edit:please open the spoiler part, its the main quote I intended, thanks.Finally i'll post this in the Q thread, not the US election one.
As many here i'm puzzled and hardly waiting to see what is going to come in regard to US elections.
I wrote a text, an open analyse with open questions, notices and remarks on "Q", and compared to what I observed in France.
In summary : for France, whoever is behind "Q" (in fact, this finaly does not much matter), it brought an almost extremly positive output for at least french-speaking people (if we consider positive as STO oriented, meaning helping truth and true knowledge to be spread)
But in order not to make too much noise, I used the "spoiler" option of the forum for those who want to read a part of my brainstorming.
I recall that i'm (or at least i try to remain) neutral in regard to "Q"
We are in the middle of an information war, and the battle is on going at this moment.
I do not agree for many negative comments on the Q movement, it is like if any important movement or group that could form is automatically labelled as a PTB or deep state manipulation/psyop. I did not and will never say that this Q thing is the truth, is "STO", but nore the contrary too. And we have to differenciate the ones behind Q, and the ones which follow Q.
Here's from the session where Q is discussed, the C's answser is pretty small :
I just would like to point that the conclusion was quickly made. I mean the following : we all associated psyop to STS, then as C's used the word "psyop" then the conclusion drop : STS, disinfo, next question.
And it is maybe well a fully 100% STS disinfo, no problem to agree on this, I do not much care in fact, and from the last comments and insights I recently read, i would tend to answer that it's more probably the case, but aren't we living an exceptionnal situation with many tricks & turning ? Isn't it too rapidly concluded ?
Some open questions :
- Is this impossible to have an STO insider in and STS-psyop team ?
- Didn't trump took the hand on NSA which is, from what I know, at the center of the control of the communications
- Is it possible that the C's answered with the keyword "psyops" in order to test us, to test if we would directly classify this as STS when in fact it's STO but we have to discover this, and to learn that as we are all STS living in a STS world, psyops are just a tool that can be used for good purposes (similar to a cunning move from and STO confrounted to and STS person, but here at the world level) ?
About Flynn, could he be the one who started/piloted this secret movement ? As Flynn was rapidly discarded 4y before, could he have then engaged on fueling "Q" in order to slowly unify many normal people under what they name "digital soldiers" for the hot fights that we are now watching in this information war ?
In practice, i can only base on what i see, means the French Q community : what they did until now. Then ask the following honest question : did they do something good for manking (in the way of STO oriented) or not ? Or simply for french people ? And the answer is a BIG yes. Because of Q, a lot of people got together, shared information, learnt a lot of truths ... and of course some lies, but in comparison it's really here the truth which won. They created a new community that is much active at this moment. And this community is active to what ? To spread truths to even more french people and they are actively fighting the PTB and more directly the GAFA censorship which we are right now experiencing. We can realy state that they fight for the truth, for free information and they are right now doing it, fighting against the PTB's censorship. The terms "digital soldier" is really a adapted to the actual situation.
If their hopes are broken because in final, let's say that the Q plan fails ! Fails because :
- it was fake since begin and it was piloted by PTB/deep state
- because PTB succeeded to counter it
... will this community then dissolve and it's over ?
Answer is NO, certainly not, this movement helped to plant seeds in many countries, and people who regrouped under this are really good people who are now quite more awake from the average, who now see quite better the reality of our world, the truths, say otherwise, the horrible reality we live in, many people now in France have now a better knowledge of the situation of our worlds than just 10 months before. They succeed to achieve this "eyes opening" for a large number of people in just a few months, isn't it a great disclosure and something good ?
So, saying that Q is STS or PTB's operation remains possible, but the output, the results, are strongly positive. Or it's just in France (or french-speaking community), because here in France I can state that i'm much impressed on how they united and how they handle this, they really do a good job until now. This would then mean that the PTB's "Q" finally produced something good, and this would not be the first time that STS plans kinda backfire. So i tend to think that Q is whether a kind of neutral or STO oriented operation, it has not to be taken as a psyop giving free lunch to all because from what I learnt this "Q" did not serve everything on a platter as some too rapidly concluded here, they in fact acted much like the C's did during these last 24 years, they asked people to network, regroup and study various information, work together, discuss, make asumption, errors, re-discuss and so on.
I would even be tempted to say that Q could be seen a kind of source of information coming from the C's, but spread in the world in another manner, more broadly, in comparison to the C's here were the community is much more structured and where all the subjects are discussed/digged quite more deeply.
C's said that they do not communicate only with this community (SOTT one), and it would be logical that in the future, these different communities regroup.
Woud it be possible that the STS forces knows about the various STO communities around in the world and that they are trying at all cost that these communities unify ? Or get on the same FRV ?
I would assume that yes, 4D STS will try to prevent this, meaning that they'll try to make them looks like STS when they are STO, so we reject them.
Would then it be here a kind of "community lesson", the one which is to spot & accept other STO sources & communities, and that the main difficulty here is not to too rapidy see STS everywhere ?
I think these are good questions to ask to ourselves.
Of course I can agree that knowledge protects and ignorance endangers. Disinfo bad for playing the game of life perfectly. BUT I think its hard to ignore that we were fed with disinfo from pre-&post birth. Actually made me who I m and the way I think, lots of hard lessons along the way. I still think this way which is: all info is retained until proven otherwise, disinfo included, or else I would most likely not have learnt my lessons the way it was meant. fwiw.Wishful thinking: "to be able to see only what one wishes to see". If one tries to see anything from a standpoint/biases of fear, judgment, unwillingness, one is prone to not see all the other possibilities besides the envisioned outcome. And, considering that these possibilities have variable probabilities, this is one of the reasons why the STS hierarchy fails again and again.
If one wishes to regard any referential through and from a biased perspective, one is bound to see things filtered through that kind of lensing, hence being unable to see every other possibility, every other possible outcome. Besides, taking into account that "whatever is is, and what is not cannot be", that is to say, that the truth is — even if it is not believed or accredited — and the lie is not — even if it is believed or accredited — it matters little what one might think or believe in regards to any referential; it matters most what actually is: the Whole Truth.
However, if one is prone to wishful thinking (as human beings are STS designed), wouldn't it be wise to broaden, to enhance the breadth as much as possible of one's perceptional biases in regards to anything?
In other words: if someone regards something as inherently bad or good, one is prone to the so-called confirmation bias. Why not stick to the Truth instead?
In this sense, to regard Q (or anyone) with a label is of little use compared to the work that analyzing and making good use of the contents of what is conveyed has.
Even dis-information, for this matter, comes from a source. Even dis-information has a certain algorithm of creation, and this algorithm reveals much of the agenda of the ones behind
Q: Whitley Strieber and Art Bell have published a book about a "global superstorm." Is any of the information they have given in this book fairly accurate?
A: Derived from non-human sources known for stark accuracy, when convenient.
Q: What makes it convenient at the present time for them to be "starkly accurate?"
A: Fits into plans.
Q: Plans for what?
A: Do we not know already?
Q: In other words: world conquest and the takeover of humanity?
A: Not as simple.
Q: What would make my statement more accurate?
A: Call it amalgamation.
Well said.Wasn't expecting to post something till after this week plays out, but it sure feels like the plunge into darkness before the drop, of my own making. I really should not attach my'self' so closely to emotions of my fellow man, but certain things resonate and seeing the suffering does not help. What this has done is my trust in God/Universe has steadily clear up much ambiguity in many of the underlying illusions of our matrix.
The Aeschylus quote rings more and more true, and I may forever relate it to Laura's profile quote then the man himself lol.
"He who learns must suffer. And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart, and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God."
...but I think that's all she wrote as far as successfully challenging the system via the ballot box are concerned. With no procedural recourse available to them, I imagine that people, going forwards, will instead engage in sporadic (and likely messy) acts of rebellion.
I just checked out 8kun. Boards are still there, though there was chatter on gab earlier. Complaint was made to owner of 8kun (Jim Watkins) about some funny business which one of the mods was getting up to....banning people, deleting posts, allowing CP to stay on the breads, etc. As of 7pm ish EST the problem mod was banned and the damage done was being reversed.