Hi j0da, great to see you back, and I have to say that you've been on my mind last days, and most likely it had nothing to do with what AI mentioned in his post (or maybe it had, who knows).
Some more facts to the picture and some thoughts:
It appears that Polish journalists, who were to fly to Smolensk, couldn't fly together with the gov people "due to insufficient plane capacity", while TU-154 can carry ca. 150 passengers. Anyway, it's been decided they would take another gov's plane, Yak-40. But when they were already aboard, they had to get out and move to another plane due to some 'technical defects'.
realitybugll said:
I glad someone mentioned this. when I read about this occurrence this morning something felt off. when I reiterated to my friend what happened, I realized the situation sounded utterly ridiculous and detached from reality. you guys pinpointed what was bothering me, I don't understand it either. all flying on the same plane it doesn't make any sense.
You need to know that they might not have much choice. The Polish government had to their disposal two Tupolevs (TU-154), with the other one being repaired at the moment, two Yak-40's (one defected) with capacity up to 37 passengers, and 12 helicopters. That's it. But it still makes their decision highly irresponsible. By the way: Bulgaria Presidential Plane (Tu-154) Banned from Flying after Polish Crash
Link
Another thing that bothers me is an lustration bill that has passed Parliament's upper house (Senate) on Thursday, when in spite of a disagreement inside the Senate, its members were forced to vote pro. Even though there was a debate before, opinions varied, and it was clear that there were many amendments required. That's an adverse bill and in its final version it gives former security agents an access to the files. The only hope was in President Kaczynski who could veto the bill or refer it to the Constitutional Tribunal.
Link. Notice that that the President of the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) Janusz Kurtyka died in the crash.
But they are just side notes. The main thing at the moment seems to have to do with the risky decision to land in Smolensk, and weird manoeuvres when trying to land. That includes some still unclear circumstances, like how many turns the plane took over the airport, weather conditions, and foremost, why the plane was too low, descending too fast, with strong tilt to the left. If not the tilt, it would pass over trees instead of catching them with its left wing. And this could suggest a flap failure.
I'm not sure if Russia is among those who benefit. Not at the moment/in short term, I think, as they are those to blame, at least for all 'conspiracy theorists'. The same time, MSM and Russians try to blame the victims - the captain or the President (or some members of the delegation).