Roger said:Reply to DAWN (Administrator). Thank you for your understanding about what my intentions where in posting my comment about "numerology" in general. Believe me, it was NOT intended to be disrespectful to anyone. My background prompts me to be very direct in my comments so perhaps unknowingly I stepped on her ego. Why,if a fact was presented, could you not ask a Cass. representative to present the right answer? I have read the "Wave Series" and "Adventure Series" plus many other articles and find them to be extremely accurate, factual,and precise..I have studied catholicism, Judism,islam and many other alternative ideas, but find this to be the most accurate in presentation. Please thank Mrs Jadczyk for all her hard work. Thanking you again for your kindness and understanding
Thanks and welcome to the forum. It would be good if Laura could have a look, yes. You mentioned you read the Wave and the Adventures series, are you familiar with the Fourth Way, Gurdjieff and Castaneda's take on the ego/self-importance and also the Work on oneself? If not, I advise you to have a look at them as they can give you much insight about the inner world of man and also help you in your line of work with people (understanding their strangeness is one example ;D), not to mention the books on psychology and psychopathy.Roger said:Reply to Ivan : Sir , please give me a chance to gather up some info for you and pass them by Mrs Jadczyk first. Will get back to you. Best wishes in your studies
Roger said:To Dawn : I'm very surprised that you took this post so personally - believe me, it was definitely NOT intended to be disrespectful to anyone. But the facts are there as you can see by your attitude.
roger said:How on earth could you take this post to believe that my "words of wisdom" pertained to you? It is a general note - not meant to make any personnel claims. Please read it more carefully and don't take it so personally
Roger said:Reply to DAWN (Administrator).
roger said:Thank you for your understanding about what my intentions where in posting my comment about "numerology" in general. Believe me, it was NOT intended to be disrespectful to anyone.
roger said:My background prompts me to be very direct in my comments so perhaps unknowingly I stepped on her ego.
roger said:Why,if a fact was presented, could you not ask a Cass. representative to present the right answer?
roger said:I have read the "Wave Series" and "Adventure Series" plus many other articles and find them to be extremely accurate, factual,and precise.
roger said:I have studied catholicism, Judism,islam and many other alternative ideas, but find this to be the most accurate in presentation. Please thank Mrs Jadczyk for all her hard work. Thanking you again for your kindness and understanding.
I wasn't sure if he intended this word as curtail means to cut short or otherwise diminish. I thought perhaps he meant "entail", as in a consequential necessity, like: Effective communications entail clarity..Roger said:Dear Mrs. Jadcyzk, Just a little note to try to explain what "Numerology sciences " really curtail
I thought he is establishing his experience to add credibility but tempers it with humility in the awareness that lessons continue to come.I have been practicing this art for about 35 years and still don't consider myself an expert.
I thought he was trying to explain Numerology and it's ancient heritage.It is a science based on the vibration of numbers (each number having a dimensional vibe that has been known since time and memorial by races and tribes to numerous to count).
I'm guessing this is where some of the concerns begin? I just thought he was explaining the role ego plays in failed readings and the need to operate with this awareness.Normally a average person cannot do his own reading due to the factor of ego,and himself/herself wanting to believe things that might not be really there...it is a science that works phenomenally well if done properly.
I felt he was merely expressing his pleasure in providing readings to others but also expands on his earlier comment about how ego issues can impact on a successful reading.All the works that I personally have done for others gives me great satisfaction as to the help and happiness they receive... I've also come up with a lot of negative conditions in peoples lives that were answered,some not so successfully because of a definite ego problem that could not be corrected..
I thought he was introducing a possible explanation for the effects he has experienced.The cass. teaching of OPs and remotes can be the reasons for this.
It seems to me he is expressing how personally rewarding it can be to provide such readings, provided one's training is "proper".If studied properly under a proper master, it is the most rewarding and people helping function that I could imagine.
An innocent question, I assumed.On a second note, what happened to the May,2010 reading?
Did you see the credo under my avatar, borrowed from Ark who borrowed it from some Russian SF novel.Gonzo said:Coincidence, eh? Is there such a thing? Oh yee of little faith - LOL.
Gonzo said:So, could someone kindly explain to me what I missed please?
This will drive me nuts until I know.
Roger said:Just a note to say that if I had known what my post did to the sensitivity's of some of your readers, I would never have posted it.
anart said:It is a very subtle thing, ... and, as Roger stated, it was not his intent to come across that way. It's a good experience for Roger, since he can learn to phrase things in a way that doesn't come across like he does not mean it.
Shijing said:Hi Roger --
So there is no need to wish that you hadn't posted your message -- it is merely one more amongst the myriad of lessons we are all learning all the time, and instructive for others to learn from as well. No harm done, and no big deal :)
anart said:I've certainly written many things here on the forum that were not read the way I intended, due to my own tendency to write how I think and not write with others in mind.