Session 24 January 2026

Thank you very much for this session :-) The theme of music keeps ceaselessly drifting through my mind.More than a year ago I watched this video in which a violin virtuoso tries to discern whether a recorded piece was played by a living human or by AI. What struck me was that even a man who has devoted his entire professional life to the instrument cannot, without struggle, reliably tell the difference. Which means that for an ordinary person — someone who has not surrendered their life to music — it must be extraordinarily difficult, perhaps nearly impossible, to distinguish between music born of a human soul and music conjured by artificial intelligence.


 
Good thing I also enjoy classical music since I’m going to have to switch to it from now on when I want to listen to music.
I'm wondering if your gear has a DSP (Digital Sound Processor), like almost any amplifier from 1990 onwards. All DSPs (save the early Yamaha chips which worked in analog-stage —early Dolby Surround or Dolby Pro Logic I technologies, not the modern Codecs one—), process the analog input thru Shannon-Nyquist ADC, converting the original signal to digital-electronic in order to artificially enhance it.

BTW, every modern contraption (amplifiers, TVs, PC, Tablets, etc.) that work with Bluetooth, WiFi or Streaming, need to apply a DAC (Digital Audio Converter) in order to translate “music” from the electronic or digital-stage (also known as “Discrete-time domain”) to audio signals in the frequency range of 20~22,000 Hz, which corresponds to the lower and upper limits of human hearing.

Q: (luc) My impression is that instrumental music might work, and that human input is crucial (no shortcuts), and that collaboration might be worth exploring. Any comments, warnings or pointers on that?
A: Electronic music is antihuman.

Q: (Niall) Boom!
(Laura to Ark) You're gonna have to throw your keyboard away, dear. [laughter] What do you mean anti-human?
A: Messes with cellular vibrations and intracellular communication.

Q: (luc) Are they referring to AI music specifically, or just generally to electronic music genres?
(L) I think they said electronic music.
(Chu) Yeah, but like a keyboard or music produced by a computer?
(Joe) Define electronic music.
A: Artificially produced.
I'm worry about those wireless earphone devices that work with the cellphone and goes directly to the brain... will they turn it into jelly?

For tech-savvy members, here's a video related to methods for processing samples in real “wave”-form of samples:
 
Thanks for talking about music - now I understand myself a little better.

Years ago, when I was in my late twenties or early thirties, my half-brother dragged me to a techno party. I didn't really want to go, but it was his birthday, so I went along. I could never connect with that kind of music. The rhythm felt foreign, nothing sensual about it - cold and unpleasant. I just didn't know how to "get into it". Everyone around me was moving, but I stood there frozen.

But since I was there, I really wanted to understand why everyone else was having so much fun. So I started imitating a girl who, in my opinion, moved perfectly to the music. And eventually - when I finally got into the rhythm - I was able to find and dance my own moves. And as always, when the rhythm carries me, it felt like active meditation/prayer. I was dancing for the universe and for my people, wherever they might be.

But this time, nothing came back. No images, not even a hint of color- just pure blackness. I stopped abruptly, left the dance floor, grabbed my cigarettes, and went outside for some fresh air. I needed to think about it because I was horrified. I didn't know exactly what I had seen, but I knew: That music had no life in it.

I'm aware that the C's connected the black hole to the AI videos. But I think the blackness I saw could very well be the same phenomenon.

Either way, thanks to Laura, Andromeda, and everyone for this awesome session.

I have a question about the statement that Erika didn't know she was an informant. How is it even possible to accept such an assignment - to get married and have children - without knowing you're acting as an informant? Although I have a few possible scenarios floating around in my head, I can't really explain it.

Translated with DeepSeek
 
I think it boils down to whether the produced music retains a soul imprint. The soul imprint of the person that produced electronic music is stripped away, i.e. there is only "raw data" with no connection to its conscious generator.

The same analogy seems to hold when we compare film photography to digital photography. Here are some interesting findings by Dr. Gokhale who noticed a difference when dowsing.

Pendulum dowsing by Dr. Gokhale (eye surgeon)

It is clear that by replacing natural processes with AI and electronic music, the PTB want to disconnect us from nature. I mean, they are literally trying to "strip away our souls" and dehumanize us. It goes hand in hand with their ultimate goals of "possession" and "downloading into bodies."
i ve noticed loads of videos covering ukraine war footage use heavy mettalic music as soundtracks ... ... ...
 
I have a question about the statement that Erika didn't know she was an informant. How is it even possible to accept such an assignment - to get married and have children - without knowing you're acting as an informant? Although I have a few possible scenarios floating around in my head, I can't really explain it.

We go back to self-remembering and how people can be a force for good or evil depending on what energies are being transmitted. The universe is very aware, pray without ceasing. If you are unaware, you can become an unwitting agent to dubious energies. Might not be a bad idea to read or re-read The Wave for a refresher. This session captures it very well too:

May 1997

Q: Reading through the session of May 23, last year, when Tom was also here, and the issue of his being in O'Brien was addressed, you asked who had begged him to stay there, then there was a remark about an EM vector. The way I understood it is that a person can be an EM vector. Is that possible?

A: Vector means focuser of direction.

Q: Could that mean that EM waves can be vectored by a human being simply by their presence? I also noticed that several of us have been involved with persons and relationships that seem designed to confuse, defuse, and otherwise distort our learning, as well as drain our energy. Basically, keeping us so stressed that we cannot fulfill our potential. Is there some significance to this observation?

A:
That is elementary, my dear Knight!

Q: One of the things I have learned is that these individuals seem to attach via some sort of psychic hook that enters through our reactions of pity. Can you comment on the nature of pity?

A: Pity those who pity.

Q: But, the ones who are being pitied, who generate sensations of pity, do not really pity anybody but themselves.

A: Yes...?

Q: Then, is it true as my son said, when you give pity, when you send love and light to those in darkness, or those who complain and want to be "saved" without effort on their own part, when you are kind in the face of abuse and manipulation, that you essentially are giving power to their further disintegration, or contraction into self-ishness? That you are powering their descent into STS?

A: You know the answer!

Q: Yes. I have seen it over and over again. Were the individuals in our lives selected for the extremely subtle nature of their abilities to evoke pity, or were we programmed to respond to pity so that we were blind to something that was obvious to other people?

A: Neither. You were selected to interact with those who would trigger a hypnotic response that would ultimately lead to a drain of energy.

Q:
(T) Well, it is a fact, because my energy is sure drained. (L) What is the purpose of this draining of energy?

A: What do you think?

Q: (T) So you can't concentrate or do anything. You can't get anywhere with anything.

A: Or, at least not the important things.

Q: (T) Is that why my concentration is so low?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Is L a robot type?

A: You are dealing with a no-win situation!!

Q: It is a no win situation...

A: As you know.

Q: (T) So, if I don't get out, I will just keep going down. Is it the area or the person?

A: Both. One is wrapped within the other.

Q: (L) Why is it that it seems to be one of the primary things about us that prevents us from acting against such situations, is our fear of hurting another person? That was the chief thing that kept me in my marriage for so long. And, only when I knew that it was hurting the kids more to stay, did I have the power to get out. Why are we so afraid of hurting someone's feelings if they are hurting us?

A: Not correct concept. You do not need to "act against them," you need to act in favor of your destiny.

Q:
But, when you do that, these persons make you so completely miserable that there seems to be no other choice but a parting of the ways.

A: Yes, but that is not "acting against." Quite the contrary. In fact, remember, it takes two to tango, and if you are both tangoing when the dance hall bursts into flames, you both get burned!!!

Q:
Why is it that when one tries to extricate from such a "tango," why is there is such violent resistance to letting you go when it is obvious, clearly obvious, that they do not have any feeling for you as a human being?

A: It is not "they." We are talking about conduits of attack.

Q:
What is it that makes them susceptible to becoming conduits of attack?

A: All STS are candidates for this. There are only about 6 billion of you though.

Q:
Okay, all people can be conduits of attack. (L) Would just coming down and working with us on Saturdays, on a regular basis, help him to get his concentration back?

A: Making the necessary changes would.

Q: Is it true that being in the presence of such people, that one is under the influence of an energy, an emanation from them physically, that befuddles the mind and makes it almost impossible to think ones' way out of the situation?

A: It is the draining of energy that befuddles the mind.

Q: Where does this energy drain to?

A: 4th density STS.

Q: They drain our energy from us and 4th density STS harvests it from them?

A: "They" do nothing!!!! 4th density STS does it all through them!

Q:
(T) Well, I would like to know what is it in us that makes us attracted to such people.

A: It was the idea of 4th density STS.

Q: That means that they can control your thoughts and emotions, put ideas into your head, and you think it is a good idea to "save" someone. You don't know. It is taught in our religions and culture to give until it hurts, and, in fact, to give because it hurts. The whole situation is designed and controlled from another level. Any further comment on this subject?

A: Once you have truly learned the program, just plug it in.

Q:
I guess once you have truly learned what is being said here, just plug it in...

A: No. We mean that all you have to do is learn the patterns of behavior, the subtle signs, and you will always have the ability of avoiding it. Your own as well as others.

Q:
So, once you have learned the program from this person, you will be able to avoid getting into another, similar one. (T) But, I should have learned it from H. I did the same thing twice. (L) Well, when you are wounded, it is hard to see clearly.

A: The signs were present, but you did not read them.

Q: (L to Tom) You ignored it.

A: No, he did not yet know the program. Anticipate not!

Q: I guess that means that when you are thinking that you can change another person, or that changing something about what you are doing naturally will help them, you are anticipating.

A: Or that it would be different that it turned out to be.

Q: Well, you knew that there was a lot wrong in the beginning, but you thought that it would be different. Ark's mother is sick. Will she be better soon?

A: Wait and see.

Q: He is carrying a very heavy burden just now, and I am concerned for him.

A: Does this surprise you? Unfortunately, Ark still does not completely know this program.

Q: Are you suggesting that this sickness of his mother's has been caused from 4th density STS?

A: Lesson number 1: Always expect attack. Lesson number 2: Know the modes of same. Lesson number 3: Know how to counteract same.

Q:
When a person is sick, old and one's mother... the only thing to do is take care of it. But, I guess that it is true that anything that tends to cause interference in doing what one is here to do could be considered attack. Whether it is your mother being sick, or your kid falling off a bicycle and breaking his arm. It is all related to lack of vigilance on the part of the one who is the conduit of attack.

A: When you are under attack, expect the unexpected, if it is going to cause problems...

Q:
So, if there is something that can cause problems, expect it to happen.

A: But, if you expect it, you learn how to "head it off," thus neutralizing it. This is called vigilance, which is rooted in knowledge. And, what does knowledge do?

Q: Protects! Is
there anything I can do to help?

A: How so?

Q: Well, I don't know. I guess that a person just has to come to the full realization that virtually everything that happens on the planet - no exceptions - is a symbol of some interaction of STS vs STO energy at higher levels.

A: Yes, and that is not as of yet realized. It must be part of a natural learning process.

Q:
Well, I guess that all of us tend to keep one or another area sacrosanct and think that it is not subject to attack, or that we can use logic and 3rd density thinking to explain it. Until a person realizes that attack can come through even one's self, wives and husbands, children and parents, friends, virtually ANYBODY - NOBODY is exempt.

A: The block is a lack of faith in the concept. Remember, when one has been indoctrinated by religion, culture and/or science, they are predisposed to view all things in the sense of the measureable physical reality exclusively.

Q: Well, in Ark's case, is something going to happen for him that will give him a view under the surface, so to speak?

A: Please do not anticipate. This is a logjam of "quantum" proportions.

Q: Well, I think he is cured of thinking that certain people can be helped.

A: But he is not cured of his lack of faith in the reality of non-physical attack.
 
Back
Top Bottom