Domagoj said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatian_War_of_Independence
This is what we are talking about for those who don't know.
The Ten-Day War (Slovene: desetdnevna vojna) or the Slovenian Independence War (slovenska osamosvojitvena vojna), also the Weekend War (vikend-vojna)[5] was a civil war in Yugoslavia that followed the Slovenian declaration of independence on 25 June 1991.[6] It was fought between the Slovenian Territorial Defence (Slovene: Teritorialna obramba Republike Slovenije) and the Yugoslav People's Army (YPA) in 1991, after Slovenia declared its independence. It lasted from 27 June 1991 until 7 July 1991, when the Brijuni Accords were signed.
Mr. Scott said:Interesting... At the same time, in Slovenia you had the Ten Day War:
The Croat–Bosniak War was a conflict between the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the self-proclaimed Croatian Community of Herzeg-Bosnia supported by the Republic of Croatia, that lasted from June 19, 1992 – February 23, 1994, caused by the Karađorđevo and Graz agreements and the previously-unified Croat forces turning on the Bosniaks. The ICTY effectively determined the war's nature to be international between Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina in numerous verdicts against Croat political and military leaders. The Croat-Bosniak war is often referred to as the war in a war because it was part of the larger Bosnian War.
H.E. said:aelyrsenn said:It is amazing how so many Serbs today still don't accept they were the aggressors, no mater who or which country/organization was behind all of it...And that if you attack someone you should expect them to defend themselves.
Talking about mainstream media...
Yozilla said:Yes it was very emotional reaction from vast majority of Croats, hence it is interesting how general Gotovina made his first statement on welcome in Zageb on Friday:"The war is over - we must concentrate on future" or something similar in this context - so no sign of manipulation for now. And if he would try something like that - i will find it very repulsive - and pretty sure that i won't be the only one.
FWIW I personally believe general Gotovina was an honest soldier who was caught up and sacrificed in political games. Atrocities were committed by paramilitary formations on both sides, hardly ever by official Croatian Army or Yugoslav Army. What he said is the key, trying to put the blame on one side or another will not contribute very much to peaceful coexistence of Croats and Serbs in the future.
I call on all citizens of the Croatian to go out on Sunday, January 22, 2012 on a referendum and vote according to their own conscience. Hereby I want to announce that I will vote tomorrow in The Hague for Croatian accession to the European Union - where Croatia and civilization historically belongs, a referendum is only formally confirmed. Croatia's place in the European Union.
grini said:Does anyone remember when was EU membership referendum this year?
A referendum on the EU accession of the Republic of Croatia was held on 22 January 2012. Croatia finished accession (membership) negotiations on 30 June 2011 and signed the Treaty of Accession on 9 December 2011, setting it on course to become the bloc's 28th member state. The Constitution of Croatia requires that a binding referendum be held on any political union reducing national sovereignty, such as via European Union membership. On 23 December 2011 the Croatian Parliament made a preliminary decision on EU accession and determined that the referendum would be held on 22 January 2012. The 2012 Croatian EU accession referendum was the first referendum held in Croatia since the Croatian independence referendum held more than 20 years earlier, in 1991.
The Croatian EU accession referendum campaign officially began on 3 January 2012; a yes vote was supported by both the political parties in government and the larger opposition parties in Croatia. The largest parties' joint support of EU membership existed since 2005, when the Alliance for Europe (Croatian: Savez za Europu) was set up as an informal alliance aimed at achieving membership as a strategic goal of Croatian foreign policy. Opposition to Croatian EU accession was voiced by non-parliamentary parties only. The pro-membership and informational campaign – which included television promotional videos, addresses by leading government and opposition politicians, and information booklets mailed to every household in Croatia – was announced to have cost 4.8 million kuna (c. €640,000). Opinion polling was regularly carried out by three different agencies; since May 2011, percentages supporting EU membership ranged between 55% and 63%. The Croatian State Election Committee was in charge of vote organization, ballot counting and result publication.
The EU accession referendum passed with 66.27% votes cast in support, 33.13% against the proposed joining of the EU and 0.60% invalid or blank votes; it also passed in all Croatian counties. The greatest support for the referendum was recorded in Međimurje and Brod-Posavina counties, at 75.73% and 72.61% respectively. The lowest support for EU accession was recorded in Dubrovnik-Neretva County, where 42.22% of votes were cast against the proposal. The average official turnout for the referendum was 43.51%; the highest official turnouts were recorded in the city of Zagreb and in Varaždin County at 55.13% and 53.66% respectively. The result was binding on the Croatian Parliament; as a consequence, it ratified the accession treaty on 9 March 2012. The outcome was welcomed by all political parties represented in Croatia's parliament; some right-wing politicians objected to the low turnout and what they consider a loss of independence.
Exactly, we can spend days on end arguing who is bigger villain and who did more atrocities. The bottom line is as long as people blindly identify with religious and national division they will always be an easy victim for psychopaths. That has been the case in Balkans since the ancient times.Mr. Scott said:... except maybe psychopaths + CIA vs. the entire region!
Zadius Sky said:The Croat–Bosniak War was a conflict between the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the self-proclaimed Croatian Community of Herzeg-Bosnia supported by the Republic of Croatia, that lasted from June 19, 1992 – February 23, 1994, caused by the Karađorđevo and Graz agreements and the previously-unified Croat forces turning on the Bosniaks. The ICTY effectively determined the war's nature to be international between Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina in numerous verdicts against Croat political and military leaders. The Croat-Bosniak war is often referred to as the war in a war because it was part of the larger Bosnian War.
Mr. Scott said:Interesting... At the same time, in Slovenia you had the Ten Day War:
...
Of course, depending on what you read, they make it sound like Croatia invaded Slovenia. Somehow, I think all this chaos and war had very little to do with Serb vs Croat, or Croat vs Slovenian, or anything else... except maybe psychopaths + CIA vs. the entire region!
Zadius Sky said:Hmm...there's another war during that time as well, involving Croatia: Croat–Bosniak War
The Croat–Bosniak War was a conflict between the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the self-proclaimed Croatian Community of Herzeg-Bosnia supported by the Republic of Croatia, that lasted from June 19, 1992 – February 23, 1994, caused by the Karađorđevo and Graz agreements and the previously-unified Croat forces turning on the Bosniaks. The ICTY effectively determined the war's nature to be international between Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina in numerous verdicts against Croat political and military leaders. The Croat-Bosniak war is often referred to as the war in a war because it was part of the larger Bosnian War.
Zadius Sky said:grini said:Does anyone remember when was EU membership referendum this year?
Here's the bit on that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatian_European_Union_membership_referendum,_2012
A referendum on the EU accession of the Republic of Croatia was held on 22 January 2012. Croatia finished accession (membership) negotiations on 30 June 2011 and signed the Treaty of Accession on 9 December 2011, setting it on course to become the bloc's 28th member state. The Constitution of Croatia requires that a binding referendum be held on any political union reducing national sovereignty, such as via European Union membership. On 23 December 2011 the Croatian Parliament made a preliminary decision on EU accession and determined that the referendum would be held on 22 January 2012. The 2012 Croatian EU accession referendum was the first referendum held in Croatia since the Croatian independence referendum held more than 20 years earlier, in 1991.
The Croatian EU accession referendum campaign officially began on 3 January 2012; a yes vote was supported by both the political parties in government and the larger opposition parties in Croatia. The largest parties' joint support of EU membership existed since 2005, when the Alliance for Europe (Croatian: Savez za Europu) was set up as an informal alliance aimed at achieving membership as a strategic goal of Croatian foreign policy. Opposition to Croatian EU accession was voiced by non-parliamentary parties only. The pro-membership and informational campaign – which included television promotional videos, addresses by leading government and opposition politicians, and information booklets mailed to every household in Croatia – was announced to have cost 4.8 million kuna (c. €640,000). Opinion polling was regularly carried out by three different agencies; since May 2011, percentages supporting EU membership ranged between 55% and 63%. The Croatian State Election Committee was in charge of vote organization, ballot counting and result publication.
The EU accession referendum passed with 66.27% votes cast in support, 33.13% against the proposed joining of the EU and 0.60% invalid or blank votes; it also passed in all Croatian counties. The greatest support for the referendum was recorded in Međimurje and Brod-Posavina counties, at 75.73% and 72.61% respectively. The lowest support for EU accession was recorded in Dubrovnik-Neretva County, where 42.22% of votes were cast against the proposal. The average official turnout for the referendum was 43.51%; the highest official turnouts were recorded in the city of Zagreb and in Varaždin County at 55.13% and 53.66% respectively. The result was binding on the Croatian Parliament; as a consequence, it ratified the accession treaty on 9 March 2012. The outcome was welcomed by all political parties represented in Croatia's parliament; some right-wing politicians objected to the low turnout and what they consider a loss of independence.
Yozilla said:It is also interesting how how Veselin Šljivančanin commented this outcome:
_http://www.slobodnaevropa.org/archive/news/20121118/500/500.html?id=24774227
In this article Šljivancanin is approving the verdict - which is totally opposite from other reactions from Serbia. One sentence is quite significant to me:
You can think of Croats whatever you want, but they taught us a lesson in dignity and we should learn from them"
Laura said:It is freaking unbelievable that all this could have happened right under everyone's nose, in a so-called modern time, and the whole rest of the world just blunders on in ignorance.
Persej said:You should quote the entire paragraph:
"If the international community thinks that so many exiled people is not a crime, the generals are not guilty for that! They, like us, were given assignments by the country that they have honorably carried out. It's just that their country stood behind them, and ours are in constant fear what other people will say. You can think of Croats whatever you want, but they taught us a lesson in dignity and we should learn from them."
What he wanted to say is that Serbs should like Croats supports their generals no matter what crimes they committed in the war because generals were just following their orders. And because Šljivančanin is general himself it is no wonder why he is approving the verdict.
Ex-chief prosecutor denounces Hague ruling
Former Chief Hague Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte has said that the acquittal of Croatian generals Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač "is not justice".
The Hague released Gotovina and Markač on appeal on Friday. They were originally sentenced to 24 and 18 years in prison for crimes against Croatia's ethnic Serbs during and after Operation Storm in 1995.
In an interview for the Belgrade-based tabloid Blic, Del Ponte said that she was "shocked" by the trial's outcome:
"I was very surprised and stupefied. It is completely incredible what happened after the sentence of 24 years in prison for Gotovina. Unbelievable. I cannot accept it. I feel full solidarity with the Serb victims of the crime. The crime, that we backed up with hard evidence."
She added that she "guessed that the facts were probably interpreted in a different manner".
Del Ponte stated she had not read the argumentation behind the decision, but that she opposed it completely, and "could not see how it could be accepted".
"The Serbian government and Serbs cannot accept such a verdict, and I agree fully with what I heard them say on televisoin. It is clear a crime was committed - and the question now is, who committed it".
"We will see what will happen next, but this certainly is not justice," the former Swiss and Hague prosecutor said.
The crime was proven and the verdict shows it, she said. The evidence is there, but it was perhaps interpreted differently, Del Ponte continued, adding that it was unacceptable either way. The decision is, however, final and nothing further can be done, she said, and added that the tribunal's credibility was undermined by the ruling.
She added that she expected the verdict regarding former KLA leader and ethnic Albanian politician from Kosovo Ramush Haradinaj to be delivered in 15 days, and expressed her fear that "the same thing could happen in that case as well".
Suspicion is emerging that the verdict was not influenced by evidence, but by politics, lobbying money, or something else not related to the court, Del Ponte concluded.
Reacting to her interview on Tuesday, Gotovina's defense lawyer Luka Mištić announced that he would "report the former chief prosecutor to the Swiss Bar Association". According to the lawyer, this complaint against her would be based on "ethical grounds".
_http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2012&mm=11&dd=20&nav_id=83250
Hague judge says justice has not been served
Member of the Hague Tribunal’s Appeals Chamber Fausto Pocar has assessed that the acquittal of two Croat generals is “contrary to any sense of justice”.
The Italian judge did not vote for the acquittal of Croat Generals Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač on Friday.
“I do not believe that justice has been served when you overturn the guilty verdict, which the initial trial chamber did not make lightly which shows a 1,300-page analysis, with only several paragraphs, without a careful consideration of the documents and an appropriate explanation,” Pocar said.
The Appeals Chamber acquitted Gotovina and Markač with a majority of three votes to two of almost all charges for the expulsion of Serbs from Knin Krajina and other crimes during and after the Operation Storm in the summer of 1995.
The Appeals Chamber therefore overturned the initial verdict which sentenced Gotovina to 24 and Markač to 18 years in prison for crimes against Serb civilians.
“I am fundamentally opposed to the entire verdict in the appeal process which is contrary to any sense of justice,” Pocar stressed.
Another member of the Appeals Chamber, Carmel Agius of Malta, also strongly opposed the acquittal.
The decision to acquit the two Croat generals was made by Judges Theodor Meron of the U.S., Patrick Robinson of Jamaica and Mehmet Guney of Turkey.
Pocar pointed to “numerous mistakes and wrong constructions in the decision-making of the majority of the judges” and added that the verdict was based on a misinterpretation of conclusions made by the initial trial chamber and on the violation of the court practice and standards in the appeal process.
According to Pocar and Agius, most of the judges were quick to neglect and reject a large part of the extensive evidence material that the initial verdict was based on.
Pocar stressed that the court had determined at the original trial that transcripts of former Croatian President Franjo Tuđman's Brioni meeting with the top military and police officials showed that the Croat officials did not have the protection of the Serb civilians in mind.
He added that it had been confirmed several weeks after the Operation Storm, when Tuđman compared the Serbs with “cancer that is spreading” and said that “they (Serbs) did not even have time to take their dirty money and dirty laundry”.
“Most of them (judges) failed to show where the first trial chamber made a mistake in determining that the joint criminal enterprise did exist,” the Italian judge said.
Agius said that the verdict was based on a “narrow, artificial, deficient, confucing and problematic” approach which led to “incorrect results”.
_http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2012&mm=11&dd=17&nav_id=83206
Persej said:Does this sound to you like a fair trial?