Interesting coincidence - I've been thinking about my own rejection of my mother over the last few days.
The C's have said to read fairy tales for clues for male-female relationships. According Marie Louise Von Franz, who pioneered the Western fairy tale renaissance, fairy tales represent a universal instinctive layer of the human psyche - there are similar stories with similar lessons all across the world. She writes that in the current blip of time in our culture, there is no adequate image of the Feminine. My understanding is that therefore boys and men have a hard time figuring out how to relate to their Mothers, their own feminine side, their intimate partners, women in general, and also all things feminine, including the Earth.
It's gotten even worse since von Franz wrote this decades ago in her book The Feminine in Fairy Tales. Not only do we have the Protestant anti-feminine assumptions suffusing some of the cultural air that we breathe, there is also the postmodernist toxin that cynically chokes out any conception of the divine, the Faces of God, or the hyperdimensional archetypes with whom we are always in contact, and with whom we always must negotiate. So everyone - men, women, boys, girls - are all at a pretty big disadvantage because we have only the slightest idea of the mythological material that could guide us through the labyrinth of decent human relationships.
I've been learning that fairy tales provide roadmaps of a soul's initiation, or in psychological terms, the path to individuation - becoming one's own person, finding out who you TRULY are, and discovering your destiny.
The fairy tale material suggests that the roadmap for men follows a certain five-fold pattern:
- bonding with the mother and separation from the mother
- bonding with the father and separation from the father
- bonding with the mentor, who points the way to the boy's unique soul
- apprenticeship with one's Self, or heeding the call of the soul
- Heiros gamos, or the holy marriage to the Queen
I think the word quintessential is a good one for describing this pattern. Quint, meaning 5, + essential meaning necessary or vital, and also denoting the Essence, as opposed to the False Personality. I think of it sort of like a 5-pointed star, and the life can jump from one point to another at any time, or someone can exist in a state of tension between two or three, or maybe all 5 at once.
The main point is that the separation from or rejection of the mother is understood to be an vital step in the growth of any man. Given our muy loco cultural moment, I think it would take a superhuman effort to do it well, whatever 'well' looks like. At any rate, I don't think it can be done without suffering, as it's sort of a death and rebirth at the same time. That's what its felt like to me, at least, as I'm navigating changes in the relationship. Sort of like a river in flood season - the best I've been able to do is stay on board and try to ride the emotional rapids.
The C's have said to read fairy tales for clues for male-female relationships. According Marie Louise Von Franz, who pioneered the Western fairy tale renaissance, fairy tales represent a universal instinctive layer of the human psyche - there are similar stories with similar lessons all across the world. She writes that in the current blip of time in our culture, there is no adequate image of the Feminine. My understanding is that therefore boys and men have a hard time figuring out how to relate to their Mothers, their own feminine side, their intimate partners, women in general, and also all things feminine, including the Earth.
Women in the Western world nowadays seem to seek images which could define their identity. This search is motivated by a kind of disorientation and a deep uncertainty in modern women. In the West, this uncertainty is due to the fact, as Jung has pointed out, that women have no metaphysical representant in the Christian God-image.
Protestantism must accept the blame of being a pure men’s religion. Catholicism has at least the Virgin Mary as an archetypal representant of femininity, but this feminine archetypal image is incomplete because it encompasses only the sublime and light aspects of the divine feminine principle and therefore does not express the whole feminine principle.
In studying fairy tales, I first came across feminine images which seem to me to complement this lack in the Christian religion. Fairy tales express the creative fantasies of the rural and less educated layers of the population. They have the great advantage of being naive (not “literary”) and of having been worked out in collective groups, with the result that they contain purely archetypal material unobscured by personal problems.
Until about the seventeenth century, it was the adult population that was interested in fairy tales. Their allocation to the nursery is a late development, which probably has to do with the rejection of the irrational, and development of the rational outlook, so that they came to be regarded as nonsense and old wives’ tales and good enough for children. It is only today that we rediscover their immense psychological value.
It's gotten even worse since von Franz wrote this decades ago in her book The Feminine in Fairy Tales. Not only do we have the Protestant anti-feminine assumptions suffusing some of the cultural air that we breathe, there is also the postmodernist toxin that cynically chokes out any conception of the divine, the Faces of God, or the hyperdimensional archetypes with whom we are always in contact, and with whom we always must negotiate. So everyone - men, women, boys, girls - are all at a pretty big disadvantage because we have only the slightest idea of the mythological material that could guide us through the labyrinth of decent human relationships.
I've been learning that fairy tales provide roadmaps of a soul's initiation, or in psychological terms, the path to individuation - becoming one's own person, finding out who you TRULY are, and discovering your destiny.
The fairy tale material suggests that the roadmap for men follows a certain five-fold pattern:
- bonding with the mother and separation from the mother
- bonding with the father and separation from the father
- bonding with the mentor, who points the way to the boy's unique soul
- apprenticeship with one's Self, or heeding the call of the soul
- Heiros gamos, or the holy marriage to the Queen
I think the word quintessential is a good one for describing this pattern. Quint, meaning 5, + essential meaning necessary or vital, and also denoting the Essence, as opposed to the False Personality. I think of it sort of like a 5-pointed star, and the life can jump from one point to another at any time, or someone can exist in a state of tension between two or three, or maybe all 5 at once.
The main point is that the separation from or rejection of the mother is understood to be an vital step in the growth of any man. Given our muy loco cultural moment, I think it would take a superhuman effort to do it well, whatever 'well' looks like. At any rate, I don't think it can be done without suffering, as it's sort of a death and rebirth at the same time. That's what its felt like to me, at least, as I'm navigating changes in the relationship. Sort of like a river in flood season - the best I've been able to do is stay on board and try to ride the emotional rapids.