Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?
- Thread starter wanderingthomas
- Start date
The study showing how cholesterol was protective in Wuhan was also shared on social media, but can't recall seeing it in this thread. And it's supremely important! Careful with the vegetable oils and sugars, they can literally wreck your health!
From one of my favorite physicians:
Lower cholesterol predicts worse infection in two studies
Can HDL Over 60 Protect You From Coronavirus?
If you are worried about coronavirus, you should be more worried about low cholesterol according to a new study that shows lower HDL and LDL predicts poor outcomesdrcate.com
Share this one! People taking stating drugs will be interested.
In French SOTT, we have this :
IEC, sartans, statines et COVID-19, épidémie de cécité chez les « experts »
L'AIMSIB s'étonne régulièrement de la façon dont certaines idées ( y compris thérapeutiques ) peuvent se diffuser à grande vitesse auprès du grand public, et d'autres non. Intéressons-nous à nouveau (1) brièvement au caractère possiblement nocif...
fr.sott.net
It's from a collective of physicians whom moto is "primarum non nocere"
Welcome to the club! The issue of authoritarianism has been discussed for years in the forum. It's astonishing many didn't get the memo. Nowadays, it is becoming more apparent, but not to all. I for one don't fear psychopaths in positions of power, because the mindless followers in everyday life are by far more dangerous. In this crisis, what I noticed in many acquaintance who used to be 'liberal' in the former sense, is that all notion of individual liberty, responsibility, self-determination, or even free thinking have suddenly all vanished, as if a switch has been turned off. It's all about what the state should do, what state experts say and about others following "recommendations" and orders. They have no self-control, so they seek to control others.
FlyingMystic
The Force is Strong With This One
One positive thing that seems to be surfacing during this virus scare is bringing attention to Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation and other natural healing therapies.
Here’s a paper on Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation
AYTU BioScience a publicly traded company just officially partnered with Cedar-Sinai Hospitals for their peer-reviewed UV COVID treatment called Healight. Unfortunately Twitter blocked AYTU BioScience account and YouTube removed their videos yesterday.
Here’s a paper on Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation
AYTU BioScience a publicly traded company just officially partnered with Cedar-Sinai Hospitals for their peer-reviewed UV COVID treatment called Healight. Unfortunately Twitter blocked AYTU BioScience account and YouTube removed their videos yesterday.
SOTTREADER
The Living Force
This is slightly off topic but it's also covid related.
I was sent this for the crime of eating steak
I had no idea the vegetarian agenda could fit into the pandemic but I was clearly wrong.
I was sent this for the crime of eating steak
I had no idea the vegetarian agenda could fit into the pandemic but I was clearly wrong.
Tauriel
Dagobah Resident
The moment you wrote about 'good harvest' I was reading
"The Montauk Project Revisited" by Michael Topper where he says
If this is the case then TPTB have all reason to create at ANY times as much inner and outer turmoil as possible so that when the moment arrives the alignment is always to their advantage.... so this virus must be a true gift to them..
Astute observation- was just discussing the same thing with a friend.
i think those that pull the strings know psychology very well and this is exactly what they are relying on.
Just wait for the gretafans to show up.
About the video, well, it's ridiculous. Here in Argentina and in the rest of the world there is Foot and Mouth Disease. It is endemic and has been passed on to humans for as long as I can remember. The reality is that with or without vaccination, people are already immunized. And this fever attacks most of the known livestock, not just cattle.
Foot-and-mouth disease - Wikipedia
psychegram
The Living Force
Vegans have been like this for years. They have a perfect trifecta of moral self-righteousness to fuel their evangelical fanaticism. First, they believe meat is unhealthy for the human body. Second, they believe animal husbandry is bad for the planet. Third, they believe that killing animals for food is ethically monstrous. So they believe they are justified on moral, ecological, and public health grounds, and therefore that anyone who resists is either deluded and ignorant, or simply evil.
It doesn't help that the average person doesn't have a very good understanding of diet, and just robotically consumes whatever processed garbage is put in front of them. For this reason, vegans - who do tend to be more conscious of what they eat - often experience a short-term improvement in their sense of well-being, simply because they're avoiding processed crap. Studies that compare health outcomes of vegans with those on the 'standard American diet' show veganism is better for the same reason, which helps fuel their delusion.
It also takes a significant amount of effort to maintain a vegan diet. That, combined with the psychological and emotional investment vegans make, makes it very difficult for them to change their minds. Sunk-cost fallacy plus their whole identity being tied up with "yummy vegan food".
I deal with these creatures by laughing in their faces. To their ethical argument, I tell them they have the ethics of children - that the belief that central nervous systems are necessary for consciousness is woefully anthropocentric, that life feeds on life, and that therefore the notion that you can be morally clean simply by avoiding certain foods (rather than concerning yourself with the quality of life your food had while alive) is delusional. Their ecological and health arguments can be BTFOd with very little effort.
That said, logic can't reach them, and yes, they are going to become an absolute menace. Expect the same tactics to be used against meat as were deployed against tobacco.
dredger
The Living Force
On the road to my mother's house I stopped during 2h to meet a cousin. She was here with her husband, her daugther and his boyfriend + a couple of friends with 2 young children, all around a table outside the house, all much relaxed. The husband of the couple of friends is in the insurances. I take care to all what I said, just sending some seeds when I can, or open questions when needed. Nothing special to relate here except one thing I do not remember having read it yet, thus here it is :
At a moment, I made a small recap, I said that starting in 2001, they declared the war against terrorism. And now, it's a new war which starts, the war against viruses, followed by some example of president who clearly stated that. He then pointed out the following : it's normal that they call it "a war", it's for "legal" reasons. I do not remember what he then said but in summary i understood the following : when there's a war it's often a situation which is not taken into account in insurance's contracts, thus, allowing insurance corporations to avoid to pay. We changed then subject. Now that i'm back to think about this, how the hell could an insurance declare that as it's a state of war (which are just words, but in reality there's NO war) they would not pay back what they should normally pay ? I mean, even if what he said seems ... possible, I've hard to believe that insurers will use this kind of argument to avoid to pay back when it's needed ? But why not, when it's about money, you an expect anything.
Maybe keep an eye on that side, and if any here is an experienced insurors, do not hesitate to comment.
At a moment, I made a small recap, I said that starting in 2001, they declared the war against terrorism. And now, it's a new war which starts, the war against viruses, followed by some example of president who clearly stated that. He then pointed out the following : it's normal that they call it "a war", it's for "legal" reasons. I do not remember what he then said but in summary i understood the following : when there's a war it's often a situation which is not taken into account in insurance's contracts, thus, allowing insurance corporations to avoid to pay. We changed then subject. Now that i'm back to think about this, how the hell could an insurance declare that as it's a state of war (which are just words, but in reality there's NO war) they would not pay back what they should normally pay ? I mean, even if what he said seems ... possible, I've hard to believe that insurers will use this kind of argument to avoid to pay back when it's needed ? But why not, when it's about money, you an expect anything.
Maybe keep an eye on that side, and if any here is an experienced insurors, do not hesitate to comment.
Last edited:
Unfortunately this is only in Italian- couldnt find with English subtitles -
In a nutshell Italian member of parliament is calling spade a spade, accusing PTB of totalitarianism and deception, claiming a biggest hoax in human history quite poignant actually - that we finally hear this being said in a Parliament of a country “worst affected”- kinda of gives me hope, fool’s hope indeed.
In a nutshell Italian member of parliament is calling spade a spade, accusing PTB of totalitarianism and deception, claiming a biggest hoax in human history quite poignant actually - that we finally hear this being said in a Parliament of a country “worst affected”- kinda of gives me hope, fool’s hope indeed.
I know something that's funny and can "turn them off" at the same time.
First you tell them that if everyone were to go vegan, then you have to dramatically increase the production of vegetables exponentially. You have to produce tons and tons of vegetables, cereals, legumes etc. To do that, of course, you have to expand the cultivable land. If you do that, you have no choice but to deforest. And if you deforest to increase your crops (which must be intensive because it also increases the demand and amount of nutrients that must be replaced when you no longer consume meat) you are unfortunately displacing and killing literally thousands of animal species and driving them to extinction. On the other hand, because of deforestation, and destruction of habitats, the soil loses its nutrients, you break the balance and in a few years the land becomes a desert. You have no more cultivable land and you have a total famine. Veganism killed the human species.
Some will just turn around and not talk to you, but the fun is seeing their faces when their minds are left BSOD.
D
Deleted member 4320
Guest
I think that the real reason for what's going on is real pandemic which will have place and the 3/4D consortium know it and want to take adventage on it. As they want to destroy of the vast 3D population on the surface of the planet...
Suspect, that they will try to weaken population as most as they can. The best way to damage the physical stability (the health, survival and general maintain of physical existence) of the 3D human beings is attack the economy.
Wearing the mask make one only more prone to get illness, because mask only work if is often changed and is correctly prepared (people do not do that and will not). Wearing masks mean also ban for smoking. WHO says that coronavirus comes from animal/animals, so we should stop eat meat in their opinion.
I think that this context presented in my post may help to see things clearer and suggest correct explanation why government will decide to make the specific steps in the future.
As they can't start something like it is in the movies (for instance, War of the Worlds), because reality doesn't work like that, in particular, at the higher levels (4 Density). They can advance things otherwise...
Suspect, that they will try to weaken population as most as they can. The best way to damage the physical stability (the health, survival and general maintain of physical existence) of the 3D human beings is attack the economy.
Wearing the mask make one only more prone to get illness, because mask only work if is often changed and is correctly prepared (people do not do that and will not). Wearing masks mean also ban for smoking. WHO says that coronavirus comes from animal/animals, so we should stop eat meat in their opinion.
I think that this context presented in my post may help to see things clearer and suggest correct explanation why government will decide to make the specific steps in the future.
Deep state in Ireland on the ropes! The Irish people make a stand and take the unlawful lockdown to the courts! Very important words spoken here, listen up!!
psychegram
The Living Force
Brilliant. I love it and am stealing this.
Another one: if we all went vegan, then there'd be no more need for livestock, and indeed we'd need the land currently used to grow livestock feed to cultivate vegetables. Therefore the livestock would have to be culled.
In the name of saving the animals, vegans would commit the greatest slaughter of animals in history ... and probably cause the extinction of every domesticated species.
