R o l a n d
"Sliders" was the series later two decades ago.
Well said Mariama - thank you very much.I think this is an excellent idea and the notion that we can learn how to stalk this thing is awe-inspiring and empowering. It could also help us overcome our anxiety, fear, outrage and grief and help transmute these emotions if they are limiting us in what we could become: true warriors the way Laura described in one of her articles.
I know that my becoming an ambassador last year pulled me through all that sadness I felt over the lockdowns last year, because in one fell swoop my aim became ever so much clearer. So, people participating more on our forum, helping one another, discussing matters, sharing sincerely as Laura said, knowing that we are all in this together and that our individual acquired strength will strengthen the whole network might bring about more co-linearity, more faith and more love, but that means that we have to get over ourselves. It's the journey of the hero!
Thank you for this very special session, Laura, the girls and the crew, and thanks to Laura and the Cs for their guidance and love.
Well the C's saying there is another time dimension in which our 3D sense of time is embedded. I would imagine that the second dimension of time also records information. Since this second time dimensions records information and is not available to our normal 3D awareness I infer the second time dimension is 4D.Is information only recorded as time in 3D and below?
That makes me think that there was definitely something special for Celts in knots:)This video on some of the interesting geometric trends that occur in higher dimensions was entertaining to watch. A part of me wants to make use of "knotting" in some way to understand linear time and its relationship with karma, but I have no clue atm. Interestingly enough I learned from this video that hyperdimensional mathematics are used for error checking in noisy communication channels.
In regards to Information recorded equals time. It can be viewed as formula: IR=t. Or if two different dimensions of Time are involved: IR=t+T.Q: (Ark) What kind of mathematics is needed to describe consciousness?
Q: (Ark) Consciousness is related to information. What really happens when things happen is that information is recorded. Where is information recorded?
A: By consciousness. [laughter] Information recorded equals time.
Q: (Ark) Is quantum theory related to time loops? That there are time loops and there are many of them? It's in my head...
c. 1200, recorden, "to repeat, reiterate, recite; rehearse, get by heart" (senses now obsolete), from Old French recorder "tell, relate, repeat, recite, report, make known" (12c.) and directly from Latin recordari "remember, call to mind, think over, be mindful of," from re-, here probably with a sense of "restore" (see re-), + cor (genitive cordis) "heart" (the metaphoric seat of memory, as in learn by heart), from PIE root *kerd- "heart."
Well the C's saying there is another time dimension in which our 3D sense of time is embedded. I would imagine that the second dimension of time also records information. Since this second time dimensions records information and is not available to our normal 3D awareness I infer the second time dimension is 4D.
It makes me wonder what the implications are for the behavior of information. 3D time may be embedded in a higher time dimension, but the "plane" of 2D time is likely itself embedded in other dimensions of informational processing and transformation. I would imagine being in 4D and striving toward hyperdimensional understanding from the perspective of a 4D organism would necessitate understanding and seeing into these non-temporal dimensions. Interestingly enough one level above that 4D level of awareness is 5D, where there is no longer any physicality (and therefore no time as 3/4D understand it). Reading books about the afterlife they describe things in sequences that appear similar to time, but I think this is just a form of data compression (similar to how coloring or shading a flat circle on a screen can causes our brain to embellish it into a fully fledged 3D sphere). That doesn't preclude there are dimensions that do things similar to time though. But seeing something solely through the lens of time at that level would be like us only moving things in a flat way, with nothing going over or under another.
This video on some of the interesting geometric trends that occur in higher dimensions was entertaining to watch. A part of me wants to make use of "knotting" in some way to understand linear time and its relationship with karma, but I have no clue atm. Interestingly enough I learned from this video that hyperdimensional mathematics are used for error checking in noisy communication channels.
Amid all the nonsense there are some unimpeachable truths … I invite you to go and measure [an arbitrarily selected, but specific] kiosk. You will see that the length of the counter is one hundred and forty-nine centimeters – in other words, one hundred-billionth of the distance between the earth and the sun. The height at the rear, one hundred and seventy-six centimeters, divided by the width of the window, fifty-six centimeters, is 3.14. The height at the front is nineteen decimeters, equal, in other words, to the number of years of the Greek lunar cycle. The sum of the heights of the two front corners is one hundred and ninety times two plus one hundred and seventy-six times two, which equals seven hundred and thirty-two, the date of the victory at Poitiers. The thickness of the counter is 3.10 centimeters, and the width of the cornice of the window is 8.8 centimeters. Replacing the numbers before the decimals by the corresponding letters of the alphabet, we obtain C for ten and H for eight, or C10H8, which is the formula for naphthalene. …With numbers you can do anything you like. Suppose I have the sacred number 9 and I want to get the number 1314, date of the execution of Jacques de Molay – a date dear to anyone who professes devotion to the Templar tradition of knighthood.
… Multiply nine by one hundred and forty-six, the fateful day of the destruction of Carthage. How did I arrive at this? I divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by two, by three, et cetera, until I found a satisfying date. I could also have divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by 6.28, the double of 3.14, and I would have got two hundred and nine. That is the year Attalus I, king of Pergamon, ascended the throne. You see? … The universe is a great symphony of numerical correspondences … numbers and their symbolisms provide a path to special knowledge. But if the world, below and above, is a system of correspondences where tout se tient, it’s natural for the [lottery] kiosk and the pyramid, both works of man, to reproduce in their structure, unconsciously, the harmonies of the cosmos. [emphasis added] (Eco 1988, 288–289)
But if time is recorded information...what about the substrate?
That is to say, for it to be recorded you must have some medium where that information is stored.
Q: Is consciousness stored in the universal information field similar to how information is stored in water? Is the universe an information field as the medium in which consciousness resides?
(L) Information field... The medium in which consciousness resides...
A: Vice versa.
Q: (Chu) The other way around.
(L) So consciousness is the medium in which information resides.
Q: (L) "And I heard a voice from Heaven like the sound of
great waters and like the rumbling of might thunder and
the voice I heard seemed like the music of harpists
accompanying themselves on their harps..." What is this
voice from heaven and the sound like great waters and
A: The return of Christ.
Q: (L) "And they sing a new song... No one could learn to
sing that song except the 144,000 who had been ransomed
from the earth... you said the 144,000 are the leaders of
the world bank and here it says they have been ransomed
from the earth at the coming of Christ... it says the
144,000 have not defiled themselves by relations with
women for they are pure as virgins. These are they who
follow the Lamb wherever he goes...they have been
A: Symbolism added later and this is not entirely accurate
point. The symbols have been mixed. Tends to encourage
elitism and divisiveness.
Q: (L) Are the 144,000 good guys or bad guys as we would term
A: Both. But they are ones who have supreme knowledge.
Q: (L) Are these human beings?
Q: (L) There will be 144,000 people on the earth who have
Q: (L) Now, this 144,000, are we among that number? Just
I found this article in the guardian from 2016 and I wonder if it doesn't tie in with the link between certain batches of vaccines and the magnetic effect they seem to produce, knowing that the C's said it was to control people. Maybe we can pick up the pieces
“Badass” new method uses a magnetised protein to activate brain cells rapidly, reversibly, and non-invasivelywww.theguardian.com
Do you mean this section?It is not said that God is total existence. It is said that God is the balancing of total existence and total non-existence. That's a big difference.
I guess, the presence of the question marks, "?", in the transcript can lead to different interpretations. The C's first say: "Total non-existence balances total existence. Guess what is total existence?" Laura answers with a question "Well, is it kind of like a balancing force?" and the C's answer "God" in quotation marks. Did the Cs last answer two questions, only their own or only Laura's? No matter, one could also consider if what Laura is asking is along "7th density, i.e.: all that is, and is not."? The last expression from the Cs is from another session, but before that I will quote a section used in the earlier post:Q: (L) [...] And what happens to energy that is "total non-existence"?
A: Total non-existence balances total existence. Guess what is total existence?
Q: (L) Well, is it kind of like a balancing force?
In the session above, 'Gravity is "God."', with God in quotation marks, but in the following: Session 21 December 1996 "Gravity is not God.". Gravity is also not 7th density, though "All are one and all." An interesting description that follows from the dialogue is that gravity emanates from a thought center, but All is not thought centers. "All is 7th density."A: Gravity is all there is.
Q: (L) Is light the emanation of gravity?
Q: (L) What is light?
Q: (L) Is gravity the same as the strong and weak nuclear forces?
A: Gravity is "God."
Q: (L) And what is the beginning and what is the end?
A: Union with the One.
Q: (L) What is the One?
A: 7th density, i.e.: all that is, and is not.
Q: (L) Now, we have managed to dance around the whole thing, and I still do not know how matter comes to be or how time...
Q: (L) How can I get where I want to go?
A: You have the basics.
Q: (L) Can you give me a couple more basics?
A: There are no more.
Q: (L) I once asked you if time was gravity?
A: Is a fence the ground?
Q: (L) Is gravity God?
Q: (L) Is gravity 7th density?
Q: (L) Where does gravity emanate from?
A: Thought center.
Q: (L) You have mentioned thought centers of many occasions. Is there more than one?
A: All are one and all.
Q: (L) If you have a thought center, how do thought centers related to 7th density, the One?
Q: (L) Are thought centers 7th density?
A: All is.
Q: (L) All is thought centers?
A: No. All is 7th density.
comme le principe des poupées russesSi la 7e densité est tout, cela implique-t-il que chaque densité englobe toutes les densités « inférieures » ? La 3e densité englobe la 2e et la première et nous pouvons certainement « voir » et interagir avec ces densités.
Cela devient déroutant (du moins de mon point de vue limité de 3e D) comment nous pouvons (ou allons) interagir avec 4D car ils interagissent probablement déjà avec nous.
Eh bien, nous savons ce que diraient les Cs…