Trump era: Fascist dawn, or road to liberation?

NOW ALSO THE PORNOGRAPHY IS AN IMPORTANT MATTER FOR MIGRATORY POLICIES

Republicans claim to charge for watching pornography and pay the wall
Arizona plans to implement quotas on adult pornography sites on the Internet and thus obtain resources for the construction of the border wall with Mexico.

The truth
January 24, 2019 · 10:37 hs
The desperation of Donald Trump to get financing to pay the border wall with Mexico has striped the laughable and is that now, Republican lawmakers in Arizona had a new occurrence to obtain funds that can pay the wall, now raised an initiative with the that seek to charge fees to those who enter pornographic content sites online.

Republicans want to charge to see pornography and pay the wall.
The aforementioned, they affirmed what they intend to do with a firm intention to help reopen the government of the United States, which has been closed for more than a month.

According to Arizona's HB2444 bill, it states that the state government may insert a blockage into pornographic sites which could be released with advance payment or subscription.

It is worth mentioning that said proposal does not indicate a specific quota, there are legislators who speak of at least 20 dollars of income.


Donald J. Trump
?
@realDonaldTrump
Without a Wall there can be no safety and security at the Border or for the U.S.A. BUILD THE WALL AND CRIME WILL FALL!
6:37 - Jan 24 2019

However, the ruling acknowledged that Internet portals that promote pornography have "obscene and criminal content", so that state authorities have the right to intervene in these sites and control them as well.

The worldwide pornography industry generates about 100 billion dollars a year.
So far there are six other states with initiatives of laws very similar to those intended in Arizona, such as Alabama, South Carolina, Kentucky, Virginia, Rhode Island and Utah. Data reveals that the global pornography industry generates about 100 billion dollars a year. "
(Google Translation).
 
George Webb on the Deep State webb. Coast Coast Guard and rouge element's.

Day 111.2 Nancy Pelosi Tells Imran Awan To "Get In Here" For Good Reason - Pak Ordinance Factory
Published on Jan 23, 2019

Madam Speaker: A Behind-the-Scenes Look at the U.S. Speaker of the House (January 14–18, 2019)

Master Chief Petty Officer of the Coast Guard Jason M. Vanderhaden and Commandant of the Coast Guard Admiral Karl L. Schultz with Speaker Pelosi after their meeting on the negative effects the #TrumpShutdown has had on our men and women in uniform. January 15, 2019 (Photo by Julio Obscura)


Trump cancels Pelosi trip to Belgium, Afghanistan and Egypt | Reuters

Trump pens letter to Pelosi: I'm canceling your trip
https://edition.cnn.com/videos/poli...ter-to-pelosi-canceling-trip-shutdown-vpx.cnn

Related Five Minute Read.
Amazon HQ2 incentive bill with $550M in workforce grants sails through Virginia Senate
https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2019/01/23/amazon-hq2-incentive-bill-with-550m-in-workforce.html?ana=TRUEANTHEMTWT_FR&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5c498cb304d30128c952120c&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
Virginia’s proposed Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) incentive package sailed through the state Senate on Monday, not unanimously, but still with relative ease.

The Major Headquarters Workforce Grant Fund was adopted by a 35-5 vote. Of the five “no” votes, only Richard Black, R-Leesburg, represents a Northern Virginia district.

The bill, which now shifts to the House of Delegates, would provide Amazon with $550 million in workforce grants in return for creating 25,000 jobs at its second headquarters, planned for Pentagon City and Crystal City in Arlington County. Amazon, which is expected to invest $2.5 billion in HQ2, would be eligible for another $200 million if it creates 12,850 full-time jobs over-and-above its promised 25,000.
The grants are tied to performance — Amazon won't get anything if it doesn't produce.

"For every dollar invested by the state, the state will recoup $6," Sen. Adam Ebbin, D-Alexandria, said on the senate floor. Ebbin also extolled the Virginia Tech innovation campus planned for Alexandria, and the commitment to provide millions for various affordable housing funds.

Ryan McDougle, R-Hanover, was among the opposition, noting that many residents in his Northern Neck district don't even have access to the internet to become Amazon Prime members.

"As we're spending this money, which is a tremendous amount, to bring jobs, this kind of investment could have tremendous impact on individuals who currently live in the commonwealth of Virginia — can have impact on their ability to start new businesses, to expand businesses, to be educated, to have that kind of opportunity," McDougle said.

Said Black: "I think we are spending money that we don't have to spend. It's not money that's going to make the company come. The company's coming."

fe0be4d1db80ffaeab5a036aa2525d45.png
 
I'm just curious but I haven't notice Trump wearing "his signature red tie" or variations of solid red, in the last few days? Sometimes, he proudly displays it - like a badge of Honor". He doesn't look like he's getting much sleep lately, either? The Press and Media are really doing a number on him and calling him "weak", since he called off the shutdown.
616f77c7f63207dcd96fad1d0fbded14

President Trump Says Grocery Stores Will Work with Shutdown Employees

Fri, Jan 25, 2019 - Trump's Advice to Unpaid Workers Who Have Bills and Need Food: See If You Can Work Something Out
Trump's Advice to Unpaid Workers Who Have Bills and Need Food: See If You Can Work Something Out

President Donald Trump on Thursday defended comments made by his Commerce secretary, the multimillionaire Wilbur Ross, who told CNBC he didn’t “really quite understand why” some federal workers unpaid in the government shutdown had turned to homeless shelters for food.

Speaking with reporters later Thursday, Trump said that Ross “perhaps … should have said it differently,” but that he understood the point Ross was making: That the approximately 800,000 federal workers who are not being paid in the shutdown should be able to rely on their close local ties with community businesses to essentially work out other ways to still be able to get food and pay their bills.

On CNBC, Ross had said the unpaid or furloughed workers “will eventually” get their pay, referring to a bill signed by the president last week. (Workers in previous shutdowns have received back pay when the shutdowns ended.) And because of the guarantee of these future paychecks, Ross said he believed that banks and other lenders should be “making credit available” to the unpaid workers who need money in the interim.


US President Donald Trump will emerge from the longest government shutdown in US history politically weakened, his reputation questioned and his signature campaign promise still glaringly unfulfilled, according to AP Analysis.

Sun Jan 27, 2019 - Analysis: Trump's Shutdown Retreat Reveals Weakness
Farsnews
13970702000230_PhotoI.jpg


The 35-day partial shutdown over the president's demand for billions of dollars to build a wall along the US-Mexico border was, in the end, futile.

Facing defections within his own party, sagging poll numbers and public criticism for interrupted services, the self-proclaimed master dealmaker accepted an agreement that he had previously spurned and set an ignominious record that will remain part of his legacy.

Days after Trump marked the midpoint of his term, the shutdown highlighted the disquieting side effects of his unconventional governing style and the trials that lie ahead for him in dealing with emboldened Democrats.


(Just a note: This next article is an analysis report compiled by the New York Times that's heavily funded by Soros.)

US President Donald Trump and at least 17 of his campaign officials and advisers had contacts with Russian nationals and WikiLeaks or their intermediaries before his inauguration, according to an analysis published by The New York Times on Saturday.

Sun Jan 27, 2019 - Report: Trump, Associates Had over 100 Contacts with Russians Before Taking Office
Farsnews
13970901000234_PhotoI.jpg


Then-candidate Trump had at least six contacts before the Republican National Convention in July 2016, according to the analysis, while one contact included signing a letter of intent to develop Trump Tower in Moscow, The NYT reported.

Aras Agalarov, a Russian billionaire who hosted a Miss Universe pageant in Moscow with Trump, reached out to Trump several times before the Republican National Convention. Agalarov's son, Emin Agalarov, reportedly also contacted Trump on multiple occasions.

Aras Agalarov sent a letter to Trump shortly after the primaries began expressing “great interest” in his campaign, the daily noted.

Trump, according to the analysis, began denying his interactions with Russian nationals shortly after accepting the Republican presidential nomination.

The New York Times analysis was conducted by compiling the newspaper’s reporting, documents submitted to Congress and court records related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia's election interference and potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow.
 
As many are aware, the United States (Trump administration) are in the process of breaking away from the INF Nuclear Treaty. It's a very important Document that safe-guards a Nuclear confrontation between the Superpowers. Think of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bombings on steroids - to the MAX! Russia is doing everything in their Diplomatic tool box to salvage the INF accord.

Although the Pentagon, NATO and much of the Trump administration are behind the fall out, I suspect the main ring leader is Israel?

Skimming through the news sites this morning, noticed a report from Sergey Lavrov on the new US production of small-capacity nuclear weapons, the W76-2. This is the first - I have come across this info, so don't know all the specs on it yet or how it's delivered (Missile, bomb or torpedo)? But then, something else came into my mind and I find the "timing" interesting. I'm referring to reports that Israel may have used kamikaze-drones in a recent attack on Syria. After you read the description (below) of what a kamikaze drone can do and that it can loiter over the battlefield for six hours, you might understand my concern? According to US experts, the new warhead has a yield of 5-6 kilotonnes, in contrast to the 100-kilotonne warhead W76-1, created back in the 1970s.

Then picture - instead of detonating a seventy-pound explosive on impact - it's a small nuclear warhead, the W76-2? And who has undocumented supplies of Nuclear Warheads and refuses to sign any Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty? "Israel!"

Isn't it also, or maybe just coincidental that the first Senate bill of 2019 would finalize a $38 billion aid package to Israel, that would give Israel $33 billion over the next ten years in addition to the $5.5 billion enacted in last year’s defense spending bill. This is reportedly the largest military aid package in U.S. history. (OH, BTW - what was the Title of that Bill - floating around the Senate floor - about allocating money for the Security Border Wall .... that caused a semi-Government-shut down .. and all that hoopla?
Doesn't America come FIRST ... or ... that only works when we're in "other" countries??? (Slam-dunk!:rolleyes::whistle: )

Jan. 16, 2019 - Russia to continue efforts to salvage INF accord, vows Lavrov
Russia to continue efforts to salvage INF accord, vows Lavrov


Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused the US of bringing a nuclear conflict closer after the Donald Trump administration ordered the production of a new nuclear warhead, the W76-2.

Wed Jan 30, 2019 - Russian FM: US Production of New Nuke Warhead Increases Risk of Nuclear War
Farsnews
Production of W76-2 warhead in US increases risk of nuclear conflict, warns Lavrov
1213428.jpg

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov © Sergei Bobylev/TASS

The country’s top diplomat reminded journalists that Moscow voiced its concern last year that the production of small-capacity nuclear weapons “lowers the threshold of nuclear weapons use and, of course, boosts the risk of a nuclear conflict”,
RT reported.

“Apparently, these plans were put into practice,” Lavrov said, adding, “Certainly, it won’t contribute to global security.”

Russia will now await Europe’s reaction to the US move to begin production of the new weapon.

The warhead, known as the W76-2, is being produced at the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Pantex Plant in the Texas Panhandle, according to the National Nuclear Security Agency. The US Navy is expected to receive the first batch of new warheads in September.


2019-01-26 - Israel uses kamikaze-drone to counter Syria’s new air defenses: report
https://www.almasdarnews.com/articl...ne-to-counter-syrias-new-air-defenses-report/

According to the author Sebastien Roblin, the new Israeli Air Force attack on the Damascus countryside, last Sunday revealed Syria’s improved air defense systems as they were able to intercept some of the enemy missiles.

However, despite the improvements on the Syrian side, it appears Israel has found a way to counter these Russian weapons in the form of kamikaze-drones.

“In fact, the recent raids may reveal improvements to Syria’s air defense forces due to ongoing Russian training and weapons transfers. However, they also reveal Israel’s continuing ability to defeat, including through likely use of kamikaze-drones.”

Citing a military commentator, Roblin suggests that Israel likely used kamikaze-drones to overwhelm the Syrian military’s Pantsir systems.

According to Alftayeh, the anti-SAM weapon was likely an Israeli-built Harop (Harpy 2) kamikaze drone, which can either be remotely piloted, or set to automatically home in on radar emissions, detonating a seventy-pound explosive on impact. The Harop has a maximum speed of 115 miles per hour, and can loiter over the battlefield for six hours.


The first Senate bill of 2019 would finalize a $38 billion aid package to Israel, combat BDS, and rebut Trump’s attempt to withdraw troops from Syria….

January 29, 2019 - First Senate Bill of 2019 Would Give Israel Billions of Dollars, Combat BDS
First Senate Bill of 2019 Would Give Israel Billions of Dollars, Combat BDS - Global Research

According to Marco Rubio, the first bill the 2019 U.S. Senate will take up is one that is focused on Israel. His twitter announcement shows a number of people suggesting that he should instead focus on getting the U.S. government running.

The four-part bill, designated S.1, is composed of measures on behalf of Israel that Congress tried and failed to pass in 2018. Some were pioneered by AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

The first component is the “Ileana Ros-Lehtinen United States-Israel Security Assistance Authorization Act of 2019” – the 2018 text can be seen here. This would give Israel $33 billion over the next ten years in addition to the $5.5 billion enacted in last year’s defense spending bill. This is reportedly the largest military aid package in U.S. history. The bill was held up by Senator Rand Paul, who threatened a filibuster against it. Most Americans feel the U.S. already gives Israel too much money.

Unlike the memorandum of understanding (MOU) that the Obama administration negotiated with Israel in 2016, this would make the $38 billion a floor rather than a ceiling and cements it into law (an MOU is non-binding). It also provides Israel additional perks, including calling for NASA to work with Israel’s space agency, despite Israel’s alleged acquisition of classified U.S. research.


73rd Anniversary of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bombings
Hiroshima commemorates the 73rd anniversary of the atomic bomb (9 Photos)
Latest World & National News & Headlines - USATODAY.com


Mayor of Hiroshima Kazumi Matsui and Mayor of Nagasaki Tomihisa Taue have called on Moscow and Washington to prevent the termination of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.

Wed. Jan. 30, 2019 - Mayors of Hiroshima, Nagasaki urge Russia and US to prevent INF Treaty collapse
Mayors of Hiroshima, Nagasaki urge Russia and US to prevent INF Treaty collapse

We are deeply concerned the demise of the treaty without alternative measures will increase the risk of the use of nuclear weapons," they stressed in their joint letter to the Russian and US leaders.

The mayors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki also called for developing specific proposals to achieve nuclear disarmament.

They also hoped that the United States and Russia would play a leading role in efforts aimed at preventing a repeat of the tragedies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The INF Treaty was signed on December 8, 1987, and took effect on June 1, 1988. It outlawed deployed and non-deployed intermediate range (1,000-5,000 kilometers) and shorter range (500-1,000 kilometers) ground-based missiles.

In recent years, Washington has repeatedly alleged Russia was in breach of the agreement. Moscow emphatically dismissed these accusations and countered them with its own claims over the United States’ non-compliance. Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier said Moscow was opposed to scrapping the INF Treaty but would have to respond accordingly, if Washington withdrew from it.

* Nagasaki mayor urges Obama to visit Japanese cities subject to US atomic bombings in 1945
"I am calling on U.S. President and the leaders of other countries to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki to see personally what happened there 70 years ago," Taue said on Sunday as he read out the Declaration of Peace at a remembrance ceremony for the victims of the U.S. atomic bombing of Nagasaki in 1945. "It is necessary to exert every effort to free the world from nuclear weapons," the mayor of Nagasaki said addressing the world leaders. "We have the strength to safeguard peace without nuclear weapons and war," he added.

* US tries to hush up tragedies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki — senior Russian lawmaker
The United States is trying to hush up the tragedies of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which is impossible, Russian State Duma Speaker Sergey Naryshkin said on Thursday. "I have no doubt that the barbarity and over proportion of what was done is obvious to the US authorities. But instead of right comprehension of history, they want to bury it in oblivion," Naryshkin told a round table meeting on Thursday.

* Russia to publish report from Soviet embassy in Tokyo received after 1945 A-bombings
Russia to publish report from Soviet embassy in Tokyo received after 1945 A-bombings
Russian State Duma Speaker Sergey Naryshkin has issued instructions to publish on the web-site of the Russian Historical Society the unique report Moscow received from the Soviet embassy in Tokyo immediately after the atom bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. "Public interest in this theme is very great. I would suggest making this document available on the website of the Russian Historical Society in the near future, possibly, today," Naryshkin said at a round-table discussion at the Moscow state institute of international relations MGIMO, timed for the 70th anniversary of the 1945 tragedies.

"Neither the whole document nor any part of it has ever been published. In our opinion it deserves to be released on the eve of the date," the diplomat said while handing over a copy of the document to Naryshkin, the head of the Russian Historical Society. The Russian diplomat described the report’s contents as the "first eye-witness account of the horrors of bombardments and of what was rightly termed as a crime against humanity. The document points out the effects of the bombings would be felt 70 years after," Ilyshev-Vvedensky said. "The present day merely confirms the conclusions made in that report," he concluded.

~~~
Now the controversial part - "Fact or Friction"?


UFO disarmed nuclear missiles
Sep 09, 2010 · Larry King interview's a nuke missile operator who experienced shutting down of 20 nuke minuteman missiles in 1967. The weapons were disabled by the Galactic Federation.
Published on Sep 9, 2010 (1:37 min.)


DISCLOSURE: UFOs Shut Down Nuclear Missiles, Disclosure Project
Published on Jun 1, 2017 (18:07)

Disclosure Project - Capt. Robert Salas speaks & presents

March 1967 Robert Sallas was stationed at Malmstrom AFB in Montana as a missile launch officer for the minuteman 1 ICBM. Sallas and his commanding officer Frederick Mywald at the Oscar Launch Control Center had operational control over 10 minuteman nuclear missiles.

Each of the 10 missiles operated independently and had its own power and backup power. The command and control of these missiles was entirely located within the command capsule and there was no means outside of the capsule to affect the missiles.

On March 24th 1967 Sallas received a phone call from a security officer about unidentified lighted objects flying above the facility making very strange maneuvers. Salas took little interest in the first phone call. Later, the security officer called in to the capsule a second time to report that a 30-40ft diameter large oval pulsating red object was hovering above the front gate of the facility.

Salas began to inform his commander but was interrupted by the missiles shutting down. Alert status on the missiles was lost for all ten missiles while the object was above the facility. The error reporting software indicated there was a guidance and control problem. There were also indicator lights on for security violations at two of the launch facilities where the missiles were physically located

The security alert team was sent to those launch facilities to investigate. The team reported that the object was hovering above the two affected sites. When they approached the object the team's communication gear malfunctioned and they lost radio contact.

After speaking to the wing command post Lt. Mywald informed Salas that a similar incident had occurred a week earlier at Echo flight.

The first audio from Colonel Walter Figel who was the deputy missile crew commander at Echo Flight describes an incident in which a UFO is hovering above the facility before the nuclear missiles were disabled.

In the second audio Mywald and Salas are talking about the security team that went to investigate the silos that had a security breach indicator. The two men returned terrified by their encounter and had to be relieved of duty never to return to guard assignments.

A more detailed investigation of these two incidents revealed that the missiles all had logic coupler failures which triggered the guidance and control error indication. Robert Kaminsky who led the investigation at Echo flight stated that the event was virtually impossible.
 
Wed Jan 30, 2019 - Russian FM: US Production of New Nuke Warhead Increases Risk of Nuclear War
Farsnews
Production of W76-2 warhead in US increases risk of nuclear conflict, warns Lavrov

The warhead, known as the W76-2, is being produced at the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Pantex Plant in the Texas Panhandle, according to the National Nuclear Security Agency. The US Navy is expected to receive the first batch of new warheads in September.

The Government's Pantex Plant in Texas came up in another report this morning, in regards to this under-handed manuver by the US Dept. of Energy: "The U.S. Department of Energy revealed on Wednesday that it secretly shipped weapons-grade plutonium from South Carolina to a nuclear security site in Nevada months ago despite the state's protests." My guess, the shipment never made it to Reno, Nevada but was shipped directly to the Pantex Plant in Texas? Funny ... how things work that way ... being that the US Dept. of Energy is a "regulatory" commission for the over-sight of hazard materials? Sometimes, it's really hard deciphering the small print in a Document, especially when it's the size of a phone book - (you know, government regulations and all that).

Jan. 31, 2019 - US secretly shipped plutonium from South Carolina to Nevada
US secretly shipped plutonium from South Carolina to Nevada
a7a186697ab2468cb39679f065af6ce9_original.jpg

FILE - In this Sept. 29, 1994 file photo, a CSX Train with spent nuclear fuel passes through Florence, S.C., on its way to Savannah River Site Weapons Complex near Aiken S.C. Nevada and South Carolina are jostling for a home-field advantage of sorts in a federal court battle that could result in a metric ton of weapons-grade plutonium being stored 70 miles from Las Vegas. (Jeff Chatlosh/The Morning News via AP, File)

The Justice Department notified a federal judge in Reno that the government trucked in the radioactive material to store at the site 70 miles (113 kilometers) north of Las Vegas before Nevada first asked a court to block the move in November.

Department lawyers said in a nine-page filing that the previously classified information about the shipment from South Carolina can be disclosed now because enough time has passed to protect national security. They didn't specify when the one-half metric ton of plutonium was transferred.

Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak said he's "beyond outraged by this completely unacceptable deception." He announced at a hastily called news conference in Carson City late Wednesday the state is now seeking another court order to block any more shipments of plutonium as it pursues "any and all legal remedies," including contempt of court orders against the federal government.

The newly elected Democrat said he's exploring options for the plutonium that already has arrived and is working with Nevada's congressional delegation to fight back against the U.S. government's "reckless disregard" for the safety of Nevadans.

Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen called the government's move "deceitful and unethical." Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, also a Nevada Democrat, said she would demand department officials come to her office on Thursday to explain how they made the "reckless decision" in such "bad faith."

Democratic Rep. Dina Titus said the Trump administration has repeatedly tried to use Nevada as a dumping ground for nuclear waste. Trump revived a decades-old proposal to store the nation's nuclear waste at another site outside Las Vegas, Yucca Mountain, after the project was essentially halted under the Obama administration.

Justice Department lawyers said in new court filings Wednesday that no more shipments of weapons-grade plutonium are planned from South Carolina to Nevada. They said they believe Nevada's lawsuit aimed at blocking the shipments is now moot.

But lawyers for Nevada said late Wednesday that their bid for an emergency injunction is more critical than ever after the Energy Department misled them about the shipments. They say the government has created the "palpable suspicion" that more shipments are coming to Nevada.

Sisolak described the months-long negotiations with Energy Department officials over the plutonium leading up to the new disclosure as a "total sham."

"They lied to the state of Nevada, misled a federal court, and jeopardized the safety of Nevada's families and environment," he said.

U.S. District Judge Miranda Du in Reno already is considering the state's earlier request to block the Energy Department's plans — announced in August — to ship a full metric ton of plutonium to Nevada from South Carolina, where a federal judge previously ordered that the plutonium be removed from a Savannah River site by 2020.

Nevada argues the department has failed to adequately study the potential dangers of moving the material that still has the potential to be used to help develop nuclear weapons to an area that is subject to flash floods and earthquakes, and that the state's lands and groundwater may already be contaminated with radioactive materials.

In January, Du declined to immediately block the plutonium and indicated she wouldn't rule until February. "I hope the government doesn't ship plutonium pending a ruling by this court," she said at the time.

Nevada and the Justice Department filed their latest briefs Wednesday at the request of the judge, who questioned whether the case should go forward. Justice Department lawyers said any additional plutonium removed from South Carolina would not go to Nevada.

Meanwhile, the states of Nevada and South Carolina are continuing to argue over where any legal challenge should be heard. Each said in briefs filed in Reno last week that theirs is the proper venue.

Nevada's experts testified that the material likely would have to pass directly through Las Vegas on the way to the Nevada National Security Site. They fear an accident could permanently harm an area that is home to 2.2 million residents and hosts more than 40 million tourists a year.

The Energy Department's plan approved last August called for the full ton of material to be stored at the Nevada nuclear security site and the government's Pantex Plant in Texas, two facilities that already handle and process plutonium. The department says it would be sent by 2027 to the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico or another unnamed facility.

(Nevada - I think, you're spinning your wheels in Court - without first getting confirmation the Plutonium made it to Reno?)


Back in Washington, special counsel Robert Mueller is "inventing way's" of holding onto "job security".......

Jan. 31, 2019 - Mueller says Russians are altering evidence from special counsel's investigation to discredit the probe
Mueller says Russians are altering evidence from special counsel’s investigation to discredit the probe

Russians have obtained evidence from special counsel Robert Mueller’s inquiry into Moscow’s interference in US politics and altered it in a bid to discredit the probe, federal prosecutors have claimed.

The files were shared with attorneys working for Concord Management and Consulting, a Russian company that allegedly funded hacking operations by Russia’s Internet Research Agency (IRA), they said in a court filing.

The sharing evidence and documents between prosecutors and defence lawyer as part of routine discovery is common legal practice.

But the files shared by Mr Mueller's investigation were later uploaded and disseminated on Twitter in October.

However, the files shared online, "appear to have been altered and disseminated as part of a disinformation campaign aimed (apparently) at discrediting ongoing investigations into Russian interference in the US political system,” the court filing states.

A team had reviewed files to determine that roughly 1,000 files linked to by that account out of 300,000 available matched non-public evidence provided.

“The fact that the file folder names and folder structure on the webpage significantly match the non-public names and file structure of the materials produced in discovery, and the fact that over 1,000 files on the webpage match those produced in discovery, establish that the person(s) who created the webpage had access to at least some of the non-sensitive discovery produced by the government in this case,“ the filing states.

Concord Management was among 13 Russian entities or people to be charged in connection with Mr Mueller's investigation last February.

Mr Mueller’s team has charged dozens of Russian individuals or entities for attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, primarily through hacking Democratic Party email systems.

The most recent filing argued that attorneys for Concord should not be given access to “sensitive” evidence gathered for the case.

It said: “The person who created the webpage used their knowledge of the non-sensitive discovery to make it appear as though the irrelevant files contained on the webpage were the sum total evidence of ‘IRA and Russian collusion’ gathered by law enforcement in this matter in an apparent effort to discredit the investigation."
 
The warhead, known as the W76-2, is being produced at the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Pantex Plant in the Texas Panhandle, according to the National Nuclear Security Agency. The US Navy is expected to receive the first batch of new warheads in September.

What I don't innerstand is why countries are even still investing/producing nuclear weapons when we all know the the type of planetary damage it does. I mean dropping bombs on innocent populations due to political differences based on the politics of the day? How many countries have millions of tons of nuclear waste that has no way to safely dispose of or store? Are we forgetting Fukushima?
 
What I don't innerstand is why countries are even still investing/producing nuclear weapons when we all know the the type of planetary damage it does. I mean dropping bombs on innocent populations due to political differences based on the politics of the day? How many countries have millions of tons of nuclear waste that has no way to safely dispose of or store? Are we forgetting Fukushima?

I think you kind have much of the answer when you posted here.

"corporation country"

All the power, control and greed is destroying humanity it seems. Maybe it is more accurate to say "corporation country".
 
While trying to educate myself on Politics (in general), I often come across the phase, "Personnel is Policy". I still can't grasp Politics but what was Trump thinking when he appointed John Bolton - he never got out of "the Cold War" mentality! The guy is nothing short "of a loose cannon".

A senior judge at the United Nations’ International Court in The Hague has resigned in protest of “shocking” interference from the Trump administration into a preliminary war-crimes investigation into U.S. troops.

January 31, 2019 - “It Can’t be Fixed:” Senior ICC Judge Slam John Bolton, Quits in Protest of US, Turkish Meddling

“It Can’t be Fixed:” Senior ICC Judge Slam John Bolton, Quits in Protest of US, Turkish Meddling - Global Research

The judge, Christoph Flügge, who hails from Germany, slammed National Security Advisor John Bolton over his response last year to a preliminary investigation into American soldiers accused of torturing people in Afghanistan. That investigation ultimately found “a reasonable basis to believe that war crimes and crimes against humanity” were committed by U.S. forces, MintPress News reported.

“The United States will use any means necessary to protect our citizens and those of our allies from unjust prosecution by this illegitimate court,” Bolton said in September.
He also called for sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) and warned the body against pursuing any investigations into “Israel or other U.S. allies.”

Bolton even cited a Palestinian-led effort to bring Israel to the ICC over its human-rights abuses in Gaza and the West Bank as a reason for closing the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) office in Washington.

He went on to promise to ban ICC “judges and prosecutors from entering the United States,” adding:

We will sanction their funds in the U.S. financial system, and we will prosecute them in the U.S. criminal system. We will not cooperate with the ICC. We will provide no assistance to the ICC. We will not join the ICC. We will let the ICC die on its own. After all, for all intents and purposes, the ICC is already dead to us.”
“John Bolton, the national security adviser to the U.S. president, held a speech last September in which he wished death on the International Criminal Court,” Flügge said after leaving his post.
Flugge continued on Bolton’s declaration:

If these judges ever interfere in the domestic concerns of the U.S. or investigate an American citizen, [Bolton] said the American government would do all it could to ensure that these judges would no longer be allowed to travel to the United States – and that they would perhaps even be criminally prosecuted.”
The American security adviser held his speech at a time when The Hague was planning preliminary investigations into American soldiers who had been accused of torturing people in Afghanistan. The American threats against international judges clearly show the new political climate. It is shocking. I had never heard such a threat.
It is consistent with the new American line: ‘We are No 1 and we stand above the law.’”
A supine UN, a dreadful precedent

The attacks from the White House were one of two reasons for Flügge’s resignation, as the judge was left aghast by the UN’s deferential response to Turkey after Turkey arrested Aydın Sefa Akay, another UN judge, over alleged links to Fethullah Gülen, a cleric living in exile in the U.S. whom Turkish President Recep Erdoğan claims is the mastermind behind the 2016 failed coup attempt in Turkey.

Akay was at the end of his tenure when the charge was leveled by Turkey.

“We, the other judges, immediately protested. But his tenure was nevertheless not extended by the UN secretary general. And with that, he’s gone,” Flügge said.
The assaults by Turkey and the U.S. were both undertaken in the summertime. Afterwards, Flügge
said he realized that the “diplomatic world” did not value the independent judiciary that was the ICC. The lack of a response by the UN to Turkey for its meddling in ICC matters set a dangerous precedent, according to the judge.
“Every incident in which judicial independence is breached is one too many,” Flügge said. “Now there is this case, and everyone can invoke it in the future. Everyone can say: ‘But you let Turkey get its way.’ This is an original sin. It can’t be fixed.”

In an unprecedented attack on one of the most important judicial bodies in the world, National Security Advisor John Bolton on Monday threatened to sanction the International Criminal Court and its staff if the court approves a full investigation into U.S. torture in Afghanistan. The U.S. is not a member of the court, but it has supported the court’s efforts to hold perpetrators of war crimes accountable — as long as those efforts don’t involve U.S. or close allies.

Back-dated September 14, 2018 - Trump Administration Threatens International Criminal Court Judges and Prosecutors for Doing Their Jobs

Trump Administration Threatens International Criminal Court Judges and Prosecutors for Doing Their Jobs - Global Research

In a speech at the Federalist Society, Bolton said of the ICC, “We will ban its judges and prosecutors from entering the United States. We will sanction their funds in the U.S. financial system, and we will prosecute them in the U.S. criminal system.”

While Bolton’s hostility to international bodies in general — and to the ICC in particular — is not new, he is now setting a new policy on behalf of the U.S. government

He also made misleading statements and old, half-baked arguments to support the U.S.’s new approach of treating well-respected judges and prosecutors like it treats international drug traffickers or suspected foreign war criminals.

For example, Bolton suggested that the court could investigate and prosecute “acts of aggression” by the United States, warning that the term could be used to cover many U.S. policies. This is fear-mongering and incorrect. In reality, the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over the crime of aggression by non-members — and even members must specifically agree to it.

The true reason for the policy now is that the Trump administration wants to stop a long-overdue investigation into U.S. torture. The administration’s threats come as former U.S. officials face, for the first time, the possibility of a full criminal investigation by the court for possible war crimes and crimes against humanity in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is an ICC member, which means that the court can prosecute crimes committed there since May 2003 when it joined the court. The impending investigation would also cover CIA torture at secret “black sites” in three European countries that are members: Poland, Romania, and Lithuania.

The ICC prosecutor’s office announced a preliminary examination in 2007 into possible war crimes and crimes against humanity in Afghanistan. In November 2017, the ICC prosecutor announced that she was seeking a full investigation, which can lead to prosecutions. The full investigation is awaiting authorization by the ICC’s “Pre-Trial Chamber.”

A full investigation would cover crimes by all parties involved in the war since 2003, including the Taliban, Afghan forces, and allied forces including the United States. The investigation could cover acts by civilian and military leaders who approved the illegal torture regime.


Obviously, the Trump administration doesn’t want this to happen. Indeed, in talking about the reasons behind Bolton’s remarks, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that the ICC had just informed the administration that a decision on the investigation was imminent.

A Bush-era law prohibits the government from assisting the ICC in extraditing U.S. citizens, and bars military aid to countries that are ICC members (with some exceptions). However, there is no legal basis for the Trump administration’s threat to criminally prosecute ICC judges and prosecutors and hit them with travel and financial sanctions.

The long-term goal of the Trump administration is clearly to attack the ICC’s legitimacy and pressure other countries to cut its funding and boycott it. This misguided and harmful policy will only further isolate the United States from its closest democratic allies — every other member of NATO except Turkey has joined the ICC. Bolton’s words of intimidation also give solace to war criminals and oppressive regimes seeking to evade consequences for their crimes.

The Trump administration’s new policy is a dangerous attack on the rule of law and an affront to survivors of U.S. torture who have been denied justice for the past 15 years — including during the Obama administration, which decided to “look forward not backward” and failed to hold former Bush administration officials accountable for their torture policy.

This week’s attack on the ICC is also the latest salvo in the Trump administration’s campaign to undermine universal human rights and international bodies. Previous offenses include withdrawing from the U.N. Human Rights Council and the U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Trump has also pulled out of the negotiations leading up to the Global Compact on Migration, attacked a U.N. independent human rights expert investigating poverty in the United States, and refused to appear at a hearing before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

The American people and our political representatives in Congress must push back against these dangerous actions. The Trump administration’s move must also be strongly resisted by allies abroad to prevent further damage to institutions that were created to fight impunity and hold rights violators accountable.


U.S. intelligence officials confirmed to the Senate Intelligence Committee, on Tuesday, that Iran was not developing nuclear weapons in violation of the 2015 nuclear agreement, and furthermore had no strategic plans to do so.

January 31, 2019 - Who Is the Real Threat to World Peace: Nuclear Israel with Its 400 WMD or Non- Nuclear Iran?

Who Is the Real Threat to World Peace: Nuclear Israel with Its 400 WMD or Non- Nuclear Iran? - Global Research

This report from the US intelligence community indicate that Israel’s Netanyahu and his American cohort, Donald Trump, have deliberately misinformed the world regarding Iranian nuclear capability. The state of Israel, which is estimated to have in excess of more than 400 undeclared nuclear warheads must be compared to Iran which is not a nuclear weapon state. Who, therefore, is the threat to world peace?

Under the influence of the Israeli Prime Minister and ignoring the emphatic advice from the UN Security Council and the European Union, US President Trump last year pulled out of an international nuclear deal with Iran,
put in place under his Democratic predecessor Barack Obama. Trump then re-imposed sanctions on Tehran causing massive economic and political destabilisation throughout the Middle East in addition to dismay from the European and other signatories to the nuclear deal.

It is crystal clear where the truth lies, and it is certainly not in Tel Aviv nor in the Trump White House. Now is surely the time for Europe to strengthen cooperation with the geographically important state of Iran, both economically and politically, whilst cutting ties and trade with Israel. It is vital that the West recognises who are its future friends and strategic partners.


In February 2018, the US authorities officially accused 13 Russian citizens and three Russian organizations of attempting to meddle in the 2016 presidential race.

Jan. 31, 2019 - ‘Names, dates’: Diplomat tells US to get real over Russian hacker hysteria

‘Names, dates’: Diplomat tells US to get real over Russian hacker hysteria

"Since the focus is on the special counsel’s probe and on high-ranking US officials, who have attracted attention in the United States and around the world, it would be not redundant at all to know who the hackers are and to mention concrete names and dates and provide some more specifics, and not come out with impersonal speculations on that score, which have an unmistakable political flavor."

"The time is ripe for replacing the ‘Russian hackers rhetoric’ with names, dates, etcetera," she said.

In mid-February 2018, the US authorities brought formal charges against 13 Russian citizens and three Russian organizations accusing them of attempting to meddle in the US political processes and the 2016 presidential election campaign. Mueller’s office has produced a 37-page indictment, claiming that in October 2018 an Internet account created by anonymous users published an archive of documents reportedly stolen by hackers from the Mueller office’s database. The data published online was altered and disseminated as part of a disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting ongoing investigations into alleged Russian interference
 
Our President is still looking like he's under a lot of pressure and getting very little sleep. His eyes look bloodshot? The US Senate is giving him a hard time - opposing his plans to withdrawal Troops from Syria and Afghanistan. The Senate have added an Amendment
to the Middle East Security Bill "with a precondition" that Trump "certify conditions" that the groups’ (ISIS or whatever d'jour)
have met “enduring defeat” before any significant withdrawal from Syria or Afghanistan. Simple translation - the Senate wants perpetual War!

WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he wants to hold talks aimed at creating a new arms control treaty, after his administration announced that it may withdraw from a pact with Russia in six months.

Feb. 1, 2019 - Trump says he wants to discuss new Arms Control Treaty

Trump says he wants to discuss new arms control treaty
r
U.S. President Donald Trump listens during a meeting to "discuss fighting human trafficking on the southern border" in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., February 1, 2019. REUTERS/Jim Young

“I hope that we’re able to get everybody in a big and beautiful room and do a new treaty that would be much better. Certainly, I would like to see that,” Trump told reporters at the White House.


In a rebuke of President Donald Trump, the Republican-led U.S. Senate advanced largely symbolic legislation on Thursday opposing plans for any abrupt withdrawal of troops from Syria and Afghanistan.

January 31, 2019 - Senate rebukes Trump, advances measures on Syrian troops

Senate rebukes Trump, advances measure on Syria troops

The Senate voted 68-23 in favor of a non-binding amendment, drafted by Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell saying it was the sense of the Senate that Islamic militant groups in both countries continue to pose a “serious threat” to the United States.

The procedural vote to cut off debate meant that the amendment would be added to a broader Middle East security bill likely to come up for a final Senate vote next week.

The amendment acknowledges progress against Islamic State and al Qaeda in Syria and Afghanistan but warns that “a precipitous withdrawal” without effective efforts to secure gains could destabilize the region and create a vacuum that could be filled by Iran or Russia.

It calls upon the Trump administration to certify conditions have been met for the groups’ “enduring defeat” before any significant withdrawal from Syria or Afghanistan.

Thursday’s Senate action marked the second time in two months that the Republican-led Senate has supported a measure going against Trump’s foreign policy, although legislation to change his policies has yet to become law.

In December, over Trump’s objections, the Senate voted to end U.S. military support for the Saudi-led coalition in the war in Yemen and blame Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

However, the December measure went no further, since it never came up for a vote in the House of Representatives, then led by Trump’s fellow Republicans.

The potential impact of Thursday’s vote was similarly uncertain, since the amendment McConnell offered was non-binding and there has been no indication of when, if ever, the broader Middle East security bill would come up for a House vote.


Donald Trump participated in just one event per day on average throughout January, according to his public schedule, amid mounting accusations he is not working hard enough as president.

Jan. 31, 2019 - Trump accused of ‘not working hard enough’ as schedule reveals he averaged one event a day in January

Trump accused of ‘not working hard enough’ as schedule reveals he averaged one event a day in January

So far this week, Mr Trump’s calendar showed he took part in one intelligence briefing, a lunch with vice-president Mike Pence, and a private Trump campaign fundraiser at his own Washington hotel.

That followed a week in which four days were made up of no more than a single lunch with Mr Pence and another intelligence briefing.

He has also failed to make any form of public appearance since Friday, a stretch in which he has sent more than 45 tweets.

Overall, Mr Trump’s public schedule showed a total of 32 events in the 31 days throughout January – not including his daily intelligence briefings, personal fundraisers or private White House lunches.

That compares with 39 events Mr Trump had on his schedule through January 2018.

A former staffer on Capitol Hill, Joe Cirincione, tweeted on Wednesday: “Has anyone else noticed that Donald Trump has stopped working? For weeks, he’s had little or nothing on his schedule.”

Former US ambassador to Russia Dan Shapiro suggested the president “sitting around watching Fox News and hate-tweeting all day” was better than “doing serious work to advance a terrible agenda”.

The White House noted he did have a call on Wednesday with Juan Guaido, who the US has recognised as the interim president of Venezuela, and the president’s calendar states he is due later on Thursday to sign an executive order and meet with the vice-premier of China.

It comes after Axios reported last year the president was often only beginning his official day by 11am, in order to give him more time to watch TV, make phone calls and send tweets in what White House officials dubbed “executive time”.


WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump will say to a divided U.S. Congress in his State of the Union speech on Tuesday that Republicans and Democrats can "break decades of political stalemate," according to an excerpt released by the White House.

Feb. 1, 2019 - Trump to say in Tuesday speech that parties can 'break decades of political stalemate'

Trump to say in Tuesday speech that parties can 'break decades of political stalemate'

Trump will call on Congress to send him legislation to fund infrastructure projects, will update lawmakers on China trade talks and urge them to approve his trade pact with Canada and Mexico that would replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) a senior administration official told reporters on Friday.

"Together we can break decades of political statement, we can bridge old divisions, heal old wounds, build new coalitions, forge new solutions and unlock the extraordinary promise of America’s future. The decision is ours to make," Trump will say.


WASHINGTON - Under pressure from fellow Republicans to reset his contentious presidency, Donald Trump plans to offer Democrats a choice in his State of the Union speech on Tuesday: Work together to make progress, or fight each other and get nothing done.

Feb. 1, 2019 - Under pressure to recalibrate, defiant Trump tackles big speech

Under pressure to recalibrate, defiant Trump tackles big speech

He signaled on Friday that the address, an annual rite of American politics, will include extensive remarks about his standoff with Democrats over building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, the subject of an intense partisan battle that prompted a 35-day partial government shutdown that ended a week ago.

Dwelling at length on this could undermine any attempt by Trump to strike a compromising tone, which many Republicans, including some close to the White House, are urging him to offer in an effort to temper his rhetoric and move past the shutdown fight.

Beyond the wall, a senior White House official told Reuters that Trump will outline what he sees as areas where Republicans and Democrats may be able to find agreement. These include a plan to fund infrastructure improvements across the country, lower the cost of prescription drugs and work to resolve long-standing differences over healthcare.

Whether the two sides are prepared to work together in any significant way is far from clear, with tensions still high over the shutdown fight and another deadline approaching on Feb. 15.

“He will offer a choice of either working together and doing great things or fighting each other and doing nothing," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The speech comes as Trump begins the second two years of his first term facing major challenges: a long-running probe into whether his 2016 presidential campaign colluded with Russia; investigations by House Democrats of his presidency and his business ventures; and difficult trade negotiations with China, among many others.

He and his advisers do not believe the shutdown fight will give him lasting scars. Many Republicans are urging him to focus on the U.S. economy in his speech and beyond, to try to broaden his appeal beyond a hard-core conservative base of voters that make up about a third of the electorate.

"I would hope he would choose the pathway of broadening his appeal to voters who might want to consider voting for him in the next couple of years," said Lane Chen, a Hoover Institution fellow who advised the presidential campaigns of Republicans Marco Rubio in 2016 and Mitt Romney in 2012.

Presidential aides said Trump would still talk about immigration and his demand for a border wall in his speech. "Some of it will be border-related," said one.

Nancy Pelosi, who took over as speaker of the House of Representatives after Democrats won big in November elections, has vowed not to support funding for a border wall, and the issue has increased partisan tensions across the board.

Trump's speech was delayed from January after a fight with Pelosi that stemmed from the dispute on border wall funding.

Trump, along with chief speechwriter Stephen Miller, plans to work on the address during a trip this weekend to his Mar-a-Lago retreat in Palm Beach, Florida, aides said.
 
Just up on the News Wire - Associated Press 29 minutes ago - a cool and confident Putin .........

Feb. 2, 2019 - Putin: Russia will only deploy new missiles if US does
Russia to pull plug on nuclear arms pact after US does same
2d8e2bdf1c664ba9b31aa208eafe6ce7.jpg

Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a Security Council meeting in Moscow, Friday, Feb. 1, 2019. (Alexei Nikolsky, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

MOSCOW (AP) — President Vladimir Putin says that Russia will abandon a centerpiece nuclear arms treaty, following in the footsteps of the United States, and that Moscow will only deploy intermediate-range nuclear missiles if Washington does so.

Putin spoke after the U.S. announced Friday it was pulling the plug on the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty over alleged Russian violations. Moscow denied any breaches and accused Washington of making false accusations in order to justify its pullout.

Following the U.S. notice of withdrawal from the treaty in six months, Putin said in televised remarks Saturday that Russia will do the same. He ordered the development of new land-based intermediate-range weapons, but emphasized that Russia won't deploy them in the European part of the country or elsewhere unless the U.S. does so.


Conservative firebrand Ann Coulter called President Trump “lazy and incompetent” and a “lunatic” and warned that he could face a Republican primary challenger from the right if he doesn’t fulfill his promise to build a wall across the Mexican border.

Feb. 2, 2019 - Ann Coulter: 'Lunatic' Trump could be challenged in 2020 = from the right

Ann Coulter: ‘Lunatic’ Trump could be challenged in 2020 — from the right

“We put this lunatic in the White House for one reason,” said Coulter in an interview on the Yahoo News podcast Skullduggery. (Save your energy - it's a 2 minute clip - typical screaming match - Coulter is just another mouth-piece with NO brains.)

Coulter even suggested a possible “terrific” primary challenger to the president — Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., who recently charged that Democratic leaders in Congress have “American blood” on their hands for refusing to fund the wall.

Brooks’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Coulter’s comments are her latest attempt to pressure the president to stand by his promise to build the border wall, a campaign she has conducted largely on Twitter, where she called Trump a “wimp” for caving in to Democrats by allowing the government to reopen after a five-week shutdown. Coulter, with 2.14 million Twitter followers (compared to Trump’s 57.9 million) appears to wield an outsized influence over the White House, and she wasn’t shy in discussing it in her interview with Yahoo News’ Dan Klaidman and Michael Isikoff.

“That’s none of your beeswax,” she said, when asked if she is still talking to the president despite their seemingly frayed relationship.

In an interview last week, Trump remarked of Coulter, “I hear she’s become very hostile. Maybe I didn’t return her phone call or something.” Databases of Trump’s tweets indicate he hasn’t mentioned Coulter since August 2016, when he retweeted her praise of his campaign speech on immigration as “the most magnificent speech ever given.”

Asked about reports that Trump had “unfollowed” her on Twitter after one of her recent attacks, Coulter laughed and insisted: “He’s still reading me. I can tell. … Well, somebody’s reading me. They’re all reading me over there.”

As if to underscore the point, Coulter repeatedly pressed an argument that Trump himself seemed to be making in a New York Times interview the same day: that the president doesn’t need a congressional appropriation to build the wall, nor does he need to declare a national emergency.

Instead, Coulter claimed, he can simply use his inherent authority as commander in chief to direct that the wall be built in order to “protect” United States citizens and “defend” the country from illegal immigrants.

“He doesn’t need to declare an emergency” to build the wall, Coulter said, claiming the president can simply order the Department of Defense and Homeland Security to begin construction.

“I think Trump is gonna do that,” Coulter said. “I think he’s finally going to pull that pocket Constitution out of his lapel pocket and [say], ‘Oh my gosh, I’m the president. This is great.’”

Coulter did not have an answer when challenged to name a constitutional scholar who would support such an extreme view of unilateral executive power. Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe ridiculed the idea in a Twitter response to Coulter’s comments Friday morning.

“No! Inherent presidential power as C-in-Chief dsn’t give Trump the power of the purse. We fought a revolution to end such power,” he wrote.

But Trump seemed to be entertaining the idea in his interview with the New York Times the same day. Saying that his efforts to negotiate with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and congressional Democrats were “a waste of money and time and energy,” the president insisted he will simply proceed with his plans for a wall anyway.

“I’ll continue to build the wall and we’ll get the wall finished,” Trump said. “Now whether or not I declare a national emergency — that you’ll see.”


Thurs. Jan. 31, 2019 - Pelosi draws red line: No money for border wall

Pelosi draws red line: No money for border wall

ABC news Video clip - (1:15 min.)
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she will allow a floor vote on any bipartisan border security proposal, but she insisted "there's not going to be any wall money in the legislation."
 

Exactly! National Security Advisor John Bolton is wrapped - too tight! I doubt, he will ever get out of the "Cold War" mindset?

He's the only high ranking Political figure, that still wear's J.C. Penn'ay' dress shirts with button down collars, like he's still in Prep School?

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says he is sending a team “someplace in Asia” to set up a second summit between President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un by the end of February.

January 31, 2019 - Pompeo says team heading to Asia for 2nd Trump-Kim summit
Pompeo says team heading to Asia for 2nd Trump-Kim summit

Pompeo on Wednesday told Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity that his team is “headed that way now to lay the foundations” for steps toward the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula as well as “a brighter future for the North Korean people.”

Trump tweeted earlier Wednesday: “I look forward to seeing Kim Jong Un shortly. Progress being made — big difference!“

On Tuesday, however, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats told Congress that intelligence information does not support the idea that Kim will eliminate his nuclear weapons or the capacity for building more.


China urges U.S. not to withdraw from nuclear treaty with Russia
The United States should resolve its differences with Russia through dialogue instead of threatening to withdraw from an important nuclear arms control agreement between the two nations, China's foreign ministry said on Saturday.
 
Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
I will be interviewed Sunday morning on @FaceTheNation and prior to the Super Bowl on @CBS at 3:30 P.M. Enjoy!

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said it was important to keep a US military presence in Iraq so that Washington can keep a close eye on Iran, according to a CBS interview to be broadcast on Sunday.

February 03, 2019 - Trump wants US military in Iraq to ‘watch Iran’ -CBS interview
Trump wants US military in Iraq to ‘watch Iran’ -CBS interview

Trump said the United States spent a fortune on a base in Iraq. “We might as well keep it. One of the reasons I want to keep it is because I want to be looking a little bit at Iran because Iran is a real problem,” he said in excerpts from a CBS “Face the Nation” interview.

Asked if that meant he wanted to be able to strike Iran, Trump said, “No, because I want to be able to watch Iran.”

“All I want to do is be able to watch. We have an unbelievable and expensive military base built in Iraq. It’s perfectly situated for looking at all over different parts of the troubled Middle East rather than pulling up.”
[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom