(T.C.) How do the Cs determine what events they will try to prevent by transmitting them to the group? It seems like there are plenty of events that seem horrible to us that they haven't prevented by doing this. Are they determining what is good or bad for humanity by doing this?
A: Depends on the questions!
Q: (T.C.) Can I ask a follow up to that?
(L) Yeah.
(T.C) So that then means that if we do the correct research and ask the right questions, then we can pretty much prevent anything from... well, not anything, but anything that could be preventable, could be prevented by asking the right questions?
A: If there was sufficient awareness generated, yes.
In the last session, when the C's said that there was the possibility of disasters being averted by them having transmitted warnings about them ahead of time, I thought about it for a bit.
I wondered about how free will of humanity factors into the equation. My thoughts lead me to the conclusion that it must depend on the questions asked, since it is the free will of the person asking which can potentially reveal the information necessary to avert the calamity.
Of course, by the same token, I believe that if there are definite risks of free will violations of humanity as a whole, or some similar risk, the C's can simply not answer the question, which is what lead me to ask how they determine what info of this type that they will give. The circular answer was, "Depends on the questions!", which I actually find quite amusing, considering the subject and 'my' thoughts about it.
It had been a while since that last session, and a while since I had gone over those ideas. I remembered after this latest session, that I had another question to tack onto the last one I asked: about preventing calamities. The question, had I remembered it, would have been, "Is this, in fact, what has been happening in our reality since the beginning of the cassiopaean transmissions, via Laura and the group's questions?"
Who knows how many timelines have shifted, how many disasters may have been averted so far. And if this is the case, if this non-linear, complex systems, butterfly effect dynamics have been in play, then how much of the early cassiopaean material regarding the future is now rendered null and void?
I'm seeing a mechanism - a trans-density mechanism - at play. 6th density thought forms see a particular dynamic playing out in the one true reality. A cosmic drama, for lack of a better term.
They decide that they will act to bring balance, since if the drama is allowed to play out as is, there will be imbalance of positive and negative.
They incarnate into 3rd density, (through 4th, apparently? No idea how that works or why it has to work that way, but that's what I've gathered from the sessions. I could have completely butchered that), and then they transmit their balancing influence into the reality via their superluminal communication. Not just through the board, but via other means as well like inspiration or during mediations or when a person is pondering or searching for answers. They create a yearning, maybe, in certain people, like those here on the forum - who are really themselves - for answers to questions: questions about the mission, about why they're here. And it's through answering the questions, or through their 3D versions of themselves finding the answers to the questions and putting them out there, living those answers every day in their interactions with the reality, that they are able to influence reality, shift the larger awareness of a large enough number of humans, which then closes off certain potential futures, and opens up new ones.
So it would then logically follow that a large part of our responsibility here and now is to always strive to be mindful of and maximise our receivership capacity/capability, since without it, we will not search, or yearn, or be inspired to seek, and ask. We will just sleep, mired in the default, entropic frequency of this environment. Everything the PTB does to us, through our food, environment, technologies, etc., is to damp the receivership capability, to stop this process.
When Laura said, "It sounds like there was a battle, and you guys lost.", regarding the 'fall', it would then be like an army allowing themselves to be captured by the enemy and taken back to their city, in order to effect a slow and gradual change within that city, by, say, introducing a different culture. In that sense, you would not have to fight a battle with the enemy army. You instead change their nation state's long-term cultural and political direction. It was one big plan, all along.