited to no more than 50 percent, down from a 60-percent limit that will go into effect in January.
J.Hallyday was supposed to get the Belgian nationality (which he obviously did not get in the end), then move to Monaco.

Many Big business guys have moved to Belgium because of the ISF.

How many other wealthy people will move back to France now ?
I think it's clear which way Sarkozy is trying to drive France towards.
 
Tigersoap said:
I heard this news yesterday:
(snip)
Many Big business guys have moved to Belgium because of the ISF.

How many other wealthy people will move back to France now ?
I think it's clear which way Sarkozy is trying to drive France towards.
Jean-Philippe Smet aka ah-que-Johnny finally said he would not come back to France right now, and would wait till Sarko applies this measure in effect. The Stepford wife Laeticia commented that the taxes were "scandalous" (or "inacceptable", don't remember the exact term. But she sounded quite outraged at this "injustice").
Yeah, like it's scandalous to live with 800 Euros/months.
I hope the SMICards and workers who voted for Big Boss are quickly going to realise on which side he is, and who he's going to favour, after his dinner at the Fouquets and his trip to Malta, in a private jet and luxury yacht.
Another example of where his "heart" goes :
his programme includes a cancelling of inheritance taxes. Which most people swallowed naively saying it was a fair measure, when you have "laboured all your life", to leave something to your children without having to pay for "the fruit of your labour" (Sarkozy sounds very biblical sometimes). What a lot of people don't know is that only very rich people pay inheritance taxes. Millionnaires ! Poor or modest people are already exempt from this tax. It's all demagogy.

There'll be a big demonstration on S's inauguration day, the 16th may. People are required to dress in black and demonstrate peacefully to express their sadness and discontent.
 
Just curious to know - do the Chateau crew get to vote in the presidential election or is it restricted to French citizens?
 
ec1968 said:
Just curious to know - do the Chateau crew get to vote in the presidential election or is it restricted to French citizens?

It is restricted to French citizens.
 
1h15 before officials result, François Hollande (Left) is given as the winner with 52/53% so Sarkozy should be out.

Hollande don't seem to be a psycho so I think France will regain some balance. Can be important for SOTT headquarters.
 
I'm keeping my fingers crossed, but not holding my breath.

What is known about Hollande, his cronies, history?
 
Ellipse said:
1h15 before officials result, François Hollande (Left) is given as the winner with 52/53% so Sarkozy should be out.

Let's hope he spends most of his post-political life in jail.
 
Back
Top Bottom