No need to assume. Cs said Semites were formed from Kantekkian and Homo Sapiens.
The Semites today have a role to play in the collapse of NATO/Israel.
Absolutely correct. The last transcript excerpt that you quoted finished by saying:
Q: (Discussion of who are the Semites) (Galahad) So the real Semites are the Aryans?
A: You got it!
Q: (L) So that means that the rank and file of Jews that have carried the tradition, the Arabic types, just took on the tradition and carried it... They were just intermediaries. They stole the significator of the original Semites and applied it to themselves. (Perceval) Semites is like Middle Eastern, isn’t it?
A: Is it? Was it?
Q: (Galahad) Then the genetic tweak, was it made in the Aryan Semites or was it made in the Jews that we know as Jews today?
A: Aryan. Reason for destruction of Jews of the “Abrahamic” line.
You will note that the C's spoke of the Jews of the "Abrahamic" line here. By that I think they mean the Sephardic Jews who mainly came to Europe after the second diaspora created by Roman Emperor Hadrian in 174 AD. The Ashkenazim Jews are effectively Oriental Jews or Kahazars, although there has no doubt been a lot of intermarriage between the two groups over the centuries.
My own research has led me to believe that the original Abrahamic Jews were Hittites and Levites from Asia Minor who subsequently mixed with other Semitic groups in Egypt and Canaan (today Palestine) like the Habiru or Hapiru, who may have been the early Hebrews. The Hittites, a Bronze Age people who settled in what today is Turkey and Northern Iraq, were not only Semitic but also a Scythian Celtic tribe (like my own people the Irish Gaels), thus related to the Scythians of Sargon the Great's age who lived approximately a thousand years earlier. As Celts, they were clearly Aryans. One of their calling cards was the wearing of plaid or tartan, which may be reflected in the story of the Patriarch Joseph and his multicoloured coat.
Another feature of the original Jewish people may have been that many of them had red hair (think here of Esau, the supposed brother of Jacob, who had red hair and founded the Edomites who were the biblical cousins of the Israelites). I read some time ago that archaeologists had found graffiti in Egypt that spoke mockingly of the Hebrews as "red haired donkeys". By tradition, Abraham, King David and Jesus were all meant to be red heads.
Red hair tends to be associated today with the Celts, particularly those from the British Isles and their offspring in the USA and what was the British Empire or Commonwealth (indeed two of my own sons have red hair). However, red hair is also associated with Jewish people too (take the late US Jewish entertainers Danny Kaye and Red Buttons for example). Indeed, a late Polish lady acquaintance of mine told me that when she managed to escape Nazi occupied Poland with her baby son to join up with her husband in war time England, she was amazed at how many red headed people she encountered and thought they were Jewish, since red hair in Poland was at that time associated with Jewish people (perhaps it still is). This concerned her as she was not well disposed to the Jews after her father had been betrayed to the Gestapo by a Jewish man trying to save his own skin, and was killed. I had to explain to her that the red haired people she encountered in Britain were overwhelmingly of Celtic stock. However, the fact remains that there must be a genetic connection because red hair is still quite a rare feature within the human population as a whole.
It is interesting that the C's seem to use Celt and Aryan interchangeably. One tends to think of the Aryans though as being blonde haired and blue eyed, perhaps as a lingering effect of Nazi propaganda. Whatever the case may be, it appears that Abraham and his fellow Hittites may have been genetically tweaked hybrids (could this be where the red hair stemmed from?) with Nephilim genetics, which may explain why people often associate red heads with strong tempers:
Session 20 August 2001:
Q: All right, first question is, what is the origin of the Levites?
A: Hittites Moon Worshippers.
Q: Well, before the Hittites became Hittites, what were they?
A: Indo-europeans.
Q: What was the source of the Indo-europeans?
A: Aryan sub-race.
Q: Is there any other group the Aryans mixed with to produce the Indo-Europeans?
A: Fourth Density genetic tweak.
Q: Was Abraham a Levite?
A: Yes.
Q: Was Sarah Nefertiti?
A: Yes.
Q What was the reason for the strange skull shape of Nefertiti and her family?
A: Genetic tweak.
Q: Was this 4th density genetic tweak done by STS or STO?
A: STS
Session 23 August 2001:
Q: (L) Once before you talked about the "mission destiny profile prior encoding" of the Semitic genetic code structure. Of course, you talked about this being done 130,000 years ago, so that's a long time. But, was that original code structure put into the genetic code of the Black peoples...
A: Yes. [
MJF: recall though that the black race originally had Aryan genes too, mixed with Dravidian Indian and Aboriginal genetics]
Q: ... to then be spread via their mixture with Aryans - as Semites - into other races?
A: Partly.
Q: (L) What is the other part?
A: Genetic tweaking of Semites. [MJF: which given the timeframe, suggests that this occurred on Kantek.]
Session 20 October 2005:
Q: (Galahad) In reading through the transcripts in the 9/11 book, I was confused about the genetic tweak that was made 130,000 years ago. Was that a tweak that was done to all the Semites, so it wasn’t only the Jews?
A: Question is what is a Semite?
Q: (Galahad) You make a remark that this thing with Hitler goes off planet. So was this something that was going on on Kantek before it exploded?
A: Yes.
This suggests that the Kantekkian Aryans can be divided into Semites and non-Semites and the two groups may have been in conflict on Kantek, a conflict that continues on Earth to this day. I have no doubt that what lie behind the current mass migration of third world peoples into Europe and North America today is a desire on the part of STS Orion forces to replace (though "diversity") the Aryan Semites of Europe and North America, thus paving the way for the easy conquest of Earth at the transition to 4th density.
As to my speculation that Abraham and his fellow Hittites seem to have been genetically tweaked Semites (Celts) with Nephilim genetics, this may be explained here by the C's:
Session 19 April 1997:
Q: Am I correct in my assessment that the origin of the Grail stories was the story of the Head of Bran?
A: But what was the "origin" of Brahna?
Q: Well, from the way I am interpreting what I have found, I have two possibilities: One is the Celts from Kantek, and two: a Nephilim hybrid.
A: Could be one and the same.
Please note that the Israelite priesthood was confined solely to the Levites (the priesthood originating under the High Priest Aaron - a fictitious brother of Abraham/Moses according to the C's) who, as we learned from the C''s, were Abraham's fellow Hittites. Today, those Jewish people descended from Aaron and his sons are known as the Cohanim, usually having the surname Cohen. In the days of the Temple, the Cohanim/Levites exercised a complete monopoly over the control of the Temple and all Jewish ritual. Since its institution, the Levite priesthood has seen an unbroken, totally controlled, succession from father to son over millennia. However, without a Temple in Jerusalem as a place to offer sacrifice to Yahweh/Jehovah, there is today no operative priesthood within the Jewish faith. No doubt there are forces at work who wish to change this situation through the building of a Third Temple where the sacrifice will be renewed (no doubt to the horror of animal lovers everywhere).
The C's have said that bloodlines are important and have even encouraged Forum members to trace their own genealogies. However, outside of royal bloodlines, nowhere has attention to bloodline inheritance been practised so assiduously than with that of the Jewish priestly line. Could there be a specific reason for this.? Is it a special bloodline?
I have recently been re-reading Dr Joseph Farrell's book Thrice Great Hermetica and the Janus Age. In his book, Farrell follows the 'Rex Deus' bloodline hypothesis in relation to the nine original founding knights who established the Catholic military religious order known as the Knights Templar. This theory posits that the founding knights came from families whose roots lay in the Jewish priesthood of Jerusalem, some of whom had escaped to Europe and southern France prior to the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans whose descendants would later marry into the noble houses of France, including those of the Merovingians and the Normans. Briefly, Farrell describes how the founding knights may have inherited through their Rex Deus roots secret knowledge concerning the Jewish Temple treasures (including the Ark of the Covenant) that had been passed on from father to son intergenerationally. These Rex Deus families had waited patiently for centuries until circumstances arose that provided them with the opportunity go to Jerusalem to reclaim the lost Temple treasures. That opportunity emerged with the Crusades. As most of you will undoubtedly know, after the fall of Jerusalem to the Crusaders, the Templars were granted lodgings within the former stables of Solomon on Temple Mount where they conducted a clandestine excavation under the Temple Mount looking for something. Moreover, they seemed to know where to look. Farrell believes they found what they were looking for. Hence, there is good reason to believe that the mission of guarding the highways of the Holy Land to keep Christian pilgrims safe, the alleged raison d’être for their foundation, was just a smokescreen for their true purpose, which was to locate and recover the treasures of the Temple and lost Kabbalistic knowledge. Laura raised the matter with the C's in the session dated 26 July 1997:
Q: Okay. The Templars were formed in Jerusalem. They were there for quite a while with no record of doing any of the things that the group supposedly intended to do. There are a lot of rumours... what were they doing in Jerusalem?
A: Templars held the secret of levitation'
Q: Is this something... and I am talking about the 9 guys in Jerusalem... did they discover some document in Jerusalem that gave them this secret?
A: Yes.
Q: And is this how they were able to get so much support from certain royal houses and so forth?
A: It is time for you to study Kaballah again, but be careful!!
Thus, the C's confirm here that the Templars did discover some document during their excavations. However, documents made from papyrus, animal skin or parchment are likely to corrupt over a long passage of time, and we are talking about a period of well over a thousand years here if not more. Admittedly, the famous Dead Sea Scrolls have survived for even longer in the dry, arid air of desert caves at Qumran, but even these scrolls are in a very fragmentary state. If you want a written document to survive for millennia, the best media to preserve such writings in are either stone, clay or metal. Indeed, just such a document was discovered in 1952 when an archaeologist found a copper scroll near a cave in Khirbet, Qumran on the shores of the Dead Sea.
Unlike the other Dead Sea Scrolls that were discovered in eleven caves near Khirbet, which were all made of parchment or papyrus, this scroll was made of copper mixed with a little tin. Although the Dead Sea Scrolls comprise fragments of extra-biblical and early Jewish writings, the Copper Scroll by way of contrast features, in Hebrew, a list of locations at which sacred artefacts and treasures are meant to be buried or hidden. Dating from circa 50-100 AD, the Copper Scroll contains an inventory of items that were taken from the Temple before its destruction by Nebuchadnezzar. These items have not been seen or accounted for since.
The Dead Sea Scrolls were also mentioned in the same session dated 26 July 1997:
Q: What about the
Essenes and the
Dead Sea Scrolls?
A:
Kaballah.
Q: What is so explosive in the Dead Sea Scrolls that they cannot release them?
A: Wait and see.
You will note here that the C's refer to "Kaballah" again, which suggests that this was part of the information the Knights Templar discovered through their excavations. It would seem from what the C's are saying that the Jewish Essenes at Qumran were also privy to the secrets of Kaballah. To date the Dead Sea Scrolls have been cloaked in secrecy with only limited extracts being made available. However, you will note that in 1997, the C's were telling Laura to wait and see whether explosive details may eventually be released.
Thus, it is with some interest that I discovered that in 2021, the
Israeli Antiquities Authority revealed that it had found new fragments from the
Dead Sea Scrolls, the first find of its kind in six decades, at the Murabba’at Caves, Nahal Darga Reserve in Israel.
These new
Scrolls contained pieces of the book of the twelve minor prophets, including Nahum and Zechariah. The new discovery was thought to be part of the
Minor Prophets, a scroll found in the early 1950s that contains
information about the End of Days. The
Scrolls survived for thousands of years, thanks to the hot, arid conditions in which the fragments were found.
Is it possible that these new finds may have played into the current push to build the Third Temple and bring about the 'End of Days' and the Messianic scenario that is being played out in Israel/Palestine at the present time?
However, I only mention this in passing since Farrell believes that the Knights Templar may have discovered another copper scroll in Jerusalem, which allowed them to track the Temple treasures down, which had been missing since the conquest of Jerusalem by
King Nebuchadnezzar in 587 BC.
Among other things, the Copper Scroll claims that the ‘
Tabernacle of the Lord’ was hidden in
a desolate valley – 40 stones deep under a hill on its east side. This has led many to speculate that the Jewish sect who wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls (most probably the Essenes)
buried the Ark in the Jordan desert* before they were overpowered or they hid it in a carved-out secret chamber ‘40 stones’ under Temple Mount. Hence, although the Templars had no knowledge of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which were not discovered until 1947, they may still have been trying to locate the Ark of the Covenant under Temple Mount based on other documentary evidence that may have come into their possession. An international team during the mid-20th century investigated the Dead Sea Scrolls and searched every site listed on the Copper Scroll but found nothing relating to the Temple or any biblical artefacts [
MJF: No doubt because the Templars had got there first]. However, they did find further evidence of the Templar presence in the 12th century, which gave rise to speculation that the Templars were looking for certain things and that they knew where to look.
*I have written elsewhere that an English Templar Knight, Ralph de Sudely, who commanded a detachment of Templars at a Templar fort overlooking the valley in which the ancient city of Petra is found, may have discovered the lost Ark of the Covenant (and with it the Grail) in a carved out chamber located under the building known as the Treasury which forms part of the ruins at Petra. This is the same Treasury building which film director Stephen Spielberg used as a backdrop for the final scenes of his movie Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade where the eponymous archaeologist found the Holy Grail being guarded by a very old Templar Knight. The carved tunnel which ended in a small chamber was excavated at the end of the last century but found to be empty. However, local Bedouin Arab tradition holds that the Templars did find a treasure within a chest or box at the site. The English researcher Graham Phillips had championed this theory and is now quoted on Wikipedia:
“Graham Phillips claimed Ralph de Sudeley may have found the Ark of the Covenant when he discovered the Maccabean treasure at Jebel al Madhbah [Petra]. Because Sudeley returned to Britain, it is theorised that he may have taken the Ark to Great Britain with him.”
Sir Ralph de Sudely returned to England in 1189 a very rich man, building a large, well-manned Templar preceptory on an estate he purchased at Herdewyke in Warwickshire, in what today is very much Shakespeare country. He allegedly brought back with him certain sacred relics from the Holy Land (possibly some of the 'Stones of Fire' gemstones which adorned the Jewish High Priest's breastplate or Ephod), which were displayed by the Templar priests at their chapel in Herdewyke, which still survives to this day. The relics were never found after the demise of the Templar priests and monks of Herdewyke when the Black Death struck Europe in the mid-14th century.
For a fuller consideration of Ralph de Sudely's possible involvement in finding the lost Ark of the Covenant, see my attached article The Knights Templar, Jeremiah and the Ark of the Covenant.
One of the researchers into the Dead Sea Scroll who Farrell quotes extensively on his book is
Robert Feather who wrote two books on the subject. These are:
The Copper Scroll Decoded: One Man's Search for the Fabulous Treasures of Ancient Egypt (1999) and
The Mystery of the Copper Scrolls of Qumran: The Essene Record of the Treasure of Akhenaten (2003), which effectively was an updated reprint of his first book. Please note that I am aiming to do a much longer article on the importance of the Egyptian connection to the Copper Scroll in a future post on the 'Alton Towers' thread but for now I just want to concentrate on one of Feather's discoveries and conclusions, which Farrell highlights in his book. This involves the peculiar genealogy of the Jewish priesthood, which may be a smoking gun and support what the C's said about the Levites (who the C's described as "
sect of monk-like pacifists connected to Moses) who may have been part Nephilim hybrids like Abraham and Nefertiti.
Quoting Feather:
"There is fascinating firm scientific evidence, 3000 years after the event, that underlines the homogeneity of the Hebrew peoples but also reveals a genetically separate priestly faction with quite different DNA patterns.
A January 1997 edition of Nature carried an article on the 'Y chromosomes of Jewish priests'. The Y-chromosome is inherited paternally and does not recombine. Because of this fact the research teams at the Technicon-Israel Institute, the University of Toronto, University College, London and the University of Arizona who wrote the article, chose to study the genetic coding of Jewish males whose designation to the priesthood, through strict patrilineal descent, has continued for thousands of years right up to this day. The surnames of the priestly strain are generally derivations of the name 'Cohanim'. The researchers concluded that there are clear differences in the frequency of Y-chromosome hapolytes between an unbroken line of Jewish 'priests' and their lay counterparts. Quite remarkably, the difference is observable in both the Ashkenazi (Central European) and Sepharid (North African, Spanish, Middle Eastern) descended populations, despite the huge geographical separations of these original communities.
The study showed that there is a 'relative preponderance of the YAP-DYS19B hapolyte in both Jewish populations, suggesting that this may have been the founding hapolyte of the Jewish priesthood'. The presence or absence of the Y chromosomes is thought to represent a unique evolutionary event dated to between 29,000 and 340,000 years ago. The significance of this latter statement is that the priestly strain must have pre-existed, by many thousands of years, events in biblical times.
In other words the priestly group that were 'chosen' by Moses to provide the line of High Priests and prime guardians of the holy rituals [MJF: the Levites] were already genetically different from the bulk of the Hebrews and must have come. or originated. from outside the main Hebrew tribes.
One possible consequence of the genetic-factor evidence is that Aaron and his family, who were designated to fill the role of High Priest, were of a different DNA grouping to the rest of the Hebrews. As the brother of Moses, in Old Testament terms, the proposition that Moses was an Egyptian becomes even more convincing."
This research provides truly astounding results when you consider that the C's told us that Abraham/Moses was an Indo-European Levite/Hittite hybrid and his monk-like Levite brothers have seemingly provided the genetics for an unbroken line of Jewish High Priests from the inception of the Jewish faith to this day. Does their YAP-DYS19B hapolyte provide a smoking gun for the genetic tweak the C's spoke of? Was it made 130,000 years ago (Farrell favours 140,000) or far more recently?
But Feather did not stop there for in his book he produced a plate of a photograph which he had reproduced from
Robert Eisenman's and
Michael Wise's book
The Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered (1992). Quoting Feather:
"When I first noticed the images, I thought I was dreaming .... No-one previously seems to have noticed what I hope to have seen for yourself. Amongst the Mount Rushmore-like shapes in the hills directly above Qumran there appear to be faces. For me, these elongated faces look remarkably like ancient Egyptians. If that is what they are, what on earth are they doing staring over the ruins of a Jewish settlement on the Dead Sea?"
Unfortunately, the black and white photographic image of the plate produced in Farrell's book is not good enough to scan and reproduce here. However, Farrell make an important observation and that is that he is more inclined to see the "images" or "faces" as resembling more the Maoi heads of Easter Island, which the C's said were representations of the Nephilim:
A: Lemurian descendants.
Q: (L) The natives say the stones walked into position. Is this true?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, how?
A: Tonal vibration.
Q: (L) And what did these stones represent?
A: Nephalim.
Farrell provides further comments to the effect that he had not been able to locate any photographs of the same embankment at Qumran from any other angles, nor any head on photographs, since the photograph showed the "faces" in profile only, as is the case with the Maoi statue shown above.
Nevertheless, he felt Feather's comments were revealing of yet another possible mystery, for if these were genuine images, then they are in a serious state of decay, a decay that would even have been evident in the time of the Qumran community, begging the question of what the Essenes were doing there in the first place. Farrell then ponders who put the images there, how long ago and why would a strict Jewish community like the Essenes choose to make it the site of their principal settlement. The Essenes, who were a community preoccupied with ritual purity, would no doubt have viewed any images that might be connected with Egypt as profane. Could it be, however, that they knew these images were connected to their ancient Nephilim (Anunnaki) forefathers?
to help old Rishi out in a time of growing crisis? Maybe it helps that he has German Jewish ancestry through his great-grandfather, Arthur Levita, a descendant of the Yiddish author Elia Levita. Who knows?
