cubbex
The Living Force
Re: Knox or Mignini the psychopath?
Read the book "Cries Unheard: Why children kill. The case of Mary Bell". My point was that being female the two reacted in the same way, the dramatization just when they can't get of out of the problem, their last card, do you know the psychopath type that makes his/her way acting like the victim of all the mess the created? So not, that doesn't mean Sollecito is innocent where did you take that?
Do we get points spotting who's innocent and who's not?
[/quote]
No look, my point is not about if she's innocent or not, my point is to spot her behavior and the behavior of those around her, as I said, if you read the book I said, or about Mary Bell's case that little reference shows the empathy of the lawyer towards his client. Simple as that.
[/quote]
Assuming she's innocent, we can find a lot of reasons to say she's innocent and that she's not innocent. Had you an experience with someone who is manipulator?. Where's the need on choosing the words "It's up to you"?, of course it's up to them, in a person with regular level of empathy, the person would be crying because of what she did not because of what's happening to her. I don't try to "prove" nothing, if you want proves ask someone who is professional, I'm sharing my observations about her and about everyone including you about this case. Also I'm reading about it and watching the video, so this is not my conclusion
You talk about proves and then about beliefs, isn't that an oxymoron? The emotional drama is used as a tool to create empathy from others, I'm talking in that sense, not about evidence, facts, etc. And it's obvious people defend them because they believe they are innocent, or, if they have "proven" the contrary.
-----
Why mu quotes are not working?
Who's talking about the prosecutor? I'm talking about Knox. Bias on your thought maybe?Mechanic said:Well, I don't, I got scarier feelings from the look of the prosecutor. But in both cases it doesn't count for anything, because you can't tell if someone is quilty of murder or a psycho just by the looks.Prometeo said:Look at her eyes, you got a scary feeling from her.
Of course you can't, I didn't say that :P it was just a comment.Mechanic said:Well, I don't, I got scarier feelings from the look of the prosecutor. But in both cases it doesn't count for anything, because you can't tell if someone is quilty of murder or a psycho just by the looks.
Mechanic said:Well, the crying could mean anything. Notice that Sollecito wasn't crying after the verdict. Does that mean she's a killer and he's innocent? Or the other way around?Prometeo said:This case remembers me a lot from that case I like a lot about the "Bells" from London, the little girl who killed the two kids reacted in the same way like her, crying after hearing the verdict.
Read the book "Cries Unheard: Why children kill. The case of Mary Bell". My point was that being female the two reacted in the same way, the dramatization just when they can't get of out of the problem, their last card, do you know the psychopath type that makes his/her way acting like the victim of all the mess the created? So not, that doesn't mean Sollecito is innocent where did you take that?
Do we get points spotting who's innocent and who's not?
Look, English is not my language so I can understand wrong. What I did understood from his sentence was that now he asks himself why he did it without a motive, but your comment makes me wonder if I misunderstand him and he tried to ask everyone why he would do it, thanks.Mechanic said:Prometeo said:But this gets obvious:
Sollecito said he was at his home but could not remember if Knox was also there."I fail to understand why I would have participated in this murder with no motive," Sollecito told the court.
In other words "why I did it if it wasn't good for business?"
Claiming that you have no motive for a murder you're on trial for is actually a pretty strong defense.
Oh yeah that's totally an admission of guilt.Mechanic said:Her lawyer, Luciano Ghirga, put a comforting arm around her as she wept.
[/quote]
No look, my point is not about if she's innocent or not, my point is to spot her behavior and the behavior of those around her, as I said, if you read the book I said, or about Mary Bell's case that little reference shows the empathy of the lawyer towards his client. Simple as that.
Well, I don't think it's an unusual statement for someone that's innocent. A quilty person could say exactly the same though, so again, it proves nothing.Mechanic said:"Now it's up to you," Knox told the court on Thursday in an emotional statement in which she said she was "afraid of having the mask of a murderer forced upon me".
I mean duh, you are a murderer lol, the way she talk about masks remembers me when Jung talks about the mask we wear on society, like if some humans really wear a mask.
[/quote]
Assuming she's innocent, we can find a lot of reasons to say she's innocent and that she's not innocent. Had you an experience with someone who is manipulator?. Where's the need on choosing the words "It's up to you"?, of course it's up to them, in a person with regular level of empathy, the person would be crying because of what she did not because of what's happening to her. I don't try to "prove" nothing, if you want proves ask someone who is professional, I'm sharing my observations about her and about everyone including you about this case. Also I'm reading about it and watching the video, so this is not my conclusion
Mechanic said:Well, it could also be a possibility that people came to defend her because they believed her to be innocent, emotional drama put aside.Prometeo said:Reading the article about the legal system from Italy, indeed, remembers me the same with Mary. Lot of people came to defend the girl Knoxy because of her emotional dramas.
You talk about proves and then about beliefs, isn't that an oxymoron? The emotional drama is used as a tool to create empathy from others, I'm talking in that sense, not about evidence, facts, etc. And it's obvious people defend them because they believe they are innocent, or, if they have "proven" the contrary.
-----
Why mu quotes are not working?