To Corto Maltese:
All of this reminds me of these portions of the Wave 3 :
"The “Maidens of the Sacred Wells” would feed wanderers and travelers
from golden bowls and cups. This symbolized the “creative potential” of
the Right hemisphere, and that it was through this “wellspring of
creativity” that one could literally “create reality and all that was needed”."
"There has been some research regarding “recordings” in stones of
buildings... of energy fields, earth grids and all that. Certain stones
produce electricity under the right conditions... and if the stones were used
to amplify mental energies... well, they would power not only transport
(eliminating the need for the wheel), communication and recording of
information (eliminating the need for writing), and perhaps could even
“manifest” anything that was needed in terms of food and other goods
(thereby eliminating the need for cities and agriculture)."
"A: Stones were once utilized to provide for all needs, as the energies
transmitted connected directly with the pituitary gland to connect spiritual
realities with the material realms of 3rd and 4th densities. So you see, the
“stone” was viewed as Matriarchal indeed!"
So I guess the difference may be whether one does it only if needed or "rapes the maiden" which would be more like YCYOR or wishful thinking. The line between those is thin as is between one thinking one's intentions are pure and what may be in reality (they may not be so pure for example). Also this session came to mind:
"Q: (L) OK, we’ve been talking earlier this evening about intent, and of
course, our own experiences with intent have really been pretty
phenomenal. We’ve come to some kind of an idea that intent, when
confirmed repeatedly, actually builds force. Is this a correct concept, and is
there anything that you can add to it?
A: Only until anticipation muddies the picture... tricky one, huh?
Q: (L) Is anticipation the act of assuming you know how something is
going to happen?
A: Follows realization, generally, and unfortunately for you, on 3rd
density. You see, once anticipation enters the picture, the intent can no
longer be STO.
Q: (L) Anticipation is desire for something for self. Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) OK, so it’s OK to intend something, or to think in an intentional
way, or to hope in an intentional way, for something that is to serve
another...
A: And that brings realization. But, realization creates anticipation.
Q: (L) Well, how do we navigate this razor? I mean, this is like walking on
a razor’s edge. To control your mind to not anticipate, and yet, deal with
realization, and yet, still maintain hope...
A: Mental exercises of denial, balanced with pure faith of a nonprejudicial
kind.
Q: (L) OK, so, in other words, to just accept what is at the moment,
appreciate it as it is at the moment, and have faith that the universe and
things will happen the way they are supposed to happen, without placing
any expectation on how that will be, and keep on working?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) We have discussed a lot of concepts about “shaping the future”. In
our discussions, we have hypothesized that it is something like an
intentional act of shaping something good, but without defining the
moment of measurement. In other words, adding energy to it by intent, but
not deciding where, when or how the moment of measurement occurs. Like
a quantum jump: you know it is statistically likely, but not definite, so you
cannot “expect” it, but you observe so that you can notice when it occurs
on it’s own, and in it’s own way.
A: Yes. Avoiding anticipation. That is the key to shaping the future...
When it hits you, it stops.
Q: (L) When what hits you? The fact that it’s happening? That you are
doing it?
A: Yes unless you cancel out all anticipation.
Q: (L) Well, this is very tricky.
A: Ah? We have doubts... And yes, you create your own reality!
Q: Well, but you have also said that anticipation messes things up, and so I
don’t want to have any anticipation.
A: Anticipation is not creating one’s own reality."
I am not the one to determine, just some thoughts. :)
