John! said:The C's said back in 1994 that there would be no atomic war. Now(and since 2002 at least) they're saying that there is going to be one? Or by nuclear bombs, do they just mean cosmic impacts giving off radiation?Laura said:New session:
(J) In Germany, the rest of the world bombed Germany...
A: Yes. Expect it in the USA ultimately.
Q: (J) Would that be nuclear bombs?
A: And more.
Don't know if it was mentioned somewhere already, so just in case it was missed...In 18 Jan 03 transcript C's said the following:
Q: Is the war drama merely a play being put on to keep us all distracted and in a state of fear?
A: More or less.
Q: Yet, you said the United States would be bombed, and on another occasion you said there would not be a nuclear war.
A: "Bombs" are not all "nuclear." And, there are "natural bombs."
Maybe this is the 'and more' part they were talking about. And if we continue to read the same transcript we get this:
Q: (A) I want to ask about the collapse of the World Trade Center. There is evidence of seismicity and unusual pulses that seem to have simply disintegrated matter.
A: Very good observation, but that does not mean human sabotage either. There were certainly "pulses." They were of a "natural" source that was "sculpted" or "shaped" and directed.
Q: What do you mean by a 'natural source?'
A: Energies of the planet artificially collected and disbursed. An artificial earthquake sort of.
So maybe US won't be openly attacked by 'conventional bombs' but perhaps disguised as something 'natural'? And maybe those 'natural bombs' can be directed in some way? Just one option out of myriad possibilities I guess. We should keep our eyes open.