I would say, that it would be correkt for both types, if you do it without concentrator, but you could also use oxygen from gas bottles to get a higher percentage, but that would be expensive.I have a question though about hard vs soft chambers... what is the percentage of oxygen youre breathing in soft chambers? Some of the articles i read say that in soft chambers you only inhale 24% oxygen whereas in hard chambers its 100%. Is this accurate? Or can the lower percentage in soft chambers be fixed with an oxygen concentrator? I read through the whole thread so far and from what i have understood buying an oxygen concentrator with the mHBOT unit you can breathe in close to 100% oxygen. Without the oxygen concentrator its only 24%. Am i correct here?
Its 24% without an oxygen concentrator.Some of the articles i read say that in soft chambers you only inhale 24% oxygen whereas in hard chambers its 100%. Is this accurate?
Yes you will need the concentrator.can the lower percentage in soft chambers be fixed with an oxygen concentrator?
Correct, the mask is connected to the concentrator that produces close to 100% oxygen, its around 94%.i have understood buying an oxygen concentrator with the mHBOT unit you can breathe in close to 100% oxygen. Without the oxygen concentrator its only 24%. Am i correct here?
The oxygen concentrator raise up the oxygen rate to 95% or so. Without the concentrator the oxygen is 21%I read through the whole thread so far and from what i have understood buying an oxygen concentrator with the mHBOT unit you can breathe in close to 100% oxygen. Without the oxygen concentrator its only 24%. Am i correct here?
WOW! this is fantastic Pierre. It's like a miracle. It agains proves that knowledge ( information and practice) can protect. I wish you to recover fully.About 7 months ago I was dying. Hemiplegia, loss of memory, loss of speech, sleeping 18 hours/day to name a few symptoms. The grade 4 brain tumors were inoperable and they were growing at an alarming rate causing bleeding and massive edema.
Then I started chemotherapy which shows only 15% success rate (stabilization) and did also SRT sessions. In my case the chemo and/or the SRT was successful and the tumors unexpectedly stopped growing.
The doctors stopped the chemo treatment in May after the 5th session because the side effects were too nasty esp. the destruction of nerves endings. around the same time we got the HBOT, which I coupled with ketogenic diet.
Yesterday, I got the interpretation of the latest MRI after 3 months free of chemo. Lo and behold, the images show a slight reduction or a stabilization (depending on the interpretation) of the tumors!
I've done about 50 HBOT sessions since May and I've been steadily gaining back motricity, speech, memory, cognitive function. I've even resumed writing my latest book!
Absolutely, it's amazing, Pierre! I'm so very happy for you!That's amazing Pierre! I'm very happy for you!
Another question is about the pressure. Is 1.3ata enough? There are a lot of people (including the guy in the clinic i went to) saying higher pressures is better but from reading this thread it seems that might lead to toxicity am i correct here? I will be in the US next month and am thinking of purchasing a unit but youre not allowed to own anything above 1.3ata.. i was looking into getting a soft chamber with at least 1.5ata. So is 1.3ata sufficient? Seems kinda low.
The guy at the clinic I went to said soft chambers are not effective but I dont think he has all the info plus hes obviously invested in selling his services. It seems many of these hard chamber hbot services twist things around in their descriptions to retain business. But im not an expert so some of these guys sound convincing and it makes sense that the more the better but that doesnt seem to be accurate from what ive read so far in this thread.
I am still wondering whether I should just do hard chamber at a hbot clinic at higher pressures (2.0-2.4) or if i should just get a soft chamber. I wish I could get a soft chamber at 1.5ata in the US. But i would have to settle for 1.3ata so I would have to take many many sessions to get the same effect like how Laura is doing. Seems more cost effective overall and safer as well.
That's correct we have Macy Pan 1.5 ATA.The Chateau also has a soft chamber 1.5 ATA Macy Pan, if I recall correctly. Hard chambers may be more effective because they can generate higher pressure, 2 ATA and above.