Thanks everyone for the session -- the genetic and historical questions were quite interesting. I'm toward the end of Bruce Fenton's book right now, and am eager to see how he interprets the African matrilineal L and patrilineal A/B haplogroups, since they are what are normally used by population geneticists to root the
homo sapiens tree in African populations.
I thought this part was a fun reference to an earlier discussion about iodine:
Q: (Artemis) Well, according to this book about neurofeedback that I'm reading, it can possibly potentially help people become immune to certain poisons, toxins, and possibly even sicknesses. Is this true?
A: Yes and you need to continue!
Q: (Artemis) I knew it. Can it also possibly protect people against beaming and HAARP?
A: Yes
Q: (Artemis) And the flu and the plague? [laughter]
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) And Ebola? (Artemis) Ebola? [laughter]
A: Yes
Q: (Artemis) Well, this is great. It means it can help a lot of people with a lot of things.
November 21st 2015
Q: (L) So, let me ask you: Could iodine combat AIDS?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Ebola?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Plague?
A: Yes.
Q: (Artemis) Chicken Pox?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Measles?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, why the hell didn't you tell us about this before?! [laughter]
The NO readings were also very interesting. When watching the embedded video, the greatest amount of activity (when looking at the chart posted by Approaching Infinity
here) appears to be in the Theta range, including both "good" and "bad" Theta according to that chart.
Since I had my own NO session today, I thought I'd ask my practitioner about the data posted in this session. I told him that the readings weren't taken during a NO session, but rather during a conversation that was occurring in an environment that may have included a high amount of local energy (so take the below with a grain of salt).
First, he told me that in regard to this kind of data:
he tends to find it unreliable, and focuses more on the brainwave patterns (as displayed in the embedded video). He then focused almost immediately on this pattern:
He basically said that it "shouldn't look like that." He offered three possible explanations in order of decreasing probability: (1) the sensors weren't connected properly, possibly due to some hair being in the way, (2) electromagnetic interference from either nearby devices or something broadcasting in the near vicinity, or (3) some kind of pathology. He thought (3) was unlikely, and that (1) was the most likely explanation although (2) was not unlikely depending on what was going on in the local environment.
Anyway, as I said take the above for what it's worth since he didn't have the full context with which to evaluate the readings, but I hope his comments are interesting in some way.