Niall said:Former education minister Luc Ferry asked in a tweet: "Who is the cretin or cretine who invented (this) unpronounceable inclusive writing?" "Rationalist" feminist Peggy Sastre, writing in the weekly Le Point, called it "intellectual terrorism".
Indeed! They spend hours and tons of money on this debate and these utterly ridiculous changes just to show open mindedness, but notice that they haven't been able to go beyong nouns, and mainly titles and professions. Whether one agrees or not with a language already being gendered, that is what French, Spanish, German, Russian and many others are. You can invent new ridiculous "all inclusive" nouns, but in order for them to stick, you need to change the entire language as well. That is asking for a step further than what is already being attempted in anglo-saxon and nordic countries, where the gender business is more prevalent.
Adjectives and pronouns adapt their form depending on the gender of the noun. So, if you use a "new" gender (or those ridiculous dots), you have to do it as well for the rest of the nominal phrase. Just impossible without imposing it way more ferociously than in anglo-saxon countries. Linguistic tyranny under the guise of gender freedom?! It might get to that, but you'd think that peoples with a gendered language would try to put more of a fight, than non-gendered languages. At this point, though, everything is possible. And I think that they are achieving the main purpose anyway, whether it ends up being fully reflected in language or not: DIVISION and SUBMISSION.
All these changes mean more dumbing down of language as an expression of thought and worldview, plus more oppression. And some people buy it for the sake of "equality". Under that same label, which covers the new definition of "freedom", is when a man is acquitted of raping an 11 year old girl because she "consented."
This all reminds me of what Laura wrote in The Wave about the tower of Babel and the brain hemispheres, and the meaning behind that (I should have quoted the whole of chapter 24, but it would be a bit long):
A: First of all, there was no “Noah”. Secondly there was no actual real flood as depicted in that story. Thirdly, the whole story was a symbolic message as opposed to an actual event.
Q: (L) What did actually occur and what does the symbolism have to tell us?
A: It is a very broad representation. It simply means that there was a cataclysmic event that did envelop the whole planet at that time and that those that were ready to experience that as part of their soul de-velopment without exiting the body, were warned ahead of time. But not by trying to manipulate events, but by simply allowing faith to let them acquire knowledge and being naturally drawn into position to experience what they needed to experience to survive the event.
Q: (L) What was the event a hundred or so years after the flood of Noah that was described as the confusing of languages, or the tower of Babel?
A: Spiritual confluence.
Q: (L) What purpose did the individuals who came together to build the tower intend for said tower?
A: Electromagnetic concentration of all gravity waves.
Q: (L) And what did they intend to do with these concentrated waves?
A: Mind alteration of masses.
Q: (L) What intention did they have in altering the mind of the masses?
A: Spiritual unification of the masses.
Q: (L) Who were the “gods” that looked down on the tower of Babel, at those who were building it with the intention of unification, and decided to destroy their works?
A: Lizards.
Q: (L) Okay, so the Lizzies blew up the tower of Babel. What else did they do to the minds of mankind; did they do something causing literal disruption of their understanding of language?
A: Close. Brainwashing of masses.
Q: (L) Did they do this through implants and abduction?
A: Partly.
From the clues above, it seems to me there was something going on prior to the time of the destruction of Atlantis that was dangerous to the Controllers. Not only that, it seems some of the survivors retained this information and were planning on employing it in the Tower of Babel project, the destruction of which has always been presented as an “example” that we should not aspire to be like the gods.
We also recall that the cities of Sodom and Gomorra were pre-sented as being extremely depraved and that they concentrated on sexual excess, which also brought about their destruction.
Well, if it is true that all this sexual stuff is “food of the gods”, so to speak, then what can there be about sex that they don’t want us to know? [...]
From all I have been able to determine, the ancient civilizations that were in direct contact with fourth-density STO beings were those that were part of the megalithic culture. There are traces of this great age of humankind from China and India to the Atlantic Ocean, and from South America to the middle of the Pacific. According to the most recent research, the very oldest form of religion that can be identified was the worship of the Celestial Mother Goddess by wandering hunter gatherers.
It was thought for a long time that such cultures were very primitive and narrow, but it has since been discovered that this is not the case. New archaeological sites are being excavated at the present time (Jomon in Japan, for example) that show very advanced levels of art and culture among these husbandmen of the Earth. The dis-cernible idea of the religion of these peoples is that of an infinite bounty of the Great Mother. It is thought that they didn’t engage in agriculture because the idea of owning land may have been abhorrent to them. The idea of forcing the Earth to yield rather than accepting the natural abundance the Goddess provided was simply not a part of their philosophy. Their Goddess was a “Star Being” rather than the later transmogrification into the Earth Mother/agriculture goddess, and this Star Being was worshipped in Temples that were laid out along Celestial Archetypes.
And, there is also something very mysterious about these early people – they seemed to have had the super powers of the Golden Age. [...]
The interesting thing is that the peoples who did erect them are still, in most circles, considered to be barbarians because they did not build cities, engage in agriculture, develop the wheel, or writing.
Yet, they did something that clearly cannot and was not done by “civilized” peoples who did all of those “civilized” things. They had some sort of “power” that we cannot replicate and do not understand. Yet, this very power may be the answer to our question about why and how sex was implicated in the fall of man, the flood of Noah, and numerous other events that may lead us to some interesting discoveries.
[...] The divinity in the old religion was not a female or a male figure, but was both male and female. This does not mean that the ancient peoples were hermaphrodites, but rather it symbolized the balanced right- and left-brain function state prior to the Fall. [...] They were cultures in which men and women were in harmony and in which the brain functions were balanced so that they were enabled to “transduce” the cosmic energies into their reality for the purpose of active creation.
[...] The goal of Bacchic culture and the secret teachings of the mystical traditions were harmony, balance, and unity between men and women and between the male and female aspects within each person.
The mystical literature tells us that the feminine principle corresponds to the intuitive, creative, intimate, immediate, unitive, nourishing, sensuous, spontaneous aspects of our consciousness. The masculine principle reflects logic, labeling, theoretical, legal, boundary consciousness, rule-following, mission-oriented, competitive characteristics. In this categorization, we can easily see that we are not referring to biophysical maleness or femaleness, but rather to the left and right modes of consciousness within all peoples.
So, when it was said that the female energy consorted with the wrong side and lost knowledge and power thereby, we can now see that it was a rewiring of the thinking, by giving dominance to the part of the brain that literally inhibits creativity and access to univer-sal energies that can be accessed by anyone. It was by taking the direct knowledge of the Cosmos via empirical observation, i.e., knowledge and replacing it with the wishful thinking, conceptual, imaginary mode of a Creator God outside of the Cosmos, and thus only accessible via intercession, that we lost our connection. But, we can’t be throwing the baby out with the bathwater here. We have to remember that science is a child of the right hemisphere, but is reared by the left hemisphere. In fact, without both aspects in proper balance, very little can be achieved. The King rules the material realm by virtue of his union with the Queen.
The direct, sensual experience of the world, unclouded by preconceptions or anticipation, is precisely what constitutes scientific empiricism and objectivity. It is at the root of the Cassiopaean motto: “knowledge protects”. But knowledge only protects if it is utilized.
Q: (L) Acquiring knowledge is akin to acquiring energy? Or light? Light energy?
A: Not exactly. That would be like saying that “filling up” at the gas station is akin to acquiring speed.
Q: (L) So, knowledge and light are like the gas for the car, but speed comes from utilization?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And utilization means …
A: Knowledge application, which generates energy, which, in turn, generates light.
[...] Now, of course, there are those who claim that to know God, and to become Godlike, one must access the blissful states of Godlike Love. So they work all their lives to achieve this emotional ecstasy of God using an image or a concept. They have missed the key that becoming Godlike consists of observing and experiencing the Cosmos directly, which results in knowledge. Knowledge leads to awareness of what is out there. Awareness of what is out there gives one the ability to think with the left-brain in concord with what the right-brain observes. This merging of the two halves of the brain – observation and thinking/formulating – is the thing that can discipline emotions so that there is no negative expression that can feed the Predator.
Our entire reality right now has turned into such an opposite of this ideal combination of the hemispheres, that to me at least, it make it a) even more likely that there IS some hyperdimensional inference (whether super conscious or just part of what is), and b) even more important for all of us to do what Laura explained recently (here and here, for example) about focusing. Using our brain (both sides!), absorbing as much knowledge as possible and sharing it. Perhaps part of the lesson is to stay sane in the midst of such insanity, and to observe and analyze. The rest is not up to us. "They" must really hate unification (of the brain and people), hence all this division and madness, and the importance of doing our best even if what we do seems so tiny to us, be it sharing information, trying to help someone, or sorting our thinking so that we can do the former a bit better every time.
Is that part of what "receivership capability" entails? Becoming better antennae (both when sorting out our machine and when picking up outside information, which goes together), absorbing more knowledge in as many areas as possible, sharing it so that others can also "tune in" with colinear people, thus accumulating knowledge as a whole, becoming more aware, etc. etc. ? Well, it's probably waaaay more complex that that, but that's as far as my non-unified brain can go today. ;)