My most recent 2 TVs both broke in less than 2 years. Samsung is a piece a junk.
Session 22 October 2022
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
I dunno - a Freudian slip or just taking things too literally?
Funny, it's what came to mind without making the connection to what I just wrote!
It's interesting rereading the original 2 caps session. The 2 caps were presented as positive, but then the Cs immediately issued an unprompted vigilance warning. Maybe they were only saying the 2 caps were positive because the attendees emotionally wanted it to be positive, which then allowed the Cs to put a warning at the end of it.
seve
Jedi Master
I think that what is positive is the fact of having seen the materialization of the intentions of the STS, thus the 2nd cap, and not the cap itself.
OutSky
Jedi
In that same day that this respective SessionOctober 22nd 2022 became available to the forum, I wrote this post —i.e. after these forewords. Nevertheless, I did not publish it in that day because I felt like it incomplete —and it still is, but well... Indeed, sometimes I don’t ever publish my posts because, for example, either they seem too lengthy, or I estimate that other fellow members have enough covered their focuses, or some other reason….
Anyway, in due course while managing some time for reading the posts in this and other threads, then I came across a report —partly quoted next— which, as I see, resonates well to the following comments —as well along with posts placed not here but elsewhere (duly linked):
Anyway, in due course while managing some time for reading the posts in this and other threads, then I came across a report —partly quoted next— which, as I see, resonates well to the following comments —as well along with posts placed not here but elsewhere (duly linked):
Okay, keep in mind the toroidal stuff, this will be permeated in the notes ahead. And now, the cited overdue post:
Henceforth a good research we have in the next quotation. Amidst others of its notes, it was very well brought up the notices by the C’s on the African floods and Artic volcanism:
Henceforth a good research we have in the next quotation. Amidst others of its notes, it was very well brought up the notices by the C’s on the African floods and Artic volcanism:
Below are remarks on the floods in Africa, and later a few comments on the context in which the old predictions appeared, as I toyed with the idea that the floods might be a marker:
Note floods in Africa.
In Africa, floods kill 1,000's
Session 18 February 1995
There was nothing particular about floods in Africa in 1995. The timing was open, it seemed. Five years later, the topic came up again:
Session 18 March 2000
In February 2000, a few weeks prior to the above session, there were floods in Mozambique which was most likely what Laura referred to:
In the List of Floods, it is a bit more dramatized, but the cyclone hitting is true. The whole country was wet, as it often is during the rainy season, but the damage was mainly near the Zambezi river. People had settled where the river sometimes flood because the land is fertile, and the good lands are few, especially when the population keeps growing. In the rainy season, the Zambezi river swells, if it swells too much then those who live close to it are in trouble.
Otherwise, the Zambezi is a majestic river and is responsible for the Victoria Falls:
Since 2000, one finds this list: Floods in Africa, where I looked up some, to see how serious it was:
See also this list of deadliest floods:
Though not all are included above:
2016 Niger flood 38 dead
2016 Ethiopian flood 200+
2019–2020 Congo River floods 38 with hundreds of thousands displaced.
2022 Africa floods more deadly and damaging
This year, there is a Wiki 2022 Africa Floods:
And a map:
It would then seem, that the flood season in 2022 has possibly been the most deadly since the year 2000, in fact more widespread.
The floods in Africa in the year 2000, waters breaking?, preceded 2001 and 9/11
Maybe that is taking it too far, but it is a fun analogy anyway. It would mean the Earth might react prior to a major shift. Next, I look into what else was predicted along with Africa in the session from February 18, 1995. The Cs talked about "Volcanic eruption under arctic ice in 1996" Indeed there was something, though not in 1996, but in 1999-2001. The timing of eruption of the underwater arctic volcano, coincided with the flood in Mozambique, only nobody found out until a few years later!
For another, more general article, see: Ice and flames: Those mysterious Arctic volcanos.
Floods in Africa 2022, so what may come in 2023...2024 ...?
Will the pattern from the floods in Africa in 2000 with many dead and missing that preceded changes in 2001 repeat itself again? That is hard to say. If anything happens, one can attribute it to mere coincidences, but I will risk playing with the possibilities and see where it might lead?
We already know that 2022 is also the year of the intensified conflict in Ukraine, but what if the remark about floods in Africa in this session was also a nudge to look up, what followed in the same old session from 18 March 2000. Might it give additional ideas? Below is the continuation of the excerpt already quoted, and until the end.
More from Session 18 March 2000
Next in the session, is a comment on The Coming Global Superstorm
.............................
Global Superstorm
If the floods in Africa in this year were a marker, we have an idea of some of the possibilities that might follow. The session from March 2000 brought up topics like ice age, snow, cold winters, global super storm, amalgamation, and Nephilim, even the last topic was brought up, as matter of history, we know the situation from other sessions. To these we could add others, like plague, more war, more social chaos, widespread famine, COVID measures and vaccine pressures.
In the old session, there were also plenty of help and encouragements: The soul, she counteth. The body, she doth not! KNOWLEDGE PROTECTS IGNORANCE ENDANGERS! One must know of attack, expect it, then counteract. Learning is fun! Even if one or two toes fall off.
It’s interesting to realise that all these above observations send us too to concepts on the nature of the reality which were highlighted in the Session on May 18th 2019. And regarding all these seen back and forth next is made some mentions and other insights:
So, the remark by the C’s on African Flood, or “floods” as can be perceived in the research quoted above, as well as, the Artic Eruptions are apparently right linked to each other. Yet, as I see, the C’s not merely tell of the defrosting in some places for the action of huge artic volcanism, and then associating them to African floods. Rather, they by and large are pointing out “timeless markers,” —and that is why we don’t realise the ‘forecasted flood’ in the dates pre told— as well as, the connection with the inversion of earth axis virtually in current process. That is to say that the Artic volcanism results as a reaction from the polar inversion, which, for example, is commented into another post —see ‘Voices of the Confederation’ quotation.
Moreover —also etched in the aforementioned quote— related to, we have:
So, the divulgation by ‘non-humans’ of the “global superstorm fits in plan” maybe, as we know, because 4D STS are required to declare?!! Let’s recall:
Now, amalgamation —as the C’s above refer to— may mean “merge of realities” within a echoing time-loop created by 4D STS. That is to say many space-time lines merged into the “current” line. So, including the latter mention, as well the “apparent” discrepancy of forecasted dates, I have spoken of these in another post which may arise some additional light on… —wherein, should be mentioned, ‘markers’ are signs, or perhaps should be termed, ‘signers.’
Yet, though within the same process, a devisable potential nasty reality involving the hats, failed to sprout an “amalgamation” of more negative nature. It failed, I wonder, —wish-thinking?— because we, the people of Cassiopaea, has been increasing its awareness, thus creating a mental obstacle …to a degree. Then, like one twin-bubble formed from soap that blows up against a wall, both hats vanished along with their intrinsic burden.
So, the remark by the C’s on African Flood, or “floods” as can be perceived in the research quoted above, as well as, the Artic Eruptions are apparently right linked to each other. Yet, as I see, the C’s not merely tell of the defrosting in some places for the action of huge artic volcanism, and then associating them to African floods. Rather, they by and large are pointing out “timeless markers,” —and that is why we don’t realise the ‘forecasted flood’ in the dates pre told— as well as, the connection with the inversion of earth axis virtually in current process. That is to say that the Artic volcanism results as a reaction from the polar inversion, which, for example, is commented into another post —see ‘Voices of the Confederation’ quotation.
Moreover —also etched in the aforementioned quote— related to, we have:
So, the divulgation by ‘non-humans’ of the “global superstorm fits in plan” maybe, as we know, because 4D STS are required to declare?!! Let’s recall:
Now, amalgamation —as the C’s above refer to— may mean “merge of realities” within a echoing time-loop created by 4D STS. That is to say many space-time lines merged into the “current” line. So, including the latter mention, as well the “apparent” discrepancy of forecasted dates, I have spoken of these in another post which may arise some additional light on… —wherein, should be mentioned, ‘markers’ are signs, or perhaps should be termed, ‘signers.’
Yet, though within the same process, a devisable potential nasty reality involving the hats, failed to sprout an “amalgamation” of more negative nature. It failed, I wonder, —wish-thinking?— because we, the people of Cassiopaea, has been increasing its awareness, thus creating a mental obstacle …to a degree. Then, like one twin-bubble formed from soap that blows up against a wall, both hats vanished along with their intrinsic burden.
Just some thoughts.
It looks like the transition will be a process and not happen all at once. Will we have some control over the process or are we gonna have to be mostly stoic about it? The process may be like being extruded or something, or maybe we will bounce back and forth for a while. I dunno. Expect some discomfort during the flight. The C's said that figuring it all out would be up to us and that cooking would be interesting. But just getting there is when we will see the stuff we have no knowledge and experience of for the first time. We could have always gone home if we had the knowledge anyway. Now it might be like some uncontrollable fledgling impulse, 'a fire from within', or something like an approaching tidal wave - maybe do a little jump right before it hits.
Sounds like maybe a loose ribbon connector somewhere.
Garuda
Padawan Learner
This soul splitting and replication process reminds me of the docker process trigger mechanism. You design one and they turn on or off based on requests from processes on the servers.
Thanks for this session.
christx11
Jedi Master
I noticed that also. It is also interesting (or insidious) that the very day Laura resolved an energy drain, the 4D attack commenced targeting Ark.
Thank you for this interesting session.
Concerning the current war in Ukraine, I also think that there cannot have a winner. NATO cannot lose thanks to its technology, money and combined armies but Russia cannot also lose for many reasons as Putin network and neurons, the russians' spirit, etc.
I go on thinking and waiting for something else to intervene.
Concerning the current war in Ukraine, I also think that there cannot have a winner. NATO cannot lose thanks to its technology, money and combined armies but Russia cannot also lose for many reasons as Putin network and neurons, the russians' spirit, etc.
I go on thinking and waiting for something else to intervene.
Bernardo GA
Jedi
Hello.
Thanks to all the Cassiopaea people for this new gift.
Thanks to all the Cassiopaea people for this new gift.
I know what you mean, and it is kind of hard and weird to think about, and I don't know if I really have a handle on it.. But it seems to me that infringing upon someone's free will would be: removing possible choices they can make, or potential opportunities. There could be any number of different levels of this... eg, killing someone, or stealing from them, locking someone up, or forcibly performing a medical operation on them without their consent. Those are very obvious and direct.
But then there are probably times when someone being locked up (or punished in some way) ends up *helping* them.. gives them time for reflection to learn about their mistakes, and change themselves. But then again, the choice to change was always there... The punishment just provided some impetus...
You could tell someone false information and maybe it could limit their choices if they believe it, but whether to believe and act on it or not IS their free will still, so I don't know if that would count. (if you did it over *generations* so that it became the default 'common knowledge' though, maybe?).... You could tell everybody lies which make the ones who believe you try to infringe the free will of the ones who don't.. But maybe these kinds of things always eventually resolve down to the more direct type of free will infringement, like above..?
But then there's also a more subtle way: helping someone or telling them even true information against their will, or without them having asked for it... removing an opportunity for them to learn something they needed to learn. (The C's have mentioned something like this before - eg when they would not answer certain questions because it would be 'abridgement of free will' - not exactly infringement, but a shortcut which removes learning opportunities nevertheless).
So I guess it could even be when someone HAS asked for something, but to receive it without having worked for it would be limiting for them... examples: When teaching someone how to perform a task, if the teacher just takes over and performs it themselves without letting the student try - and possibly make mistakes - they've limited the learning opportunities for the student. If a parent always gives their child whatever they ask for, the child might have less chance of learning how to fend for themselves..
I don't let my dog run off down the road to investigate possums, which she really wants to do. I'm infringing on her free will. If I didn't forcibly stop her from doing this (by having a garden with a fence around it), she might be hit by a car, and learn a valuable lesson..but also be injured or killed. Since I'm 3D STS and *I* don't want her to be lost or hurt, I keep my fence.. Maybe if she could run free all the time, she would learn to become really good at avoiding danger!
So anyway. I feel like it can be, at our level, quite complex & subtle & difficult to say what's what! Perhaps it's all obvious and clear as day at a higher level.... Don't know if any of this helps or not :) but, those are my thoughts at the moment...