It's the council of ATP that is within the structure, this representing body of players and that's how it's been for decades and I don't think that's the best system we have. I think the system has failed players so many times, so many times and that's the reason why PTPA needs to exist, because when it comes down to this kind of big decisions, a lot of players' voices are not heard enough. Within the ATP, you have a 50-50 split between players and tournaments, so you are never going to have 100% for the players' interest in place. Again, we always go back to the same point, whatever it is that we're talking about, now it's Wimbledon, tomorrow is gong to be something else—it's always coming back to that system and structure and I always supported the unification of the players: players being united players, players showing strength that they have (and they are not even aware they have that much strength). But because we are only part of an individual sport, we also have this kind of obstacle: most players are looking at their own interest rather than the collective interest. That's where the conflict usually appears.
