The following presentation may be bumpy in some places. Topics include nano-bots and health interference, assassination tech, and mind control signals.
Beginning with addition to this post,
Feb 6, 2026, where there were excerpts related to observed and possible effects of the mRNA vaccines.
5G and Covid shots
Session 17 August 2024
Q: (Breo) Dr. Rashid A. Buttar says the Covid shots all contain a dormant virus (poison) encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles which can be activated using specific 5G frequencies. Is this concept generally true, including with other EMFs?
A: Generally, yes.
Q: (Breo) Are there any technologies accessible to really protect from harmful frequency technologies?
A: Has been discussed in previous session.
Q: (Joe) Silk!
(Chu) But that's not necessarily a technology...
(L) Yeah, but there was also a discussion about using countering frequencies. You know, find out what the frequency that is coming at you is, and then have a device that emits one that cancels it out. Because you're dealing with waves, right? So you send out a canceling wave. So, canceling waves and silk.
(Niall) And Q-links?
(Joe) Our brains can send out canceling waves....
(Andromeda) Theoretically. (With enough knowledge.)
(Chu) So if these "nanobots", as they are called, exist, what is their main purpose? Mind control or health deterioration or something else?
A: Either/or.
Q: (Joe) Can they be shed? Can you contract them from people who have had them in the batches of vaccines…?
A: Cut them up.
Q: (Joe) What was that?
(Niall) Cut them up.
(Joe) Huh?
A: Chemical cleaving.
Q: (Gaby) Like detox?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) What would you use for that?
(L) Like serrapeptase. Doesn't serrapeptase digest stuff like that?
(Gaby) Yeah. The protocols we discussed. Bromelain, nattokinase, ivermectin...
(Joe) So it is possible for them to be shed, and contracted by other people.
(L) Well, you have to cut them up and get rid of them out of your body.
(Joe) But my question was, people who have had them injected into them via the vaccine, and who have these nanobots in them... Are they "sheddable"?
A: Under some circumstances.
Q: (L) Well, I guess sex, or sharing body fluids of some sort, or...
(Gaby) Blood transfusions.
(L) Yeah, things like that.
(Joe) Yeah. But not just coughed in your face.
(Andromeda) Not like a germ.
(Joe) Not like the way you can shed the spike protein. You can't contract it the same way.
(L) Yeah, no. Okay.
In the following session, there was more:
The human body is not without defenses that can be augmented by physiological and psychological means.
Session 21 September 2024
(L) All right. Now we want to ask about these so-called nanobots that are being seen from the Pfizer vaxx, incubated in distilled water for various days of… okay, What are these things?
A: Antennae for future use.
Q: (Joe) And are they coded in the mRNA in the shot to produce these things in bodies?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) So we're talking about super, super high tech.
(L) When you say future, how much future do you mean?
A: Future from time of injection.
Q: (L) So some of these nanobots could be doing whatever it is they do now, since so many people have had these injections. Yeah?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And are some of the things that they're used for to generate cancers, or illnesses, or diseases?
A: Some, yes.
Q: (Joe) There was another paper with a claim that this kind of nanotech was in dental anesthetic. I suppose in some cases it was found in dental anesthetic. Is that true?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) Was that very widespread?
A: No. Experimental. You should be aware that the extent of this type of experimentation is far more than widespread than you can imagine. Correct error of transmission please.
Q: (Joe) "is far more widespread than you can imagine." Is that what you meant to say?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) And so, just on that point, are we talking about in foods as well?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) In water supplies?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) But this is all experimental, right?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) So the experimentation is widespread, but it's not widespread in terms of application.
(L) Right.
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) Okay, so should we not go to the dentist anymore?
A: No!
Q: (Andromeda) Gaby was right! [Laughter]
(Joe) Gaby was recommending non anesthetic dental treatment the other day.
(Niall) Just take the pain! [Laughter]
A: The human body is not without defenses that can be augmented by physiological and psychological means.
Q: (L) So in other words, we could actually…
(Chu) …fight it off.
(L) I mean, if we're healthy and whatever, we can get macrophages to go in there and eat these things up?
A: Close.
Q: (Joe) In the study that was done showing one of these nano objects or nano bots in anesthetic, they used nicotine and it was observed to destroy them. Was that true?
A: Yes. We have often pointed out the benefits of nicotine. Why do you think there was such a concerted campaign to eradicate its use?
Q: (Joe) How does nicotine do that? What is about nicotine?
A: How does mental blocking work?
Q: (L) Mental blocking is a certain attitude of mind, and whatever. And…
(Joe) …information.
A: Produces acetylcholine
Q: (Joe) So nicotine produces acetylcholine, or mental blocking does?
(L) Mental blocking produces acetylcholine?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) So we should be asking, how does acetylcholine…
(L) Well, we know that nicotine increases the production of acetylcholine in the brain.
(Joe) Chemically it's very similar to the structure of acetylcholine.
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) So then the question is, how would acetylcholine destroy physical artifacts like nanobots, in that sense? It's information?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) So it's at that level that it's working.
(Gaby) So nanobots act like anticholinergics, like with paralyzing effects…
(L) Yeah. Okay. Have we had enough of that?
If some of the vax tech resembles implants, there are different types, not all can be easily removed:
Why would the removal of an implant cause death? - Not all implants, only those associated with direct organ function. Most implants are such.
Session 21 September 2024
(Hyperdimensional Ape on the Cassiopaean Experiment substack) Why would the removal of an implant cause death?
A: Not all implants, only those associated with direct organ function. Most implants are such.
Q: (L) When you say organ function, what organs do you mean in particular?
A: Mainly brain.
Q: (Hyperdimensional Ape on the Cassiopaean Experiment substack) I always thought that the abductions were on a much larger scale, but just 2% and people from the sessions being among them and abducted from young age…
(L) Okay, so this is a very poorly framed question. Let me start with just 2%.
A: 2% of the population is a large number.
Q: (L) Do you mean, global population?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So 2% of 8 billion is how many? All right, you mathematicians, get out your calculators.
(IrjO) 160 million.
(L) That's a lot of people. It's a lot of activity.
(Joe) Like the entire population of a large country like Russia.
(L) Yeah! It's like the entire population of Russia. The US has 300 and some million. So it would be about half the US population.
(Niall) Or a third! We don't know what the US population is. [Laughter]
(Andromeda) Oh yeah, good point.
(L) And I guess you're talking about it being concentrated in some areas, and especially the US, because the US gave permission for it, right? So it would be a lot of people in the US. That's a lot of people! Okay.
The next discussion is health related, and shows that knowledge about subtle effects is available in some quarters. The technology is marketed as benevolent, though it isn't. One may wonder what kind of research mind or institution came up with this originally, and where else it is used?
Polarity reversal
Session 6 July 2024
Q: (Joe) [...]Okay, there's a device based on polarity reversal. It's this little box. You put it in your house and it reverses the polarity of...
(Scottie) It is supposed to push water in humid walls back down into the Earth. And it sounds like it makes sense. And so we researched it and there's like nobody who can tell you, does this thing work or not? And they're expensive.
(Joe) They're expensive, and we're thinking of getting it for the humidity problem in the house. We're wondering if it would just be wasted money or whether there's any, if it's actually something that works and will be useful for the purpose that it is sold for, which is to reduce the rising of water table and humidity in the ground coming up into the walls on the floors of your house somehow reversing the polarity of the water.
(Andromeda) It's an electromagnetic thing, isn't it?
(Scottie) It emits audio frequency, electromagnetic waves, which is supposed to reverse when water starts seeping into walls. It does it via capillarity, but then also because water molecules are polarized, like plus and minus in, they tend to kind of...
A: Imagine what it might do to the body!
Q: (Joe) That was our question as well. If it would have a negative effect on people?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Okay, so it's not a good idea then.
(Scottie) So it does work?
A: Yes
Q: (Scottie) But it also works on humans.
(Andromeda) It works, but it changes our capillarity as well, right?
(Scottie) We would shrivel up and turn into human raisins.
(Joe) All your water would go down to your feet.
(Scottie) Our feet would swell up like balloons.
(L) I don't need any help with that. [laughter]
Going back in time, there was this discussion:
Satellites are used to concentrate the signal in a "bounce back"
Session 22 July 2000
Q: (A) But the water tasted so GOOD! It was the best water I ever drank! I'm serious!
A: That is by design.
Q: (A) Oh, they're so tricky! I mean, you drink the water there and you just say "This is SO good!" And you want more and more!
A: If you wish to catch bees, are you going to use a net, or some honey, maybe??
Q: (A) That makes total sense. (IT) Does Brooklyn have this problem?
A: No, Brooklyn has other problems.
Q: (IT) Yes, Dwayne and I discussed how the kids in the neighborhood are just interested in their clothes and their music - they don't even ask or think about the questions of their reality.
A: There is something located under the "East New York" neighborhood...
Q: (L) Where are the ELF waves in East Texas generated from? (IT) So, what's going on in East New York? (L) Let's get finished with Texas first!
A: Centered in two generation points: Bryan/College Station, Secret government facility connected to NASA/NORAD and located in Fort Bend County west of Houston.
Q: (A) West Texas? All the way up there from Houston? (C) Bryan College is only about an hour away from us!
A: Satellites are used to concentrate the signal in a "bounce back" mode. Power station covers underground facility in East New York. Very unobtrusive looking. The healthiest borough to live in in New York City is the Bronx.
The following begins with mentioning the frequency fence which is in part maintained through technology. The advice in this context is:
Use your rational mind and remember history
Session 6 July 2024
Q: (Ennio) Does the information about the frequency fence stalling members in the US from seeing and doing apply to the seeming hesitancy many have to move to better locations, and perhaps form groups for better living situations?
A: Yes
Q: (Ennio) If yes, does this apply to members in other regions of the world like Europe and Asia or elsewhere?
A: Yes
Q: (Ennio) And if all or some of this is more or less true, do you have any additional advice to those on and in the fence?
(L) How can you be IN the fence?
(Joe) On the fence or within the frequency fence. It's a pun!
(L) Oh... You're in the fence, therefore you're on the fence! [laughter]
(Scottie) He was being clever!
(L) Ah, geez... Do you have any additional advice to those on and in the fence about all this?
A: Use your rational mind and remember history.
The early part of the following discussion refers to 3D STS technology, the final lines to 4D STS.
STS mind control signal.
Session 7 August 2001
Q: Let me ask while I've got you here, some questions from a member of our group. He is reading some material that suggests that this planet is a breeding ground for aliens, and the life cycle of the aliens, as in the Reptilians or whatever, may mimic something, such as a preying mantis. It also alludes to the suggestion that the underground of the earth is kind of a dormant stage for the female, and it is the male that is returning or that does return at the end of each epoch, and that the focus of this appears to be the great pyramid, and that if we move to STO - it doesn't say those words but it's the same - much terror can be avoided, as the return of the male dragon will die for love for the female nymph. Okay. Is the earth a breeding round for some kind of aliens as suggested in this passage?
A: No.
Q: Hmm. So this stuff that this guy has made up about this is like right out of his darkest nightmares? I mean the worst possible spin that could be put on this? It's already bad enough. So we really ought to forget this and just get some sleep at night, huh?
A: Yes.
Q: What is the source of this type of material? I mean, what kind of energy is behind it?
A: STS mind control signal.
Q: What is it designed to do?
A: Reach those that are programmed to receive.
Q: Let me ask you this - If some of these STS programming signals that are going out ... I mean, I'm assuming that some of them come from 3rd density. Is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: Do they actually have, like, some place on the planet where these guys read science fiction books and get these really crazy theories and stories that they put together with sort of fiendish glee, and then convert them via computer into the programming code that gets beamed out into people's heads, while they sit there and just - you know - fall down on the floor laughing at what they have just done? I mean, is this possibly something that is going on [meaning in secret mind control experiments]?
A: Yes.
Q: That's sick! I mean, just take a whole HP Lovecraft novel, convert it into the programming signal and beam it out - and people are saying, "My God, the aliens told me ... it's just like HP Lovecraft said. Oh, my God!" Can you imagine? (A) And it works. (L) Sure does, doesn't it? (A) And we see what this guy RC is telling us about this egroup, and it is... What he is telling us, I think is true ... they have these capabilities ... {Referring to mind control signals being utilized in rock music, rock concerts, etc} (L) Yeah. (A) Inducing these states, and it's coming, and there will be massive programming! (L) Yup. (A) And it's coming pretty soon. (L) What are Ophanic intelligences, as Vincent understands them? The ones he calls upon with his 30 calls to the aethyrs?
A: 4D STS.
Related to the above, technology can be used for:
Projecting
Session 22 October 2022
Q: (Madara Horseman) The C's have indicated that the HAARP system is trying to impose certain thought patterns that push towards violence. The C's have also indicated that there are links between thoughts and electromagnetism. So the question is: Are the PTB somehow recording a thought or just repeatedly amplifying someone's thought somehow by electromagnetism?
A: Projecting.
Along the similar lines:
Are they going to send some kind of signal out that's going to trigger and activate some people? - Yes.
Session 23 September 2023
Q: (JEEP) Is there anything nefarious in the works for the October 4th emergency broadcast test in the USA?
A: Anything in the USA is nefarious these days.
Q: (L) Well, are they going to send some kind of signal out that's going to trigger and activate some people?
A: Yes.
How the following is used is not explained in detail, but considering previous excerpts, there might be a range of related applications:
Is Starlink being used for more than communications transmission in the context of possibly being a HAARP amplifier, or bouncer? - Close. Yes.
Session 24 January 2026
(Ellipse) Is Starlink used for more than communications transmissions?
(L) What do you mean?
(Ellipse) I was thinking that the satellites can be used, for example, to block the sun. Something that we don't know exactly.
(L) How can it... to block the sun?
(Ellipse) Eventually the satellites can block the sun or something else.
(L) How can satellites block the sun?
(Niall) I don't know. Is it theoretically possible?
(Gaby) It's too big.
(Joe) A very, very large satellite.
(L) seeker2seer, can satellites block the sun?
(Niall) Bill Gates wants to, but...
(seeker2seer) No, I don't think so. I don't see how they could put out any kind of electromagnetic radiation to block the sun. I was thinking more of like a HAARP-type activity, if there was anything nefarious about Starlink. Not that I'm aware of it.
(L) Oh, I see. So is Starlink being used for more than communications transmission in the context of possibly being a HAARP amplifier, or bouncer?
(Chu) Or something like that.
A: Close. Yes.
Q: All right. So, Ellipse, you had a good intuition. You just needed a little refinement there.
Some devices have effects that amount to assassinating people. The plans can be very intricate and complex:
Charlie Kirk: Was it something in his wireless mic? - Yes
Session 27 September 2025
(Joe) Was Charlie Kirk shot by someone in the position that they said Tyler Robinson was in?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Did something explode in close proximity to him?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Was it something in his wireless mic?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) Was it placed there by his security?
A: The rifle sound was produced by a rifle that was connected to a remote firing system linked to the same controller that was used to set off the explosive that killed Charlie. This was meant to provide a distraction for agents to remove incriminating evidence from the area around Charlie.
Q: (Joe) So instead of somebody firing a shot to make it sound like it came from Robinson, it was an automatic like...
(L) Well, somebody could have been holding it...
(Joe) Somebody could have been holding it, but it could have been an automated rifle set up in a window or something...
(Andromeda) Just to make the sound...
(Joe) ...to fire shot in the air. It was connected with the same control mechanism that detonated the thing in his mic. So the shot and the explosion in this thing happened simultaneously, which obviously isn't hard to do, right?
(Andromeda) Right.
(Joe) And they said that it was meant to provide a distraction for agents to remove incriminating evidence from the area around Charlie. I don't really get that, but...
(Niall) That means some of the guys who responded to the table were suspect, were part of it as people suspect, but not in the way that they...
(Joe) So this device that was used, it didn't create any visible damage to his chest area. You thought that would've been...
(L) Well, we didn't see his chest.
(Joe) Well, but you would've thought that if it was some kind of explosive, it would very quickly cause bleeding on his shirt or whatever bleed through, right? But it was very quick.
(L) If it sent a projectile, let's see, it was on the right side and his left carotid artery. So if it was here and it sent something up explosively, it could have gone just, I mean, not very deep...
(Joe) The wound we saw on him in the video, was that an exit wound?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Is this a more advanced version of what the Israelis did in Lebanon last year?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So was it effectively a bullet within the microphone case?
A: Not a "bullet" exactly.
Q: (Joe) Okay. Some kind of projectile.
Q: (L) A projectile?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And the people who made this, did they test it on someone beforehand?
A: Dummies.
Q: (Joe) And is this just this amorphous, transnational deep state type group? Is that who we are talking about that's behind this? Within the US working in Israel's interest and American deep state interest. Is that who is behind this?
A: More or less.
Q: (Joe) What was the name of the old guy?
(Niall) George Zinn.
(Joe) Was he a deliberate plant?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So he actually works for these people or is connected to them in some way?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And was Tyler Robinson actually in that area at the time on that day?
A: No
Q: (Joe) He wasn't even anywhere near?
A: No
Q: (Joe) So the guy on the roof was some agent?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Who looked a bit like Tyler Robinson or dressed to look like him?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And the automatic remote firing system for the rifle that fired the gunshot was in that general area where that kind of roof was, I suppose?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) But the guy on the roof didn't fire a shot?
A: No
Q: (L) But he probably was holding the gun.
A: Yes
Q: (Chu) Do we want to ask the main motive?
(Joe) Yeah. Are we correct in assuming that getting rid of Charlie Kirk wasn't the primary motive because of the way that it was done, that it could have been taken out any other more...?
A: Not primarily no.
Q: (L) Was the primary motivation the effect on the psyche of the American people or global people or whatever?
A: Yes
There are many ways:
Close contact induced aneurysm
Session 27 September 2025
(Laurs) Was the death in January 2025 of Prof. Dr. Francis A. Boyle, a healthy US law professor who suddenly died under undisclosed circumstances just 3 weeks after testifying as an expert witness in the potential landmark “Covid-19" lawsuit pending before the District Court in The Netherlands, due to natural causes?
A: No.
Q: (Laurs) If not, how was he killed?
A: Close contact induced aneurysm.
Q: (Niall) Which is an example of what they can do if they want to.
(L) And if they want you to die privately.
(Niall) Yeah, quietly.
(Joe) That's the problem with going with Occam's razor, that the simplest explanation of these things is always the most likely. That doesn't take into consideration what's simple for these people to do. Do you know what I mean?
(L) I think the Israelis just got carried away with the success of their pagers, and they just thought, "Wow, wasn't that fun?!"
(Andromeda) Look, they gave a gold pager to Trump and they were so proud of it!
(L) And that was just before Charlie Kirk was killed, right?
(Niall) No, the pagers was last year, but the day before, they had attempted to take out the Hamas leadership in Qatar, which was a new thing, because they had never bombed a US ally before.
(Joe) They're getting very flagrant. But yeah, Charlie Kirk being assassinated that way... it just has Israeli pagers written all over.
(Andromeda) Totally.
(L) Okay. Follow up:
(Laurs) If he was indeed killed, were the usual alphabet agencies involved?
A: Yes.
Q: (Laurs) Was the court case in Holland in any way significant to the decision to kill him?
A: Yes.
Background: (Laurs) For over 2 years now, a court case is pending before the District Court in The Netherlands which has the potential of a global landmark challenge against global health policies, in particular around the mRNA Covid-19 shot. Defendants include people like Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and Klaus Schwab, high profile Dutch politicians and the Dutch State.
Plaintiffs seek a Court verdict that the Covid-19 shot is a vaccine for the health of the population, or a bioweapon. One of the Plaintiffs' main strategies is to get the Court to hear and include the testimonies of six expert witnesses, including Catherine Austin-Fitts, Alexandra (Sasha) Latypova, and US Professor (of International Law) Dr. Francis Boyle.
Three weeks after confirming his participation as an expert witness, Francis Boyle, healthy and still teaching at age 74, suddenly died on January 30th 2025 under undisclosed circumstances, leading many to be highly suspicious of his death.
The eulogies mention that Francis A. Boyle was always in the right kind of trouble. He was a successful international and human rights lawyer and professor in Urbana. He spent his life pursuing the prosecution of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of genocide. F.i., he was instrumental in drafting the US legislation that became the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, and he played a significant role in the plight of the Palestinians against Israel. Boyle started the divestment/disinvestment campaign against Israel in 2000, and joined with Palestinian civil society in the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign in 2005. Israel sees the BDS campaign as an existential threat to the Jewish state.
In the above case it was only one person, but that is not always the case.
Was the autopilot system hijacked remotely? - Yes.
Session 4 April 2015
Q: (L) Alright, I guess ya'll want to ask your questions about your airplane.
(Perceval) So, what caused the crash of the Germanwings flight into the mountain?
A: Autopilot system.
Q: (Perceval) The autopilot system caused it. Well, yeah! We know that. Was the autopilot system hijacked remotely?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) Uh, by who?
A: Guess!
Q: (Perceval) Mossad.
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) Was the purpose to...
A: A warning! Imagine all the "authorities" in various governments being made acutely aware that planes that they travel on themselves can be so easily manipulated?!
Q: (Galatea) So they can control any plane they want at any time.
(Perceval) So that suggests that this remote hijacking isn't limited to Boeing's uninterruptible autopilot system being installed, because that could be taken out. "Authorities" could have that removed...
A: It needs the system!
Q: (L) So then basically, what they're probably doing is they're buying time while they get them removed from the planes they travel on themselves?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) It was just a general warning, specifically to the German, French, and Spanish governments involved?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) To... In terms of the geopolitical thing, like Russia or not Russia type of thing?
A: See what we can do!
Q: (L) Is any of this being transmitted to any of these authorities directly?
A: No! But they know.
Q: (Perceval) So, obviously all of the stuff about the pilot, suicide pilot, and kicking down the door, and the locking of the door was all bogus...
A: Yes
Q: (PoB) What about the eyewitness accounts that they heard an explosion and saw smoke?
(Perceval) Probably to muddy the water.
(L) What was the smoke and the boom?
A: Diversion.
Q: (L) Who created the diversion?
A: Jets in area. It was realized that something along this line was happening because a "warning" had been given in advance. They just did not know where and when.
Q: (Pierre) So they said, "We're gonna bring down a plane?"
(L) Is that what was said?
A: Close.
Q: (L) And of course, since it was an Airbus, then it would affect France, and it was a German flight, so it affects Germany. So it was damaging to both France and Germany.
(Chu) Today there was a report of another plane having to land in an emergency. It was going to Italy. And there was another one a couple of days ago. Are these the same types of warnings?
A: The same source is certainly toying with the "PTB" and enjoying their power and the resulting turmoil.
Q: (Galatea) Which airport had the blackout again?
(Niall) Amsterdam.
(Galatea) Did they also cause the power to go out in Amsterdam?
A: No. There are reflective events of 4D bleedthrough. Remember who is closest to 4D STS?
Q: (L) I think they once said it was Mossad. Very high up in Mossad. So, these activities are closely reflective and interrelated. Is that it?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And I guess it will get worse.
A: Yes
Q: (L) And it's all because they feel the pressure of the Wave.
A: Yes yes yes!
Q: (Galatea) Are you gonna help make sure our members don't get on a plane that crashes?
A: For those who ask and observe the signs, things should be fine.
Q: (Galatea) That's a nice message. (L) I'm getting pretty tired here, so can we close down shortly? I didn't get to my question, but I don't want to engage because it's a longer discussion and this has already taken some time. I had that other question and I was just saving it for the end. We can do it next time. It's about my historical stuff anyway, so I don't think anybody will really mind if we skip it. [laughter]
Another instance where technology was used to remove people:
Iranian helicopter crash: Jamming and signals sent into the prepared mind of the pilot.
Session 6 July 2024
(Cosmos) On 19 May, 2024, a helicopter crashed in Iran and killed the president of Iran, Ebrahim Raisi, and Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian and six other people. What caused the crash?
A: CIA.
Q: (Niall) Does the Iranian government know that?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And how was it done?
A: Jamming and signals sent into the prepared mind of the pilot.
Q: (Joe) So, the Iranian government didn't mention that it was sabotage. They said it was an accident and they didn’t in any way suggest there was any skullduggery involved. Is that because they didn't have any evidence?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) But they just suspect, I suppose, that it was CIA?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And the CIA killed him in order to...
(L) I mean, geez, what would the news article sound like? Well, the Iranian government says that they use some kind of mind control signals on the pilot, some kind of jamming technology...
(Niall) That's some pretty high tech stuff. If they can do that to the Iranian president, they can do that to Putin, surely?
A: Proximity is required.
Q: (Joe) Yeah, they were coming from Azerbaijan.
It can go both ways:
US military plane crashes: Chinese tech test
Session 1 November 2025
Q: (Niall) What caused last week's double "crash" of a US jet and helicopter off the USS Nimitz in the South China Sea?
A: Chinese tech test.
Q: (Andromeda) I knew it!
(Niall) And the Pentagon said that it was bad fuel.
(Andromeda) Yeah, right, both at the same time, within half an hour?
(L) Who said it was bad fuel?
(Niall) The Pentagon. In both craft. Trump was in the air at the time over the waters, on his way to South Korea to meet with Xi. So he met Xi. You saw the handshake. And that had just happened. [laughter]
(L) I see!
In the continuation of the session, there was another technology assisted seemingly natural event:
Was it another augmented natural event? - Yes
(Niall) Was Hurricane Melissa entirely natural in occurrence?
A: No
Q: (Niall) Was it another augmented natural event?
A: Yes
To be continued...
