...Another thought is to create local communities, local groups that discuss these things and share this information among all the members. And then have those communities connect with each other remotely as well. In some sense it could be like the communities that were proposed in "creating a new world" thread, but maybe they could be started before all things go to hell? Then the question becomes, how much association do they have back to this group, and how much of what this group does/discusses is part of what the community openly discusses (C's, hyperdimensional stuff, etc)? I think the focus would have to be on practical things like diet and EE training from our awesome EE instructors as well as psychopathy/narcissism - to help people heal themselves. We could come up with a name for these communities.
Or maybe I'm reinventing the wheel here, maybe FOTCM would serve this purpose, assuming such communities are even a good idea? One thing to consider - would people be less willing to join if there's a "religion" associated with the community? But then again, perhaps the protection awarded by this "religion" is necessary for such things to be able to exist and function without being compromised? Then again, being part of such a community may not require one to join the religion, it could just be a community that's created/sponsored by the religion so to speak, but membership in FOTCM is not required if one just wishes to be part of the local community.
Things like "alcoholics anonymous" and other groups, from what I can tell, do help people, and people are willing to join groups when they feel unhappy in their lives, if only for moral support, and it is natural because we're all social beings who, to a large degree, get our strength from others - both from seeing others succeed so we get confidence that we can succeed as well, and from the prospect of being able to help others succeed who need help. We're "wired" to be part of a community, and it's unfortunate that we have been part of dysfunctional ones all our lives.
Anyway, just some thoughts - plus, if the internet goes down at some point, it would be great to already have local communities that would be there to help everybody get through the blackout. If the internet went down today, how many of us have such a local support network? If we're lucky we would have some family and friends that have some clue and common sense and wouldn't only lead each other to destruction from ignorance and panic. Everybody here is all over the world and only connected through the internet, so it's a very real concern, osit. We can suggest that people create a network of friends for mutual support, especially in times of crisis, but I'd think that an organized and collinear effort to create such groups and give them a real purpose may go a long way to ensure that each one of us is locally ready for whatever comes, and to be able to help as many people practically in our local community as possible - not just during a crisis/blackout, but before it as well.
One possible caveat though, we don't necessarily want to paint a bulls eye on ourselves either. Bringing a lot of people together who question their world and help each other in many ways could be the first thing that the PTB would want to target, and perhaps it would not be a good idea to be physically in one place and make it easy for them? But is this enough of a threat to completely not have such communities at all just because of this? I'm not sure if the threat outweighs the benefits. Not to mention that the communities would be all over the world, so at least it's spread out. We could also just make them under the banner of FOTCM so it looks like a religious community rather than an obvious truth-weeking one to avoid attracting attention, but then that may defeat the purpose since we do want to attract attention from people who would benefit from the knowledge/support of the community. Sorry if I'm starting to ramble, there's just so many considerations here.