...many experienced rescuers say that they never saw anything like this
He complained before the flight that the technical condition of the aircraft leaves a lot to wish for.
It might be a good idea for flight companies to consider much "pilote gut feelings" before they take off... I mean, these guys have so much direct knowledge of the flight conditions, they spend their time high in the sky, so they must have developped some kind of "special abilities", and are maybe able to grasp straight when there are some, even if unknown, "strange parameters" before taking off?
If a guy gets angry during the departure of the plane, they would stop it, call the police and evacuate the person; I am wondering what leverage does a pilot have if he thinks there is something unusual? He is all alone to follow his instinct, to determine if he is himself confronted to a situation involving manipulation - if he is able to spot "it", whatever form it would take in that moment - And if it happens? And moreover, what, when the pilot have the gut feeling like in the russian case, what would make him think "This is strange" > "Let me not give to much credit to this" > "Let's take off" even tough pilots seems to be very responsible people, need to have specific levels of "knowledge" for becoming a pilot.
There must be the kind of "bad atmosphere" we know when something terrible is going to happen, surrounding the place, something like the "guardian angel teaching about danger". And I think the not only the pilot would have it, but passengers as well. I can understand that in the circumstances of a flight, which is very unusual, most of the people are already stressed out, distracted by all the bleeps and planes around, the modernity of an airport, so many parameters that can distract the holding of a "there is something bad" feeling when it elusively passes by, and quickly disappear.
Today, we are better informed by people who work hard to find the needle in the dump, people who are not paid are doing better findings that those officials who gather to investigate the case, presenting us reports that are sadly "not convincing enough", and sometimes it could even be thought that they are joking, when seeing the kind of things they dare to issue to the public.
At 11:56 Sputnik above noted that a flight recorder was found at the crash site.
at 12.20 Egyptian aviation authority denied that a flight recorder was found.
I really like the "Egyptian aviation authority denied that", because it really shows that in their world, it seems that it does not matter, and that for them, they really think that they can proceed like this, lookking as they were able to overcome what is not "overcomable". Or it is like seeing that in what seems to be a manipulation orchestrated by strong occult people, the small little Egypt does not have the nerves to face the situation when having to assume some responsability, by having to eexpress itself regarding facts and the event, instead of those who really did it, bringing their own "allies" down instead of them.
When McCain is photographied with an al-quaida boss, it is not enough for the people, and they would keep in going against Syria in their minds, wishing the fall of Bachar El Assad. What do we need to do in order for people to stay on the truth (if McCain photo is the truth, and not some sugar thrown for conspiracy building)?
Maybe some years before, "finding something which does not fit" in a plane crash would immediately be reported in the media, along with some kind "will of clarify things out". Maybe it was all theater, or because there weren't the nowadays expert internet community, so they could control the information better, but at least we had the feeling that Sherlock Holmes was in charge... Like people having the feeling that autorities "really want to know the truth and that they work in this direction".
Moreover, "russian plane crash in egypt" is a really odd combo. It shows some rather exotic aspects, and the title itself made me dream about some kind of "1001 nights" far away event. It is true, the occidental parameter is not present there any more, it's like "look how they deal with it".
