Below are
remarks on the floods in Africa, and later a few comments on the context in which the old predictions appeared, as I toyed with the idea that the floods might be a marker:
Note floods in Africa.
(Rancho Relaxo) In the session of December 3rd of 1994 the C's gave a list of marker events connected to the Wave, including: Ukraine explosion; chemical or nuclear. Is this still on the menu, so to speak?
A: With minor modifications. Note floods in Africa.
Q: (L) I don't think floods in Africa were a part of that sequence. That was mentioned at another time.
A: Yes
Q: (L) They did give "floods in Africa" though as some kind of marker. There are some major ones now - worse than we've seen.
In Africa, floods kill 1,000's
Session 18 February 1995
A: Expect 4.7 tremor in the U.S. within three days. In the N.E., Rochester, N.Y. Area. Faults exist near there. Mt. Vesuvius and Etna activity within calendar 1995. And Thera as well. In Africa, floods kill 1,000's in summer of 1995.
Q: (D) I think it might be very important for us to contact somebody and tell them how we got this information... (T) Are the volcanos related to the Japanese stuff?
A: Yes. Volcanic eruption under arctic ice in 1996.
There was nothing particular about floods in Africa in 1995. The timing was open, it seemed. Five years later, the topic came up again:
Session 18 March 2000
Q: Now, a couple of world events have recently occurred which were in an earlier list of predictions. One of these was the Ukraine explosion and the other was the flood in Africa. In fact, the flood headlines were almost in the same words you gave it. What this made me think was that, since these things are beginning to happen, since they were given as a group prediction, does this mean that the other things in that particular segment may be just around the corner in time, so to speak?
In February 2000, a few weeks prior to the above session, there were floods in Mozambique which was most likely what Laura referred to:
Mozambique Floods, 2000
The 2000 Mozambique flood was a natural disaster that occurred in February and March 2000. The catastrophic flooding was caused by heavy rainfall that lasted for five weeks and made many homeless.
Approximately 800 people died, 1400 km2 of arable land was affected and 20,000 head of cattle and food were lost. It was the worst flood in
Mozambique in 50 years.
(2)
In the
List of Floods, it is a bit more dramatized, but the cyclone hitting is true. The whole country was wet, as it often is during the rainy season, but the damage was mainly near the Zambezi river. People had settled where the river sometimes flood because the land is fertile, and the good lands are few, especially when the population keeps growing. In the rainy season, the Zambezi river swells, if it swells too much then those who live close to it are in trouble.
Otherwise, the Zambezi is a majestic river and is responsible for the
Victoria Falls:
One of the greatest attractions in Africa and one of the most spectacular waterfalls in the world, Victoria Falls is located on the Zambezi River, the fourth largest river in Africa, which is also defining the border between Zambia and Zimbabwe.
Fact: Victoria Falls is the only waterfall in the world with a length of more than a kilometer and a height of more than hundred meters. It is also considered to be the largest fall in the world.
Fact: The noise of Victoria Falls can be heard from a distance of 40 kilometers, while the spray and mist from the falling water is rising to a height of over 400 meters and can be seen from a distance of 50 kilometers. No wonder that the local tribes used to call the waterfall Mosi-o-Tunya “The smoke that thunders”.
Since 2000, one finds this list: Floods in Africa, where I looked up some, to see how serious it was:
See also this list of
deadliest floods:
Though not all are included above:
2016 Niger flood 38 dead
2016 Ethiopian flood 200+
2019–2020 Congo River floods 38 with hundreds of thousands displaced.
2022 Africa floods more deadly and damaging
This year, there is a Wiki
2022 Africa Floods:
Since January 2022, floods affected most of Africa, killing nearly 2,700 people. The worst affected country was Nigeria, over 1,400 deaths.
And a map:
It would then seem, that the flood season in 2022 has possibly been the most deadly since the year 2000, in fact more widespread.
The floods in Africa in the year 2000, waters breaking?, preceded 2001 and 9/11
Maybe that is taking it too far, but it is a fun analogy anyway. It would mean the Earth might react prior to a major shift. Next, I look into
what else was predicted along with Africa in the session from February 18, 1995. The Cs talked about
"Volcanic eruption under arctic ice in 1996" Indeed there was something, though not in 1996, but in 1999-2001. The timing of
eruption of the underwater arctic volcano, coincided with the flood in Mozambique, only nobody found out until a few years later!
Volcanoes Erupt Beneath Arctic Ice
By
Jeanna Bryner published June 27, 2008
New evidence deep beneath the Arctic ice suggests a series of underwater volcanoes have erupted in violent explosions in the past decade.
Hidden 2.5 miles (4,000 meters) beneath the Arctic surface, the volcanoes are up to a mile (2,000 meters) in diameter and a few hundred yards tall. They formed along the Gakkel Ridge, a
lengthy crack in the ocean crust where two rocky plates are spreading apart, pulling new melted rock to the surface.
Until now, scientists thought undersea volcanoes only dribbled lava from cracks in the seafloor. The extreme pressure from the overlying water makes it difficult for gas and magma to blast outward.
Robert Reeves-Sohn of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in Massachusetts and his colleagues discovered jagged, glassy fragments of rock scattered around the volcanoes, suggesting
explosive eruptions occurred between 1999 and 2001.
For another, more general article, see:
Ice and flames: Those mysterious Arctic volcanos.
Floods in Africa 2022, so what may come in 2023...2024 ...?
Will the pattern from the floods in Africa in 2000 with many dead and missing that preceded changes in 2001 repeat itself again? That is hard to say. If anything happens, one can attribute it to mere coincidences, but I will risk playing with the possibilities and see where it might lead?
We already know that 2022 is also the year of the intensified conflict in Ukraine, but what if the remark about floods in Africa in this session was also a nudge to look up, what followed in the same old session from 18 March 2000. Might it give additional ideas? Below is the continuation of the excerpt already quoted, and until the end.
More from Session 18 March 2000
Q: You also made a remark once that ice ages occur much, much faster than people ever thought...
A: Yes.
Q: Do we need to invest in some mukluks and snowshoes?
A: ??
Q: Well, what I am trying to get at is: should we start stockpiling firewood?
A: Maybe.
Q: So, it could be that fast?
A: Oh yes, and faster when in response to global"warming."
Q: When you put "warming" in quotes, you obviously mean warming in more than just an ordinary sense? Is that correct?
A: And/or not really "warm."
Next in the session, is a comment on
The Coming Global Superstorm
Q: Whitley Strieber and Art Bell have published a book about a "global superstorm." Is any of the information they have given in this book fairly accurate?
A: Derived from non-human sources known for stark accuracy, when convenient.
Q: What makes it convenient at the present time for them to be "starkly accurate?"
A: Fits into plans.
Q: Plans for what?
A: Do we not know already?
Q: In other words: world conquest and the takeover of humanity?
A: Not as simple.
Q: What would make my statement more accurate?
A: Call it amalgamation.
.............................
Global Superstorm
Q: So, I guess that means I will figure it out from clues yet to be found. Now, I want to go back to what you said about Whitley Strieber and Art Bell getting their information from "non-human" sources about world conquest and domination. Are Art and Whitley consciously aware of their connection to this source of information?
A: Amalgamation, we did not say "conquest."
Q: But, on previous occasions you have discussed the alien plan to manipulate humanity via time travel, creating an infrastructure for taking over the world. Are you saying that it will be done in such a way that there is no "outward" sign that it has happened?
A: Close.
Q: So, in other words, the world is being taken over gradually, right now, as we sit here and speak, and most people aren't even aware of it?
A: Sort of....
Q: Are people, at any point, going to become aware of it? Are they going to wake up... or is it just the way of nature?
A: Natural processes.
Q: So, aliens are never going to appear in the sky; there is never going to be a battle as you have previously stated; there is never going to be...
A: WHOA!
Q: Well, that's kind of what you are saying!
A: No. You are impatient for a quick, packaged definition.
Q: What I am trying to get at is; you are saying it is a natural process; you are saying we are being taken over; it is not a conquest; though you did not say that it was not domination, of course - clearly domination is part of it, is that correct?
A: One could call it evolution.
Q: Well, still those things make one tend to think of natural processes that do not involve a war in the sky, spaceships shooting lasers...
A: Who says such rules apply?
Q: I'm just saying that it how you are making it sound; that it is just a strictly natural process. We are talking about 4th density beings... I guess they could...
A: Natural processes are not restricted by your preconceived boundaries.
Q: Then, let me come at it from another direction: are these beings who are behind Strieber and Bell's book part of those who will participate in some sort of battle? The problem here is that you have excluded the word "conquest." (A) I think they excluded conquest because, to a large extent, for most people, it is not a conquest; they just simply allow it. So, there is no conquest for most...
A: That is part of it, but we know you can exceed your programmed ideas if you try. Conquest, or lack thereof is a matter of opinion/perception.
Q: Let me get this straight: how is this book by Strieber and Bell going to play into the plans of STS aliens?
A: Not the book, the events depicted.
Q: So, are you saying that Whitley and Art are doing a favor for all of us by publicizing this information, that it could be helpful?
A: Makes little difference.
Q: Is there anything that COULD make a difference? Or is it necessary to make a difference?
A: In the biggest picture, no.
Q: So, it's not necessary to make a difference?
A: The soul, she counteth. The body, she doth not!
Q: So, that's the biggest picture. Narrow the picture down: is there something that could make a difference? Clearly, in the biggest picture, nothing makes a difference...
A: Native Americans asked similar questions once!
Q: Which brings up the subject of Native Americans. A big part of what is being taught by them at the present time is that the aliens, the Grays, and assorted others, are good guys - the "star people" coming here to teach us and to help us advance! They claim that it is a "good" thing to have contacts, abductions, and so on and on.
A: No. Corrupted message. Some early contacts were with benevolent STO beings.
Q: And now they are confused because they think that the present contacts are with the same beings of the past contacts?
A: Close.
Q: Okay. Now, there is a peculiar side effect going on with our little mail group. These are folks who are well-read and pretty much aware. But, what seems to happen is that, when folks start to read our material, to become aware, they start to have all kinds of weird stuff start happening to them. Some of this stuff is SO bizarre!
A: You know this already.
Q: Are there any words of advice you can give to the group, in general?
A: Sure... KNOWLEDGE PROTECTS IGNORANCE ENDANGERS!
Q: It seems that once they start getting some clues, the attacks increase and it becomes very discouraging. How can they survive this stage of the process?
A: One must know of attack, expect it, then counteract. Some of your correspondents are too naive.
Q: Any other advice? Some of them are getting hit pretty hard just now...
A: You can take it from there. And you are tiring now...
Q: I know, but I have one quick one. We have this guy, Johan M*** in Belgium, who claims to have had a sort of Epiphany on a night train to China some years ago. Apparently, this involved Cassiopeia, and he believes that he is "in touch" with you guys. He is coming to Florida next month and wants to meet with us. Is he really in contact with you, or is he a spy? Even if a friendly spy?
A: Who cares? Learning is fun! Even if one or two toes falls off.
If the floods in Africa in this year were a marker, we have an idea of some of the possibilities that might follow. The session from March 2000 brought up topics like ice age, snow, cold winters, global super storm, amalgamation, and Nephilim, even the last topic was brought up, as matter of history, we know the situation from other sessions. To these we could add others, like plague, more war, more social chaos, widespread famine, COVID measures and vaccine pressures.
In the old session, there were also plenty of help and encouragements: The soul, she counteth. The body, she doth not! KNOWLEDGE PROTECTS IGNORANCE ENDANGERS! One must know of attack, expect it, then counteract. Learning is fun! Even if one or two toes fall off.