How Fake Is Roman Antiquity?
This is the first of a series of three articles challenging the conventional historical framework of the Mediterranean world from the Roman Empire to the Crusades. It is a collective contribution to an old debate that has gained new momentum in recent decades in the fringe of the academic world...
www.unz.com
This is the first of a series of three articles challenging the conventional historical framework of the Mediterranean world from the Roman Empire to the Crusades. It is a collective contribution to an old debate that has gained new momentum in recent decades in the fringe of the academic world, mostly in Germany, Russia, and France. Some working hypotheses will be made along the way, and the final article will suggest a global solution in the form of a paradigm shift based on hard archeological evidence.
How Fake Is Church History?
The Gregorian Coup and the Birthright Theft
The Gregorian Coup and the Birthright Theft
www.unz.com
This is the second of three articles drawing attention to major structural problems in our history of Europe in the first millennium AD. In the first article (
“How fake is Roman Antiquity?”), we have argued that the forgery of ancient books during the Renaissance was more widespread than usually acknowledged, so that what we think we know about the Roman Empire — including events and individuals of central importance — rests on questionable sources. (We have not claimed that all written sources on the Roman Empire are fake.)
How Long Was the First Millennium? (Part 3/3, Unz review)
This article is taken from How Long Was the First Millennium? and mirrored here due to it's importance. How Long Was the First Millennium? - Gunnar Heinsohn’s stratigraphy-based chronology Author: The First Millennium Revisionist This is the final installment of a three-part essay advocating...
stolenhistory.net
This is the final installment of a three-part essay advocating a radical revisionism of the first millennium AD. In
Part 1 and
Part 2, I examined a series of fundamental problems in our standard history of the greater part of the first millennium AD. Here I present what I believe is the best solution to these problems.
We are so used to rely on a universally accepted global chronology covering all of human history that we take this chronology as a given, a simple representation of time itself, as self-evident as the air we breathe. In reality, this chronology, which allows us to place with relative precision on a single time scale all major events in the histories of all peoples, is a sophisticated cultural construct that was not achieved before the late sixteenth century. Jesuits played a prominent role in that computation, but the main architect of the chronology we are now familiar with was a French Huguenot named
Joseph Scaliger (1540-1609), who set out to harmonize all available chronicles and calendars (Hebrew, Greek, Roman, Persian, Babylonian, Egyptian). His main works on chronology, written in Latin, are
De emendatione temporum (1583) and
Thesaurus temporum (1606). The Jesuit
Denys Pétau (1583-1652) built on Scaliger’s foundation to publish his
Tabulae chronologicae, from 1628 to 1657.
cassiopaea.org
Let's see if some snow comes down in the Northern Hemisphere.
