Palinurus said:Yes I agree; but to be honest with you Laura I wasn't planning to read it myself and secretly I was hoping someone else would volunteer to have a look at it... ;)
Nevertheless, I'm willing to go for it as soon as I have finished the whole of Josephus's works, which is waiting to happen sooner rather than later. Just state that I ought to and I will do that, and report back afterwards whether there's anything in it worthwhile.
If Jesus Christ was indeed the good person the Bible proclaims him to be, why did so many legends survive accusing him and his disciples of shockingly terrible deeds?
Barbelo shows that the person millions of Christians think they know and love as Jesus may not, in actuality, have been the person the Good Book purported him to be. Instead, the man known in Western society as Jesus is argued to have been born in 28 BCE, from an illicit affair between Herod the Great’s second wife and his treasurer, Joseph. Standing at little more than four feet tall, with a deformed, tattoo-covered body and ugly face, Simon Magus – or Jesus, as he later came to be known – wreaked unimaginable havoc on the people of his time and created a violent, vicious legacy that history has tried to hide. But nonetheless, through testimonies of unsophisticated people, these tales have lived on and became the basis of the modern Christian faith.
To give potential readers an idea of what to expect, below are a couple of summarising articles from Barbelo:
Joseph, Herod’s Treasurer, and Mariamne I, the Parents of Jesus Christ
Jesus and Simon Magus
The Physical Appearances of Jesus and Paul
Joseph, Joseph of Arimathea, and Josephus
The Violent Messiah
Having been brought up in the Christian faith and having been a believer for much of my adult life, I came to know the Bible quite well, including the theosophical challenges Christianity has to face. Over the years, however, the questions behind not only the Christian faith but all others as well became overwhelming and in the end I could no longer adhere to Christian beliefs. In 1996 Graham Hancock’s Fingerprints of the Gods introduced me to a new realm of possibilities, the realm of the ancient world. For many years Fingerprints remained in the back of my mind and it was only in August of 2000, when I purchased a copy of Josephus’ Works, that I actively began delving into the past. For several years I collected any book on ancient history that I could find, taking the information it presented at face value, with an open mind. Eventually my own theories began to form, culminating in what is presented here. I trust you will find this an interesting read and would like to invite you to comment or contribute freely in any manner you may wish to.
Professionally I am a practicing engineer that holds a PhD degree in Electromagnetics and have been awarded Senior Membership of the IEEE. The theories presented here were developed in my leisure time over many years and I decided to publish the essence of these theories on the Internet mostly for the sake of review by interested scholars and novices alike, but also due to the practical time constraints associated with writing a complete book. This I still plan to do, but I would like to eliminate any gross misconceptions I may have before completing the work, hence the request for comments.
You may find some aspects of these theories implausible, but I trust that you will nevertheless find it stimulating and I hope that it will create within you an interest in our fascinating ancient past.
Palinurus said:Okay Laura, understood. I apologize for shying away from it. :(
It's just that reading Josephus's works turned out to be much more demanding than I ever envisaged when I volunteered for it. Therefore I'm very reluctant to engage in other commitments while I'm still not done completely with my first assignment so to speak. And I have to go slowly because I need researching every detail that's not clearly explained by Josephus himself, otherwise I'm missing vital information which would hamper my full understanding. Not everyone has the broadness of view and the abundant background knowledge that you can bring to the table, nor are most of us able to speed read while still retaining the content swallowed and fully digest it as well.
Palinurus said:If Jesus Christ was indeed the good person the Bible proclaims him to be, why did so many legends survive accusing him and his disciples of shockingly terrible deeds?
Barbelo shows that the person millions of Christians think they know and love as Jesus may not, in actuality, have been the person the Good Book purported him to be. Instead, the man known in Western society as Jesus is argued to have been born in 28 BCE, from an illicit affair between Herod the Great’s second wife and his treasurer, Joseph. Standing at little more than four feet tall, with a deformed, tattoo-covered body and ugly face, Simon Magus – or Jesus, as he later came to be known – wreaked unimaginable havoc on the people of his time and created a violent, vicious legacy that history has tried to hide. But nonetheless, through testimonies of unsophisticated people, these tales have lived on and became the basis of the modern Christian faith.
From what I gathered by cursory reading, Booysen explores the hypothesis that Jesus and Simon Magus are one and the same. He's supposed to have been born in ca. 28 BCE as a (bastard) son of Mariamne I --second wife of Herod the Great-- and his treasurer Joseph, and would have been conceived while Herod was summoned to appear before Marc Anthony. His 'crucifixion' which he survived would have taken place in ca. 21 AD at the age of 49.
According to anti-Marcionite sources, Marcion's teacher was the Simonian Cerdo. Irenaeus writes that "a certain Cerdo, originating from the Simonians, came to Rome under Hyginus ... and taught that the one who was proclaimed as God by the Law and the Prophets is not the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Against Heresies, 1, 27, 1).
Cerdo started out as a follower of Simon Magus.
The different sources for information on Simon contain quite different pictures of him, so much so that it has been questioned whether they all refer to the same person.
Justin Martyr (in his Apologies, and in a lost work against heresies, which Irenaeus used as his main source) and Irenaeus (Adversus Haereses) record that after being cast out by the Apostles, Simon Magus came to Rome where, having joined to himself a profligate woman of the name of Helen, he gave out that it was he who appeared among the Jews as the Son, in Samaria as the Father and among other nations as the Holy Spirit. He performed such miracles by magic acts during the reign of Claudius that he was regarded as a god and honored with a statue on the island in the Tiber which the two bridges cross, with the inscription Simoni Deo Sancto, "To Simon the Holy God".
Myth of Simon and Helen
Justin and Irenaeus are the first to recount the myth of Simon and Helen, which became the center of Simonian doctrine. Epiphanius of Salamis also makes Simon speak in the first person in several places in his Panarion, and the inference is that he is quoting from a version of it, though perhaps not verbatim.
In the beginning God had his first thought, his Ennoia [=sense, meaning - see below also Sophia] , which was female, and that thought was to create the angels. The First Thought then descended into the lower regions and created the angels. But the angels rebelled against her out of jealousy and created the world as her prison, imprisoning her in a female body. Thereafter, she was reincarnated many times, each time being shamed. Her many reincarnations included Helen of Troy, among others, and she finally was reincarnated as Helen, a slave and prostitute in the Phoenician city of Tyre. God then descended in the form of Simon Magus, to rescue his Ennoia, and to confer salvation upon men through knowledge of himself.
"And on her account," he says, "did I come down; for this is that which is written in the Gospel 'the lost sheep'."[10]
For as the angels were mismanaging the world, owing to their individual lust for rule, he had come to set things straight, and had descended under a changed form, likening himself to the Principalities and Powers through whom he passed, so that among men he appeared as a man, though he was not a man, and was thought to have suffered in Judaea, though he had not suffered.
"But in each heaven I changed my form," says he, "in accordance with the form of those who were in each heaven, that I might escape the notice of my angelic powers and come down to the Thought, who is none other than her who is also called Prunikos and Holy Ghost, through whom I created the angels, while the angels created the world and men."[11]
But the prophets had delivered their prophecies under the inspiration of the world-creating angels: wherefore those who had their hope in him and in Helen minded them no more, and, as being free, did what they pleased; for men were saved according to his grace, but not according to just works. For works were not just by nature, but only by convention, in accordance with the enactments of the world-creating angels, who by precepts of this kind sought to bring men into slavery. Wherefore he promised that the world should be dissolved, and that those who were his should be freed from the dominion of the world-creators.
In this account of Simon there is a large portion common to almost all forms of Gnostic myths, together with something special to this form. They have in common the place in the work of creation assigned to the female principle, the conception of the Deity; the ignorance of the rulers of this lower world with regard to the Supreme Power; the descent of the female (Sophia) into the lower regions, and her inability to return. Special to the Simonian tale is the identification of Simon himself with the Supreme, and of his consort Helena with the female principle.
Ο Σίμωνας ασκούσε το επάγγελμά του παρουσιάζοντας τα φανταστικά γεγονότα ως αληθινά με τη συνεργεία των δαιμόνων. Για παράδειγμα, στο απόκρυφο κείμενο "Πράξεις Πέτρου" (2ος αι. μ.Χ.), αναφέρεται μία νεκρανάσταση που έκανε ο Σίμων ο Μάγος, η οποία όμως ήταν ψευδο-θαύμα που οφειλόταν σε "μαγεία" και οφθαλμαπάτη των παρευρισκομένων. Το γεγονός αυτό παρουσιάζεται σε αντίθεση με όσα έπραξε ο Απόστολος Πέτρος, που με πραγματική δύναμη θεού ανάστησε τελικά τον νεκρό.
Για να εντυπωσιάσει το ακροατήριό του, έκανε ανδριάντες να περπατούν, έμπαινε στην πυρά χωρίς να καίγεται, πετούσε, μετέβαλλε τις πέτρες σε ψωμί, γινόταν φίδι, διπρόσωπος, μεταβαλλόταν σε χρυσό, άνοιγε κλειστές θύρες, διέλυε σιδερένια δεσμά, στα δείπνα ζωντάνευε τα είδωλα, έκανε τα σκεύη να κινούνται μόνα τους, δημιουργούσε σκιές που πήγαιναν μπροστά του, όταν βάδιζε. Σύμφωνα με την παράδοση, σε όσους δεν τον πίστευαν, προξενούσε ασθένειες καλώντας τους δαίμονες και βασανιστήρια με τη βοήθεια των πνευμάτων του Κακού.
Simon pursued his profession presenting fantastic events as true with the aid of demons. For example, the apocryphal text "Acts of Peter" (2nd cent. AD), naming a resurrection that Simon Magus performed, but it was pseudo-miracle due to "magic" and optical illusion. This is in contrast to what Apostle Peter did, who with true god power he resurrected the dead.
To impress his audience he [Simon] made statues to walk, entered the fire without burning, he could fly, turned stones into bread, turned himself into a snake, could duplicate himself, change himself into gold, opened closed doors, shattered iron fetters, during dinners he would give life to idols, made the dishes to move by themselves, create shadows that went before him when walking. According to tradition, to those who did not believe in him, he caused diseases by calling on the demons and caused torture with the help of the spirits of evil.
Simon Magus and Paul
Ferdinand Christian Baur, the founder of the "Tübingen School" of New Testament criticism, rested his ideas about the New Testament on the Clementines, and his ideas about the Clementines on St. Epiphanius, who found the writings used by an Ebionite sect in the 4th century. This Judeo-Christian sect at that date rejected St. Paul as an apostate. It was assumed that this 4th century opinion represented the Christianity of the Twelve Apostles; Paulinism was originally a heresy, and a schism from the Jewish Christianity of James and Peter and the rest; Marcion was a leader of the Pauline sect in its survival in the 2nd century, using only the Pauline Gospel, St. Luke (in its original form), and the Epistles of St. Paul (without the Pastoral Epistles). The Clementine literature had its first origin in the Apostolic Age, and belonged to the original Jewish, Petrine, legal Church. It is directed wholly against St. Paul and his sect. Simon Magus never existed; it is a nickname for St. Paul. The Acts of the Apostles, compiled in the 2nd century, have borrowed their mention of Simon from the earliest form of the Clementines. Catholicism under the presidency of Rome was the result of the adjustment between the Petrine and Pauline sections of the Church in the second half of the 2nd century. The Fourth Gospel is a monument of this reconciliation, in which Rome took a leading part, having invented the fiction that both Peter and Paul were the founders of her Church, both having been martyred at Rome, and on the same day, in perfect union.
Throughout the middle of the 19th century this theory, in many forms, was dominant in Germany. The demonstration, mainly by English scholars, of the impossibility of the late dates ascribed to the New Testament documents (four Epistles of St. Paul and the Apocalypse were the only documents generally admitted as being of early date), and the proofs of the authenticity of the Apostolic Fathers and of the use of St. John's Gospel by Justin, Papias, and Ignatius gradually brought Baur's theories into discredit. Of the original school, Adolf Hilgenfeld may be considered the last survivor (died 1907). He was induced many years ago to admit that Simon Magus was a real personage, though he persists that in the Clementines he is meant for St. Paul.
Laura said:You can skip the OT re-write of Josephus and just start with the Maccabees.
39a Jesus said: The Pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys to knowledge and have hidden them. they did not go in, and they did not permit those desiring to go in to enter.
39b You should be clever as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Sayings from The Gospel of Thomas translation by Steven Davies
"The genuine seeker will eventually find the genuine teacher." from the chapter titled "Indra's Pearls" in the book "The Truth Will Set You Free" by Svami Purna
ge0m0 said:All the competing theories are like so many grains of sand on a beach. Why look over any of them, much less count them all if you are really interested in looking for gold?
A pebble of truth is gold while a pile of lies is nothing but sand.
- Laura Knight-Jadczyk
ge0m0 said:ge0m0 said:All the competing theories are like so many grains of sand on a beach. Why look over any of them, much less count them all if you are really interested in looking for gold?
A pebble of truth is gold while a pile of lies is nothing but sand.
- Laura Knight-Jadczyk