Q source / Qanon

ephemerality

The Force is Strong With This One
Wishful thinking: "to be able to see only what one wishes to see". If one tries to see anything from a standpoint/biases of fear, judgment, unwillingness, one is prone to not see all the other possibilities besides the envisioned outcome. And, considering that these possibilities have variable probabilities, this is one of the reasons why the STS hierarchy fails again and again.

If one wishes to regard any referential through and from a biased perspective, one is bound to see things filtered through that kind of lensing, hence being unable to see every other possibility, every other possible outcome. Besides, taking into account that "whatever is is, and what is not cannot be", that is to say, that the truth is — even if it is not believed or accredited — and the lie is not — even if it is believed or accredited — it matters little what one might think or believe in regards to any referential; it matters most what actually is: the Whole Truth.

However, if one is prone to wishful thinking (as human beings are STS designed), wouldn't it be wise to broaden, to enhance the breadth as much as possible of one's perceptional biases in regards to anything?

In other words: if someone regards something as inherently bad or good, one is prone to the so-called confirmation bias. Why not stick to the Truth instead?

In this sense, to regard Q (or anyone) with a label is of little use compared to the work that analyzing and making good use of the contents of what is conveyed has.

Even dis-information, for this matter, comes from a source. Even dis-information has a certain algorithm of creation, and this algorithm reveals much of the agenda of the ones behind it.
 

Alejo

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
In this sense, to regard Q (or anyone) with a label is of little use compared to the work that analyzing and making good use of the contents of what is conveyed has.
Perhaps, but I think one should also call a spade a spade when the truth is revealed. In the case of Q, sitting on a neutral ground of objective perspective tends to miss the lesson that it can present.

If one sees a source that seeks to convey disinformation for nefarious purposes for the lives of many, one should understand it as such and treat it as such. Perhaps one should try to avoid becoming too identified with the moral stance of it and attempt to see it for what it is, but one should not dismiss the moral reaction as this is what makes us human.

To give one example, if one sees a robbery take place, one could see that it's a robbery and call it wrong and react against it, or one could say that, well... its a robbery and it happens all over the world, and I'm sure both have their reasons and lessons to go through to be where they are. While that is technically the case, at the level that we all dwell, seeing it as such is putting distance between the reality of the world and our souls, and that's akin to refusing the lessons we came here to learn in my view.
 

goyacobol

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I was not going to invest much more energy into this thread but then I started searching for more information from the sessions and that led to the following. I don't really know if this may help but since I already found some references I am sharing how "disinformation" relates to "knowledge" according to some of the Cs sessions. I see how the "Q" source has created stress and I feel for those with differing opinion on both sides of the coin so to speak. I may get my weed-eater charged up.:-/

Session 19 November 1994:
Q: (T) The object behind using the electronic ignitions, from what I have heard, whether the source is true or not I can't say, but I had a strange confirmation of part of it.

A: Beware of disinformation. It diverts your attention away from reality thus leaving you open to capture and conquest and even possible destruction.

Q: (L) Is the information about the electronic ignition systems correct?

A: Disinformation comes from seemingly reliable sources. It is extremely important for you to not gather false knowledge as it is more damaging than no knowledge at all. Remember knowledge protects, ignorance endangers. The information you speak of, Terry, was given to you deliberately because you and Jan and others have been targeted due to your intense interest in level of density 4 through 7 subject matter. You have already been documented as a "threat."

Q: (L) Can you tell Terry what event occurred (referring to "confirmation" of electronic ignition subject)...

A: Remember, disinformation is very effective when delivered by highly trained sources because hypnotic and transdimensional techniques are used thereby causing electronic anomalies to follow suggestion causing perceived confirmation to occur.

Session 17 December 1994:
Q: (L) Well, in another session we were told that a lot of what EDDIE Page is saying is disinformation designed to take people in, is that true?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And what is the source of that disinformation?

A: Orion STS.

Q: (L) Are they trying to, to put this in plain terms, are they trying to "take his soul?"

A: No.

Q: (L) Are they trying to win the battle in terms of dominating him in 4th density?

A: And you and all others.

Q: (L) Well that is pleasant...

A: We have told you this before, knowledge protects, ignorance endangers.

It is sometimes complex and maybe purposfully made that way.

Session 21 January l995:
Q: (L) Symbolism of what? What does O. H. Krill translate out to?

A: For documentary purposes only, your government likes code names.

Q: (L) Are you implying that this piece of work was put out by the government for dissemination of the subject matter? (J) Is it disinformation?

A: Complex.


Q: (L) Give us a percentage of factual information in this document.

A: 43%

Q: (L) Are you saying that 43% is factual?

A: Close enough.

Q: (L) Okay, so, in other words, this has been planted by the government. Was it put out with the intention of giving out some factual information...

A: No. Planted? No.

Q: (L) You are saying it was planted? (T) It was leaked purposely?

A: Your government is operating on many cross-purposes, very complicated!

Q: (T) Even the simplest things are very complicated with them. Okay, question: The U.S. government...

A: On purpose!


Q: (T) Very true. Question: The government, our government, the U.S. government, is holding 36 craft of one kind or another that they gotten in one way or another. How many other governments have craft?

A: All is one.

Session 24 September 1995:
Q: (L) You have told us on other occasions that the Semitic peoples were remnants of the Atlanteans, and yet they are quite unlike...

A: Whoa!! Wait a minute, let's not get ahead of ourselves. First things first. What Roxanne said was not entirely factual. Remember, there is much disinformation to weed through.

Q: (RC) What did I say that was not factual?

A: In this part of your 3rd and 4th density universe, specifically your "galaxy" it is the region known as Orion that is the one and only indigenous home of human type beings... reflect on this! Indigenous home base, not sole locator. What you are most in need of review of is the accurate profile of "alien" data.

It is sometimes possible to "weed" through material with disinformation if you have the gardening skills (not saying who can do it well and who cannot).

Session 9 June 1996:
Q: (L) But didn't you tell us that Bielek was a disinformation artist?

A: Yes, but can you weed?

It seems normal here that guarded secrets held are going to be full of media disinformation.

Seaaion 31 July 1999:
Q: I don't think I have a good enough grasp. Back to Montauk. Is Montauk connected in any way with this Alternative Three idea of transferring groups or perimeters in the event of a cataclysm or disaster?

A: Too complex, but be careful of what you read.

Q: In what sense?

A: Disinformation. This is most of what you hear and read.

Sometimes the Cs give you a "Yup" so there not much doubt what they mean in their answer.

Session 13 November 1999:
Q: Oh, you mean the big Hoagland prediction that something was going to strike the earth... supposedly revealed to him by a "confidential informant" who somehow proved his "reliability," by having "inside information" and so forth. In other words, another spate of disinformation?

A: Yup!

The "muddy waters" aspect seems to be very rampant right now.

Session 27 May 2000:
The thing that occurs to me is that
a) either we have somebody going back and forth in time, tweaking the facts, such as Marcel's military records and such things including any records of the nurse that the undertaker claims to have talked to, or
b) we have something that did happen and either they went back in time to set a situation up so that people would start remembering something OTHER than what happened, so as to cover up the real event with more or less "false memories" that could be not stand scrutiny; or
c) they are just feeding disinformation through all of these people, and have produced a whole scenario with all kinds of witnesses and weird stuff to cover up something that happened. Could you comment on this. You have already said that the actual crash did not occur at Roswell, that it occurred on the Plains of San Augustin...

A: Try scenario 3.

Q: (L) So, they are feeding disinformation through all the so-called "Roswell witnesses."

A: Close.

Q: (L) To cover up something that really did happen?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And they are feeding the disinformation through the people so that they will come out with this whole story, make all this big splash, so that it can THEN be proven false, so that everybody will think that the whole thing was a crock of kaflooey. Is that it?

A: Not quite. Confusing stories and fabrications are used to muddy the waters in anticipation of future disclosures. And beware of authors who cast one stone and hit multiple targets. As with any conspiratorial mystery, keep focused on the earliest entries in the evidentiary train, i.e. "RAAF recovers flying disk in Roswell region."

The "truth" may be "in there" but maybe you need to get your weed-eater out...

Session 5 August 2000:
Q: Well, when I read this Top Secret document and they said this business about the sun, I just really wondered where they were getting all this! I mean, does the secret government really believe this crap? And if they do, and all their actions are geared around that, then that would explain a lot. But, if they don't believe it, then they might even be responsible for putting out this kind of disinformation just to make people panic and get even more anti-government so they can have more excuses to clamp down on the masses and take away more freedoms! This Nexus Seven says right up front: " This document is a clear and present danger to the mental health of unstable persons!" Well, they DID warn us! [Laughter] (A) Well, it's a Val Valerian source! The fact that one or more things are wrong does not mean that everything is wrong!

A: Arkadiusz is right on the money!! There is much accurate information there and some disinformation mixed in!

My posting this on my computer is part and parcel of how disinformation is being disseminated everywhere we turn.

Session 13 June 2015:
Q: (L) Alright, I have a series of questions here from forum members. Apparently, there was a conference with Barbara Marciniak where she was doing some trance channeling. Several of the forum people had a look at it and condensed the major points of the event. Out of what was said in that particular channeling, some questions arose... Not particularly about the channeling, but about some of the issues that were covered. Of course, everybody knows how I feel about trance channeling and that sort of thing. But anyhow, one of the questions that came up was:

"Can the internet be seen as a "window of opportunity"/"an experiment in human consciousnesses"?"

(L) I don't exactly know what the person means... I guess it would be one or the other. Is it a window of opportunity, or is it an experiment in human consciousness?

A: We once told you that your computers would overpower you. Thus neither question is precisely to the point. Internet was initially manifested for practical purposes, then other applications were developed. It could be said that the "experiment" in consciousness appeared in reaction to more positive uses. At present the internet is more a source of confusion and propaganda than anything else. Thus the opening statement is fulfilled.

Q: (L) In other words, the overpowering of people by their computers would be the use of the internet for confusion and propaganda. Is that what we're getting at here?

A: Yes

Q: (L) So, people being taken over in their minds by disinformation, propaganda, lies and so forth on the computer are literally being taken over by their computers?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Okay, the next part of that question is:

"Is the internet likely to end soon?"

A: If you consider the ramifications of the previous answer, not likely until the power grid goes down.

Q: (L) In other words, why would they shut down something that so easily enables them to control the masses?

A: Exactly.

I guess the good news is we can keep sifting though the "disinformation" until the "grid goes down". :-/
 

Phill4

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
While diving online I found out the Q people are pretty psudo religious about the so called prophecies of certain events, Lin Wood's profiles were a massive source of misdirection.

It shared an article claiming the pope was arrested on 80 counts of child trafficking., the pope was murdered and "it was going down"
They were claiming there was gonna be a mayor blackout, and indeed there was, but also one blackout in the Vatican
From what was confirmed there was indeed closure on the roads leading to Vatican city but I could not confirm if there was a blackout. I think Pompeo was there that day and the pope's personal doctor allegedly died from coronavirus complications , allegedly from a previous cancer. Pope is alive.

Lin wood appeals to a crowd that clings to pseudo prophetical interpretations of the bible, from what I understand. and the left totally WEAPONIZED these people.
And someone made a comment that perhaps Lin Wood's activity was a direct sabbotage in any network where he landed. knowingly or unknowingly.
I do think he is a person with a massive ego and that makes him available to be used as a tool for entropy and point of entry for STS energy.

I think Q people saw the rally as a prophesy of the 100,000 men from the book of revelations , I think that is the level of conviction the Q people have in the "trust the plan to catch the elite" wagon..


Among the stuff I came across, there was something interesting, they talked about technology that allows the government to go back and forth in time to select the best possible outcome for them to stay in power, and although I believe they are not far it only holds value in the world of speculation.
I thought, we cannot see STO beings in this world, but I can see in that scenario of manipulating time as the place where the most wishful thinking of STS beings occur. and that is what 4D STO being play a role, in shinning light in every direction or in this case in every possible timeline, that would be a monumental thing that fits in my understanding of the battle between both polarities in 4th density.

They jumpped on Gab dot com after Parler
 

Ruth

The Living Force
Even Alex Jones has figured it out.
I have a feeling that Alex Jones didn't know that he was being set up at the time, and was being led into a trap. A trap that is being sprung, now, on many people who challenge the 'mainstream' narrative. (A trap I hope some people i.e. 'the health ranger' - Mike Adams - wakes up to very quickly). I have the feeling that he may be now aware. Perhaps Alex Jones is chatting with him'? Well, he loves to talk... God bless him.

When it comes to Alex Jones opinion, I'm thinking his legal council may have had some influence here, and yes, he actually listened. Many, it appears, do not. His legal defender at the time was Robert Barnes.

This YouTube vid is not specifically about Q, and Robert Barnes is discussing current events with Parler. He makes a joke about the 'technical glitches' that seem to occur whenever Alex Jones's name is mentioned.


It is my personal opinion that the "Q world" has both 'white hats' and 'black hats' involved. You can pretty much depend on 'black hat' involvement if anything becomes too popular, or begins to hold sway. They'll naturally want to vector, control and manipulate. The C's weren't kidding when quoting Matthew 10:16.... :shock:
 
I stumbled upon this curious video concerning the wildest claim about Q, which is that they (and the cabal) have access to something called Project Looking Glass, which is allegedly reverse-engineered alien technology that allows views into possible timelines based on those present (and other inputs) during its use, which has been to vet PTB decisions and actions to keep them in power. FWIW. It's not the kind of thing I would want to try to research for any verification. So, just entertainment for me. It does remind me, though, of the C's statements that the time-travel involved is natural to 4D.

It was suggested to me some years ago (anecdotally) that supercomputers are already being used beyond their generally accepted capabilities to model societal behavior [and hence, reaction to external events] and that the precision is only increasing as technology continues to generate more and more data. I'm not dismissing the idea of Project Looking Glass, it may very well exist, but it's also another potential example of a semi-truth that has been embellished for someone else's gain.

That is, 'they' may well have access to 'possible timelines', but in a way where each would be based on known human attributes and behaviors including decision-making, and all the newly acquired habitual data - all values that could be modelled, and could therefore produce a statistically probable outcome (modelled, with +/- errors) to a real-time event.
 

wmu9

Jedi
The paranoid make prophecies in untestable ways. Here's one that is testable. If Parler is as compromised (honey pot) as people suspect, then we can also expect ACLU (which is woke now) to stick up only for Parler and make a ceremonial "win". They will get reinstated and all the useful idiots can go get tracked everywhere again in false fantasy. The PTB do not want their enemies invisible. They need to track Parler. It also goes for PornHub. They need to track and compromise people. They do not want massive encryption and secrecy. This "expell the right" game will be rolled back real fast after the inauguration. Can you imagine how crazy it would make them to not know what is going on? Nope, they'll want all the alt-right, conservatives back online so they can snoop and predict behavior.
 

PopHistorian

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Talk about muddy waters - a guy who completely believes in Corey Goode says Simon Parkes is untrustworthy.

Simon is comfortable with putting out the unverifiable, having said he lost his virginity at age 5 in an experience with holographic aliens, and such as that. I wonder if the 1 million views is the result of little else being left on YouTube at this point.

1610477002000.png
 

Meechel17

Jedi
FOTCM Member
Thought you guys would find this interesting. It is on a Telegram post from Project Camelot. I'm guessing Laura might take issue with this???

"As it happens the news group releasing the info from Lin Wood is run behind the scenes by someone I interviewed many years ago: Laura Knight Jadczyk. She is in regular contact with an ET race. She would not be putting this out there if there wasn’t some substance behind it.

Besides when Trump spoke about the Wall at the ALAMO the hints were there. I KNOW the wall is actually a frequency fence that was built to keep not only the grey alien-human hybrids out but also the Chinese.

I have had precog dreams about the Chinese invading…. I hoped they were on another timeline. Guess not!

My dreams often warn me about the future!"
 

goyacobol

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Thought you guys would find this interesting. It is on a Telegram post from Project Camelot. I'm guessing Laura might take issue with this???

"As it happens the news group releasing the info from Lin Wood is run behind the scenes by someone I interviewed many years ago: Laura Knight Jadczyk. She is in regular contact with an ET race. She would not be putting this out there if there wasn’t some substance behind it.

Besides when Trump spoke about the Wall at the ALAMO the hints were there. I KNOW the wall is actually a frequency fence that was built to keep not only the grey alien-human hybrids out but also the Chinese.

I have had precog dreams about the Chinese invading…. I hoped they were on another timeline. Guess not!

My dreams often warn me about the future!"

@Meechel17,

If that is really Kerry Cassidy (really doubtful) on Telegraph it is a bunch of BS if you ask me. It amounts to slander against @Laura. But there was only one mention of Lin Wood in this thread and it doesn't really mention a very direct connection to Q.

Wikipeda describes Lin Wood as "reflecting QAnon conspiracy theories".
Wood made allegations against U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Robertsreflecting QAnon conspiracy theories that Judge Craig A. Karsnitz of the Delaware Superior Court described as "too disgusting and outrageous to repeat."

There far more references to Lin Wood in the 2020 US Election - Let the games begin thread than here. I think if you post it there you will get better responses.
 

Windmill knight

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
I KNOW the wall is actually a frequency fence that was built to keep not only the grey alien-human hybrids out but also the Chinese.
Kerry Cassidy or not, that's hilarious! :lol: Coyotes and drug dealers can get through no problem, but if you are a grey-hybrid or a Chinese person you'll be stopped on your tracks! And of course, they'll never think of trying a boat or using their 4D connections to fly over!
 

Aeneas

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
If that is really Kerry Cassidy (really doubtful) on Telegraph it is a bunch of BS if you ask me.
I was also doubtful if that was Kerry Cassidy, but at her site she says the same thing at the end of an article about how 250.000 Chinese are surrounding the US. It sure sounds like she has drunk the Q Koolaid.
It can be found here: htt----ps://projectcamelotportal.com/2021/01/16/250000-chinese-troop-at-border-mexico-canada-lin-wood-unconfirmed/

But not to worry, the military will save the day and install Trump. Something big and explosive is just about to happen. The good guys will win and arrest all the bad guys. People with all kinds of colored hats, not least the white ones are coming, so just sit back, do nothing but pray and retweet and check for updates tomorrow. [This message has been reposted with slight variations for months/years on end and regurgitated by the Q faithful]

I suspect that once Biden is installed, then the Q movement will fade away as its mission of diversion and distraction was accomplished.
 

Anthony

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I was also doubtful if that was Kerry Cassidy, but at her site she says the same thing at the end of an article about how 250.000 Chinese are surrounding the US. It sure sounds like she has drunk the Q Koolaid.
It can be found here: htt----ps://projectcamelotportal.com/2021/01/16/250000-chinese-troop-at-border-mexico-canada-lin-wood-unconfirmed/

But not to worry, the military will save the day and install Trump. Something big and explosive is just about to happen. The good guys will win and arrest all the bad guys. People with all kinds of colored hats, not least the white ones are coming, so just sit back, do nothing but pray and retweet and check for updates tomorrow. [This message has been reposted with slight variations for months/years on end and regurgitated by the Q faithful]

I suspect that once Biden is installed, then the Q movement will fade away as its mission of diversion and distraction was accomplished.

Another possibility is that it will be kept somewhat alive in order to help prop the narrative for the "war on domestic terror."
 
Top Bottom