Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 Crashes in Ukraine

I'm not familiar with this site but it's highlighting "a tweet on 22nd January 2016 by Dutch MP Pieter Omtzigt"? Very little information.

DUTCH MP CONFIRMS MH17 SHOT DOWN BY US-CONTROLLED KIEV REGIME
https://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2016/02/19/dutch-mp-confirms-mh17-shot-down-by-kiev-regime/

A Dutch MP has tweeted confirmation that the rocket which shot down the MH17 plane in July 2014 was fired from the East Ukraine, implicating the US controlled regime in Kiev.

In a tweet on 22nd January 2016, Dutch MP Pieter Omtzigt said that a Dutch inquiry and secret services agreed that the BUK rocket was fired from the eastern Ukraine.

Omtzigt tweeted:

“CTIVD (toezichthouder geheime diensten) bevestigt: volgens diensten had alleen Oekraine operationele BUK systemen in Oost Oekraine 17/7“


The eastern Ukraine is controlled by a regime in Kiev brought to power by a colour revolution organized by George Soros.

_http://www.infowars.com/soros-admits-responsibility-for-coup-and-mass-murder-in-ukraine/

WHO spokesman Glenn Thomas was allegedly killed in the MH 17 plane crash.
 
Thanks for bringing this one up, angelburst29.

Dutch MP Pieter Omtzigt was mentioned in Reply 500 (on page 34). He's a Christian Democrat and very active on the MH17 dossier from the very beginning.

His tweet as cited is genuine but was a tiny part of an ongoing discussion about each and every aspect of this sordid affair. The CTIVD report mentioned is also genuine but dates from April 8, 2015 and is only available in Dutch AFAIK.

So I'm afraid there's very little new info around this one, sorry to say... There's no apparent reason (in my eyes at least) why they would cite this specific one remark just now.
 
Palinurus said:
Thanks for bringing this one up, angelburst29.

Dutch MP Pieter Omtzigt was mentioned in Reply 500 (on page 34). He's a Christian Democrat and very active on the MH17 dossier from the very beginning.

His tweet as cited is genuine but was a tiny part of an ongoing discussion about each and every aspect of this sordid affair. The CTIVD report mentioned is also genuine but dates from April 8, 2015 and is only available in Dutch AFAIK.

So I'm afraid there's very little new info around this one, sorry to say... There's no apparent reason (in my eyes at least) why they would cite this specific one remark just now.

Palinurus, I had recently posted something in the Ukrainian thread that might applied to the "reason" why the Dutch are repeating the BUK rocket scenario and ignoring the Russian data?

Quote:
This article has taken me by surprise ... when I think "of Dutch involvement with Ukraine" .... first thought is the MH17 criminal investigation? According to this article, the Dutch Government is involved in an April 6 Ukraine referendum ? And to add more confusion and nullify any neutral position in the MH17 investigation - as of January first, 2016 - the Netherlands is the president of the European Union. Is this one of the factors - why the Dutch have ignored Putin and Russia's investigation and analysis on MH17?

Dutch strategy to influence Ukraine “yes” vote leaks out
http://www.nltimes.nl/2016/02/18/dutch-strategy-to-influence-ukraine-yes-vote-leaks-out/

Thursday Feb 18, 2016 - The Dutch government recruited dozens of Dutch celebrities and opinion leaders to convince the public to vote “yes” in the so-called Ukraine referendum, according to a comprehensive communication strategy around the referendum that RTL Nieuws managed to get hold of.

The Ukraine referendum takes place on April 6th. In the referendum, the Dutch public can vote whether or not to accept an association agreement between the European Union and the Ukraine.

The strategy calls these Dutch celebrities “support channels”. Their goal is to talk about the referendum in a positive light, so that the Dutch are more inclined to vote in favor of the referendum. The list includes actress Victoria Koblenko, former soccer player Evgeniy Levchenko, Hilversum mayor Pieter Broertjies, publicist and D66 senator Petra Stienen, gay interest group COC and the Clingendael Institute.

All ministers will be given a copy of this communication strategy and it will be discussed in the council of ministers on Friday.

The communication strategy advises the politicians not to call the agreement with the Ukraine an “association agreement”, but a “cooperation agreement” instead. The team who drew up the strategy sees association agreement as a far too complicated word which is difficult to understand.

Politicians should also emphasize that the referendum is not about the quarrel with Vladimir Putin and Russia, or about the European Union’s management. It is only about the cooperation agreement with the Ukraine, and how it will be good for the Dutch market and for “ordinary Ukrainians”. It is simply a trade agreement with a country neighboring the EU which will open the door to “a market of 45 million people”, which will be good for the Dutch economy.

The document also contains answers to a number of questions. On the question of what the government will do if the public votes no, for example, the answer is: “At a valid no the government will reflect on the next steps and also discuss it with the parliament. The content of the public debate about the agreement will play an important role in that.”

The strategy finally also outlines what the cabinet should absolutely not do. The intention is to keep the discussion away from the geopolitical struggle between Russia and Europe for more influence in the Ukraine. The government does not want to give the “security argument” for or against Russia and Putin too much weight. The strategy team thinks that this will feel too much like “power games” and “scaremongering” to the public.


Published Jan. 1, 2016:

Netherlands takes over EU presidency as asylum issue looms
http://www.nltimes.nl/2016/01/01/netherlands-takes-over-eu-presidency-as-asylum-issue-looms/

Starting today the Netherlands is the president of the European Union. And with divided politicians, critical citizens and international tensions putting the Union under pressure, Prime Minister Mark Rutte and his ministers are set to have a difficult term, according to broadcaster NOS.

The main cause of the so-called refugee problem is the war in Syria – as long as the war continues, people will flee from it. The first tentative negotiations with involved parties may start late in January, but so far the international community have been unable to contain, much less resolve the conflict.

Another contribution to this problem is division in the EU. Despite numerous crisis talks and summits, most of the agreements made regarding the reception of asylum seekers, the asylum procedures, hotspots on the borders of Greece and Italy and guarding the borders better are yet to be implemented.

The Netherlands will also have to deal with the so-called Brexit during its term as EU president in the first six months of this year. The United Kingdom government plans to hold a referendum on whether the UK will remain in the EU before the end of this year. British Prime Minister David Cameron made a number of demands and thinks that his country will only stay part of Europe if they are granted.

Then there is the Ukraine. In addition to dealing with the aftermath of the MH17 disaster and war in the east, there is also the association agreement to deal with. The EU and Ukraine agreed on closer political and economic cooperation in 2014, but the Netherlands will hold a referendum on the matter on April 8th. While the results are by no means binding, a “no” will put the Dutch government in a difficult position. Disappoint their own people? Or go back on the “yes” they already gave in 2014.

And that is not even most of it. The bulk of the work the Dutch officials have to do happens behind the scenes. The EU President takes part in every EU meeting, draws up agendas, prepares decisions and formulate compromises. And while most meetings will be held in Brussels, the Netherlands will have to accommodate many ministers and officials during its term as president.


Published on Nov 26, 2015:
Ukraine president: Voting no on referendum is a “yes” vote for Putin
http://www.nltimes.nl/2015/11/26/ukraine-president-voting-no-on-referendum-is-a-yes-vote-for-putin/

Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko is very hopeful that the Netherlands will vote for the association agreement with Ukraine in the referendum in April next year. He stresses the importance of Dutch people’s right to express themselves in a referendum, though he calls the voting “corn on Putin’s mill”, in an interview with NRC on Thursday.

In the referendum next year, Dutch citizens will vote on the Association Agreement that the European Union closed with Ukraine. The agreement hasn’t been ratified by the Netherlands yet. A majority in the Tweede Kamer, lower house of parliament, believes that the outcome of the referendum should be adopted as the Netherlands’ stance, if the outcome is valid, the Telegraaf reported on Wednesday. The validity of the outcome is determined by a number of factors, including that a minimum of 30 percent of Dutch citizens should cast their vote.

President Poroshenko issued a cautious warning in the interview with NRC. “Everyone in the Netherlands needs to know that a vote in the referendum is a vote for or against the Ukrainians who gave their lives for European dignity and values”, he said. He added that the MH17 disaster improved the relationship between the Netherlands and Ukraine. “You can’t arrange it. It just happened. Within three hours there was an ocean of flowers at the embassy in Kiev, from people who had never been in the Netherlands. Pain unities peoples.”
 
Angelburst29, I think you misunderstood my remark but nevertheless thanks for your elaborate reply. :flowers: It doesn't hurt to have this info here now.

What I meant to say was that I didn't understand the reasons why the source you cited (i.e. birdflu666.wordpress.etc...) did come up with the Omtzigt quote at this precise moment in time and I still don't because I'm not familiar with that blog nor its political stance in general or their publication strategy specifics. I'm sorry if that wasn't clear.

As for the referendum etc. -- as a Dutch citizen I'm well aware of the ins and outs of it. In fact, I posted about it twice (here and here) in the Ukraine topic you mentioned but didn't follow up on it further because in that context it's something of a distraction I believe. Glad you picked up on it over there. ;)
 
Hi Palinurus, chances are very good - that I misunderstood your question. I find this situation to be very complicated "from the beginning" and half the problem seems to be lack of hard evidence - to some of the claims made?

I just came across this article, published Tuesday Feb. 22 that goes into some elaborate detail with photos and videos.

MH17: The Buk videos are fake
http://energia.su/mh17/buk_vids/fake_buk_vids.html

Introduction: There are only four photos and three videos of the alleged separatists’ Russian Buk launcher. Most of them were uploaded to the social media within hours after MH17 was shot down, others were published elsewhere within days. A website called Bellingcat uses them as evidence of Russia’s and separatists’ culpability in the MH17 case. The photos were examined in my previous article. This article is about the videos (Picture 1).

Picture 1The three known videos of the alleged separatists' Russian Buk recorded in Ukrainian cities. From left-to-right: in Zuhres, Snizhne, Luhansk.
 
MH17 - Dutch Prosecutor Opens Doubt on MH17 Evidence (Photos - additional links)
The cover-up is cracking up -- Dutch and Australian prosecutors can’t get their evidence straight
http://russia-insider.com/en/mh17-dutch-prosecutor-opens-doubt-mh17-evidence/ri13019

Originally appeared at Dances with Bears - http://johnhelmer.net/?p=15188

Dutch government prosecutors investigating the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 have reported that secret US satellite intelligence they have been shown cannot be used in evidence in a prosecution in an international or Dutch court, and that no evidence is currently available to charge anyone for the crime of firing on the aircraft, killing the 298 passengers and crew on board. The report, in the form of a 5-page letter addressed to families of the victims was signed by Fred Westerbeke, the Dutch official in charge of the investigation, and mailed last week.

Yesterday the Australian government, whose federal police are participating with the Dutch in the criminal investigation, dissociated itself from the contents and conclusions of the Dutch government letter, despite the claim on the signature line by Westerbeke that he was reporting “on behalf of the Joint Investigation Team [comprising] Australia, Belgium, Malaysia, Ukraine and Netherlands”.

The Dutch letter has not been sent to Denise Kenke, daughter of Willem Grootscholten, one of the Dutch passengers killed on MH17. To date, she is the only MH17 family member to launch a lawsuit in the European Court of Human Rights or in any other court in Europe. She is charging the Ukraine Government with culpable negligence. The court has placed a secrecy order on the Kenke case; reassigned the judges on the case; and refused to hear evidence on the charges against Ukraine.

Westerbeke has told the selected recipients of his report there is “no video or film footage available from launch or trajectory of the missile”. He implies the investigators have now concluded that widely published photographs of the launch and the missile contrail in the sky are unreliable or false.

Westerbeke also charges that evidence from satellites and radar, which would be admissible in a court of law, have been withheld by the governments of Ukraine, the US and Russia.

For the full letter in Dutch, read this. (PDF) For an English translation, click to open.

Also - November 14, 2015 -- one missile, four launch sites; Source: http://kremlintroll.nl/?p=605

Westerbeke reported that radar evidence “is especially important for determining whether other aircraft were in the area.” This is a fresh suggestion from Dutch officials contradicting claims by the Dutch Safety Board and by the Ukrainian government that there were no Ukrainian warplanes operating in range of MH17 at the time of the attack.

According to Westerbeke, no missile has been detected in the radar evidence gathered to date, but there may be other aircraft.
“The radar does not see the missile. Although the JIT [Joint Investigation Team] does not have at its disposal primary raw radar data, it has been provided with the available (secondary raw and processed primary and secondary) radar data which is already sufficient information about the traffic.”

The Dutch prosecutor reports questioning Ukrainian air traffic control and radar operators who responded that “no primary radar data was recorded in Ukraine”. In response to Russian government claims that their radar evidence had been ignored by the Dutch Safety Board in its report of last October, Westerbeke reports that to obtain further Russian radar evidence, “the prosecution is discussing with the Russian authorities.”

Public presentations by the Russian Defence Ministry and commentaries by Russian military experts have suggested the evidence points to the shooting-down of MH17 by one or more air-to-air missiles fired by a Ukrainian air force plane. As of last week, Westerbeke said the JIT is lacking “conclusive and irrefutable proof.”

It won’t have this, he added, for at least another six months. “For the second half of this year, the JIT expects to provide criminal evidence on what type of weapon and from where the MH17 was shot.” This statement suspends the evidence and the conclusion already accepted by the Dutch Safety Board, and repeated by an Australian coroner in an inquest last December, that the weapon was a ground-to-air Buk missile fired by Ukrainians opposed to the Kiev regime in the Ukrainian civil war.

Westerbeke admitted secret US intelligence, including satellite images, “could potentially provide information on a rocket trajectory.” The secret images and hearsay about what they show are inadmissible in a court of law, Westerbeke acknowledged. He and Dutch intelligence agents are “now investigating in what form the US state secret information can be used in the criminal investigation and what will be provided in a so-called official report to the Public Prosecution.”

Almost two years after the July 17, 2014, crash, the US is still withholding its evidence, the Dutch concede. A Dutch source close to the investigation says the opposite is true: “Westerbeke is explaining that all secret US data provided and given to the Dutch secret services can be used in court after it is legalised by the JIT and the Public Prosecutor.”

The multi-country investigation team headed by Westerbeke has examined “more than five billion web pages and more than half a million images, audio and video files..… With advanced search tools the relevant data are selected, whose origin is then followed up and its reliability tested. The same happens with information submitted by third parties such as international research collective Bellingcat.”

Westerbeke reveals that the prosecutors have examined the claims, and rejected them. “Many sources which Bellingcat relies on were known to the JIT. In addition, the research team still has more and other information on this subject, which is not mentioned by Bellingcat. Insofar as Bellingcat has offered new sources, they are examined and assessed for suitability for the criminal investigation. No evidence of direct involvement of individual members of this [Russian military] unit at the shooting of the MH17 follows from the report of Bellingcat.”

Bellingcat is a UK-based group, headed by Eliot Higgins (below, left). They have been publishing claims accusing the Russian military of direct involvement in the shoot-down. A Dutch-based group has published detailed analyses of Bellingcat, and concluded its evidence has been fabricated and its claims false. In October, following a lengthy visit to the crash site in eastern Ukraine,

one of the Dutch researchers, Max van der Werff (right), reported his research results. http://kremlintroll.nl/?p=605

Bellingcat can be read here. https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2016/02/23/53rd-report-en/

Higgins tweeted his accusation against a Russian military unit in January. https://twitter.com/eliothiggins/status/553633974594314242

The Dutch group reported its evidence on the faking of the BUK missile evidence a month later.
http://energia.su/mh17/buk_vids/fake_buk_vids.html

Gabriele Wolff, a former German prosecutor, has reported her analysis of the evidence, coming to the same conclusion. Her reports can be read in German here.
https://gabrielewolff.wordpress.com/tag/max-van-der-werff/

Last week’s report to the Dutch victims was signed by Westerbeke as chief prosecutor for the Dutch government, “Coordinator of the Joint Investigation Team”, and “on behalf of the Joint Investigation Team – Australia, Belgium, Malaysia, Ukraine, Netherlands”. A total of 193 MH17 casualties were Dutch; 27 were Australian (plus 11 dual nationals or residents); 43 were Malaysian. There were 4 Belgian casualties (PDF); no Ukrainians.

Westerbeke’s counterparts for the Australian prosecution are Assistant Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (AFP) (below, left) and Detective Superintendent Andrew Donoghoe (right). Source: http://johnhelmer.net/?p=14500

According to the JIT agreement of 2014, the five member states are required to agree on public disclosure of information. Each of the member states has a veto power on what may be released.

In December Donoghoe testified at the Victorian state coroner’s inquest on the Australian MH17 victims. He too refused to rule out an air-launched missile attack on MH17. He said he could not disclose to the state coroner the forensic evidence gathered by the JIT because the Ukrainian government had not consented. “Official communication of the conclusions of the results of the MH17 investigation”, Donoghoe said in court, “will only be released after agreement between the two JIT [Joint Investigation Team] countries.” For details, read this. http://johnhelmer.net/?p=14812

Asked this week if the Dutch prosecutor’s letter to the MH17 victims had been approved in advance by the AFP and sent to the Australian victims’ families, the AFP refuses to say. The AFP spokesman in Sydney disengaged from the Dutch report, saying: “the head of the JIT are the Dutch authorities, so you are best placed putting your questions to them in the first instance.” The spokesman added: “What is the purpose of asking questions about letters to NOK relating to MH17?” NOK is not an acronym in Australian or Dutch use. It is the US military term for “next of kin”.

Sources close to the investigation believe Australian officials are worried by mounting public and political concern in the Dutch parliament and media, charging American and Ukrainian manipulation of the MH17 story. No comparable questioning has appeared in the Australian parliament or press.

The Australian government is so sensitive to the growing European doubts about the MH17 evidence, the AFP refused last week to declassify a report already presented in the Victorian state coroner’s inquest in December. A February 10 letter from the AFP to an Australian lawyer requesting public disclosure of evidence for the cause of death on board the MH17 said the document must remain secret because it is “a confidential document shared with JIT partners. It is part of the JIT file….Disclosure of the document…would or could reasonably be expected to cause damage to the Commonwealth’s [Australia] international relations with those countries represented on the JIT.”

The secret document, titled “Environmental Impact and Physiological Strain on Passengers and Crew of Flight MH17”, was written by Andrew Hunt, a scientist in the Australian Defense Department.
http://johnhelmer.net/?p=14853

After reading a Dutch press copy - http://politiek.tpo.nl/2016/02/19/dit-is-de-brief-die-de-mh17-nabestaanden-kregen/
of the letter which Westerbeke had not sent her, Denise Kenke, one of the MH17 “survivors” – Westerbeke’s term of address in last week’s letter – commented that there is a pervasive cover-up of the MH17 evidence. “I am not informed about any procedural step [by the European Court of Human Rights]. I do not know if defendant Ukraine has been given the chance to comment on my complaint, I even do not know if my complaint has been sent to Ukraine. I do not trust the Ukrainian Court system. This is why I have directly approached the ECHR. It seems to me that this choice is even worse. I am completely lost in darkness.”
 
Angelburst29, thanks again for collecting and sharing this new info. It's refreshing to see how many people still care for the truth and are trying to get to the bottom of this problem and solve (parts of) it.

Needless to say that Dutch mainstream media pay little or no attention at all to any of these alternative findings or scrutiny. :evil:
 
Palinurus said:
Needless to say that Dutch mainstream media pay little or no attention at all to any of these alternative findings or scrutiny. :evil:

Indeed! Thank you Angelburst29.

No evidence of direct involvement of individual members of this [Russian military] unit at the shooting of the MH17 follows from the report of Bellingcat.”

Bellingcat is a UK-based group, headed by Eliot Higgins (below, left). They have been publishing claims accusing the Russian military of direct involvement in the shoot-down. A Dutch-based group has published detailed analyses of Bellingcat, and concluded its evidence has been fabricated and its claims false.

Apparently Bellingcat has gone even so far as to blame Putin and Russian minister of Defence Sergey Shoygu for the downing of MH17. They claim: "They provided the weapon, which was probably operated by the Russian army, that shot down flight MH17."

Bellingcat also says Russia has been manipulating satellite images... :rolleyes:
 
Just to reiterate that point the following.

Source: _http://www.nltimes.nl/2016/02/24/report-russia-leaders-sent-missile-that-struck-mh17-to-ukraine/

Report: Russia leaders sent missile that struck MH17 to Ukraine

Posted on Feb 24, 2016 by Janene Pieters

The head of the Russian army and President Vladimir Putin made the decision to send the BUK missile system that shot down flight MH17 to the front in Ukraine. They are therefore responsible for the MH17 disaster, according to international research collective Bellingcat in a report they published on Wednesday, NOS reports.

Part of the report was already revealed earlier this year. Bellingcat has narrowed the number of suspects down to about 20 Russian soldiers who should know who fired the missile that brought down the Malaysia Airlines flight on July 17th, 2014.

Bellingcat lies the responsibility for the disaster with two people: Russian Defense Minister Sergej Sjojgoe and President Vladimir Putin. They provided the weapon that shot down flight MH17. The weapon system was likely operated by the Russian army, according to Bellingcat.

The research collective could not figure out who actually pressed the button to fire the missile. Though the report does show who transported the missile to the Ukraine – the Second Battalion of the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade. Bellingcat managed to map the structure of this battalion by spying on social media for more than a year and comparing thousands of photos and films. The battalion consists of some 200 soldiers, but Bellingcat narrowed the group directly involved to 20 soldiers. Their names and photos can be found in the report, though they have been made partly anonymous. According to Bellngcat, this group must know who fired the missile.

The Dutch Public Prosecutor hopes to have evidence surrounding what type of missile was used in the attack and where it was fired from by the middle of this year.

It seems obvious that a growing number of different parties are trying to muddy the water even further.
 
This is the Guardian's spin ....

MH17 report identifies Russian soldiers suspected of downing plane in Ukraine
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/24/mh17-report-identifies-russian-soldiers-suspected-of-downing-plane-in-ukraine



MH17: Report claims Russian soldiers downed plane in Ukraine
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/24/mh17-report-claims-russian-soldiers-downed-plane-i/

Notice how the Washington Times - places a photo on top with the trucks carrying the wreckage of downed Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 and right below it - a video - "Kerry faces skepticism on Syria cease fire." What does Kerry have to do with the MH17 investigation? A distraction?



MH17 report identifies Russian soldiers suspected of downing plane in Ukraine ✔
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crp3RtQnl0g

Published on Feb 24, 2016 - Investigative team says it can link Russian soldiers to missile thought to have downed Malaysia Airlines flight in 2014
 
Just my opinion, at the moment but I sense there is a little game going on here called blame Russia and dethrone Putin? This so called report has been "in the air" for months now - with all kinds of mystery surrounding it, not to mention some of the characters involved (Bellingcat, for one). The questionable report, is one thing - it's the timing and build up of leaks that has me mystified?

***On the World scene ....a Syrian truce was agreed upon on 12 February - to go into affect at midnight 27 February.

Syria conflict: US-Russia brokered truce to start at weekend
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35634695

The US and Russia have announced that a planned ceasefire in Syria will come into effect at midnight on 27 February.

Their statement said the truce did not include so-called Islamic State (IS) and the al-Qaeda-linked Nusra Front.

World powers had on 12 February agreed a truce to come into effect within a week, but that deadline passed and scepticism remains over the new plan.

***You have a Dutch Group/Netherlands over seeing the Ukrainian MH17 investigation. As of Jan. 2016, Netherlands takes over the EU Presidency which has the upper hand in influencing a Referendum vote in Ukraine which could favor Russian Politics, if the Ukrainian's vote against the Referendum.

Published Jan. 1, 2016 - Netherlands takes over EU presidency as asylum issue looms
http://www.nltimes.nl/2016/01/01/netherlands-takes-over-eu-presidency-as-asylum-issue-looms/

Thursday Feb 18, 2016 - Dutch strategy to influence Ukraine “yes” vote leaks out
http://www.nltimes.nl/2016/02/18/dutch-strategy-to-influence-ukraine-yes-vote-leaks-out/

Published on Nov 26, 2015 - Ukraine president: Voting no on referendum is a “yes” vote for Putin
http://www.nltimes.nl/2015/11/26/ukraine-president-voting-no-on-referendum-is-a-yes-vote-for-putin/

*** On 22nd January 2016 - a tweet is posted by Dutch MP Pieter Omtzigt, that a Dutch inquiry and secret services agreed that the BUK rocket was fired from the eastern Ukraine and blaming Russia.

DUTCH MP CONFIRMS MH17 SHOT DOWN BY US-CONTROLLED KIEV REGIME
https://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2016/02/19/dutch-mp-confirms-mh17-shot-down-by-kiev-regime/

*** Exactly a month later - Tuesday Feb. 22, 2016 - article published of the alleged separatists’ Russian Buk launcher.

MH17: The Buk videos are fake
http://energia.su/mh17/buk_vids/fake_buk_vids.html

***Feb. 24, 2016 - three days before the Syrian cease fire begins - the New York Times, The Washington Times and the UK Guardian simultaneously post an article - doubting MH17 evidence and pointing all fingers and blaming Russia and Putin. Except for the Guardian, neither the New York Times or the Washington Times mentioned anything or reported any information on a possible Syrian cease fire?

MH17 - Dutch Prosecutor Opens Doubt on MH17 Evidence (Photos - additional links)
The cover-up is cracking up -- Dutch and Australian prosecutors can’t get their evidence straight
http://russia-insider.com/en/mh17-dutch-prosecutor-opens-doubt-mh17-evidence/ri13019

Originally appeared at Dances with Bears - http://johnhelmer.net/?p=15188

*** What I'm seeing - is an elaborate scheme to demonize Russia and Putin - with controlled opposition? It gets even deeper, if the rumors are to be taken into consideration - that at the time MH17 was downed - Putin's plane was in the same airspace?
 
angelburst29 said:
Just my opinion, at the moment but I sense there is a little game going on here called blame Russia and dethrone Putin? This so called report has been "in the air" for months now - with all kinds of mystery surrounding it, not to mention some of the characters involved (Bellingcat, for one). The questionable report, is one thing - it's the timing and build up of leaks that has me mystified?

<snip>

*** What I'm seeing - is an elaborate scheme to demonize Russia and Putin - with controlled opposition? It gets even deeper, if the rumors are to be taken into consideration - that at the time MH17 was downed - Putin's plane was in the same airspace?

I think you gave a good summary and a fair assessment of all shenanigans, angelburst29. Thank you.

Of course, we'll have to wait and see how exactly this plays out in the long run but it already seems clear that the victims of this crash and their next of kin will be victimized again several times over if the pathocrats should have the only say in this whole mess. :evil:
 
I scanned the pages in this thread - to see if this report was listed and I didn't see any mention of it? Don't know if the information will add to anything already listed?

Quemado Institute Rebuttal: MH17 Dutch Investigation Weak, Inconclusive (Updated)
http://quemadoinstitute.org/2015/10/16/mh17-dutch-investigation-weak-inconclusive-quemado-institute-analysis/

Quemado Institute
October 16, 2015 - Updated October 20, 2015 [See end of post.]

On the numerous flaws in the Dutch Investigation

The official 279-page Dutch Investigation Report (DIR) on the crash of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 (click here) is flawed in a number of aspects. The report is surprisingly nontechnical, as compared, for example, with the detailed September 2014 study conducted by Russian engineers entitled Analysis of the causes of the crash of Flight MH17- Malaysian Boeing 777 (click here).
http://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/en/onderzoek/2049/investigation-crash-mh17-17-july-2014

Discussion of the most critical evidence is completely omitted from the DIR document. What evidence there is appears to have been carefully selected, and even that is weak and inconclusive.
http://ukrainetoday.blogspot.com/2014/09/analysis-of-causes-of-crash-of-flight.html

The Dutch report contends that the Malaysian Boeing 777 was destroyed in flight by a BUK missile explosion occurring slightly left of and above the cockpit. I will call this the “BUK scenario”. The Dutch investigation falls far short of actually proving this scenario.

In our estimation, the most likely event was that the MH17 was shot down by machine gun, cannon and/or missile fire from a Ukrainian military jet, possibly an SU-25. I will call this the “SU-25 scenario”. This scenario is convincingly argued in the Russian study mentioned above. (Article continues.)
 
SOTT now carries an RT piece covering the recent Dutch parliamentary debate about the final report into the causes of the incident issued by the Dutch Safety Board last October, and the recent chief prosecutor's letter which revealed the investigation has no raw radar data, useful footage or satellite images of the missile launch:

http://www.sott.net/article/313617-Dutch-lawmakers-slam-secrecy-of-MH17-investigation-point-out-lack-of-evidence-of-US-claims

So far, the two available Dutch websites in the English language only focused on reporting a rather minor skirmish between some opposition parliamentarians and Dutch MP Mark Rutte who got very angry about their suggestions concerning the possibility of a cover-up:

_http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2016/03/dutch-pm-insinuations-of-cover-up-after-the-mh17-crash-are-total-nonsense/
_http://www.nltimes.nl/2016/03/02/dutch-pm-punching-below-the-belt-to-say-mh17-was-a-cover-up/
 
This was the only information I could find on Bellingcat.

The So-Called 'Bellingcat' Is a Western MSM Shill Posing as an Alternative Truth Crusader (Photos)
http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/so-called-bellingcat-western-msm-shill-posing-alternative-truth-crusader/ri7522

Fri, May 29, 2015 - This article originally appeared at DeepResource (Password protected)

The blogger Elliot Higgins conveys an image of a goody chap... …who lives somewhere in a modest flat and spends all his time to find out the truth behind the headlines, by merely using his brain, laptop and internet connection. A fine pro bono example of civic journalism in action. Every now and then he tears himself away from his laptop screen to feed his cat, rock the cradle of his third child or go to the supermarket to buy coffee and a can of soup and pays for it with coins, not bank notes. Elliot Higgins has one passion in life and that is the truth and people in general are more inclined to believe a British nerd than representatives of the Ukrainian secret service or the CIA.

And all the mainstream media in the world are using his ‘research’ to add credibility to their own news casting, because the MSM realize very well that the internet is used by many as an alternative source of information with a reputation that on the internet ‘real unfiltered information’ can be found. Higgins claims that he gets his modest funds via crowd sourcing, a method recommended by none other than NATO chieftain Philippe Breedlove:

Breedlove in his tweet directly links to Eliot Higgins. Isn’t it nice to receive support from such a high level? Right.

Let’s cut the crap. Higgins is not an unconnected loner with a strange hobby at all. He is part of the The London Project Investigation media network, a partnership of hackers and journalists of the Financial Times. Additionally there exists ties to the much greater OCCRP, The Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Officially a research project concerning organized crime, but in reality an anti-Russian information database. The OCCRP is sponsored by organisations as theThe Open Society of the speculator George Soros.

Another sponsor is the very governmental US NGO and CIA front US Aid.

Here is our nerd on an Atlantic Council sponsored trip to Kiev, representing western interest pure and simple.

Here Higgins admits openly that he works with the Atlantic Council. There is nothing ‘independent’ about Higgins. Note that ’60-minutes Australia’ refers to Higgins (here as a ‘Geo-location expert’) like all western media do, hardening the hypothesis that all major western media are soft-controlled from the same center (read: CIA)

Seriously, would you buy a Brooklyn bridge from this 2nd hand car salesman?

Higgins’ work concerning the alleged Syrian government use of poison gas and now the Buk-centered explanation of the downing of MH17 all serve US-UK interests. Higgins is a propaganda organ of the western media and interests.

[joostniemoller.nl] – Het machtige ‘open society’ netwerk achter de eenvoudige blogger Bellingcat #MH17

Higgins is an Anglo professional Putin hater, the latter being the great saboteur of the NWO and that doesn’t sit too well with our global imperialist wannabees.

Very detailed German analysis of the work of Eliot Higgins by former public prosecutor Gabriele Wolff: (Note - some English)
[part 1]
https://gabrielewolff.wordpress.com/2014/09/28/ukraine-informationskrieg-um-mh-17-1/

[part 2]
https://gabrielewolff.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/ukraine-informationskrieg-um-mh-17-2/

[part 3]
https://gabrielewolff.wordpress.com/2015/01/19/ukraine-informationskrieg-um-mh-17-3/

[part 4]
https://gabrielewolff.wordpress.com/2015/05/24/ukraine-informationskrieg-um-mh-17-4/

Eliot Higgins debunked in 2nd part of this article (from “Fifty Shades of Brown“):
[counterpunch.org] – There Goes the Guardian, Lying About Ukraine…Again!
 
Back
Top Bottom