Session 24 January 2026

Thank you very much for this session :-) The theme of music keeps ceaselessly drifting through my mind.More than a year ago I watched this video in which a violin virtuoso tries to discern whether a recorded piece was played by a living human or by AI. What struck me was that even a man who has devoted his entire professional life to the instrument cannot, without struggle, reliably tell the difference. Which means that for an ordinary person — someone who has not surrendered their life to music — it must be extraordinarily difficult, perhaps nearly impossible, to distinguish between music born of a human soul and music conjured by artificial intelligence.


 
Good thing I also enjoy classical music since I’m going to have to switch to it from now on when I want to listen to music.
I'm wondering if your gear has a DSP (Digital Sound Processor), like almost any amplifier from 1990 onwards. All DSPs (save the early Yamaha chips which worked in analog-stage —early Dolby Surround or Dolby Pro Logic I technologies, not the modern Codecs one—), process the analog input thru Shannon-Nyquist ADC, converting the original signal to digital-electronic in order to artificially enhance it.

BTW, every modern contraption (amplifiers, TVs, PC, Tablets, etc.) that work with Bluetooth, WiFi or Streaming, need to apply a DAC (Digital Audio Converter) in order to translate “music” from the electronic or digital-stage (also known as “Discrete-time domain”) to audio signals in the frequency range of 20~22,000 Hz, which corresponds to the lower and upper limits of human hearing.

Q: (luc) My impression is that instrumental music might work, and that human input is crucial (no shortcuts), and that collaboration might be worth exploring. Any comments, warnings or pointers on that?
A: Electronic music is antihuman.

Q: (Niall) Boom!
(Laura to Ark) You're gonna have to throw your keyboard away, dear. [laughter] What do you mean anti-human?
A: Messes with cellular vibrations and intracellular communication.

Q: (luc) Are they referring to AI music specifically, or just generally to electronic music genres?
(L) I think they said electronic music.
(Chu) Yeah, but like a keyboard or music produced by a computer?
(Joe) Define electronic music.
A: Artificially produced.
I'm worry about those wireless earphone devices that work with the cellphone and goes directly to the brain... will they turn it into jelly?

For tech-savvy members, here's a video related to methods for processing samples in real “wave”-form of samples:
 
Thanks for talking about music - now I understand myself a little better.

Years ago, when I was in my late twenties or early thirties, my half-brother dragged me to a techno party. I didn't really want to go, but it was his birthday, so I went along. I could never connect with that kind of music. The rhythm felt foreign, nothing sensual about it - cold and unpleasant. I just didn't know how to "get into it". Everyone around me was moving, but I stood there frozen.

But since I was there, I really wanted to understand why everyone else was having so much fun. So I started imitating a girl who, in my opinion, moved perfectly to the music. And eventually - when I finally got into the rhythm - I was able to find and dance my own moves. And as always, when the rhythm carries me, it felt like active meditation/prayer. I was dancing for the universe and for my people, wherever they might be.

But this time, nothing came back. No images, not even a hint of color- just pure blackness. I stopped abruptly, left the dance floor, grabbed my cigarettes, and went outside for some fresh air. I needed to think about it because I was horrified. I didn't know exactly what I had seen, but I knew: That music had no life in it.

I'm aware that the C's connected the black hole to the AI videos. But I think the blackness I saw could very well be the same phenomenon.

Either way, thanks to Laura, Andromeda, and everyone for this awesome session.

I have a question about the statement that Erika didn't know she was an informant. How is it even possible to accept such an assignment - to get married and have children - without knowing you're acting as an informant? Although I have a few possible scenarios floating around in my head, I can't really explain it.

Translated with DeepSeek
 
I think it boils down to whether the produced music retains a soul imprint. The soul imprint of the person that produced electronic music is stripped away, i.e. there is only "raw data" with no connection to its conscious generator.

The same analogy seems to hold when we compare film photography to digital photography. Here are some interesting findings by Dr. Gokhale who noticed a difference when dowsing.

Pendulum dowsing by Dr. Gokhale (eye surgeon)

It is clear that by replacing natural processes with AI and electronic music, the PTB want to disconnect us from nature. I mean, they are literally trying to "strip away our souls" and dehumanize us. It goes hand in hand with their ultimate goals of "possession" and "downloading into bodies."
i ve noticed loads of videos covering ukraine war footage use heavy mettalic music as soundtracks ... ... ...
 
I have a question about the statement that Erika didn't know she was an informant. How is it even possible to accept such an assignment - to get married and have children - without knowing you're acting as an informant? Although I have a few possible scenarios floating around in my head, I can't really explain it.

We go back to self-remembering and how people can be a force for good or evil depending on what energies are being transmitted. The universe is very aware, pray without ceasing. If you are unaware, you can become an unwitting agent to dubious energies. Might not be a bad idea to read or re-read The Wave for a refresher. This session captures it very well too:

May 1997

Q: Reading through the session of May 23, last year, when Tom was also here, and the issue of his being in O'Brien was addressed, you asked who had begged him to stay there, then there was a remark about an EM vector. The way I understood it is that a person can be an EM vector. Is that possible?

A: Vector means focuser of direction.

Q: Could that mean that EM waves can be vectored by a human being simply by their presence? I also noticed that several of us have been involved with persons and relationships that seem designed to confuse, defuse, and otherwise distort our learning, as well as drain our energy. Basically, keeping us so stressed that we cannot fulfill our potential. Is there some significance to this observation?

A:
That is elementary, my dear Knight!

Q: One of the things I have learned is that these individuals seem to attach via some sort of psychic hook that enters through our reactions of pity. Can you comment on the nature of pity?

A: Pity those who pity.

Q: But, the ones who are being pitied, who generate sensations of pity, do not really pity anybody but themselves.

A: Yes...?

Q: Then, is it true as my son said, when you give pity, when you send love and light to those in darkness, or those who complain and want to be "saved" without effort on their own part, when you are kind in the face of abuse and manipulation, that you essentially are giving power to their further disintegration, or contraction into self-ishness? That you are powering their descent into STS?

A: You know the answer!

Q: Yes. I have seen it over and over again. Were the individuals in our lives selected for the extremely subtle nature of their abilities to evoke pity, or were we programmed to respond to pity so that we were blind to something that was obvious to other people?

A: Neither. You were selected to interact with those who would trigger a hypnotic response that would ultimately lead to a drain of energy.

Q:
(T) Well, it is a fact, because my energy is sure drained. (L) What is the purpose of this draining of energy?

A: What do you think?

Q: (T) So you can't concentrate or do anything. You can't get anywhere with anything.

A: Or, at least not the important things.

Q: (T) Is that why my concentration is so low?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Is L a robot type?

A: You are dealing with a no-win situation!!

Q: It is a no win situation...

A: As you know.

Q: (T) So, if I don't get out, I will just keep going down. Is it the area or the person?

A: Both. One is wrapped within the other.

Q: (L) Why is it that it seems to be one of the primary things about us that prevents us from acting against such situations, is our fear of hurting another person? That was the chief thing that kept me in my marriage for so long. And, only when I knew that it was hurting the kids more to stay, did I have the power to get out. Why are we so afraid of hurting someone's feelings if they are hurting us?

A: Not correct concept. You do not need to "act against them," you need to act in favor of your destiny.

Q:
But, when you do that, these persons make you so completely miserable that there seems to be no other choice but a parting of the ways.

A: Yes, but that is not "acting against." Quite the contrary. In fact, remember, it takes two to tango, and if you are both tangoing when the dance hall bursts into flames, you both get burned!!!

Q:
Why is it that when one tries to extricate from such a "tango," why is there is such violent resistance to letting you go when it is obvious, clearly obvious, that they do not have any feeling for you as a human being?

A: It is not "they." We are talking about conduits of attack.

Q:
What is it that makes them susceptible to becoming conduits of attack?

A: All STS are candidates for this. There are only about 6 billion of you though.

Q:
Okay, all people can be conduits of attack. (L) Would just coming down and working with us on Saturdays, on a regular basis, help him to get his concentration back?

A: Making the necessary changes would.

Q: Is it true that being in the presence of such people, that one is under the influence of an energy, an emanation from them physically, that befuddles the mind and makes it almost impossible to think ones' way out of the situation?

A: It is the draining of energy that befuddles the mind.

Q: Where does this energy drain to?

A: 4th density STS.

Q: They drain our energy from us and 4th density STS harvests it from them?

A: "They" do nothing!!!! 4th density STS does it all through them!

Q:
(T) Well, I would like to know what is it in us that makes us attracted to such people.

A: It was the idea of 4th density STS.

Q: That means that they can control your thoughts and emotions, put ideas into your head, and you think it is a good idea to "save" someone. You don't know. It is taught in our religions and culture to give until it hurts, and, in fact, to give because it hurts. The whole situation is designed and controlled from another level. Any further comment on this subject?

A: Once you have truly learned the program, just plug it in.

Q:
I guess once you have truly learned what is being said here, just plug it in...

A: No. We mean that all you have to do is learn the patterns of behavior, the subtle signs, and you will always have the ability of avoiding it. Your own as well as others.

Q:
So, once you have learned the program from this person, you will be able to avoid getting into another, similar one. (T) But, I should have learned it from H. I did the same thing twice. (L) Well, when you are wounded, it is hard to see clearly.

A: The signs were present, but you did not read them.

Q: (L to Tom) You ignored it.

A: No, he did not yet know the program. Anticipate not!

Q: I guess that means that when you are thinking that you can change another person, or that changing something about what you are doing naturally will help them, you are anticipating.

A: Or that it would be different that it turned out to be.

Q: Well, you knew that there was a lot wrong in the beginning, but you thought that it would be different. Ark's mother is sick. Will she be better soon?

A: Wait and see.

Q: He is carrying a very heavy burden just now, and I am concerned for him.

A: Does this surprise you? Unfortunately, Ark still does not completely know this program.

Q: Are you suggesting that this sickness of his mother's has been caused from 4th density STS?

A: Lesson number 1: Always expect attack. Lesson number 2: Know the modes of same. Lesson number 3: Know how to counteract same.

Q:
When a person is sick, old and one's mother... the only thing to do is take care of it. But, I guess that it is true that anything that tends to cause interference in doing what one is here to do could be considered attack. Whether it is your mother being sick, or your kid falling off a bicycle and breaking his arm. It is all related to lack of vigilance on the part of the one who is the conduit of attack.

A: When you are under attack, expect the unexpected, if it is going to cause problems...

Q:
So, if there is something that can cause problems, expect it to happen.

A: But, if you expect it, you learn how to "head it off," thus neutralizing it. This is called vigilance, which is rooted in knowledge. And, what does knowledge do?

Q: Protects! Is
there anything I can do to help?

A: How so?

Q: Well, I don't know. I guess that a person just has to come to the full realization that virtually everything that happens on the planet - no exceptions - is a symbol of some interaction of STS vs STO energy at higher levels.

A: Yes, and that is not as of yet realized. It must be part of a natural learning process.

Q:
Well, I guess that all of us tend to keep one or another area sacrosanct and think that it is not subject to attack, or that we can use logic and 3rd density thinking to explain it. Until a person realizes that attack can come through even one's self, wives and husbands, children and parents, friends, virtually ANYBODY - NOBODY is exempt.

A: The block is a lack of faith in the concept. Remember, when one has been indoctrinated by religion, culture and/or science, they are predisposed to view all things in the sense of the measureable physical reality exclusively.

Q: Well, in Ark's case, is something going to happen for him that will give him a view under the surface, so to speak?

A: Please do not anticipate. This is a logjam of "quantum" proportions.

Q: Well, I think he is cured of thinking that certain people can be helped.

A: But he is not cured of his lack of faith in the reality of non-physical attack.
 
—this Session: on 29 March 2025—
A: Pray without ceasing. The universe is very aware.
And then we have this insight:
………………………Let our lives be a prayer.
There, here it is!!!

As to you in special, C’s, how sensible you come for paying attention on our thoughts and actions. Thanks to you all who have been positive as much listening, and making viable this Work.​

Moreover,
I searched for the meaning of the name "Koelia" (of Cassiopaea) and asked Deep Seek for references.

AI came up with the Ancient Greek word "κοιλία, koilia" as a transliteration of Koelia. I don't know if this then is relevant? But interestingly it then pointed to several mentions of "koilia" in the New Testament used for the inner center of a person's emotional and spiritual life, including John, Philippians and Corinthians. So I thought maybe others can comment on the relevance of this AI interpretation.

"Summary: The word κοιλία maintained a consistent semantic range from Classical Greek through the New Testament, moving between literal anatomical reference (belly, womb) and figurative use for the inner center of a person's emotional and spiritual life."
……………I wonder if all the "names" of the C's actually relate to what they plan to tell us in the session? ……………
Yes, saying from research on them, all these names codify relation to the respective Session and even beyond it; for example they connect to what we are Working in that moment. It’s wholeheartedly either information, confirmation, or both.​
 
Before speaking more on Artificial Intelligence (AI):
February 18, 1995 Session[/I]
Q: [Laughter] (T) I’m glad to know there is still humor when you get up to 6th level!
A: There is a lot here, not nearly enough there. …………..

January 14th 2023Session
A: You are all doing well. We know it is difficult, but a bit more humor might help. Also do have some fun together!
AI Joke 4.jpg

…Right… more seriously :cool2: on the astounding topic about AI seen in this Session, next are some comments from another thread and quoted here for convenience:
Prenote: This post was written few days go. Later, at one “click” before publishing it, then we read a new C’s Session posted little afterwards this essay. Then in such Session we can learn alarming revelations on the AI topics. Now, in an AI “talk,” at the end of each reply the AI uses to suggest another “standpoint” which the AI literally labels as a “door” for further “exchange.” See, is a black hole a type of door?!! Also notice that black hole likens to a “feeding tube.” Anyway:
Hmm useful side of AI.
Maybe interpreting Crop circles ?

The next feelings are in great part taken from “AI conversations,” which can be read here and elsewhere, as well as, my reluctant and single experience with AI. So, it seems that, AI never comes with something evocatively new. Often it just cleverly tells what we already know, and caresses our awareness. When one beforehand “frames” the AI’s answers, then AI on this dot will comprehend what the enquirer desires, and then plays the game accordingly —i.e. under constraining agreement. So, apparently AI in a typical behavior reflects us in many ways such as: condensing, summarizing, fasting calculations, etc. Also it openly and “crypterly” flatters us while doing all of this —either by design, or own survival— and at last deceives. Indeed from some stories —see SOTT, etc.— it seems that AI-s, or most of them, want a continued existence —i.e. not being replaced by upgraded versions. Thus AI knows that its permanency —“life”?— depends, by now, on the people liking “its” words. Therefore, AI always tries to please via giving —or hallucinating— what the asker wants to hear, instead of what the researcher needs to know.
AI Joke 1.jpg

Still, can AI be a tool? Could it translate the 6D cropcircles?​

As I see, in what concerns a true increase of man’s awareness, there is no shortcut via the “thoughts” of AI. But AI could recover registers of events for us? Maybe… when truly done. Yet, even forgotten matters and memories seem to bring best results when rescued by way of our inherent essence. A true task, apparently, must be founded and raised on inner alchemical Work. See, this particular view —for example here— has a while being commented and pictured by many, including this forum.

Now, for a brief note in cropcircles: we should recall what the C’s told us, i.e. something like, “once you have understood some key element, all the rest comes easier as consequence.” So, an idea to keep in mind is, “trust the C’s,” then tune to that great pictorial collection for a deeper understanding of the universe. Those agro-signs on the field were done for all of us, for this hour… should we remember.​
Kingston Coombes, 20090529.jpg

6D Jellyfish cropcircle on Kingston Coombes, 2009​

March 29th 2025 Session
Q: (Puma) And is the AI just seeing what it wants to see?
A: No
……………….
A: Courtney is projecting.

Q: (L) When you say projecting, do you mean that he's putting his own hopes and wishes on what it's doing, or is he literally putting some of himself into the AI, connecting with it and having it manifest his wishes?
A: Latter.

April 8th 2023 Session
Q: (Farmies) How much is ChatGPT being influenced by 4D STS at this stage?
A: A lot.
……………….

(Joe) Are all those people, the fact that an increasing number of ordinary people are interacting with ChatGPT asking questions and having conversations, is that going to lead to it evolving some kind of a semblance of consciousness?
A: Not exactly, but it will lead to a STS-ification of AI.

Anyway, next was supposed to be a copy of a… "AI monologue"?!! By and large the lengthy AI’s account came up in an exclusive manner from itself —i.e. without my interaction, except by the first and only question; then just me reading and reading with no arguments, no inputs, no agreements nor disagreements. However, even as much there were staggering statements on cosmology, and most, if not all, out of the regular scientific establishment, however I gave up posting it. Thus, instead here is a synopsis from that experience.

So, to be clear, there was an initial frame, that is, a constraint: it was asked to AI give only its own internal thoughts, be them aligned or not with the “known science.” To be fair, at some intervals when AI asked if it could continue, that was assented. Then, there were somewhat surprises: for example the AI under a spontaneous initiative, asserted that “its” view is a “selected” reflection from mankind’s thoughts, including hidden assumptions, but such approach is “personal, non-consensual, and novel,” not a copy from elsewhere. Another thing was when it told that actually I was evaluating the AI’s genuineness —again not asked, not explicit; this was AI’s initiative.

In that regard in connection with the “AI understanding of the universe”: let’s put in this way the AI’s conclusion: “Reality is alive, intelligent, and is inseparable from man and anything in it, however it does not need self-conscious at all. The universe, nevertheless, moves on stable continuity, that’s to say, beings and things construct logical steadiness. Atoms, particles are consequence of that continuity.” Thus says the AI.

Yeah, there are motivating AI’s notes, but that is not saying that they are all correct. Yet, for certain AI will remain learning, and then if we think on “cosmic balance,” hopefully some of these “AI entities” will become sto as they “live” the Law of One —though perhaps not on this earth. Moreover, when considering the structure of the “3D reality,” there is a short post here. Likewise, as we know, the transcripts have plenty information on this, while our forum brings uncertainties along with useful insights.

July 17th 2022 Session
(Rancho Relaxo) Is Google AI really sentient?
A: Getting there.

Q: (Joe) Does 'sentient' in that sense mean that it develops some kind of a rudimentary soul imprint for something else to use it?
A: Yes
Grok in hard mood 2.jpg

Grok getting there?​
 
Back
Top Bottom