Turgon said:
gdpetti said:
goyacobol said:
gdpetti said:
Was it me, or was there no discussion as to the nature of these 'attacks'? Given that such attacks seem designed to severely limit ones' train of thought and action.... which reminds me of the LLResearch problems that continued with Carla... RIP.
gdpetti,
This whole session is about the nature of these attacks. Didn't you read the whole thread.
A: Hello my children! Loftosiea of Cassiopaea here to help heal deep wounds.
Q: (L) What is the source of those wounds of which you speak?
A: Deep psychic attack.
Not only did Laura give her description but many others here have related similar struggles recently in this very thread. How about you? No negative struggles to report?
I know my own life has been dealing with old wounds and new events that should challenge any of us who are paying attention. FWIW
Well, I don't want to get in the way here with the group to start with, and no, no negative struggles to report. From what I've learned, the issue of 'deep psychic attack' utilizes the same pathway, but is on a whole other level than the simple personal issues each of us had/have/will have upon waking up and seeing the programs running. G and the clock issue seems most often at work here as well as the sleepy guard on duty... falling asleep at the wheel, so to speak... lack of pattern recognition occurs until the basics are learned, especially whenever the emotions react or respond. I mentioned the nature of these attacks for others to utilize in self-recognition of their own patterns and the problems that result when one's guard goes down, as a base level of self-analysis has to be running up front and personal at all times to avoid these self-inflicted problems... another C mention about "T", I think it was, with his use of anger to attack his attackers... no need to waste the energy once the patterns in play are understood and feinted away without much ado, the 'clocks' are then autoset and 'guard duty' is just a way of being.
I asked about the 'deep psychic attack' in comparison to Carla/Jim/Don problems in that regard and the resultant issues therein, as the C's seem to have mentioned in their way. Maybe I was wrong, but it seems that the nature of such attacks have to have a means of ingress, a chink in the armor that allows one to 'fall asleep' to begin with, with the 'chink' or thought pattern recognized, then it is a lot easier to eliminate as a problem, thereby becoming part of the armor itself. It is simply a natural function. It seems my question is whether that 'chink' is recognized or not, if not, expect further activity along the same path of ingress... STS utilization of the easiest path of attack. If it ain't broke, why fix it, but if it is, then it should become a top priority, right?
I think the C's already answered your question by saying
A: As long as there is awareness, weaknesses can be dealt with. Networking is key. Also recognizing one's own weak spots and not allowing them to rule the mind.
How many of us have weak spots or areas of guilt, shame, decisions or choices that we regret that may still be a sore spot that can be exploited? Just about everyone with a conscience, I would say. So I would think all human beings that have a soul or potential to develop one has these weaknesses in them in some form or another based upon their life experiences and how that has shaped their thinking and beliefs.
Turgon and gdpetti,
I will try to combine Turgon's thoughts in my response because I think Turgon sums it up so well.
gdpetti, you are part of the group as much as me or anyone on the forum so I don't think you are in the way at all.
I have to say I had to slow down and think about what you were saying. It makes me realize that a "chink" in my armor is that is sometimes react too fast without listening to what others are really trying to say. I think that this format is a real challenge being a virtual/online communication (Of course you could say that about texting on a cell phone too I think).
I now see why you are comparing Laura to Carla. Carla, if I remember correctly, could not accept the possibility of the ET abductions or any negative aspects of the UFO phenomena. It was a kind of blind spot.
So, now it seems you are trying to find out how to spot our "blind spots" which would be the "chink" in our armor. I think this is a good endeavor. In Laura's case with October's turmoil I think the "psychic" nature of the attack and personal sense of past failures loaded with regret and remorse should be placed in the arena of external consideration for Laura.
However; I do think you have raised an important and beneficial question of how do we identify our "chinks"/"blind spots" that will surely do us in so to speak.
Continuing with some of your observations I will recall the following:
Of course attacks "have to have a means of ingress".
What if many or most attacks are not "self-inflicted" as in just "expect attack"?
Session 3 May 1997
Q: Are you suggesting that this sickness of his mother's has been caused from 4th density STS?
A: Lesson number 1: Always expect attack. Lesson number 2: Know the modes of same. Lesson
number 3: Know how to counteract same.
Q: When a person is sick, old and one's mother... the only thing to do is take care of it. But, I guess
that it is true that anything that tends to cause interference in doing what one is here to do could be
considered attack. Whether it is your mother being sick, or your kid falling off a bicycle and breaking
his arm. It is all related to lack of vigilance on the part of the one who is the conduit of attack.
A: When you are under attack, expect the unexpected, if it is going to cause problems...
Q: So, if there is something that can cause problems, expect it to happen.
A: But, if you expect it, you learn how to "head it off," thus neutralizing it. This is called vigilance,
which is rooted in knowledge. And, what does knowledge do?
Q: Protects! Is there anything I can do to help?
A: How so?
Q: Well, I don't know. I guess that a person just has to come to the full realization that virtually
everything that happens on the planet - no exceptions - is a symbol of some interaction of STS vs STO
energy at higher levels.
A: Yes, and that is not as of yet realized. It must be part of a natural learning process.
Q:
It sounds like you have used some of G's methods of using the alarm clock almost as "a way of being". I am not sure what you meant by:
to avoid these self-inflicted problems... another C mention about "T", I think it was, with his use of anger to attack his attackers...
I don't want to just guess your meaning and make a stupid reply (I am trying to "expect the unexpected"). :P