Trump's support for Israel has become very intense these days. Twitter exploded with reports of him quoting a radio host Wayne Allyn Root calling Trump the "king of Jews". The C's said Trump's buying powerful friends but all that brown nosing can only work on psychos with over inflated ego. Och, wait...
I've been going through the book JFK and the Unspeakable, and it is remarkable the efforts JFK made towards world peace with Khrushchev, Castro, Diem, and NPT treaty, and knowing that he would likely die in the process. In contrast, Trump is blowing up relations with China, scraped the INF treaty with Russia, and threatening war with Iran. JFK wanted to destroy the CIA, and Trump appointed a CIA director as his Secretary of State.
Also, remember that in many interviews prior to when Trump became president, he said that American wasn't respected enough. Besides, in regards to JFK, all I've read about him points that he had a genuine interest in history. So, I think he had a much better grasp of geopolitics compared to Trump. Trump isn't as bad as the media make him out to be, but he's kind of like the Kardashian of politics, surviving on hype and stunts.
Well, first of all we have what the C's said about Trump on a number of occasions, including his not so obvious and straight forward relationship with Israel:
Could be just a tactic, to play "nice with Israel", which doesn't have to be a bad thing, when you put yourself in his shoes and look at it from a broughter perspective. Assuming he knows what role Isreal (or rather the Zionist power elites in grips of the US and Isreal) play:
Session 12 November 2016 said:
Q: (L) Well he's already picking some people that I consider to be quite questionable. His attitude towards Israel and the Palestinians is completely delusional.
A: Yes... It seems...
Q: (Galatea) He's playing everybody, I think. My impression is that everything he's been doing has just been an act, and he's secretly, covertly doing some good things. He's just being evil to be good.
A: Close. He knows what he is up against!
Q: (Joe) You don't just walk into a system like that that's very entrenched and start knocking things over and throwing people around the place and cutting ties. If you wanna do anything, you have to ingratiate yourself and make like you're part of the team, ya know? And THEN gather your forces...
A: Yes
I think the C's gave pretty much the same answer, at some point in regards to Putin: "He knows what he is up against!"
And the above seems to be very clear to me.
We also have to keep in mind that the run up to the next US-election is already in full swing. Assuming Trump wants to have a second 4 year term to "make America great again" (which I think is very likely), he probably knows full well that he has to play nice with Israel to have a better chance to be re-elected, since Israel/Zionists/Crypto-Zionists are pretty much the ones in control over the outcome of the election, or at least they think so and Trump might want to be on the safe side.
So strategically speaking, it is a smart move. All I'm saying is that "Trumps support/love of Israel" and "Israels support/love of Trump" on the other side might not be as obvious and black and white as it is presenting itself to be.
Gilad Atzmon asked a pretty interesting question
recently on his blog:
Igor Ogorodnev wrote yesterday on
Russia Today that, “the media has wilfully misinterpreted Donald Trump’s words to portray the most pro-Israel US president in history as an anti-Semite. It makes more sense to chide him for sacrificing US interests to please Benjamin Netanyahu.”
Here is my practical advice for Americans. Instead of accusing Trump of being an ‘anti-Semite,’ ask instead why your president is more loyal to Israel than most Israelis, let alone Jews.
Indeed, why? Might be part of the answer the old saying:
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.
If we assume Trump "knows what he is up against" as the C's suggested, Trump certainly could be capitalizing big time right now on exactly that saying, by putting Israel (the biggest enemy by all accounts with the biggest power network) closer than any other country/player/interest on "his side". And why do a big number of Israeli outlets, publications and interests seem to hype up and support Trump as "the greatest President for Israel ever"? At least for me that "overwhelming support" strikes me as quite over the top, almost as if this is another double game of the Israeli/Zionist Psychos. We know that those interest have a big track record of saying/playing very nice overtly towards people like Putin, while in the shadows pursuing a quite different agenda. Remember, they also have a good track record of playing very nice to Putin/Russia overtly, in midst of a huge propaganda/terror campaign against the exact same person/country, that covertly comes from the exact same people. We have seen something that appears pretty similar in Trumps case. Also remember how Putin seems "to know what he is up against" according to the C's and is playing very nice toward Israel as well.
Then we also have to consider the obvious contradiction in all those claims of Trump and Israel "being best friends" with Trumps actual policies that clearly seem to work against "his friends" interests big time. And that is quite an understatement. When you look at Trumps actual actions, not his words and little gestures like "recognizing Jerusalem as Israels capital", what one seems to notice is a quite different picture. For example, here is a big one, that can't be emphasized enough: Still, he has not caved in, against all odds it seems, to start another war. And boy was he pushed already in at least 4 countries to do exactly that: Iran, Venezuela, Syria, North Korea! Not to mention the "color revolution" attempts, like in China recently... And what did he actually do? He refused to do so, and actually does exactly that; not really doing/supporting it, while saying "outrages words" against all those countries/leaders at the same time. So far he seems to turn out as the most peaceful president ever in the US, and
as I argued elsewhere, he likely intents to have it stay that way during his stay in office. Which is a HUGE deal for an American president, by all measures. And here is another biggie, that is something those interest don't like at all; He pursues a very nationalistic policy/agenda in America by "making America great again" and "putting Americans first" putting all focus on creating jobs and so forth.
So I can't really understand all the complaints of people about Trump and all the comparisons to "peaceful" presidents like Kennedy and how he "isn't measuring up to him at all". All those people who screamed and yearned for years to finally have a president who actually pursues peace and puts his focus on improving American lives are now presented with exactly that person who actually does that, and they still scream "how bad Trump is" or is not "fulfilling something like Kennedy did". That's quite a mystery to me.
One can argue/complain about the seemingly "crude/childish and kardashian" way he is doing things, but what exactly have people expected from such a corrupt, ingrained and shallow/superficial system like the US, to magically emerge out from? A Messiah or what? Somebody that fulfills all the imaginations of what a "perfect leader" out to be? Isn't that quite a silly demand/requirement in itself? Shouldn't people instead stop expecting a Messiah to solve all their problems?
Trump is next best thing you can expect to emerge out from such a system while actually pursuing all the things everyone has hoped for. So what's all the beef about? Maybe it is as simply as that; "I wanted a holy Messiah, and I didn't get it; so, how dare the universe does something like that!" Shouldn't many people be rather grateful instead? So it might be worthwhile to stop complaining about all the shattered imaginations of who Trump out to be, and be rather grateful to the many gifts Trump has brought on to the center stage, be it conscious or not.
Having said all this, we also have the C's comments that Trump is now "a perfect puppet" to consider. My guess is that things are constantly in a changing mode at present and that things/realities can turn out this or that way at any given point and the C's comment was on how it looked like at that specific point in time. I guess things can change at any moment, depending on what is happening on the globe and the decisions and actions every singly person on this planet with a soul is implementing and the collective effect of all of this. We also have the recent statement of the C's, that the likelihood that Trump would have started a war with Iran in that specific incident was about 50 to 50. My suspicion is that a big part of the reason why it turned out to be "not a war" was this changing realities thing that depends on collective decisions of the "human race".
www.rt.com
