Session 10 December 2022

[Freya Stewart]

Do you and the other person want to be included in the access to the Grail? Well, first it must be worthy of it if we base ourselves on the characteristics of the "desired gentleman" or diamond in the rough like Parsifal, that is, a gentleman is not a "gentleman" just because he is good at fighting, it also includes codes of conduct such as empathy and compassion but from a particular point of view, as you say, based on suppositions, you can criticize me if you want or suppose, and that is all that leads to a constructive debate. In fact, I use the translator

If you are interested in information concerning the holy grail you might want to check out the information posted here:

The Grail Quest and the Destiny of Man – Cassiopaea

cassiopaea.org

 

[Torri]

@Torri ,

Your statements are more like incorrect assumptions full of anticipation.


You are making the assumption that someone (@benkostka) does not have any opinion about the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail, and high technology, and then saying "it is occluded for people like you". You must think you have "access" that we do not have.

First of all the Cs never said anything about 10,000,000 Nephalim (do not know where you got that number) but they mentioned 36 million riding the Wave in 3 separate ships having about 12 million each.

Session 2 November 1994:


The rest of your speculations are muddled in my opinion.

My friend, if you want, you can read Laura's article on "Lucifer and the search for the Grail of non-anticipation" that has a good Snow.

 

[gottathink]

Do you and the other person want to be included in the access to the Grail? Well, first it must be worthy of it if we base ourselves on the characteristics of the "desired gentleman" or diamond in the rough like Parsifal, that is, a gentleman is not a "gentleman" just because he is good at fighting, it also includes codes of conduct such as empathy and compassion but from a particular point of view, as you say, based on suppositions, you can criticize me if you want or suppose, and that is all that leads to a constructive debate. In fact, I use the translator

Torri,
You clearly have things to contribute to this forum in points of discussion, but I find your posts come off as being fueled by more emotion than critical thinking. If that’s so, it’s a poor balance and you end up sounding arrogant IMO.
Can you chill out a bit, take a breathe to calm down and wait a while before you post reply. Give yourself a chance to check if your response is respectful to others here.

 

[Torri]

Torri,
You clearly have things to contribute to this forum in points of discussion, but I find your posts come off as being fueled by more emotion than critical thinking. If that’s so, it’s a poor balance and you end up sounding arrogant IMO.
Can you chill out a bit, take a breathe to calm down and wait a while before you post reply. Give yourself a chance to check if your response is respectful to others here.

Under what criteria am I because of your "arrogant" and "emotional" judgment? So you could tell me within yourself what has offended you? tell me something, do you feel well?

 

[irjO]

Under what criteria am I because of your "arrogant" and "emotional" judgment? So you could tell me within yourself what has offended you? tell me something, do you feel well?

I'm not sure if it's a translator issue or the real intention of your words are not in reality as we are perceiving them, but that question you made felt rude and indeed your responses sounds emotional and defensive.

 

[Jones]

Under what criteria am I because of your "arrogant" and "emotional" judgment? So you could tell me within yourself what has offended you? tell me something, do you feel well?

Perhaps the objects of power are real, such as the Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Grail, a high technology and surely for you they do not exist because it is occluded for people like you without access and veiled.

The way that the above sentence is worded gives the impression that you think that you are superior to the person it's directed at. It seems like an arrogant and defensive stance.

 

[Torri]

No estoy seguro si es un problema del traductor o si la verdadera intención de sus palabras no es tal como las percibimos, pero esa pregunta que hizo se sintió grosera y, de hecho, sus respuestas suenan e

La forma en que está redactada la oración anterior da la impresión de que crees que eres superior a la persona a la que está dirigida. Parece una postura arrogante y defensiva.

mocionales y defensivas.

Buenas noches mi amigo solo son suposiciones también te has ofendido ? En el año 2012 hemos conversado un poco también con Josue y otros..ahora llego al foro y en realidad no publiqué nada pero si he comentado amigo

 

[Torri]

La forma en que está redactada la oración anterior da la impresión de que cree que eres superior a la persona a la que está dirigida. Parece una postura arrogante y defensiva.

La forma en que está redactada la oración anterior da la impresión de que crees que eres superior a la persona a la que está dirigida. Parece una postura arrogante y defensiva.

The way that the above sentence is worded gives the impression that you think that you are superior to the person it's directed at. It seems like an arrogant and defensive stance.

Jones would like to be included in the most important news of all time! I say it openly for everyone?
It would be very important for me to say it... But it would be better for the Cs themselves to clarify about the Grail.
I mean, do the Cs have access to 7th density?

 

[Tauriel]

Jones would like to be included in the most important news of all time! I say it openly for everyone?
It would be very important for me to say it... But it would be better for the Cs themselves to clarify about the Grail.
I mean, do the Cs have access to 7th density?

You come across arrogant and sarcastic.
After reading your comments I have some difficulty to blame it on the translation device you're using.
But I might be wrong. At least it's word salad. Won't you heed the great advice of hold it for a moment to check yourself?

 

[goyacobol]

Do you and the other person want to be included in the access to the Grail? Well, first it must be worthy of it if we base ourselves on the characteristics of the "desired gentleman" or diamond in the rough like Parsifal, that is, a gentleman is not a "gentleman" just because he is good at fighting, it also includes codes of conduct such as empathy and compassion but from a particular point of view, as you say, based on suppositions, you can criticize me if you want or suppose, and that is all that leads to a constructive debate. In fact, I use the translator

Why whould anyone offer to give a hand grenade to a baby?

Session 11 April 1998:

Q: Ummm, in reading this funny book I just finished {I believe it was “Fingerprints of the Gods” by Graham Hancock}, I discovered that there is the tradition of the Ark of the Covenant being in Ethiopia. This guy did a bunch of research on it, and it seems possible that it is there, and that it may even be active. Is it, in fact, in the church of St. Mary of Zion in Ethiopia?

A: No.

Q: Where is it?

A: If we were to reveal this to you, it would be akin to giving a hand grenade to a baby!!

Q: Well, I just thought I would ask! What I found out was that this wonderful Hakluyt Society that chronicled the funny business in the Canary Islands {which I had read previously, and which claimed that the Ark of the covenant was there} also kept track of the goings on in Ethiopia. One of the things they told about was the carrying of the Ark in procession by red or blond headed guys. And there was the Croix Patte of the Templars on a number of objects in Ethiopia. The Rose Croix. Did we have Templars there, or what was going on? Was the Ark there and was it then taken somewhere else?

A: The Ark of the Covenant is not what you think it is.

Q: You guys said that it was a power cell. I don't have some sort of romantic idea of it. I can accept that. But there are all these stories about it and a lot of people have mythologized it. What do you mean by saying such a thing. What is the Ark?

A: See Oak Island.
{Trans-dimensional Atomic Remolecularizer?}

Q: It seems that the Templars were in charge of building the Cathedral at Chartres, and there is a tableaux on one of the porches of Melchizedek and the Queen of Sheba. Equidistant between them is the Ark of the Covenant in a cart. Melchizedek is holding a cup that is supposed to be the Holy Grail. Inside this cup is a cylindrical object of stone. What is this?

A: Greater sight.

Q: What?! (A) Is it a symbol or a device?

A: Why cannot it be both?

Q: (A) It can be both, but is it both?

A: Yes.

Q: (A) So, it is a device for greater sight like a crystal ball, yes?

A: Only when utilized exactly precisely.

Q: How do you execute something with this device?

A: Why should one wish to "execute" someone with this device?

Q: We don't understand...

A: Laura did say "execute."

Q: You were using the phraseology of my question to give a clue, I suppose... Okay, in 1306 a mission from the Ethiopian King went to visit Pope Clement V. Exactly one year later the Templars were arrested. What did the Pope and the Ethiopian king and all the others talk about at that meeting?

A: Whether or not orders were being realized. Goodnight.

End of Session

 

[gottathink]

You come across arrogant and sarcastic.
After reading your comments I have some difficulty to blame it on the translation device you're using.
But I might be wrong. At least it's word salad. Won't you heed the great advice of hold it for a moment to check yourself?

These posts from Torri seem very much to me like an attack on group members. So I wonder if we are dealing with an “expected attack”.

 

[Tauriel]

These posts from Torri seem very much to me like an attack on group members. So I wonder if we are dealing with an “expected attack”.

I was thinking the same.
There were some more quite aggressive or condescending posts by other new members in other threads so that I was wondering whether this is some kind of 'concerted effort' of attack.
But maybe it's just hyperkinetic sensate taking hold.

 

[benkostka]

I was thinking the same.
There were some more quite aggressive or condescending posts by other new members in other threads so that I was wondering whether this is some kind of 'concerted effort' of attack.
But maybe it's just hyperkinetic sensate taking hold.

It is strange, and I review the posts of anyone before I mention anything, just because things can get lost in translation from using a translator, but it was just incomprehensible. The internet isn’t perfect, but I’ll say that this forum is one of the places where you can get a gist of a person’s essence by how they post.

It enters bizarro world quickly occasionally, though my take is that the best people who are trying to subvert things are more subtle. But, the long game just doesn’t favor anyone of the STS flavor, into the black hole they eventually go.

Now to find Thor’s Hammer…..

 

[Torri]

Estas publicaciones de Torri me parecen mucho un ataque a los miembros del grupo. Entonces me pregunto si estamos ante un “ataque esperado”.

Why whould anyone offer to give a hand grenade to a baby?

Session 11 April 1998:

I have not wanted to call the attention of some, much less put on "alert", what yes, cultural exchange can confuse things, the same with writing, but I think that basically they are perspectives 7 or more people against 1 sincerely shows that the attack is more well towards me influencing you (it seems) well... in short what it seems that what hurt was the theme of the Grail the "occlusion" and if everything is part of the same thing they want to be called to participate in the search for the Grail well well in good time but I bet you are not going to make it..No.
Solo el legitimo heredero puede hacerlo pero si me equivoco está bien solo fue otra "suposición".

 

[Ruth]

In High Strangeness (I am reading it again) The C's say that the Nordics will help us but here the aliens that the elite are talking to are described as Nordics. So are the Nordics good guys or bad guys ?

Both apparently. Probably a mixture of STS and STO. STS means 'service to self' (which our planet is based on - something to do with a short wave cycle) and STO means 'service to others'. STS is about inbalance and having power (over others) and STO is more about balance and helping people when they ask for it. The key in that situation, is not to disadvantage anyone. I suppose it could be classified as a pretty big subject.

My guess, is at that level they are either one or the other (with STS not being able to 'see' where their choices will take them - maybe even devolution?). However, in general, I feel the concept of STS and STO is like the Bell Curve of IQ. There are obviously some people who are completely to one side or the other. Those in the middle have (maybe more) of an ability to chose which way they want to go. In my opinion those in the extremes have already chosen their paths. This is probably a very simplistic view and there are other complicating factors!