Doctors for Covid Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Symposium II - Sounding the Call
Having watched most of it, I can say it is excellent. The
link to the Rumble
One can download the video using
pastedownload.
Below are the list of speakers with a few comments, that really do not do justice to the content, except that it may give an idea of what to expect:
Taylor Hudak, a journalist, introduces after a few minutes of music.
Part one is about medical evidence
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD
Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhart has done some interesting autopsies, and shows microscope pictures.
Associate Prof. Michael Palmer
Dr. med. Carsten Stümke, Ophthalmologist, Germany shows microscope pictures.
Clip from Planet Lockdown, trailer including Reiner Fuellmich, Global Fraud Attorny, founder Corona Investigative Committee
Part two: The Global Coup d'etat
Catherine Austin Fitts
Mike Yeadon PhD
Piers Robinson PhD
Brian Gerrish, UkColumn, this organisation was the host of the online symposium. He suggests that the most important thing is to make people of aware of how they are being manipulated psychologically. On their site there were a few articles that might explain what he had in mind:
The Psychological Attack on the UK: Start of a Series, where to give an idea of his position:
At this stage, we ask the reader if they were even aware that in 2010 the UK Government boasted in its
Mindspace document (p. 66, bottom) that it could change the way the public thought and behaved without us even knowing this had been done. Even if we assume that our government only has our best interests at heart, the document and techniques are surely of concern in that we were not widely and publicly informed of the intention to use such techniques. When we realise that our government clearly does not always have our best interests at heart, the applied behavioural psychology techniques in question become more chilling in their reality and implications.
Ethical psychotherapy versus the unethical applied psychology of SPI-B and the UK Government by Dr.
Bruce Scott, psychologist and psychoanalyst
We are all Pavlov’s dogs now by Dr. Bruce Scott
Brian Gerrish's testimony to Reiner Füllmich: Our oppressors are very frightened people
Democracy Lost: Propaganda, Character Assassination and the Campaign Against Professor David Miller by Dr. Piers Robinson
Blaming Anyone Who Questions Covid-19 Policy for a New Wave of Terrorism by Iain Davis
Part three: Is the temple of Justitia still standing?
Patrick Henningsen
Mary Holland, Children's Health Defence
Dr. Renate Holzeisen, Italian attorney
Phillip Kruse, Swiss attorney
Meryl Nass M.D. She goes through all the promises not fulfilled with regard to the safety of the vaccines, and advices people to read
Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals, Part 3 that explains one way, how some statistics work is carried out to hide the problems.
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, who mentions a recent publication:
A Guide to a Pandemic Treaty
04.10.2021
Things you must know to help you make a decision on a pandemic treaty
The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Global Health Centre "Why this guide? The preparatory work towards the special session of the WHA in late November 2021 to consider a treaty or other international instrument for pandemic preparedness and response continues to trigger questions and debates on the subject matter. Many reviews, discussions and publications so far point to the need for synthesis and clarity on various aspects, important for countries as they engage in the process. (...) This guide therefore represents an independent academic attempt to systematise and shed light on some of the most frequently asked questions or issues otherwise important in the run up of the special session of the WHA, and potentially beyond. It is part of a project located at the Global Health Centre at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva."
How much the above guide resembles the final draft from late November I don't know. I found also
GOVERNING PANDEMICS A one-stop shop tracking efforts to strengthen global pandemic governance and they have planned: "2021/12/13
Deep Dive on a Pandemic Treaty, 10th Global Conference on Health Promotion for Well-being, Equity, and Sustainable Development"
World commits to a pandemic-response pact: what’s next, In Nature, December 1, 2021
After failing to rein in COVID, world leaders begin to shape an accord to prevent future disasters — one that holds them accountable.
WHO reaches draft consensus on future pandemic treaty In Reuters, November 28, 2021
GENEVA, Nov 28 (Reuters) - Member states of the World Health Organization have reached a tentative consensus to negotiate a future agreement on preventing pandemics, bridging the gap between sides led by the European Union and United States, diplomats said on Sunday.
[...]
A global agreement to strengthen pandemic prevention and responses, expected to be ready in May 2024, would cover issues such as sharing of data and genome sequences of emerging viruses, and of any potential vaccines and drugs derived from research.
[...]
Britain, along with the EU and some 70 other countries, had pushed for a legally-binding treaty. The United States backed by states including Brazil and India was reluctant to commit to a binding treaty, diplomats said last week.
read more
[...]
From WHO in connection with the negotiations:
Elevating political leadership for Pandemic Preparedness and Response Meeting with the UN General Assembly
Earlier articles:
Human Rights Must Guide a Pandemic Treaty, November 20, 2021
A guide to a pandemic treaty - things you must know to help you make a decision on a pandemic treaty September 30, 2021
The World Needs a Post-Pandemic Health Treaty With Teeth In Foreign Policy, April 5,2021
Back to the symposium, there were final words by:
Associate Prof. Michael Palmer
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD (A sincere, sharp, and also emotional appeal.)
Regarding a UN/WHO Pandemic Treaty, I couldn't find much about the most recent developments in the thread, though it is possible that it has been mentioned in a video or that I simply overlooked it. But certainly it predecessors have been mentioned:
Really good video. Shows how this whole pandemic has been planned and executed by the WHO. Gives a lot of detail on the Global Preparedness treaty that was signed by most countries in 2005, and created the infrastructure in all the countries to do what they are doing now. It's long, but informative IMHO
And:
1992 • Rio de Janeiro • The stepping stone
I just remember an important detail from a discussion at the german Nuoflix.de talkshow called “Röper and Stein” recently:
It was about the UN meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 3-14 June 1992 which was an important gathering under the label of "Conference on Environment and Development" or better known under the great title of "Earth Summit". In essence; the kick-off for the UN 2021/2030 agenda.
The Climate change agenda roots can be traced back to the first "Human Environment" meeting in Stockholm 1972 with Maurice Strong laying the public ground to a future frenzy of Climate Change hysteria. Curiously that man was an oil and mineral business guy, according Wikipedia - playing Climate expert. Not unlike Bill Gates, going from Computer Nerd to Vaccine Expert and now Climate expert, as well. (They got plenty of tinfoil hats, one could say)
The lesser known
However... at the same time in Rio de Janeiro 1992, there was a much lesser known event going on at the same time - the "Convention on Biological Diversity" where the delegates basically traveled back and forth between both UN events. When you heard/hear the word "Bio Diversity" - you were probably associating it with of good deeds for humanity and how to preserve the variation of endangered animals and plant species, etc.
Well that... was just for show. A mouse trap for the public.
Treaty with Big Pharma
181 UN member states signed an agreement (treaty) to protect and support the Bio Diversity of THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY’S future genetic technologies and new types of "medicines"
BAM !! What a switch of reality... I was pretty chocked when I heard this.
So, when the UN/WHO and the usual suspects did their thing years before the Plandemic together with Big Pharma - it was then time to implement the future spectacle called "Corona Pandemic".
The UN/WHO tentacles knocked onto the doors of most Nations - reminding them that they had obligated themselves to support Big Pharma's new genetic tech: And so the time had come to bring the project into the minds of men, into every corner of the planet.
It is another aspect added, why so many governments uniformly played by the same script book all over the planet at once. And hasn't the private fake WHO just recently outlined "guidelines" for the "acceptance of manipulations in the human genome"?
What a surprise:
They once started with modifying plants with GMO. They continued with modifying animals. They get the jerk-off Nobel prize for the genetic cut-and-paste technology Crispr9. And now, as it so "happens", it is all about modifying/experimenting on humans, while curiously, we see openly a shameless lack of respect, morality, dignity and humanity.
Which all ties in with the topic of this post in the AI and transhumanism thread
Genetically networked
Saturday, 04 December 2021, 3:57 pm
As early as 2020, the
Internet of Bodies was envisioned at the gene level - today, the WHO is coordinating the DNA manipulation of all humans.
by Jens Bernert
They can already do quite a lot without the genetic component, as I recently learned and shared in the thread on
homeschooling and education:
School World Order with John Klyczek
Whitney is joined by professor, author and Unlimited Hangout contributor John Klyczek to discuss how teachers unions and the US education system are selling out to Big Tech as well as the oligarch class and their long-standing plans to exploit students to advance the 4th Industrial Revolution. Originally published on 10/05/21.
Klyczek have written various
articles on Natural News and done a longer interview
here.
So hang in there.
, that's 108 days to review/approve the Pfizer's vaccine license (an FDA
), and 27,375 days, roughly speaking, to disclose (
) the shenanigans. Well... that puts many, if not most, well beyond the veil (as peeps see time anyway).
