What Rense.com is not talking about
It takes a certain amount of external consideration to see yourself as being wrong. None of us claim to be right, yet you say we are wrong. With that type of argument, you win Ruth. Cuz I'm willing to leave you to your illusions. You're lucky to have people here who at least try, continually, to help you SEE. I hope you recognize this.
John Chang said:Most of us are guests here, and it's a bit inconsiderate to march in, and tell your hosts that the food is bad or the chairs are uncomfortable, and that maybe you should redo the drapes because they look so dingy.
I don't buy that you weren't aware of what you were doing. But perhaps I'm wrong, maybe this relates to the issue of not having the correct organ to understand. Like I already said, what you previously wrote was essentially a diss of the entire works of ponerology done by Laura and the Signs crew. Not only were you criticising, you were basically saying that cuz you didn't 'get it', you didn't even have to entertain such foolish notions. Which isn't like sacrilege to me, but when you come back and say that you had no idea what you were saying would be inconsiderate, I'm a bit suspect of that.Ruth said:Yeah, you've got a point there. Critisism of ones 'home' is never a good thing. I was not aware that it appeared as if this was what I was doing. Its disrespectful. I appologise if this was how it was seen.
It takes a certain amount of external consideration to see yourself as being wrong. None of us claim to be right, yet you say we are wrong. With that type of argument, you win Ruth. Cuz I'm willing to leave you to your illusions. You're lucky to have people here who at least try, continually, to help you SEE. I hope you recognize this.