—this Session: on April 27th 2024—
(Altair) Was the Nordic covenant made on the 3D Earth?
A: No.
Q: (L) If so, where? Well, that's irrelevant. It was not made on the 3D Earth. Where was it made?
A: 4D.
Q: (Altair) Are there any traces of the Nordic covenant in German/Norse mythology?
A: The whole mythos is permeated with it.
Something peculiar about mythos is that they look like symbolic and at the same time literal. The usual difficult of people to interpret such symbolism seems because most of us, a 3D earth people, lost the ability to realize the presence of the sentient life, who supposedly not only permeates the creation, but also is itself the greatest structural parts of the universe, and sometimes also the tiniest ones.
We tend to see structures and forms like being material, inert, cold parts of a building, and yet, if you remember for example ―as well as in most of the mythologies― the tales of Castaneda, then one is taken to notice life everywhere and in everything, truly a whole animistic world. Then one could ask, "If the symbols are real why they differ from a tale to other?" Well, maybe is like the C's stated in this Session, "what attracts the window-faller is the consciousness of the people.”
—this Session: on April 27th 2024—
(Ryan) Why do 3D window-fallers fall through one window but not another? For example, why haven't there been reports of chupacabras in Europe? What relates the consciousness of a window-faller to a specific locator?
A: The consciousnesses of those located at the locator.
See, every mythology may be accurate in its “metaphors,” since they resonate the "profile" of the learner. Perhaps the difference between the many cultural versions of a tale, is where is supposed to be the attention, ...if there or over there. Around this line, i.e. structures, also were originated another posts, such as for example one on the
Japanese scroll.
Moreover we could remember some other C's hints, i.e. something like,
"we never left our point of origin." Thus, when they say now that the Norse covenant was made not at 3D earth, but at 4D, this may not mean necessarily another "location." So, again we could use some info from the C's lessons like:
"The densities permeate each other;" or, "1D and 2D creatures do not share with us this 3D earth?!!!" There are many references in the transcripts for these 3 emphases, for example
here regarding “permeation.”
Anyway, there is a popular tale on a group of people fleeing from the Deluge, who at last stuck on a Caucasian mountain called
Mount Ararat. Yet Ararat has had many names ―such as
Nizir, Masis, Nimush, etc seen in the Sumerian tablets and other sources― and perhaps its symbolism can merge with that of another mount, in particular the not so far
Mount Hermon between Syria and Lebanon.
Notice that these notes try to contemplate third density on what the C’s call “
perfectly synchronous meanings” as well as
“duplicity.” Okay, resuming: Over there, on the summit of the latter, was discovered a
rectangular shrine of stone, called as
Qasr Antar. There was a stele ―today in the British Museum― Greek inscribed with an ancient event where usually reads,
"According to the command of the greatest and Holy God, those who take an oath (proceed) from here" ― Κατά κέλευσιν θεού μεγίστου κ[αι] άγιου οι ομνύοντες εντεύθεν. Or,
also "
According to the command of the great bull god Batios, those swearing an oath in this place go forth."
Mount Hermon stele
See, the cited "god" used to be claimed the 14th century BC Canaanite Baal, after all Hermon also is known as Baal-Hermon, though “Batios” more recently has being considered the god Enlil. Now notice, Baal also spells and mirrors like the Chaldean Bel, in turn commonly seen in Babylonian-Sumerian myths. As to the inscription, it is speculated as the oath taken by the fallen angelsEnoch 1, 6:6 bound by a curse, in order to take human wives. However, here is not proposed that Watchers and Nordics are the same thing, but rather it suggests a close involvement between those parties.
Mount Hermon, 1857 CW Meredith vd Velde
At any rate, Hermon was then known as "the mountain of oath." See, an oath, is a covenant, and Hermon, Ararat, etc. may be just sparse memories, in spite of "real" physical 3D remains, of events occurred at "another place" and under a deeper state of awareness, which today happen to be a blurry and confused register to mankind.
Furthermore, speaking of “blur” and somehow relating it to the famous “enjoy the show:” Well, saying from own experience and faith: along the years we have being exposed to the “dots” ―and some ones for sure have been found out― as well as to directions to pursue knowledge. Thus, all we need to do is to continue connecting these pieces while abandoning the dice?!! And could this be the true observation, that is, really watching to the point of a critical transcendental awareness?!!
April 13th 2024 Session
A:
Knowledge protects.
Q: (L) And who do we have with us?
A: Ginueaeil of Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) Okay. Well, why did you open with, "knowledge protects"? Is there some particular
knowledge we need to
acquire?
A:
Much.
August 16, 1997 Session
A:
All who observe, learn.