anart
A Disturbance in the Force
darkhazza said:Hi I've been a lurker for a while now.
I've come to the conclusion that whilst good these scripts are peppered with STS influence. The notion of soul smashing being one of them.
Hi darkhazza. I'm glad that Vulcan asked you to introduce yourself to the forum, since without knowing who you are or what your background is, it is difficult to know how to interpret this comment. For instance, without knowing whether or not you have an in-depth understanding of what STS is and what STO is, it's impossible to tell if this conclusion of yours is worth considering or nonsensical.
A lot of people had a negative reaction to the idea of 'soul smashing' - but - quite frankly, sometimes the truth hurts. Those looking for only 'good news' or those who think that STO would only give 'good news' are missing the mark by quite a long shot regarding this forum, this material and growth of objective knowledge.
So, it will be good to get to know a little bit about you so we can have a conversation in context.
dh said:Another thing that I believe shows it to be true is their description of what happened on 9/11. I think by asking a lot of "earthly" questions you open the doors to STS. Of course I don't know anything about channeling to be fair.
Well, don't you think it's kind of funny that someone who doesn't know anything about channeling is posting for the first time on this forum by denigrating the content of channeled material?
dh said:Q: We have a series of questions about this recent event. Was the attack on the World Trade Center undertaken by Moslem Terrorists?
A: No.
Q: Who was behind this attack?
A: Israel.
Q: Is it going to become known that it was Israel? Will they be exposed?
A: Yes.
Q: Is this the event that is going to lead to the destruction of Israel?
A: Yes.
Q: Did the United States know about this attack at any time in advance of it? Did any of our people in any position to do anything, know?
A: No.
Q: Were they blindsided?
A: No. But not expecting.
Q: (A) So, they knew it was going to happen, but they didn't know when and what exactly? Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: Is it truly a "failure of intelligence?"
A: Yes.
There's a lot of evidence, such as the BBC accidentally reporting the fall of WTC 7 before it happened, that is at odds with this explanation. The idea that the US was not involved, that NORAD didn't stand down etc seems way off to me. That's one heck of a lot of infiltration otherwise. The fact that G W Bush sat their and carried on reading after being given the news as well.
It's not actually 'at odds'. If you've had a chance to read '911 The Ultimate Truth' you'll see that all you've mentioned and much more is explained and accounted for. So, if you avail yourself to the information available on this forum, you might find that your current perception isn't necessarily the correct one regarding the C's take on 911 and this forum's understanding of 911.
dh said:Please don't take this as a personal attack, just an opposite point of view to consider. The thing that separates cults from honest debate.
Let me know what you think... Thx.
Well, I for one am not sure what to think, which is why I look forward to your introduction. I am a bit confused with the 'cult' statement above since it is - to my understanding - completely out of context from the rest of your post. Is it possible that you arrived here to this forum with some erroneous preconceptions about what it is we do here? If so, that's okay, as long as your mind is open to learning and getting a better idea of these things. Welcome.