In this post, there is more about windows, but now as spheres, which then might indicate one of the properties the STS HQ for our star system, as it is described as being a
partial sphere, hexagonal.
Interestingly, many viruses, but not all, also have spherical, or near spherical shapes. In one session, there is a reference to the ethereal structure of viruses, which then might connect back to some of the window properties of stars. In a broader context, a sphere is a geometric object, and in the transcript one finds mention of the relation between geometry and the properties of molecules and atoms in relation to the information field. The importance of geometry goes beyond the material, as thoughts also connect to geometry, and language.
Previously there has been mentions of planets, stars, atoms, being windows. These objects are also spherical or close to spherical. Thus, it is not surprising that:
Remember the "center of the sphere" is a window.
Session 3 September 2008
A: Remember the "center of the sphere" is a window.
Q: (Ark) Center of the sphere... Now again, you mentioned long ago Mandelbrot, in fact you spelled it strange like "Mandlebrot" while normally people say "Mandel"... So I was looking for years for this Mandelbrot, and I thought it was fractals, and this was a good beginning. But I still don't know what Mandelbrot has to do with the center of the sphere because it must be somehow connected to windows, too. Hint?
A: Emergence from the center. The surface is where "things happen" and where the fractals coalesce.
In the following, Pierre asks about El Niño, and what powers it. The Cs explain it is "usually powered by the sun in its interaction with its companion", an there is also:
Remember that the center of a sphere is a window! Portal too!
Session 27 February 2016
(Pierre) In the previous session, you said that El Niño is powered by some cosmic energy. What's the source of this cosmic energy? Is it the superbright supernova?
(L) Is that the whole context?
(Pierre) Yeah.
(L) Where did they say it was powered by cosmic energy?
(Pierre) In a previous session.
(L) What was the question?
(Pierre) They say that energy from cosmic origin was the cause of El Niño through those pillars at 18 degrees latitude.
A: It is usually powered by the sun in its interaction with its companion.
[...]
Q: (Pierre) Uh, okay. This cosmic energy coming from the sun and its interaction with its companion powers El Niño. But I guess El Niño is not the only effect of these surges...
A: Remember that the center of a sphere is a window!
Q: (Pierre) Yeah, I remember that.
A: Portal too!
Q: (L) So the energy that powers El Niño could come from within the Earth in a sense as coming through a portal to another dimension?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Or density or something.
(Joe) It's one of the effects of the Wave, right?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Is the Wave going to come upon us from within our own planet?
A: Partly already showing signs and symptoms!
If
the center of a sphere is a window, at what stage would a geometric shapes be close enough to a sphere to share the properties of being a window? The question is motivated by this excerpt where the shape of the Orion STS HQ for our star system is described as "
Partial sphere, hexagonal."
Session 4 December 1999
Q: Now, according to some information posted on the Millennium Group site, there are some photographs that seem to indicate that there IS something anomalous in orbit around the Sun... maybe a new "planet, " or something. Is there a new object in our solar system in a close orbit around the sun?
A: Maybe.
Q: There is conjecture that this object appeared around the time of the passage of the Hale Bopp comet. Is that the case?
A: No.
Q: Is this object that is possibly in orbit around the sun, is it a natural or artificial construction?
A: Latter.
Q Who constructed it?
A: Orion STS.
Q: What is it?
A: HQ.
Q: The Orion Headquarters?
A: For your star system.
Q: Okay, you said "maybe" to this being a "new object." When did it arrive, or when was it placed there?
A: You measure "time" linearly.
Q: Can we give it a "linear" definition, or does it come and go through some sort of portal in terms of time, in a cyclical way, or a variable and selective way?
A: Yes, but it arrived at that coordinate 26730 years ago, sort of.
Q: What is its orbit, or distance from the Sun?
A: 31,230,000 miles.
Q: How large is this object?
A: 1005.6 kilometers diameter.
Q: What is the general configuration or shape of it? (A) A sphere, a ball, a disc, a cylinder?
A: Partial sphere, hexagonal.
A sphere is impossible,
they say, to make of only hexagons and all of the same size, but one can make one that has many hexagons, like a
soccer ball:
or
this 
Incidentally, several types of viruses also have shapes that ressemble spheres, do these structures have window properties too? For an idea of what viruses can look like, here is an
image from a Harvard page:
In the image above, the helical viruses looks more like cylinders, a variation of this theme is the
ebola virus:
The transcripts do not explicitly say that viruses have windows, though we know that atom and electrons have, but there is:
A virus is a transdensity structure
Session 17 July 2022
(Joe) How correct are scientists' ideas about viruses?
A: Close enough though there is a lot they do not know including the fact that a virus is a transdensity structure.
Q: (Joe) Do viruses come from outside of the human body or from inside?
A: Both.
Later there was regarding the transdensity structure of viruses, and what scientists do not know about them:
What are the mechanisms/structures or other things they do not know about? - Ethereal for example.
Session 22 October 2022
Q: (MK Scarlett) In the last session, the C's said about Joe's question "How correct are scientists' ideas about viruses?": "Close enough though there is a lot they do not know including the fact that a virus is a transdensity structure." What are the mechanisms/structures or other things they do not know about?
A: Ethereal for example. Do you know about such structures?
Q: (L) MK Scarlett?
(MK Scarlett) I didn't understand the question, sorry.
(L) They asked if you know about such structures.
(MK Scarlett) No, I asked about what they said: "They do not know." What don't we know? And: What do the scientists not know?
A: More than that would be highly technical and lengthy.
Q: (Joe) I think the idea is that when you ask a question like that, it obviously implies complicated details about the nature of viruses that unless you are already acquainted with that, the answer wouldn't really mean much to you. It's technical.
(L) You probably need a virologist to ask the right questions because they would know where to go.
It is possible that the ethereal structures would take us back to earlier expression, only it is on the microscopic level rather than the macroscopic or cosmic:
[N]eutron stars, supernovae, "black holes," et cetera - All are the junction of matter/antimatter... the borderline between realities as you know them... material realms/etheric realms, density level junctures, realities. One can pass through these windows with ease; remember, the stars and planets are windows too.
Is a proton a window? Yes. - Is a photon a window? Yes. - Gravity is as much matter as antimatter!!
Session 1 March 1997
Gravity center of planet is also "window" to all other density levels and dimensional planes of existence
Session 15 March 1997
Could you define for us a 'window? - Convergence; opening to alternative states via energy grid points.
Session 12 December 1998
In a more general sense, a sphere can be understood as a geometric structure
Maybe that is relevant, because, about geometry there is:
Is geometry the fundamental interface between the cosmic information field and our material reality? Very close.
Session 5 August 2017
Q: (Pierre) I have a question. It's about the interface between information and our reality. You see, molecules have what is called chirality. Handedness. Left-handedness, or right-handedness. They're the same component, the same atoms, chemically they are the same. Just geometrically, they are different. They're like mirror images of each other. Those two molecules are almost exactly the same, only the chirality is different. But their properties are totally different: one can be a poison, and the other can be very beneficial. The only difference is geometry. So I would like to ask: Is geometry the fundamental interface between the cosmic information field and our material reality?
A: Very close.
Q: (Ark) Pierre, but you see, you have these two molecules, and one is the mirror image of the other. And you say they have completely different properties. They have completely different properties with respect to the body which already has a fixed chirality. Our universe has a preferent chirality. Our DNA has preferent chirality. How it happened? But if there exists another universe that is a mirror image of ours?
(Pierre) So you're saying the properties of the geometric symbol is not absolute, but relative to the environment?
(Ark) Exactly.
(Pierre) Okay.
(Ark) Information, in fact, is always relative.
(Pierre) Oh yeah?
(Ark) Yes.
(L) STS, STO. Information that is one way to the STO pathway is perceived or understood or received differently to one on the STS pathway. Some love the darkness, some love the light.
The thoughts raised above, that chirality and the geometric pattern of molecules matters more than the chemical composition, was brought up again, and might relate to, on a micro cosmic level, what was said earlier; "Could you define for us a 'window? - Convergence; opening to alternative states via energy grid points" The connection is that the configuration of the atoms would define the energy grid structure, but at the level of atoms.
So, at a lower atomic scale for example, is it the same? That is, elements like nickel and cadmium, their protons are mostly related to their geometry? - Yes.
Session 22 September 2018
(Pierre) [...] Okay, next question: In a previous session, it was mentioned that chirality - the geometric pattern of molecules - was what matters more than the chemical composition of molecules. So, at a lower atomic scale for example, is it the same? That is, elements like nickel and cadmium, their protons are mostly related to their geometry?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Okay, so that's why in the Mendeleev table, you can have two elements next to each with only one neutron difference, and one is highly beneficial while the other is highly toxic. Okay, next question: Last session, it was mentioned that DNA is like a receiver device connecting our genetic bodies to the information field. Does the 3D spiral geometry of DNA play any role in the receivership capability of DNA?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) I have a hypothesis, and I'd like to know if it's true. The spiral shape of DNA connects it to the information field. And then the nucleotide sequences like TCAG for example, it doesn't directly decode this or that amino acid. TCAG connects to one specific set of information in the information field which is the instruction code for creating this or that amino acid. Is that true?
A: Yes
When something is sent through the realm curtain as described next, does that take place through the windows?
Genome manufactured in 4th density and sent through realm curtain in a manner similar to how virii are transmitted.
Session 22 September 2018
(Approaching Infinity) If the first cell more or less appeared in sea water, there's still the question of how that cell came about because it is irreducibly complex in the sense that the cell needs the insides of the cell, like the genome and the proteins, in order to create the cell through self-replication. And then within the cell, it's the same thing with DNA: the DNA needs proteins and enzymes to replicate and do all the stuff it does. But the proteins and enzymes need DNA in order to produce themselves. So, it seems like all of things needed to come about at the same time.
(Joe) The chicken and the egg.
(Approaching Infinity) Yeah.
(Pierre) There is a solution to solve this paradox, but maybe it's wrong. My hypothesis is that there's a density shift from first to second density when you get a critical mass of 2nd density organisms (molecules for example) and then you reach a critical mass of information, so they're ripe for graduation into 3d. Is this hypothesis right?
(L) You haven't read enough yet. It's impossible without the first step, manifestation of basic cellular life.
(Approaching Infinity) So how does the first cell manifest?
A: Partly correct, pair.
Q: (L) Well, what is the other part of it?
A: Genome manufactured in 4th density and sent through realm curtain in a manner similar to how virii are transmitted.
Q: (L) So the elements were developing, were present, and jostling around together in the primordial soup or whatever... But then the genome was manufactured.
(Pierre) It goes both ways: downside up, molecules reaching critical mass, and from top down - from 4th density down to 3rd.
(L) So in a sense, that's the basic thing about intelligent design. There is a lot of parts to it that rely on the nature of the physical world itself and how all the different elements - which themselves come into being via information - accumulate or gather or interact. And then a direct intervention is added. That's what it amounts to.
A: Yes indeed!!!
Q: (Joe) Who sends it through the realm curtain from 4th density?
A: Transient passengers. Perhaps the term will have more meaning now?
Q: (Approaching Infinity) It's almost like in the Bell Witch case when there were direct manifestations of things. I would imagine that if there's this information being sent through the realm curtain into 3rd density, if you were an observer watching in the sea water with a microscope, it might appear as if the cell just manifests. It just takes form and looks like it came out of nowhere.
A: Very close indeed!
Q: (L) Has this sort of direct intervention happened more than once? Like when major changes of DNA have occurred, or when there were major changes in the so-called evolutionary record?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So basically we are indeed surrounded by an intelligence that is more than we can even comprehend.
A: Yes. We have been saying that!
There is geometry evident in the structure of atoms and molecules, but also of thought:
Apparently, geometry is important somehow for understanding gravity. We know our space is 3 dimensional. Well, why? - Necessary for expression of thought in sequence.
Session 11 August 2018
(L) Honey, you have questions?
(Ark) Yes. It's a mathematical question. One thing is to talk about gravity, and another thing is to do something about gravity. Apparently, geometry is important somehow for understanding gravity. We know our space is 3 dimensional. Well, why? Well, probably there is some reason. And then we know there are other dimensions. How many, we don't know...
A: Necessary for expression of thought in sequence.
Q: (Ark) I don't see any reason for that. It could be 2 or 1 or 4.
(L) Apparently, in order for it to be in sequence, maybe thoughts are something more than 2-dimensional things?
A: Yes
Q: (Ark) Well...
A: Geometry of thought requires it.
Q: (Ark) Yeah, geometry... So, for some reason we have 3 dimensions. It's good for some reason, but we don't understand. This is not an answer that explains anything. We don't know the geometry of thought. So, it's explaining an unknown by an unknown. It's not a good thing. So, anyhow, we have 3 dimensions. There are also other dimensions. We don't know how many are really necessary. And in these other dimensions, our world is somehow floating. We don't know. However, with mathematics and prime numbers and whatever, it has some clues. It means that there are exceptional mathematical structures that somehow have been chosen by creation because they are in some sense exceptional. Not any would do. Now, there are exceptional structures in 3 dimensions that are called Platonic solids. And there are only 7 of them.
A: Help for your problems is coming soon!
Remember that "thoughts" are similar to proteins made by DNA: there is as much information transmitted by the shape as by the string of amino acids and other components. There is more than one basic "structure" for thoughts.
Session 22 September 2018
Q: (Ark) Okay, so I will try to imagine, yes... Ah! And the second question: I'm looking for a structure that's related to geometry of thoughts. So, it came to my attention that there is one exceptional structure that may be good for it. It's called Exceptional Jordan Algebra M38. Is it an atom from which mathematics of thoughts should be built?
A: Good avenue to travel. But remember that "thoughts" are similar to proteins made by DNA: there is as much information transmitted by the shape as by the string of amino acids and other components. There is more than one basic "structure" for thoughts.
One structure of thought is mathematics:
Mathematics is the one and only true universal language.
Session 30 November 1996
Q: (L) Okay, crop circles are a language, so to speak. Are they in some way related to mathematics?
A: Mathematics is the one and only true universal language.
If
there is more than one basic "structure" for thought, it might, from one interpretation, be reflected in there being different languages, each with there own vocabulary, patterns of pronunciation and rules of grammar.
It is not said whether the development of language is similar to that of the first cell, that is "
Genome manufactured in 4th density and sent through realm curtain in a manner similar to how virii are transmitted.", or if there is a parallel in language to the role of viruses in the development of new characteristics among life forms, or if windows facilitate sending information related to spoken languages through the realm curtain. That might be a line of questioning for the future. For now we have:
Is it the case that all languages are derived in some sense from say, fourth density engineers? Yes.
Session 13 January 2024
Q: (thorbiorn) Session 24 September 1995:
A: Each time a new flock was "planted," it was engineered to be best suited to the environment where it was planted. Aryans are the only exception, as they had to be moved to earth in an emergency.[/qoute]
New question: Were the languages, except that of Kantekkian "planted" along with the flock?
(L) In other words, did the flock that was planted come with a language that was designed for them?
A: Yes
Q: (thorbiorn) Can you give an example?
A: Semitic language which was taken over by slave class and lost by true Semites.
Q: (L) So that would suggest that it's really hard, if not impossible, to track languages by following genetic flow or migration patterns because in some cases, a slave class can take on the language of the ruling class. Then later, the ruling class can lose the language, and the slave class can keep it alive or even vice versa. Yeah?
A: Yes
Q: (L) But essentially,
is it the case that all languages are derived in some sense from say, fourth density engineers?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And are those words, are the languages, are they related to the FRV of the group of engineers that are creating a particular group of people?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So that could answer the reason for the difference in languages: It's the difference in FRV or status or orientation of the engineers doing the work?
A: Yes
The post began with considerations of spheres in stars, it moved on to the possible window properties of partial spheres, and spherical like objects, the significance of the chirality and the structure of molecules for the connection to the information field, and eventually transited from the material structures to those of thought and language. How to end this post other than repeating:
Q: (L) So basically we are indeed surrounded by an intelligence that is more than we can even comprehend.
A: Yes. We have been saying that!
