As many of you I'm completely caught up in the momentum this last session has seemed to create and find myself contemplating 4D a lot lately. I'm also reading the other threads that are hypothesizing what 4th density is all about and much to my dismay it just seems to create more questions than conclusively answering any. But I guess that's our lot in this pre-transition time, to just bounce these ideas back and forth between each other and in that way try to refine our understanding and hope we're not caught with our pants down when the 4D bleedthroughs start becoming increasingly commonplace.
What do you guys think about the concept of sub-densities as described by Ra? Could this possibly explain why the conjectured differences between 3D and 4D aren’t so different, simply because we are gradually climbing upwards through the “sub-densities”, until we “reach the next octave” AKA 4D in its totality? (Whatever that even means.) Do you think this could be, more or less, where we are currently at/going?
Maybe it could also be the case that the higher up on the 3rd octave we are, the more we will start to be able to perceive the 4th. If I'm only on, let's say, the first 2 or 3 sub-densities of 3D, then I won't really be aware at all of 4th, but as I progress and learn to "play more notes" (learning the lessons) within the 3rd octave, reaching the higher sub-densities, maybe 4D will become faintly 'visible', until one day, as if by accident, while "playing the last note" within 3D, I hit the first C-note of 4D which instantly resonates harmonically with the C-note of 3D and my understanding of physicality and linearity morphs and expands in a kind of drawn out aha-moment.
What happens after this hypothetical scenario is anyone's guess. Maybe I would phase back into only-3D existence again, this initial experience remaining as a sort of vivid memory, such as one of those dreams we sometimes have that stays in our minds for days or weeks after. Then perhaps after more time and continued effort to stay the STO-course, another day will come when the soul completely phases into permanent 4D experience (whatever THAT may be).
The idea of G's Law of Seven came to mind as well; that at certain intervals where growth is possible, there has to be a shock or a particular effort made in order to steer the octave towards expansion. So maybe then the sub-densities could correlate to this idea. When we are on the first sub-density of 3D, we will face situations that prompt us to grow. If we don't use free will to choose the path of expansion, our experience will loop back on itself within that sub-density, thus repeating the cycle until we choose to learn the lesson.
This idea then scales down into smaller and smaller micro-sub-densities, where experiences get compounded over time. So we have a choice in how quickly we grow. Maybe one sub-density can play out over a number of years in a persons life, but because of the fractal nature of reality, even one day holds within it the whole pattern, if one has eyes to see and discern it (and possibly act on it).
Just to riff a bit more off of this idea; maybe the sub-densities could correspond to certain chakras as well. So let's say then the first sub-density correlates to the root chakra or moving/instinctive center (if I'm remembering the correspondences correctly) which correlates to material reality, base needs, security, the reptilian brain etc. So, for instance, if someone has a particular trauma that affects their sense of safety/security, a part of them would keep revolving in the first sub-density of 3D, never being able to even start conceptualizing non-material aspects of reality until that trauma is healed (lesson is learned).
Contrarily, many on this forum would then be on the last sub-density of 3D which would correlate to the crown chakra, thus learning lessons that have to do with higher consciousness, metaphysical concepts and our connection to the divine.
Furthermore, maybe the case is that, just as we say 3D minds would do good to not dabble in 4D (astral projection, psychedelics, magick etc.), the same could presumably be said to some extent of the sub-densities. Maybe this is why concepts such as strategic enclosure are given much weight on this forum. If someone is stuck in the first sub-density of 3D, looping around some very dense trauma, time and again, living a life almost indistinguishable from animal life, what good could it possibly bring them to try to share ideas that are 5 or 6 sub-density-classifications over their level of understanding?