T.C. said:luke wilson said:Tell you what I dislike... Complainers!
luke, is the irony of this statement lost on you??
Cute! ;). For some reason this reminded me of the joke: I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not so sure. :)
Kris
T.C. said:luke wilson said:Tell you what I dislike... Complainers!
luke, is the irony of this statement lost on you??
I need to fix it for him, for him to continue, for the project to finish...
Alada said:RflctnOfU said:In addition, these ideas also - in a subtle manner - express the Law of Three...in Joe's statement, the third force is indicated in choice. But without the positive/negative opposition, as Joe stated, there can be no choice, no manifestation of the third force. It is through the manifestation of the third force that very fine, subtle energies are liberated, increasing the overall density of vibrations...or, as the C's expressed it, Frequency Resonance Vibration (am I remembering that correctly?)
That’s where my thoughts went on this too, that negative emotions are necessary and can be seen as a kind of fuel in that regard.
kalibex said:I need to fix it for him, for him to continue, for the project to finish...
Hate to say it, Luke... but sounds like your co-worker has gotten you nicely trained up to do his work for him whenever he feels that type of discomfort. In turn, you seem to be refusing to test the limits of how much of his complaining you can endure without 'rescuing' him. So there you both are, apparently 'suffering' - but caught up in a habit.
Can't give up your suffering, looks like... ;)
luke wilson said:...how are these societies still ticking along? It's bloody people... that's why... the local villager who opens up an administrative centre in his ravaged village because the local politicians have done a runner in some trying times, those volunteers in Haiti building make-shift shelters because the government is corrupt and won't build proper houses... multiply across different situations, from the small level to the big levels... you get the picture...
Interesting keyhole. So we have toxins on a human micro level that "shock" and prompt the body to create to grow stronger and evolve, we have negative emotions on the human conscious awareness level doing the same thing (shock, grow and evolve) and we have large scale earth changes that shock the entire "body" of the human race into reacting and, possibly, evolving. Of course, at each level some form of choice is required, and it seems that consciousness or awareness is the factor that determines what choice or reaction will be taken.
luke wilson said:Haha, I know I am a complainer... the thread 'hit a wall' is a good example. I just don't like complainers who due to their complaining, force others to pick up their slack...
It's surely good to complain every now and again, it's even therapeutic... but there is a time to complain and there is a time to act.. That was the point I was aiming at.
I could be wrong though... :)
luke wilson said:T.C. said:luke wilson said:Tell you what I dislike... Complainers!
luke, is the irony of this statement lost on you??
Haha, I know I am a complainer... the thread 'hit a wall' is a good example. I just don't like complainers who due to their complaining, force others to pick up their slack...
It's surely good to complain every now and again, it's even therapeutic... but there is a time to complain and there is a time to act.. That was the point I was aiming at.
I could be wrong though... :)
kalibex said:luke wilson said:...how are these societies still ticking along? It's bloody people... that's why... the local villager who opens up an administrative centre in his ravaged village because the local politicians have done a runner in some trying times, those volunteers in Haiti building make-shift shelters because the government is corrupt and won't build proper houses... multiply across different situations, from the small level to the big levels... you get the picture...
Well, given that reality... that those who can do, can make that choice to step forward to do 'what needs to be done'... where do you think the resentment is coming from, then, in your case? It's certainly not a unique reaction. Is it the usual 'It shouldn't have to be this way!' attitude that so many of us are prone to? I can imagine a large percentage of humanity's angst arises from that sort of resentment...
Laura said:luke wilson said:T.C. said:luke wilson said:Tell you what I dislike... Complainers!
luke, is the irony of this statement lost on you??
Haha, I know I am a complainer... the thread 'hit a wall' is a good example. I just don't like complainers who due to their complaining, force others to pick up their slack...
It's surely good to complain every now and again, it's even therapeutic... but there is a time to complain and there is a time to act.. That was the point I was aiming at.
I could be wrong though... :)
Is it also lost on you how many people responded to YOUR complaints, i.e. picking up your slack???
Haha, I know I am a complainer... the thread 'hit a wall' is a good example. I just don't like complainers who due to their complaining, force others to pick up their slack...
've noticed 1 chronic complainer. A person who when met with anything that arises a negative emotion in him whilst he's performing a task, he stops and complains! Naturally external consideration demands that you cater this person back to a good emotional state where they can continue... Internal consideration makes me want to shout across, "For God's sake, less complaining and more doing
Beau said:luke wilson said:Haha, I know I am a complainer... the thread 'hit a wall' is a good example. I just don't like complainers who due to their complaining, force others to pick up their slack...
It's surely good to complain every now and again, it's even therapeutic... but there is a time to complain and there is a time to act.. That was the point I was aiming at.
I could be wrong though... :)
One of the things I've noticed, both in myself and in others, is that the things that bother us about other people are often traits we ourselves have.
luke wilson said:In this case, I have quite a lot to reflect on. This is probably a case for maintaining a neutral position. You just never know when you take a position against something why it is you are doing it. Clearly somethings may indeed be lost on you so it's best to remain put!
PS: Naturally you can take a position against criminal injustice...
edgitarra said:luke wilson said:In this case, I have quite a lot to reflect on. This is probably a case for maintaining a neutral position. You just never know when you take a position against something why it is you are doing it. Clearly somethings may indeed be lost on you so it's best to remain put!
PS: Naturally you can take a position against criminal injustice...
I see that you very much "reflect" things, and you already somehow discern what you should do(maintain a neutral position).Thus you lack understanding. You want to know why you never know when to take a position? Because you live too much in your thoughts, and you never pay attention to your emotions, thus they control you to create even more internal consideration. This a loop, Luke.
Your PS statement lost on me in relation with this discussion. Criminal injustice is not part of this very discussion.
luke wilson said:edgitarra said:luke wilson said:In this case, I have quite a lot to reflect on. This is probably a case for maintaining a neutral position. You just never know when you take a position against something why it is you are doing it. Clearly somethings may indeed be lost on you so it's best to remain put!
PS: Naturally you can take a position against criminal injustice...
I see that you very much "reflect" things, and you already somehow discern what you should do(maintain a neutral position).Thus you lack understanding. You want to know why you never know when to take a position? Because you live too much in your thoughts, and you never pay attention to your emotions, thus they control you to create even more internal consideration. This a loop, Luke.
Your PS statement lost on me in relation with this discussion. Criminal injustice is not part of this very discussion.
Thanks Ed. Uhm, the criminal injustice statement was just meant as being neutral is not ok in those situations.. Banality of evil way of being. However in other situations e.g. If someone has a quark (non criminal in nature) that irks you in some way, its best to maintain a neutral frame of mind. This is because if you react it may be due to reasons lost on you.
I hope that makes sense... :/
At least this is what I'm understanding from the comments.