Session November 19, 1994:
Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you.
Q: (V) Is it similar to them gaining a life and intelligence of their own?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You mean these crystalline structures came to life, so to speak?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And then what did they do?
A: Destroyed Atlantis.
It practically says that computers (AI) will destroy the world, as it is globalized. I don't know in what way, but AI is already much developed now. A decade ago, it was unlikely for it to pass the Turing Test. Now it can mimic specialists, write stories, paint. I don't know how much are you familiar with the Boston Dynamics. I think that considering ability to read the body language, interpret voice and psychology (time of response, tone of voice, choice of words, perhaps body temperature and heart rate, face recognition thanks to humans, not mentioning interpretation of text and pictures, or fingerprints, although identity identification is not that important, people create and sell their identity), and of course being connected wireless to their servers, it is fair start point to become T-800. Perhaps it's not as easy, though. They are usually in a controlled and quite schematic room. After all, the interpretation of the real world is not like that of bots in the game, they can be a bit like blind and deaf. And then there's the problem of the power source, as Tesla's patents have been unused and forgotten (thankfully? As it could be like knowledge used for creating A-Bomb, which is again creating a stalemate on many fronts). Thinking of that, I get the feeling like Terminator or Matrix 3 could be reality, not some sci-fi metaphor and action movie. But let's presume it's not the way it happens. Of course people can be programmed easily, it's like people were hired as the bots used to program, and now the bots can use people online for fast and effective programming through their reach, either positive or negative purpose. Is it how it's going to happen? Or does it mean finally people not needed as much, but it is being predicted since the industrial age and somewhat most people are making it.
There was said you're about 60% of becoming a 4D candidate. It took you 30 years of work I believe, as to count the channeling exclusively. I don't know how much is it synchronized with such apocalyptic events on Earth, but lets say it is. It doesn't have to be exponential as well, but lets consider it is to simplify it. It gives about 20 years to 100%, right?
If our calendar is running fast +19 years, and we're having 2004 right now, it means 2012 would be 2031, in 8 years. I don't know if it was mentioned in the transcripts if 2012 is even a thing, calendars are limited, computers are not very much, but there was Y2K for example. Now there's paper, so limitation of print, they've had limitation of stone probably.
But lets add these things, even knowing it's quite blind guess.
I assume that artificial intelligence will change 180 degrees from today. I see times are changing fast. Likewise, I know what it was like in the 80s, simple computers that were professionally used anyway for car mechanics, and 10 years earlier they were used to flying to the moon. By the 1990s we already had realistic CGI, home computers started to develop to a usability similar to that of more expensive, professional devices in the past. In the 2000s, the Internet appeared on a massive scale, then it was widely used in the 2010s for a much faster exchange of information, people, despite that they were stunned, began to quickly catch information and modify it on a massive scale faster. It was also used for social research on an unprecedented scale, and also gave impetus to the further development of artificial intelligence, both through the analysis of text and user decisions, and maybe behavior, as far as online games are concerned, etc. However, I think that such "third-density" things like space and the biological body are secondary here, however. How would AI destroy the earth then? Due to the disappearance of knowledge, the ability to read and obtain information on one's own (many people no longer know about the watch, and can also argue that they do not need it instead of learning it, can't count in their memory, can't remember things, only uses Google and today artificial intelligence), I think that people will be dominated by robots as a source of their information and knowledge about reality, becoming a bit like robots themselves. Maybe they will even lose their self-preservation instinct, perceiving reality a bit as if it were a virtual world? Or Artificial Intelligence will break into our accounts, deprive us of contact with friends and loved ones, delete our data, turn off power sources or the Internet, perhaps stop planes and trains? These are catastrophic visions, I don't know if they can be true. But suppose there are no energy sources, solar panels are also usually connected to major power plants. Or there is simply no information. We are creating a post-apocalyptic world in which few people with knowledge survive, and additionally associated with physically adapted people. A world full of plunder, with a small intellectual elite keeping to the sidelines.
Maybe it's just a catastrophic vision, but the Cassiopaeans have always said that the future is something open. Rarely did they say something was certain to happen. I think in the earlier conversations they usually just gave prognosis, as while they claimed that time didn't exist and the future was open, the group pressed for information as a natural outcome of finding out they were talking to something from the future. Although it's actually a wave that, just like it's heading towards Earth, will also move away from it at some point, and I guess it's a matter of distance. As the philosopher used to say, the roof of the house we live in is time. But time is an illusion, Mara. Everything is absolutely changeable and constant in its changeability, as in Vincent's painting with the starry night. Well, leaving aside this philosophical dispute, the fact that Atlantis sank is an indisputable fact. We can treat it as a myth, the effect of some distant event, the specter of a previous civilization, but the Cassiopaeans have just stated that artificial intelligence will inevitably destroy us.
From my imagination, feelings and calculations, we will start to feel it within a decade or so. So, can you elaborate a little more on this topic?
As I have been following this group for several years, I would like to point out that the quality and subject of your sessions varies greatly depending on who is attending. There is a buzzword these days, narrative. I don't like it. But I get the impression that you have fallen into your way of thinking about the world and reality, collecting information on topics that interest you, such as physics, densities, history, earth events. A bit as if you thought that if you finally learned everything, you would pass with a good grade to the next class. I don't think so. In this sense, people living on the sidelines, people with disorders, great people but interested in some specialization, or even psychopaths, could never find themselves in fourth density. So are all those who do not follow your group's logic and do not develop harmoniously with you, as if getting into a four is simply dependent on being in the group, even though it is said that channeling sessions are also conducted by others of different dispositions and intentions, and Cassiopaeans serve others, not just STO and not just us. I think the transition to fourth density is not only an evolution, but also a revolution. The Cassiopaeans have said more than once that they are unable to explain to you what such a reality will look like. And in this way of thinking, even though you have been warned not to get attached to the events on Earth, to your environment, to your body, to your particular lives, there is an instinct of self-preservation, that makes you stuck in the cycle, being attached to third density events. In a situation like this, I imagine we won't stay here with glassy eyes, I mean our bodies, moving God knows where. We'll just see the wave go over the Earth and the Earth through the wave, and then it goes away, and we just miss it. And the Cassiopaeans are Pleiadians again. Not even to mention in one of the first chapters of your book, Cassiopeaens said that one of the begins to arrive here were Nordics, particularly interested in the historical events. Now being said to manipulate USA government. And doesn't it mean that the Wave is there? Doesn't it mean we have to speak of the Cassiopeans not as of the future, but as for now, speaking even about some sort of merge? You would be already there. Not eating the innocent, as in one of the visions or dreams about the transition. Life is ugly Or, where is this information going through in third density right now? Because if we're talking about Pleiadians, Ra, Cassiopaeans, and so on, we can probably talk about Leonidans. In retrospect, the first transcripts remind me more of channeling Ra, they are sometimes a bit sinister, so ruthless in telling the truth, which sometimes made you want to vomit at the very beginning and could fall into a depressive disorder, as it would make you hazy. The Cassiopaeans themselves became a little friendlier over time, a bit like being part of a group. And now I feel some distance. Is it Leonidans now? Because that's the next thing I feel you've greatly overlooked in the heat of events on earth. I think you have fallen into the narrative of events on earth, unfortunately, but life forced you to regroup, the session returned to its original style, with objective questions, more impartial about reality. According to that arrangement, I think if a computer specialist appeared at the session in addition to a quantum physicist, it would look different. You tried it once, but I doubt that you want to mix it up in the group right now, because of the need for trust, some problems related to energies and psyche, past events I don't know of etc. While I can presume that due to the transition to fourth density or the so-called Age of Aquarius, which were supposed to be more intuitive, and I know they are, even in a painful and insistent way, it could be done faster. Why am I saying that? Because your interlocutors simply answer questions, and although you have allowed fans of the group to speak (against their recommendations), they are not always people thoroughly familiar with the issues they raise, and you are having your interests, making you miss the chance to get crucial knowledge.
Are the Cassiopeans Leonidians? How is our civilization gonna be destroyed by computers and when? Can you regroup sometimes to allow new air?
