Q source / Qanon

Just looked it. Its not that much coded. One just have to read it all at once, without brackets and tags.

Public to awaken [mass-start].
Sleeping pill reject.
OP Mockingbird FAILURE.
FAKE>REAL.
BLIND>20/20.
KILL_CHAIN.
Where we go one, we go ALL>

Problem is with time tenses in English. Is that happening now or will in future?
 
The whole Q source / Qanon stuff kind of reminds me of the release of 'BY, FOR, AND OF PSYKOPATHS' and the mystery surrounding it. https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,1868.0.html

I'm trying to remember what the verdict was in terms of who wrote that or if it is still unknown, but do remember at some point thinking it could have been intelligence agents related. FWIW
 
Rhythmik said:
[quote author=Q]
Read slowly and carefully.
Will become critically important in coming weeks.
Continue to track those who are resigning across all platforms.
Where there was once darkness, there will now be LIGHT.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/
Q
[/quote]

This could be explained in another interview with Mr. Corsi, by Lionel Nation youtube channel on Jan 26, 2018

Lionel Interviews Dr. Jerome Corsi on the Significance and Criticality of #QAnon

At some point he throws Eric Schmidt (Google) into that:

{Text extracted from automatic subs}
[quote author=Lionel]...One more question...

December 21st 22nd when Trump signed that executive and ??Coonan also at that point said the Eric Schmidt's resignation from Alphabet, the parent of Google, was connected with, not coincidentally, was connected to the signing of the executive order...

Now well, then I think the word was very cleverly done because first of all it was specifying that Donald Trump was only after, and allowing the Treasury to identify people who are involved in human rights trafficking abuses...
Okay and in the middle of the dot of the document in one sentence it says, I hereby declare a national emergency...[/quote]

That was in fact on Dec. 21

Eric Schmidt steps down as executive chairman of Google's parent Alphabet
Thu 21 Dec 2017 22.58 GMT
 
Post#408
Dec 22, 2017:
[quote author=Q]
[quote author=Q]

Did you find the exchange 2 days ago re: WH EO today?
We listened.
Feel proud.
Q[/quote]

>>142639
ES (Goog) resigned today post EO.
Coincidence?
Q[/quote]


[quote author=Q]NOTHING is a coincidence.[/quote]


Over the past few months there has been an unprecedented number of CEOs resigning and politicians deciding not to run for re-election. Swamp draining in action? Another interesting claim is that the Saudi purge was due to Trump, who visited not long before the corrupt officials and princes were arrested. Also "Dopey Prince" Alwaleed just put out a short video in English (?) alleging that he's fine and says he's on his way to being released shortly. I know some Saudi citizens who aren't buying it or at least have suspicions, and also:

Post#536
January 15, 2018:
[quote author=Q]
[quote author=anon]
>>49315
just saw story about alwaleed in prison because he won't pay 6 billion to secure freedoom[/quote]

>>49330
He doesn't have 6b.
We froze his assets.
Think logically.
When does a BIRD TALK?
Q[/quote]
 
Rhythmik said:
Some of Q's claims/hints I found the most interesting:
Military intelligence is listening in on and thwarting/overthrowing the deep state.
NK is a shell country run by the CIA. Elon Musk of all people has been one aiding them with their rocket tech, which is why they now have ICBMs that can strike anywhere on the US mainland (the US would not have allowed NK to progress if they legit opposed it).
Hinted that a missile fired at Hawaii was intercepted.
Debbie Wasserman-Schulz had two MS-13 gangsters assassinate Seth Rich, who were then murdered to tie up loose ends.
7/10 plane crashes are not accidents.
Multiple planes that been turned back recently have been related to people fleeing the country.
The massive number of CEOs resigning is related to Trump's EO signed 12/21/17
"Estimated 4-6% we consider ‘hopeless' and forever brainwashed." :/

My favourite one is "NK is a shell country run by the CIA."

:lol:

If he ever gets to writing proper sentences, he should submit his stuff to whatdoesitmean.com or yournewswire.com.
 
angelburst29 said:
Palestine (Aid)

Trump has cut off $65 million worth of aid to the Palestinian UN Relief Fund (UNRWA) which goes to the Palestinian Authority. The U.S. still allocates $60 million to other Palestinian programs, which taken together was $125 million a year. The question is, "Why did Trump cut aid to UNRWA?" Because "the bulk of US aid to the PA ... goes on security for the Israelis through the Palestinian Authority’s 70,000 security personnel."

So why is the media claiming that Trump is cutting off "emergency food assistance and other support"?

Israel: Aid cut to harm ‘security coordination’ with PA Sunday January 28, 2018
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180128-israel-aid-cut-to-harm-security-coordination-with-pa/

The Israeli army has warned of grave consequences of a US move to cut funding for the Palestinian Authority (PA) and UN refugee agency UNRWA.

The army and security agencies fear that US aid cuts will “cause damage to security coordination” with the PA, Israeli daily Haaretz reported Sunday.

In a report to the government, the army warned that without US financial aid, the PA “would find it difficult to maintain the capabilities of its security forces and [then] its desire to continue coordination with Israel.”

Earlier this month, the US State Department said it was withholding $65 million in aid to Palestine “for further consideration”.

The US fund cuts came a month after President Donald Trump sparked a world outcry by officially recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Under the Oslo Peace Agreement signed between the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Israel in 1993, the two sides coordinate to prevent any attack against Israel.
 
Niall said:
If he ever gets to writing proper sentences, he should submit his stuff to whatdoesitmean.com or yournewswire.com.

lol good one, I think he should get a job at the Psychic Hotline.

Niall said:
My favourite one is "NK is a shell country run by the CIA."

It's possible? Again, how did NK's rocket technology advance so quickly in only 20 years? Why did the US allow it? Funding SpaceX allowed them to operate sans oversight that would restrict NASA. Q has written:
"NK _ SpaceX"
"Why did BO (Obama) scuttle the shuttle program? What is SpaceX?"
"$4.9 billion in government subsidies. Why?"
"Rizvi Traverse Management. Very important"

[quote author=Q post#437]2011 Shuttle Program terminated by Hussein.
US loses space dominance.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/08/09/obama-administration-knew-about-north-koreas-miniaturized-nukes.html
IRAN Nuke deal.
NK Nuke/Missile Tech.
SpaceX.
NASA Tech to ?
HRC SAPs (private server).
Connected.
$$$,$$$,$$$.00 (pockets).
EYE OF RA.
Left eye [marker].
Symbolism.
EVIL.
STUPID.
JUSTICE.
Q[/quote]

We know that some of the classified files that Hillary stored on her unsecured server related to NK's nuclear program. One reason why Clinton would be 'dumb' enough to stash SAPs on an unsecured server while meeting with foreign officials, was that she was selling state secrets and invited her server to be hacked. Q seems to confirm this.

Trump's outlandish comments and ridiculous tweets to Kim make more sense if viewed as theatre and he is really taunting the CIA (while at the same time having fun trolling his detractors). He threatens Kim with his "big Nuclear Button" and less than a week later NK & SK are engaging in peace talks with NK pledging to have their athletes march together under a unified Korean banner during the opening ceremony at the Olympics.

Trump on NK in '99 - https://youtu.be/XjXZNJ50GN0

You can thank Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton for North Korea's nukes
https://nypost.com/2016/01/06/you-can-thank-jimmy-carter-and-bill-clinton-for-north-koreas-nukes/

f-clintonkim-a-20161031-870x616.jpg
 
My reading of the situation is that the guy is a bit of a spook running a sort of informal psyop. The way I view politics, you could say that faction A in the deep state that wants to dissolve the US and the rest of the world into an opaque, bureaucratic, totalitarian superstate. This is the faction that infuses the "left." Faction B wants to make a more traditional empire, with the US the center of a vast array of vassal states. It seeks a return to the Pax Americana carrot and stick system of the 50s and 60s, however they are aware that China and Russia will have to be accommodated to some degree. Currently Faction B stands behind the "right." In order for Faction B to succeed, they have to "Make America Great Again," and a lot of Trump's ideas are aligned with their goals, up until a certain point, where he ceases to be useful. I also see a Faction C, which consists mainly of the secret government/UFO guys, which is only interested in maintaining the flow of resources to their sector of the military industrial complex so that the farm can continue to function. Faction C knows it is wholly irrelevant which human sits upon the throne, but are sensitive to any instabilities that threaten the stability of the Earth project and the interface with 4D STS. Therefore, they play both sides against each other to keep any one from getting too powerful or unruly and threatening their position. There are probably a multitude of subfactions, but these are the three main groups to be concerned with, in my opinion.

Q works for Faction B, and the infighting has gotten rather close to his desk in the deep state bureaucracy. Maybe he's having it out with his boss, who belongs to Faction A, or maybe he was forced into retirement. Faction B is currently weaker than Faction A, but is experiencing a resurgence due to the quasi-awakening of the conservative voter base. Therefore, there will be many people like Q who will be exposing the dirt on Faction A while managing to avoid the corrupt heart of the matter. This empowers Faction B at the expense of Faction A. This outcome has been deemed acceptable and necessary by Faction C. Faction C intends to use Faction B as a release valve for the general body politic. It could be argued that Faction B is a little more honest and out in the open than Faction A, but none of these people are what you would consider to be nice guys. They're all very grey actors, some of them a rather dark shade of grey. I'm also of the opinion that Julian Assange is an asset of Faction B. I'm sure there are a handful of "white hats" out there, a Faction D if you will, but they are so few and far between that they're mostly a myth perpetuated by Faction B. I think the system for agent and leadership selection in the deep state has been fine tuned over the years to select for psychopathy, and you don't stand much of a chance unless you are a primary or secondary psychopath, or a 4D STS candidate. Anyone who doesn't fall into that milieu is having to do an awful lot of pretending, occasionally having to betray their principles, and needs a large degree of skill and luck just to make it through each day. It would be extremely difficult for any decent person to survive in that crucible year in and year out. The only way Faction D can become viable, is if Faction C experiences some kind of internal collapse.

I think this is the situation Trump walked into. He had some ideas which would upset all three factions. Faction A attacked him with Faction C waiting quietly in the shadows. Faction C made him feel powerless through indirect means. Due to Trump's values, Faction B saw an opportunity and offered him a way out of a tough situation. The price was that Trump would be essentially beholden to them, and is now powerless against Faction C.

It'll be interesting to see how far out in left field I am with all of this.
 
Rhythmik said:
It's possible? Again, how did NK's rocket technology advance so quickly in only 20 years? Why did the US allow it?

The US didn't "allow" it. North Korea WILLED it. *

This might strike some of you as strange, but other peoples have immanence too! [That's a fancy word for 'agency' or 'sovereignty'. Minds of their own!]

Not everything revolves around the US, and not everything is under the control of the Empire, as this self-referential Q stuff would like you to remain believing.

* Actually, that's not the whole story. NK has signalled time and again that it is ready to desist with its nuke program. Here, I'll let Vlad fill you in on what happened next:


https://youtu.be/AOB8s0vs2EY

So you see, yes, the US had a role to play in NK getting its nukes... by being an antagonistic imperial a$$h*le threatening to level the country like it did Iraq and Libya, which spurred NK to get nukes ASAP!
 
Niall said:
So you see, yes, the US had a role to play in NK getting its nukes... by being an antagonistic imperial a$$h*le threatening to level the country like it did Iraq and Libya, which spurred NK to get nukes ASAP!

Same goes for Iran (although Israel played the same role).
 
Not really earthshattering but a hit for Q nonetheless.

Q (Jan 21) post#567 said:
Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?
1 of 22.
#Memo shifts narrative.
#Memo reinstates SESSIONS' authority re: Russia/ALL.
#Memo factually demonstrates collusion at highest levels.
#Memo factually demonstrates HUSSEIN ADMIN weaponized INTEL community to ensure D victory [+insurance].
#Memo factually demonstrates 'knowingly false intel' provided to FISA Judges to obtain warrant(s).
THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE.
[The 16 Year Plan To Destroy America]
........
 
Rhythmik said:
Not really earthshattering but a hit for Q nonetheless.

Q (Jan 21) post#567 said:
Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?
1 of 22.
#Memo shifts narrative.
#Memo reinstates SESSIONS' authority re: Russia/ALL.
#Memo factually demonstrates collusion at highest levels.
#Memo factually demonstrates HUSSEIN ADMIN weaponized INTEL community to ensure D victory [+insurance].
#Memo factually demonstrates 'knowingly false intel' provided to FISA Judges to obtain warrant(s).
THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE.
[The 16 Year Plan To Destroy America]
........

Yes. The memo really didn't tell us anything we didn't already suspect; it just made things FACTUAL. It's rather amazing to see the cognitive dissonance about it among liberals.
 
Five headlines on CNN that show the angle the left is taking on it. Basically, there's nothing here, Trump's still an evil Russia colluder.

Here's what's behind the disputed four-page document and its potential fallout

Analysis: The memo's most interesting part is Trump's reaction

Did the Nunes memo undermine its own core argument?

Nunes hints that there's more to come

Fired FBI chief weighs in on memo: That's it?
 
Joe said:
Five headlines on CNN that show the angle the left is taking on it. Basically, there's nothing here, Trump's still an evil Russia colluder.

Here's what's behind the disputed four-page document and its potential fallout

Analysis: The memo's most interesting part is Trump's reaction

Did the Nunes memo undermine its own core argument?

Nunes hints that there's more to come

Fired FBI chief weighs in on memo: That's it?
Yup. And it was released on a Friday which gives the Deep State and MSM time to adjust their talking points and see where the wind blows by Monday. What's even more unfortunate is that a lot of people around me are totally uninterested and buy into the "that's it?" theme the press and left are pushing.
 
^ just as Q said in the latest drop
https://qcodefag.github.io/

Q (5th Feb) post#663 said:
Why did the #Memo drop a Friday [& before the SB]?
Did this seem strange to you?
Watch the news.
Rothschild estate sale [Black Forest].
Stock market DIVE [666 - coincidence?].
Soros transfer of wealth.
Dopey FREED.
Marriage for POWER, not LOVE.
Hilton/Roth.
Soros/Clinton. Etc.
News unlocks MAP.
Think Mirror.
Which team?
THEY don't know.
APACHE.
These people are EVIL.
Still don't believe you are SHEEP to them?
20/20 coming.
PUBLIC is VITAL.
RELEASE of INFO VITAL.
OUTRAGE.
JUSTICE.
Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?
FOLLOW THE LIGHT.
Q

What was going on at the Black Forest?
Dopey = Saudi Prince Alwaleed
What is APACHE? (he's said this a few times recently)

Q (4th Feb) post#665 said:
 
Back
Top Bottom