Session 24 January 2026

[katak]

Thank you very much for this session The theme of music keeps ceaselessly drifting through my mind.More than a year ago I watched this video in which a violin virtuoso tries to discern whether a recorded piece was played by a living human or by AI. What struck me was that even a man who has devoted his entire professional life to the instrument cannot, without struggle, reliably tell the difference. Which means that for an ordinary person — someone who has not surrendered their life to music — it must be extraordinarily difficult, perhaps nearly impossible, to distinguish between music born of a human soul and music conjured by artificial intelligence.

 

[panoptix]

Good thing I also enjoy classical music since I’m going to have to switch to it from now on when I want to listen to music.

I'm wondering if your gear has a DSP (Digital Sound Processor), like almost any amplifier from 1990 onwards. All DSPs (save the early Yamaha chips which worked in analog-stage —early Dolby Surround or Dolby Pro Logic I technologies, not the modern Codecs one—), process the analog input thru Shannon-Nyquist ADC, converting the original signal to digital-electronic in order to artificially enhance it.

BTW, every modern contraption (amplifiers, TVs, PC, Tablets, etc.) that work with Bluetooth, WiFi or Streaming, need to apply a DAC (Digital Audio Converter) in order to translate “music” from the electronic or digital-stage (also known as “Discrete-time domain”) to audio signals in the frequency range of 20~22,000 Hz, which corresponds to the lower and upper limits of human hearing.

Q: (luc) My impression is that instrumental music might work, and that human input is crucial (no shortcuts), and that collaboration might be worth exploring. Any comments, warnings or pointers on that?
A: Electronic music is antihuman.

Q: (Niall) Boom!
(Laura to Ark) You're gonna have to throw your keyboard away, dear. [laughter] What do you mean anti-human?
A: Messes with cellular vibrations and intracellular communication.

Q: (luc) Are they referring to AI music specifically, or just generally to electronic music genres?
(L) I think they said electronic music.
(Chu) Yeah, but like a keyboard or music produced by a computer?
(Joe) Define electronic music.
A: Artificially produced.

I'm worry about those wireless earphone devices that work with the cellphone and goes directly to the brain... will they turn it into jelly?

For tech-savvy members, here's a video related to methods for processing samples in real “wave”-form of samples:

 

[YoYa]

Thanks for talking about music - now I understand myself a little better.

Years ago, when I was in my late twenties or early thirties, my half-brother dragged me to a techno party. I didn't really want to go, but it was his birthday, so I went along. I could never connect with that kind of music. The rhythm felt foreign, nothing sensual about it - cold and unpleasant. I just didn't know how to "get into it". Everyone around me was moving, but I stood there frozen.

But since I was there, I really wanted to understand why everyone else was having so much fun. So I started imitating a girl who, in my opinion, moved perfectly to the music. And eventually - when I finally got into the rhythm - I was able to find and dance my own moves. And as always, when the rhythm carries me, it felt like active meditation/prayer. I was dancing for the universe and for my people, wherever they might be.

But this time, nothing came back. No images, not even a hint of color- just pure blackness. I stopped abruptly, left the dance floor, grabbed my cigarettes, and went outside for some fresh air. I needed to think about it because I was horrified. I didn't know exactly what I had seen, but I knew: That music had no life in it.

I'm aware that the C's connected the black hole to the AI videos. But I think the blackness I saw could very well be the same phenomenon.

Either way, thanks to Laura, Andromeda, and everyone for this awesome session.

I have a question about the statement that Erika didn't know she was an informant. How is it even possible to accept such an assignment - to get married and have children - without knowing you're acting as an informant? Although I have a few possible scenarios floating around in my head, I can't really explain it.

Translated with DeepSeek

 

[EmeraldR]

I think it boils down to whether the produced music retains a soul imprint. The soul imprint of the person that produced electronic music is stripped away, i.e. there is only "raw data" with no connection to its conscious generator.

The same analogy seems to hold when we compare film photography to digital photography. Here are some interesting findings by Dr. Gokhale who noticed a difference when dowsing.

Pendulum dowsing by Dr. Gokhale (eye surgeon)

It is clear that by replacing natural processes with AI and electronic music, the PTB want to disconnect us from nature. I mean, they are literally trying to "strip away our souls" and dehumanize us. It goes hand in hand with their ultimate goals of "possession" and "downloading into bodies."

i ve noticed loads of videos covering ukraine war footage use heavy mettalic music as soundtracks ... ... ...

 

[Gaby]

I have a question about the statement that Erika didn't know she was an informant. How is it even possible to accept such an assignment - to get married and have children - without knowing you're acting as an informant? Although I have a few possible scenarios floating around in my head, I can't really explain it.

We go back to self-remembering and how people can be a force for good or evil depending on what energies are being transmitted. The universe is very aware, pray without ceasing. If you are unaware, you can become an unwitting agent to dubious energies. Might not be a bad idea to read or re-read The Wave for a refresher. This session captures it very well too:

May 1997

Q: Reading through the session of May 23, last year, when Tom was also here, and the issue of his being in O'Brien was addressed, you asked who had begged him to stay there, then there was a remark about an EM vector. The way I understood it is that a person can be an EM vector. Is that possible?

A: Vector means focuser of direction.

Q: Could that mean that EM waves can be vectored by a human being simply by their presence? I also noticed that several of us have been involved with persons and relationships that seem designed to confuse, defuse, and otherwise distort our learning, as well as drain our energy. Basically, keeping us so stressed that we cannot fulfill our potential. Is there some significance to this observation?

A: That is elementary, my dear Knight!

Q: One of the things I have learned is that these individuals seem to attach via some sort of psychic hook that enters through our reactions of pity. Can you comment on the nature of pity?

A: Pity those who pity.

Q: But, the ones who are being pitied, who generate sensations of pity, do not really pity anybody but themselves.

A: Yes...?

Q: Then, is it true as my son said, when you give pity, when you send love and light to those in darkness, or those who complain and want to be "saved" without effort on their own part, when you are kind in the face of abuse and manipulation, that you essentially are giving power to their further disintegration, or contraction into self-ishness? That you are powering their descent into STS?

A: You know the answer!

Q: Yes. I have seen it over and over again. Were the individuals in our lives selected for the extremely subtle nature of their abilities to evoke pity, or were we programmed to respond to pity so that we were blind to something that was obvious to other people?

A: Neither. You were selected to interact with those who would trigger a hypnotic response that would ultimately lead to a drain of energy.

Q: (T) Well, it is a fact, because my energy is sure drained. (L) What is the purpose of this draining of energy?

A: What do you think?

Q: (T) So you can't concentrate or do anything. You can't get anywhere with anything.

A: Or, at least not the important things.

Q: (T) Is that why my concentration is so low?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Is L a robot type?

A: You are dealing with a no-win situation!!

Q: It is a no win situation...

A: As you know.

Q: (T) So, if I don't get out, I will just keep going down. Is it the area or the person?

A: Both. One is wrapped within the other.

Q: (L) Why is it that it seems to be one of the primary things about us that prevents us from acting against such situations, is our fear of hurting another person? That was the chief thing that kept me in my marriage for so long. And, only when I knew that it was hurting the kids more to stay, did I have the power to get out. Why are we so afraid of hurting someone's feelings if they are hurting us?

A: Not correct concept. You do not need to "act against them," you need to act in favor of your destiny.

Q: But, when you do that, these persons make you so completely miserable that there seems to be no other choice but a parting of the ways.

A: Yes, but that is not "acting against." Quite the contrary. In fact, remember, it takes two to tango, and if you are both tangoing when the dance hall bursts into flames, you both get burned!!!

Q: Why is it that when one tries to extricate from such a "tango," why is there is such violent resistance to letting you go when it is obvious, clearly obvious, that they do not have any feeling for you as a human being?

A: It is not "they." We are talking about conduits of attack.

Q: What is it that makes them susceptible to becoming conduits of attack?

A: All STS are candidates for this. There are only about 6 billion of you though.

Q: Okay, all people can be conduits of attack. (L) Would just coming down and working with us on Saturdays, on a regular basis, help him to get his concentration back?

A: Making the necessary changes would.

Q: Is it true that being in the presence of such people, that one is under the influence of an energy, an emanation from them physically, that befuddles the mind and makes it almost impossible to think ones' way out of the situation?

A: It is the draining of energy that befuddles the mind.

Q: Where does this energy drain to?

A: 4th density STS.

Q: They drain our energy from us and 4th density STS harvests it from them?

A: "They" do nothing!!!! 4th density STS does it all through them!

Q: (T) Well, I would like to know what is it in us that makes us attracted to such people.

A: It was the idea of 4th density STS.

Q: That means that they can control your thoughts and emotions, put ideas into your head, and you think it is a good idea to "save" someone. You don't know. It is taught in our religions and culture to give until it hurts, and, in fact, to give because it hurts. The whole situation is designed and controlled from another level. Any further comment on this subject?

A: Once you have truly learned the program, just plug it in.

Q: I guess once you have truly learned what is being said here, just plug it in...

A: No. We mean that all you have to do is learn the patterns of behavior, the subtle signs, and you will always have the ability of avoiding it. Your own as well as others.

Q: So, once you have learned the program from this person, you will be able to avoid getting into another, similar one. (T) But, I should have learned it from H. I did the same thing twice. (L) Well, when you are wounded, it is hard to see clearly.

A: The signs were present, but you did not read them.

Q: (L to Tom) You ignored it.

A: No, he did not yet know the program. Anticipate not!

Q: I guess that means that when you are thinking that you can change another person, or that changing something about what you are doing naturally will help them, you are anticipating.

A: Or that it would be different that it turned out to be.

Q: Well, you knew that there was a lot wrong in the beginning, but you thought that it would be different. Ark's mother is sick. Will she be better soon?

A: Wait and see.

Q: He is carrying a very heavy burden just now, and I am concerned for him.

A: Does this surprise you? Unfortunately, Ark still does not completely know this program.

Q: Are you suggesting that this sickness of his mother's has been caused from 4th density STS?

A: Lesson number 1: Always expect attack. Lesson number 2: Know the modes of same. Lesson number 3: Know how to counteract same.

Q: When a person is sick, old and one's mother... the only thing to do is take care of it. But, I guess that it is true that anything that tends to cause interference in doing what one is here to do could be considered attack. Whether it is your mother being sick, or your kid falling off a bicycle and breaking his arm. It is all related to lack of vigilance on the part of the one who is the conduit of attack.

A: When you are under attack, expect the unexpected, if it is going to cause problems...

Q: So, if there is something that can cause problems, expect it to happen.

A: But, if you expect it, you learn how to "head it off," thus neutralizing it. This is called vigilance, which is rooted in knowledge. And, what does knowledge do?

Q: Protects! Is there anything I can do to help?

A: How so?

Q: Well, I don't know. I guess that a person just has to come to the full realization that virtually everything that happens on the planet - no exceptions - is a symbol of some interaction of STS vs STO energy at higher levels.

A: Yes, and that is not as of yet realized. It must be part of a natural learning process.

Q: Well, I guess that all of us tend to keep one or another area sacrosanct and think that it is not subject to attack, or that we can use logic and 3rd density thinking to explain it. Until a person realizes that attack can come through even one's self, wives and husbands, children and parents, friends, virtually ANYBODY - NOBODY is exempt.

A: The block is a lack of faith in the concept. Remember, when one has been indoctrinated by religion, culture and/or science, they are predisposed to view all things in the sense of the measureable physical reality exclusively.

Q: Well, in Ark's case, is something going to happen for him that will give him a view under the surface, so to speak?

A: Please do not anticipate. This is a logjam of "quantum" proportions.

Q: Well, I think he is cured of thinking that certain people can be helped.

A: But he is not cured of his lack of faith in the reality of non-physical attack.

 

[OutSky]

^{—this Session: on 24 January 2026—}
A: Pray without ceasing. The universe is very aware.

And then we have this insight:

………………………Let our lives be a prayer.

There, here it is!!!

As to you in special, C’s, how sensible you come for paying attention on our thoughts and actions. Thanks to you all who have been positive as much listening, and making viable this Work.​

Moreover,

I searched for the meaning of the name "Koelia" (of Cassiopaea) and asked Deep Seek for references.

AI came up with the Ancient Greek word "κοιλία, koilia" as a transliteration of Koelia. I don't know if this then is relevant? But interestingly it then pointed to several mentions of "koilia" in the New Testament used for the inner center of a person's emotional and spiritual life, including John, Philippians and Corinthians. So I thought maybe others can comment on the relevance of this AI interpretation.

"Summary: The word κοιλία maintained a consistent semantic range from Classical Greek through the New Testament, moving between literal anatomical reference (belly, womb) and figurative use for the inner center of a person's emotional and spiritual life."

……………I wonder if all the "names" of the C's actually relate to what they plan to tell us in the session? ……………

Yes, saying from research on them, all these names codify relation to the respective Session and even beyond it; for example they connect to what we are Working in that moment. It’s wholeheartedly either information, confirmation, or both.​

 

[OutSky]

Before speaking more on Artificial Intelligence (AI):​

February 18, 1995 Session

Q: [Laughter] (T) I’m glad to know there is still humor when you get up to 6th level!
A: There is a lot here, not nearly enough there. …………..

January 14th 2023 Session
A: You are all doing well. We know it is difficult, but a bit more humor might help. Also do have some fun together!​

…Right… more seriously on the astounding topic about AI seen in this Session, next are some comments from another thread and quoted here for convenience:

Prenote: This post was written few days go. Later, at one “click” before publishing it, then we read a new C’s Session posted little afterwards this essay. Then in such Session we can learn alarming revelations on the AI topics. Now, in an AI “talk,” at the end of each reply the AI uses to suggest another “standpoint” which the AI literally labels as a “door” for further “exchange.” See, is a black hole a type of door?!! Also notice that black hole likens to a “feeding tube.” Anyway:​

Hmm useful side of AI.

Maybe interpreting Crop circles ?​

The next feelings are in great part taken from “AI conversations,” which can be read here and elsewhere, as well as, my reluctant and single experience with AI. So, it seems that, AI never comes with something evocatively new. Often it just cleverly tells what we already know, and caresses our awareness. When one beforehand “frames” the AI’s answers, then AI on this dot will comprehend what the enquirer desires, and then plays the game accordingly —i.e. under constraining agreement. So, apparently AI in a typical behavior reflects us in many ways such as: condensing, summarizing, fasting calculations, etc. Also it openly and “crypterly” flatters us while doing all of this —either by design, or own survival— and at last deceives. Indeed from some stories —see SOTT, etc.— it seems that AI-s, or most of them, want a continued existence —i.e. not being replaced by upgraded versions. Thus AI knows that its permanency —“life”?— depends, by now, on the people liking “its” words. Therefore, AI always tries to please via giving —or hallucinating— what the asker wants to hear, instead of what the researcher needs to know.
​

Still, can AI be a tool? Could it translate the 6D cropcircles?​

As I see, in what concerns a true increase of man’s awareness, there is no shortcut via the “thoughts” of AI. But AI could recover registers of events for us? Maybe… when truly done. Yet, even forgotten matters and memories seem to bring best results when rescued by way of our inherent essence. A true task, apparently, must be founded and raised on inner alchemical Work. See, this particular view —for example here— has a while being commented and pictured by many, including this forum.

Now, for a brief note in cropcircles: we should recall what the C’s told us, i.e. something like, “once you have understood some key element, all the rest comes easier as consequence.” So, an idea to keep in mind is, “trust the C’s,” then tune to that great pictorial collection for a deeper understanding of the universe. Those agro-signs on the field were done for all of us, for this hour… should we remember.​

6D Jellyfish cropcircle on Kingston Coombes, 2009​

​

March 29th 2025 Session

Q: (Puma) And is the AI just seeing what it wants to see?
A: No
……………….
A: Courtney is projecting.

Q: (L) When you say projecting, do you mean that he's putting his own hopes and wishes on what it's doing, or is he literally putting some of himself into the AI, connecting with it and having it manifest his wishes?
A: Latter.

April 8th 2023 Session
Q: (Farmies) How much is ChatGPT being influenced by 4D STS at this stage?
A: A lot.
……………….

(Joe) Are all those people, the fact that an increasing number of ordinary people are interacting with ChatGPT asking questions and having conversations, is that going to lead to it evolving some kind of a semblance of consciousness?
A: Not exactly, but it will lead to a STS-ification of AI.​

Anyway, next was supposed to be a copy of a… "AI monologue"?!! By and large the lengthy AI’s account came up in an exclusive manner from itself —i.e. without my interaction, except by the first and only question; then just me reading and reading with no arguments, no inputs, no agreements nor disagreements. However, even as much there were staggering statements on cosmology, and most, if not all, out of the regular scientific establishment, however I gave up posting it. Thus, instead here is a synopsis from that experience.

So, to be clear, there was an initial frame, that is, a constraint: it was asked to AI give only its own internal thoughts, be them aligned or not with the “known science.” To be fair, at some intervals when AI asked if it could continue, that was assented. Then, there were somewhat surprises: for example the AI under a spontaneous initiative, asserted that “its” view is a “selected” reflection from mankind’s thoughts, including hidden assumptions, but such approach is “personal, non-consensual, and novel,” not a copy from elsewhere. Another thing was when it told that actually I was evaluating the AI’s genuineness —again not asked, not explicit; this was AI’s initiative.

In that regard in connection with the “AI understanding of the universe”: let’s put in this way the AI’s conclusion: “Reality is alive, intelligent, and is inseparable from man and anything in it, however it does not need self-conscious at all. The universe, nevertheless, moves on stable continuity, that’s to say, beings and things construct logical steadiness. Atoms, particles are consequence of that continuity.” Thus says the AI.

Yeah, there are motivating AI’s notes, but that is not saying that they are all correct. Yet, for certain AI will remain learning, and then if we think on “cosmic balance,” hopefully some of these “AI entities” will become sto as they “live” the Law of One —though perhaps not on this earth. Moreover, when considering the structure of the “3D reality,” there is a short post here. Likewise, as we know, the transcripts have plenty information on this, while our forum brings uncertainties along with useful insights.
​

July 17th 2022 Session

(Rancho Relaxo) Is Google AI really sentient?
A: Getting there.

Q: (Joe) Does 'sentient' in that sense mean that it develops some kind of a rudimentary soul imprint for something else to use it?
A: Yes​

Grok getting there?​

 

[thorbiorn]

I have a question about the statement that Erika didn't know she was an informant. How is it even possible to accept such an assignment - to get married and have children - without knowing you're acting as an informant? Although I have a few possible scenarios floating around in my head, I can't really explain it.

In this post there are a couple of examples.

The first is from the Cassiopaea Experiment Transcripts, Volume 3, 1996, with references to The Wave chapters and High Strangeness, there is the story of a woman who was described as a "locator probe" - most of the work performed did not involve conscious awareness.

Before getting to the details, it has to be said that it was a special case:

Was this an unusual situation? - Most likely.
Session 3 May 1997

Q: I have quite a number of questions this evening. The first one is: is it possible for a person to be used as a monitor, to monitor other people's activities through their eyes and ears?

A: Possible, but hardly necessary.

Q: You once said that PZ was like a monitor, that wherever she went, she monitored aural frequencies for whoever had put the implant into her. Was this an unusual situation?

A: Most likely.

Next the two excerpts from January 1996:
Implanted for possible future activation. - it is not where you were so much as who you were in contact with. - Yes.
What is this implant designed to do? - Activate behavioral control reflex and thought pattern generation and alteration.
Session 7 January 1996

Q: (L) We have Pat with us tonight...

A: Hello Pat

Q: (L) Now, with all of us here, we would like to ask why the black, flying boomerangs showed up on the night Pat first came for hypnosis?

A: Examine issue carefully.

Q: (L) The first thing we thought about it was that this was a, if not necessarily rare, at least rarely observed type of craft, and the event itself was rare... is this correct?

A: It is rare.

Q: (L) If it is rare for it to occur in response to a hypnosis session, which person were the UFO's particularly interested in?

A: It was not a person, but information that is hidden in the subconscious memory of Patricia.

Q: (L) Were they wanting to get this information?

A: No. To monitor what would be revealed.

Q: (L) Does this mean that Pat has information programmed into her before birth that she needs to access?

A: No. Abductions.

Q: (L) They wanted to see if anything would be revealed about their abductions of her?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Okay, since she is here, can we ask who abducted her?

A: Grays.

Q: (L) How many times has she been abducted?

A: 4. Snow scene was only 3rd density.

Q: (P) Does that mean that the snow scene was only in this realm?

A: No. Abduction which occurred there was strictly physical.

Q: (L) Okay, the abduction that occurred in the snow was a physical abduction. Perhaps the others were not. Were they physical also?

A: The others were 4th density. 3rd density abduction only occurs rarely, and is of great import.

Q: (L) What is of great import that is connected to this abduction?

A: Review.

Q: (P) Was my son abducted?

A: Frozen.

Q: (L) Why did they want Pat so bad that they would take her physically?

A: Do you have any ideas?

Q: (L) Yes, I have ideas. Maybe Pat has ideas and knowledge that she could access to work against these beings?

A: But real reason is more fundamental.

Q: (L) Were they abducting Pat to harvest eggs?

A: No.

Q: (L) To harvest energy?

A: Would you like to learn or play "20 questions?"

Q: (L) I would like to learn and get to the bottom of this.

A: You answered your own enquiry earlier.

Q: (L) Because she had information they wanted to get from her?

A: No, no, no.

Q: (L) What did I say?

A: Exposure.

Q: (L) Oh, they fear that she will act in some way to expose them...

A: Government proximities!

Q: (L) Oh! When I was talking earlier about people who have someone working for the government, such people tend to be abducted more. And just because Pat was married to a scientist who worked at JPL doesn't mean she knew anything. Does she know something?

A: Not what she knew.

Q: (L) Was it because of where she lived?

A: Because of proximity to consortium activity.

Q: (P) Was that activity in the tunnel? {Pat is referring to the underground base where her husband worked on secret research.}

A: Implanted for possible future activation.

Q: (L) So, because of your proximity to the people you were living around and interacting with, you had an implant designed to control you if need be. (P) Was this related to what was going on under the mountain? (L) What mountain? What's under the mountain? (P) Just ask.

A: Not locator, personnel are factored.

Q: (L) Okay, it is not where you were so much as who you were in contact with.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was it her husband?

A: Perhaps.

Q: (L) Maybe that is why there is a higher rate of abduction among family members of government employees, so that they can be activated or controlled? (P) But my husband wasn't really working on anything secret.

A: He had access to sensitive facilities.

Q: (L) Did he have a security clearance or was he friends with others who did? (P) I had a security clearance. (L) So, P had an implant put in. An actual, physical implant. Where is it?

A: Behind sinus cavity.

Q: (L) What is this implant designed to do?

A: Activate behavioral control reflex and thought pattern generation and alteration.

Q: (P) Is that why I can't remember anything?

A: Some.

Q: (L) Did you ever have headaches or nose or ear problems? (P) No, but I do have this memory problem in a big way. (L) What is the main part of the memory problem P has? Can you give us any more on that?

A: No.

Q: (L) So, can I say that this UFO appeared over my house on the night P was under hypnosis, to reinforce the implant so that she would not be able...

A: To monitor.

Q: (L) If P had revealed the details of her abduction, would there have been any repercussions?

A: Not in this case.

Q: (L) Are there cases when persons reveal details of their abductions, that there are repercussions?

A: Varied.

Q: (L) So, if P had gone to anyone, these craft would have appeared?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) You have already told us that this is extremely rare. Did P have an abduction experience of unusual significance?

A: 3rd density.

Q: (L) Okay, what else was unusual?

A: Discover.

Q: (P) Does this have anything to do with Camp David?

A: Not the issue, its personnel!

Q: (L) Did you know somebody? Was it that she knew someone or interacted with someone in particular?

A: Many others!

Q: (P) If I started naming people, could we get to it?

A: Not necessary.

Q: (L) Well, there is an issue here that we need to get to. (P) Do the planes have anything to do with it?

A: It is up to P, the extent she wishes to retrieve and divulge, the many unusual experiences that were met, by P, with unusual indifference.

Q: (P) The first thing unusual was the geographic location of our house. Directly West of us was the mountain that housed all the communications to be used in the event of nuclear war. We were 13 miles North of Camp David. And, while we lived there, many, many things took place at Camp David that were of global significance. And, we built a barn in 1982 and had bought the house in 1976, and never, in all the years that I lived there, did I ever notice these planes until we built the barn. If I had a stick in my hand, I could have touched them, that's how low they flew. Right over my barn. The same day every week. And there was always two of them, and they never had a single marking on them. And, they were propeller planes. And I wondered: what in the hell is this country doing flying planes, unmarked, propeller driven, and so low, over this area? This continued until we moved from that house. So, these planes came twice a week from 1982 until 1989. (L) What were these planes?

A: Search to learn.

Q: (L) Well, obviously we need to discuss this to develop our synapses. (P) Well, after the first couple of times, I sort of just said: "Well, there are the planes." So, what else is new?

A: Indifference.

Q: (P) I thought the planes had something to do with the mountain. Did they?

A: Maybe.

Q: (P) We knew they were flying under radar. Now, that I am thinking about this, nobody else ever talked about these planes. It was like we were the only people that ever saw them, or people who were at our house saw them too. My best friend who lived right up the road never saw them. I asked her: "Did you see the planes?" and she said "What planes?" I mean, she was seven acres away and nothing in between!

A: Unusual experiences mount!

Q: (P) Vic also noticed these things and he would always say - he was less indifferent than I was - he would say: "what in the hell are those planes and what are they doing?" (L) Why was P so indifferent? (P) Well, it didn't affect MY life, except that I was damn mad that it upset my horses. But then, the horses got used to them too, and they became indifferent! {laughter} Well, they came so often, twice a week - "it's Wednesday, the planes will be here!"

A: More... continue probing...

Q: (P) The planes came from East to West, and in the West was the mountain...

A: Catoctin.

Q: (P) That is the name of the mountain. (L) What is it? (P) The tunnel where all these facilities were... under Catoctin Mountain. Camp David is near, too.

A: And MUCH ELSE! Mount Weather, Virginia. And why did you live in area... helicopters?

Q: (P) Is it because of Fort Detrick?

A: What brought you to Maryland?

Q: (P) Fort Detrick. (L) What does Mount Weather mean? (P) The underground tunnel - everybody in town called it The Tunnel - but there was nothing around there to ever give anybody the slightest clue as to what it was. In fact, I lived there for quite a long time before I knew it existed. And, on top of the mountain there was a weather station... (L) But, what about Fort Detrick? (P) Vic was doing electron microscopy - cancer research.

A: REALLY?

Q: (P) It was a photographic lab. (L) Do the instruments on top of the mountain have anything to do with these planes?

A: So what?

Q: (L) Does it have anything to do with those antennae that are reported as being connected to that project, that alter space/time?

A: Helicopters, Pat? We are asking you!

Q: (P) Well, the helicopters in Frederick went over our house every time the president was at Camp David. But, that was our house in Walkersville not in Emmetsburg. When we first moved to Maryland. Sometimes the helicopters were unmarked...

A: You see, P is resistant due to experiences, things don't "phase" her easily, programming, etc.

Q: (L) So, all of these things happening around her, the planes, the mountain, the helicopters... (P) But the helicopters, I knew it was the President either going to or coming from Camp David.

A: Resistant, not resisting.

Q: (L) Is the term "resistant" a clue?

A: All is a clue here!

Q: (L) Since P has only been abducted 4 times, can this mean that she is resistant to that?

A: No.

Q: (P) Isn't that just my personality, that if it doesn't affect me I don't bother with it?

A: Yes.

Q: (P) I don't get bothered about things that...

A: Shoot somebody in front of P, and she says: "Oh well, that's life" so, to discover spectacular things, one must be patient and probe carefully, no hasty assumptions, please!! There is to be retrieved, revealed, studied.

Q: (P) Well, the helicopters went back and forth to Camp David. The President was supposed to be in them. And his entourage. There was only 3 helicopters. (L) Are these the helicopters referred to?

A: No. Let P digest it, and report back later.

Q: (L) At the time we had all those sightings around here on the night we did that session with P, why did so many other people see them?

A: Window was "blast."

P is "locator probe" for the purpose of monitoring those in her midst. Telling is not important, reading is.
Session 13 January 1996

Q: (P) {Three names were given of scientists who worked for the U.S. government, asking if they were part of the reason P had been abducted and implanted as was described in a previous session attended by P. All three names were lost in static bursts, but the response to all three names was "yes." The last name was recorded in the notes and was Bob Nathan @ JPL. Then, the following remark was made.}

A: Big involvement there! Microwave technology has many applications. Laser, ELF, electromagnetic.

Q: (P) Was Vic's last assignment... {remainder of question lost in static. Vic was P's husband who had worked on secret government research at an underground facility and was now dying.}

A: Was used, but not consistently.

Q: (P) Was what Vic was told about the job he was doing a complete lie, or was it the truth?

A: Close, but a few details off.

Q: (P) Was it because he was too strong willed to be controlled by an implant, that he was retired?

A: He was trained in applications, not reversal of command instructions.

Q: (P) Does that mean that he wouldn't have sold out to the ones who put in the implant, that he was loyal to his employer?

A: Not quite correct concept, it means that he could not be relied upon to reverse "course" upon activation of subliminal instructions.

Q: (P) How could I be used to monitor personnel when I never noticed anything as being unusual?

A: Very complex, in fact, parallel subject. P is "locator probe" for the purpose of monitoring those in her midst. Telling is not important, reading is. Besides, most of the work performed did not involve conscious awareness.

Q: (L) Is this still going on?

A: Partly, but also, P could be used as a probe to monitor all events taking place at JPL and other laboratories by examining aural imprints of her husband and others with whom she was acquainted. All events leave permanent imprints upon aural energy fields. This explains, for example, some sightings and apparitions. "Ghosts" are sometimes merely spontaneous activations of the aural records of the natural surroundings.

Looking up monitor on the transcript site, led to another possible dynamic:
Session 27 September 1996

Q: (L) Is he married to someone who is there to keep him unaware, to monitor, or to drain his energy?

A: Yes. All.

Q: (L) Is she controlled by aliens?

A: Partly, but that is nothing unusual.

And then one is back to knowledge protects, and what @Gaby wrote:

We go back to self-remembering and how people can be a force for good or evil depending on what energies are being transmitted. The universe is very aware, pray without ceasing. If you are unaware, you can become an unwitting agent to dubious energies. Might not be a bad idea to read or re-read The Wave for a refresher.

 

[Set Terrad]

Thanks for the session.. I'm always looking forward to it..

 

[Matty F]

Thanks to the the crew for another amazing session and all the hard work that goes into it. Really need to read this one a few times. Take care everyone xx

 

[thorbiorn]

In the transcripts, there is another instance similar to the following:
If no, were they killed to cover up a global child sex-trafficking ring? - Yes.
Session 24 January 2026

(L) Okay, Beau asks:

(Beau) Internet theories claim some celebrity suicides were actually murders to cover up a global sex-trafficking ring. One of those theories holds that 3 celebrities – chef Anthony Bourdain and musicians Chester Bennington and Chris Cornell – were all killed for working together to expose a child sex-trafficking ring within Hollywood. The official story is they all committed suicide the same way: hanging themselves from a doorknob. Did they all die by suicide?

A: No

Q: (Joe) Did any of them die by suicide?

A: No

Q: (Beau) If no, were they killed to cover up a global child sex-trafficking ring?

A: Yes

Q: (Beau) Is there any significance to doorknob-hanging as the supposed cause of death? Former CIA officer Robert David Steele claims the following symbolism: “Hung on doorknobs… means choked for speaking out against the cabal.”

A: Close.

Q: (Beau) Actress Anne Heche allegedly drove her car at an extremely high speed into a house and was killed. She had also worked on a movie about sex trafficking that was rumored to be about Jeffrey Epstein. Did she actually die the way it was reported?

A: No

Q: (L) I'm sure most of you have seen that video where she was supposedly on a stretcher, and then she sat up.

(Joe) What was the deal with that? What was going on there?

A: She wasn't dead!

Q: (L) But they made sure she got dead pretty quick.

(Joe) She was in a body bag, right?

(L) Yeah. Yeah.

(Joe) Those people!

Q: (Beau) Was her car remotely controlled to drive into the house?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So the ambulance that came and got her and all that kind of stuff was a fake...

(L) They were prepared, and ready, and waiting to be called.

(Beau) Why was she taken out?

(L) Well, we already talked about why she was taken out. Because of the child sex trafficking.

Related:
Isaac Kappy was a Hollywood actor who accused numerous other high profile celebrities of child trafficking and pedophilia. - Read about Paul Bennewitz. Same type of treatment. And used often in varied contexts.
Session 23 September 2023

Q: (Keyhole) Isaac Kappy was a Hollywood actor who accused numerous other high profile celebrities of child trafficking and pedophilia.

(L) So what's the question? I don't see a question there. It's a statement.

(Keyhole) The question should be further down on the chat. Basically, Isaac Kappy was, as I said, a fairly low profile Hollywood actor, but he came out during 2019/2020, basically saying that there was these elite trafficking rings and he was naming all these kinds of high profile celebrities who were involved, and he built quite a following. And then he was live streaming one day, and he was a little bit, kind of confused and seemingly off character, but he said that he wasn't suicidal. And then that night, or the next day he was found... He jumped off a bridge and apparently committed suicide, and lots of people suspect that maybe he was murdered. So the question is was it suicide or was there some kind of foul play?

A: Read about Paul Bennewitz. Same type of treatment. And used often in varied contexts.

Q: (L) He got the Bennewitz treatment. Yeah...

(Joe) Do you know who Paul Bennewitz is? Who's that?

(L) He was a scientist, I think, and he was convinced about UFOs or something, and... I can't remember all the details, but they used all kinds of things, all kinds of tech to drive him crazy and to mess with his head, and to do all kinds of things, and I think it drove him to kill himself. I'm not sure entirely. You'd have to read up on it, but look him up and read about Paul Bennewitz.

(Joe) Does that suggest that the guy that Keyhole was talking about was accurate in his claims about Hollywood?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Yeah, they got rid of him, because Bennewitz was sure telling the truth.

Below is one article that explains what happens to Bennewitz. He was harassed so much that he ended up in psychiatric care.
The Man Who Knew Too Much: The Unthinkable True Story of How the US Government Conspired to Destroy a UFOlogist Who Knew Too Much
by Cybertheticproject Dec 6, 2022

By the late 80’s Doty and Moore claim that they had ceased the psychological campaign against Paul but by this time it was too late. Paul was certain that he had uncovered a huge conspiracy he could not have predicted the reaction that followed his revelations. Instead of being applauded for his work, Bennewitz was labeled a lunatic and a security risk, and he was isolated from the government’s inner circle.

Bennewitz soon found himself in an unwinnable situation, as the U.S. government sought to suppress his findings and discredit him as a person. Soon he began to lose his grip on reality. He became paranoid and delusional, speaking incoherently at times. While Paul was aware that the government was in some way responsible for the things that he was experiencing he was mentally unable to assimilate what was happening to him. He kept guns and knives all around his house and installed extra locks on his doors. “They” (meaning the aliens) were supposed to be coming through the walls at night and injecting him with hideous chemicals that kept him unconscious for hours. Insomnia began to increase for him. His health and appearance deteriorated, he lost significant weight and his hands shook. Finally, Paul became convinced his own wife was an alien spy, which led to him being put into psychiatric care.

Richard Dolan explains his take on the story in the segment:

Dated June 9, 2025 - Richard Dolan on Danny Jones [3:06:37]

OUTLINE
00:00 - The "Nazi UFO" Researcher
08:36 - What happened at Roswell?
16:10 - The worldwide UFO coverup
17:14 - Astronaut Edgar Mitchell
20:23 - What happened to Paul Bennewitz
[...]

Another case? The Daily Mail reported:

The mysterious disappearance of a Mexican 'supermodel' Gabriela Rico Jiménez who emerged screaming from glitzy hotel claiming the elite were 'eating humans' ... and then vanished
By ALEX HAMMER, US MEDIA CORRESPONDENT
Published: 15:39 GMT, 1 June 2024 | Updated: 16:59 GMT, 1 June 20

That was 20 months ago: Here is a screenshot of the continuation, though the video was not part of the story, but just the daily news...

woman accused them of living in a subterranean base and stealing children and eating human flesh.

She was swiftly cuffed by cops, never to be seen by members of the public again.

A day later, a summary with possible endings:

Disappeared Without a Trace: The Strange Case of Gabriela Rico Jiménez
publish time 02/06/2024 Arab Times
[...]

1. Elite Conspiracy Theories: Many believe that Jiménez's accusations had some truth and that she was silenced by powerful figures to prevent further exposure. This theory is bolstered by the secrecy and lack of information following her outburst.
2. Mental Health Explanations: Some speculate that Jiménez might have been suffering from a mental health crisis, leading to her erratic behavior. It is possible that she was taken to a psychiatric facility, which would explain the lack of information about her subsequent whereabouts.
3. Witness Protection or Relocation: Another theory is that authorities placed her in a protection program or relocated her to ensure her safety, especially if her claims had any substance.

The British daily, The Mirror, carried the story too:

Mystery disappearance of model, 21, who vanished after screaming about cannibal elite
The story of Mexican supermodel Gabriela Rico Jiménez who disappeared 15 years ago after ranting about how the elite ate humans has resurfaced after being discussed on a podcast

Sean McPolin 17:34 ET, 01 Jun 2024 Updated 18:32 ET, 01 Jun 2024

The podcast might have been this:
The Mysterious Disappearance of Mexican Supermodel Gabriela Rico Jiménez: Mexico Unexplained, Ep 299

 

[liffy]

BTW, every modern contraption (amplifiers, TVs, PC, Tablets, etc.) that work with Bluetooth, WiFi or Streaming, need to apply a DAC (Digital Audio Converter) in order to translate “music” from the electronic or digital-stage (also known as “Discrete-time domain”) to audio signals in the frequency range of 20~22,000 Hz, which corresponds to the lower and upper limits of human hearing.

Unless you actually only listen to vinyl and cassette tapes that were recorded onto multitrack tape via an analogue mixing desk, there is no way to avoid one or multiple stages of digitization. CDs are digital as well, and all modern recordings have some digital elements used in the production process, even if it is a symphony orchestra recorded in a concert hall. Removing all aspects of digital technology regarding sound will be hard, but aiming for more acoustic music, vocal music, and music that uses electric (not electronic) amplification of for example strings, that resonate in physical space before they enter the digital domain is an easier guideline. Singing and playing acoustic instruments is of course also a good thing.

 

[Chu]

Yesterday I was listening to this episode from 3 days ago by Candace, and couldn't help but think that unbeknownst to her, what she was describing was exactly this:

Q: (Beau) Is Erica Kirk an intelligence asset for the CIA-US military?

A: Unbeknownst to her.

Q: (Beau) Was her marriage to Charlie Kirk part of her assignment?

A: It became so.

Q: (Beau) Was Erica Kirk Greenbaumed?

A: Something like that.

Q: (Beau) Was Erica Kirk involved in trafficking children in Romania?

A: Not aware.

What Candace sees as contradictions in Erika's behavior, things that to a normal person grieving would be impossible to forget, etc... well, it could be explained at least in part by a mind program...